In my opinion, winning percentage is nice,but doesn't translate to 21 in a row. The record of the person really doesn't matter. A person can have a below .500 percentage and run off 21. Obviously, people have skills,do research and it's important to win, but a winning record doesn't always = survivor winner. If it really mattered we'd have a winner already and we don't because winning record or not it's hard for anyone to hit 21 in a row no matter what type of handicapper you are or record you have. ||an_light.gif' border=0>||an_shake.gif' border=0>||moneybag.gif' border=0>||thumbs_up.gif' border=0>
In my opinion, winning percentage is nice,but doesn't translate to 21 in a row. The record of the person really doesn't matter. A person can have a below .500 percentage and run off 21. Obviously, people have skills,do research and it's important to win, but a winning record doesn't always = survivor winner. If it really mattered we'd have a winner already and we don't because winning record or not it's hard for anyone to hit 21 in a row no matter what type of handicapper you are or record you have. ||an_light.gif' border=0>||an_shake.gif' border=0>||moneybag.gif' border=0>||thumbs_up.gif' border=0>
ESPN - I don't think the guy is trying to see who has the best shot at 21 in a row. I think he wants to take a look to see who could be good guys to follow for betting.
If someone is a 70% capper on one game a day (or less than 1 a day) and I want to bet that day, I am going to look up that 70% survivor capper and follow that pick if one is made that day.
ESPN - I don't think the guy is trying to see who has the best shot at 21 in a row. I think he wants to take a look to see who could be good guys to follow for betting.
If someone is a 70% capper on one game a day (or less than 1 a day) and I want to bet that day, I am going to look up that 70% survivor capper and follow that pick if one is made that day.
yes that is why i posted this. I bet on my pick of the day everyday and it seems to work well, so I was just wondering who had a great winning percentage
yes that is why i posted this. I bet on my pick of the day everyday and it seems to work well, so I was just wondering who had a great winning percentage
along with good handicapping, you need luck to run off 21 in a row. Honestly, i have been routing for Sully and saw that he had Super Bowl XL1 under 48 and after the COlts ran a pick back for 6 i thought he was dead. But no points, not even a field goal attempt by the Colts deep in Bears territory happened. Pure luck, but winning percentage is significant too. ||clover.gif' border=0>
along with good handicapping, you need luck to run off 21 in a row. Honestly, i have been routing for Sully and saw that he had Super Bowl XL1 under 48 and after the COlts ran a pick back for 6 i thought he was dead. But no points, not even a field goal attempt by the Colts deep in Bears territory happened. Pure luck, but winning percentage is significant too. ||clover.gif' border=0>