unfair policy

on july 1st i had a play voided that was considered a favorable line an under on a 13 , covers had no hesitation in applying a construct of "in good faith" betting advantage , so i saw that one particular user name had a very favorable line in a wnba game, a line that wasnt offered portland + 11.5 , i looked at sbr, pregame, oddshark, not one book on any of those sites offered this game at 11.5, all the openers were either +4, or +4.5 portland, and some books closed at +7, but never was there a consensus from multiple books at 11.5, my point -why was my play that won, voided yet the usual suspect here graded a win -not voided? if they got to keep a favorable line taken in bad faith, then why am i the one penalized for the same action.

Talking about almightydragon who is clearly just shopping bad lines for his/her streak?

Yes, I made a separate post about Almighty Dragon trying to cheat their way to 25 wins

@tylerb2115

 Yeah it's funny to watch. If I'm covers I void every single bad line he grabs. My guess is eventually one of those bad lines gets an L.

@ljohnson7131

 Yet when they picked the over on Washington Colorado game covers took it away sono one else could pick it

moillydog does the same thing...is on a wnba total over that was never that number..is like 8 pts lower than what the actual line is...i remember last year mollydog locked in on an under 260 or so on central florida/oklahoma state basketball game...was a bad line and was posted like 3.5 months before it was to play...so he was locked in for 3.5 months and was on a low streak as well...covers finally voided close to around the game was to be played