Streak Survivor new option ?
Personnally i like the contest as it is......but your best bet would be to send a message directly to them instead of using the forum section...may get a quicker response to your inquery
Personnally i like the contest as it is......but your best bet would be to send a message directly to them instead of using the forum section...may get a quicker response to your inquery
Personnally i like the contest as it is......but your best bet would be to send a message directly to them instead of using the forum section...may get a quicker response to your inquery
Personnally i like the contest as it is......but your best bet would be to send a message directly to them instead of using the forum section...may get a quicker response to your inquery
Because, less options is more better, moneyline sports are inferior to point spread sports, and I'm sure it's impossible to program.
Because, less options is more better, moneyline sports are inferior to point spread sports, and I'm sure it's impossible to program.
Hey Oakley,
At this time we don't have any plans in changing the contests but i will bring it up in our next meeting to see what IT thinks.
-Rizz
Hey Oakley,
At this time we don't have any plans in changing the contests but i will bring it up in our next meeting to see what IT thinks.
-Rizz
If, as has been suggested here, +100 is the record of a pretty good picker, I'm closing in on being "pretty good". I'm at +86 but I'm convinced I'll never make it picking MLB games.I'm ususally like win 2-3 and lose 4. I'm going to wait for NFL to start again. I do better on WNBA, of which I know nada. Come on Sept/Redskins.
If, as has been suggested here, +100 is the record of a pretty good picker, I'm closing in on being "pretty good". I'm at +86 but I'm convinced I'll never make it picking MLB games.I'm ususally like win 2-3 and lose 4. I'm going to wait for NFL to start again. I do better on WNBA, of which I know nada. Come on Sept/Redskins.
Its a good idea, i've been wondering the same thing for a while.
Its a good idea, i've been wondering the same thing for a while.
I actually like the idea
I actually like the idea
Its like every body here is on the same page. Ive been thinkin the samething.
There is no undue advantage either way. In fact it would create more losers due to over saturation of options. Seems like they are inching in that direction, because now they are putting -130's out there. Which dog or fave wins about 50% of the time. Currently the teams they select.....the dogs have about a 5% edge over the faves as it relates to probability.
Its like every body here is on the same page. Ive been thinkin the samething.
There is no undue advantage either way. In fact it would create more losers due to over saturation of options. Seems like they are inching in that direction, because now they are putting -130's out there. Which dog or fave wins about 50% of the time. Currently the teams they select.....the dogs have about a 5% edge over the faves as it relates to probability.
REALLY d20, who's the smokin' butt attached to the
REALLY d20, who's the smokin' butt attached to the
I agree with Tuppy, I think the contest is fine the way it is. If on a certain day there are not enough selections for your fancy, take the day off. Surviving does require some patience as well as getting a lucky break every now and then in key situations.
Someone mentioned that being +100 is good in this contest. That is all relative to how many selections you have overall. For instance, I have seen 1 player with 3000 total selections, if he is 1550-1450, that is not a good enough ratio to be winning anything to wriite home about. Rather a better way of judging a player is by %. I think 55% is rock solid, and if I see players above this, I will not hesitate to follow them like a religion.
As always, good luck to all.
I agree with Tuppy, I think the contest is fine the way it is. If on a certain day there are not enough selections for your fancy, take the day off. Surviving does require some patience as well as getting a lucky break every now and then in key situations.
Someone mentioned that being +100 is good in this contest. That is all relative to how many selections you have overall. For instance, I have seen 1 player with 3000 total selections, if he is 1550-1450, that is not a good enough ratio to be winning anything to wriite home about. Rather a better way of judging a player is by %. I think 55% is rock solid, and if I see players above this, I will not hesitate to follow them like a religion.
As always, good luck to all.
I agree with Tuppy, I think the contest is fine the way it is. If on a certain day there are not enough selections for your fancy, take the day off. Surviving does require some patience as well as getting a lucky break every now and then in key situations.
Someone mentioned that being +100 is good in this contest. That is all relative to how many selections you have overall. For instance, I have seen 1 player with 3000 total selections, if he is 1550-1450, that is not a good enough ratio to be winning anything to wriite home about. Rather a better way of judging a player is by %. I think 55% is rock solid, and if I see players above this, I will not hesitate to follow them like a religion.
As always, good luck to all.
We are required to make a pick within 7 days of last selection made.Can't afford to be Too patient !
The option of over/under totals not above $ -130...would help offset the time restriction,as pertaining to the days with few &small menu of game options.
Same parameters could be implemented for totals,just as concurrent odds conditions,per:Teams.
Funny how you agree with TUPPY.I'm sure it's simply a coincidence that he's the BIGGEST Streak Survivor winner,yet.
I agree with Tuppy, I think the contest is fine the way it is. If on a certain day there are not enough selections for your fancy, take the day off. Surviving does require some patience as well as getting a lucky break every now and then in key situations.
Someone mentioned that being +100 is good in this contest. That is all relative to how many selections you have overall. For instance, I have seen 1 player with 3000 total selections, if he is 1550-1450, that is not a good enough ratio to be winning anything to wriite home about. Rather a better way of judging a player is by %. I think 55% is rock solid, and if I see players above this, I will not hesitate to follow them like a religion.
As always, good luck to all.
We are required to make a pick within 7 days of last selection made.Can't afford to be Too patient !
The option of over/under totals not above $ -130...would help offset the time restriction,as pertaining to the days with few &small menu of game options.
Same parameters could be implemented for totals,just as concurrent odds conditions,per:Teams.
Funny how you agree with TUPPY.I'm sure it's simply a coincidence that he's the BIGGEST Streak Survivor winner,yet.
Hot Forum Topics
Warning - External Link
Report User
This post is spam
Delete Post
Remove Thread
Scan Results
Login/Register
Accounts are free and easy to create.
Search
