Posted:
#1
Thank you to the academy for this,all 6000 members.Thank you to the other nominees,all these performances are impeccable,in my opinion. 
1700 & Counting
...
Views: 2301
Posts: 17
1800 
Posted:
#7
Quote Originally Posted by sandyman:
I just went from -21 to plus 5 and happy plus 91 and 98 pretty f ing good id say
The 91 and 98 your talking about,are both at a 51% winning percentage,now granted some of those wagers might be them, betting on a underdog here or there in baseball or hockey,otherwise if they are betting on a game with a spread,they are losing the juice,so in other words they are losing money.If you think them losing money,and then bragging online about how good they are doing,is pretty f ing good,then there aint much I can say,follow their picks,and you could lose money to.
I just went from -21 to plus 5 and happy plus 91 and 98 pretty f ing good id say
Posted:
#8
Ya sandyman,their being 98 and 91,over .500 really isn't that good,considering how many games they have bet.I really don't think my record is all that impressive,but its still better then theirs.Im +128 and that's after a recent 1-9 beating,and that's in 3.5 times less the amount of games then they have bet on,and mine is at a 56% winning pct..Now classof78 and Lacaze please don't take what Im saying the wrong way,cause the reason im posting is not to make you guys look bad,but im sure you guys would admit that hitting at .51 pct ,aint exactly that good of a record.
Posted:
#12
Quote Originally Posted by MrWhatsItToYa:
Ya sandyman,their being 98 and 91,over .500 really isn't that good,considering how many games they have bet.I really don't think my record is all that impressive,but its still better then theirs.Im +128 and that's after a recent 1-9 beating,and that's in 3.5 times less the amount of games then they have bet on,and mine is at a 56% winning pct..Now classof78 and Lacaze please don't take what Im saying the wrong way,cause the reason im posting is not to make you guys look bad,but im sure you guys would admit that hitting at .51 pct ,aint exactly that good of a record.
Ya sandyman,their being 98 and 91,over .500 really isn't that good,considering how many games they have bet.I really don't think my record is all that impressive,but its still better then theirs.Im +128 and that's after a recent 1-9 beating,and that's in 3.5 times less the amount of games then they have bet on,and mine is at a 56% winning pct..Now classof78 and Lacaze please don't take what Im saying the wrong way,cause the reason im posting is not to make you guys look bad,but im sure you guys would admit that hitting at .51 pct ,aint exactly that good of a record.
I don't think you make me look bad. What you don't understand yet is the more games you play the harder it is to keep above .500. Yes, you have played less than me...let's see your 56% hold when you have played as many games...wanna bet on that?
GL dude..
Posted:
#13
Quote Originally Posted by LaCaze:
Hell yeah I would bet you,i might not continue to hit at 56%,but I would definitely hit better then your 51%.As a matter of fact,i think im right about 1,000 picks,and hitting about 56%,so my next 1,000 picks,i would only have to hit about 46% of my picks to be at your 51% level for the total 2,000 games I would of picked.And it don't matter how many games you play,as far as it being harder to keep above .500,your basically hitting 1 out of every 2 bets you make,no matter how many total games you have picked.If you want to come on here and brag about hitting at 51% of your picks,and then when someone hitting at 56% calls you out on it ,your feelings get hurt,then there really aint nothing I can say,or no way I can reason with you.Your right about 1 thing,i don't make you look bad,you coming on a gambling website bragging about hitting at 51%,makes you look pretty bad.Good luck on continuing to lose money,great job.
I don't think you make me look bad. What you don't understand yet is the more games you play the harder it is to keep above .500. Yes, you have played less than me...let's see your 56% hold when you have played as many games...wanna bet on that?
GL dude..
Posted:
#14
Quote Originally Posted by MrWhatsItToYa:
Hell yeah I would bet you,i might not continue to hit at 56%,but I would definitely hit better then your 51%.As a matter of fact,i think im right about 1,000 picks,and hitting about 56%,so my next 1,000 picks,i would only have to hit about 46% of my picks to be at your 51% level for the total 2,000 games I would of picked.And it don't matter how many games you play,as far as it being harder to keep above .500,your basically hitting 1 out of every 2 bets you make,no matter how many total games you have picked.If you want to come on here and brag about hitting at 51% of your picks,and then when someone hitting at 56% calls you out on it ,your feelings get hurt,then there really aint nothing I can say,or no way I can reason with you.Your right about 1 thing,i don't make you look bad,you coming on a gambling website bragging about hitting at 51%,makes you look pretty bad.Good luck on continuing to lose money,great job.
Hell yeah I would bet you,i might not continue to hit at 56%,but I would definitely hit better then your 51%.As a matter of fact,i think im right about 1,000 picks,and hitting about 56%,so my next 1,000 picks,i would only have to hit about 46% of my picks to be at your 51% level for the total 2,000 games I would of picked.And it don't matter how many games you play,as far as it being harder to keep above .500,your basically hitting 1 out of every 2 bets you make,no matter how many total games you have picked.If you want to come on here and brag about hitting at 51% of your picks,and then when someone hitting at 56% calls you out on it ,your feelings get hurt,then there really aint nothing I can say,or no way I can reason with you.Your right about 1 thing,i don't make you look bad,you coming on a gambling website bragging about hitting at 51%,makes you look pretty bad.Good luck on continuing to lose money,great job.
Ok
Posted:
#15
Quote Originally Posted by BuckFalls:
NO ARS Fools gamble,and I'm no fool, so FOADEST !
What are you looking to get from the academy "a lifetime achievement award" for longevity,i hate to break it to you,but your hitting at a whopping 51%.That aint to good,if you were actually betting all your picks,you would be down money,congrats on losing money, genius.
Posted:
#16
Quote Originally Posted by BuckFalls:
I was being facetious LOSER and you are 303/589 = .514 and I'm 1900/3686 = .515 ......SO shut the fo ck up ! What are you looking to get from the academy "a lifetime achievement award" for longevity,i hate to break it to you,but your hitting at a whopping 51%.That aint to good,if you were actually betting all your picks,you would be down money,congrats on losing money, genius.
Hot Forum Topics
