Only lost a small amount ( $125) , so the money is no big deal.. Sure England are known to lay eggs .. ..Betting on lazy soccer is brutal .. Very little pressure on the ball , no real pace , no sense of urgency , playing for the draw ... I'd rather watch, and bet on paint drying .. Looking forward to fading this fraud squad in the Knockout round .
This game has nothing to do with future matches.
It’s a beautiful language.
0
Quote Originally Posted by DoubleUp4Life:
Only lost a small amount ( $125) , so the money is no big deal.. Sure England are known to lay eggs .. ..Betting on lazy soccer is brutal .. Very little pressure on the ball , no real pace , no sense of urgency , playing for the draw ... I'd rather watch, and bet on paint drying .. Looking forward to fading this fraud squad in the Knockout round .
Quote Originally Posted by DoubleUp4Life: Only lost a small amount ( $125) , so the money is no big deal.. Sure England are known to lay eggs .. ..Betting on lazy soccer is brutal .. Very little pressure on the ball , no real pace , no sense of urgency , playing for the draw ... I'd rather watch, and bet on paint drying .. Looking forward to fading this fraud squad in the Knockout round . This game has nothing to do with future matches.
Do you think a squad that's only scored 1 goal in 2 games againist inferior opponents will magically turn it on vs better teams??
England has a nice Collection of individual talent , but team vs Team I'd bet on at least 10+ teams to beat them , especially given their inflated odds.
BEST OF HEALTH, HAPPINESS,WEALTH, BLESSINGS and LUCK TO ALL !!
0
Quote Originally Posted by benhogan76:
Quote Originally Posted by DoubleUp4Life: Only lost a small amount ( $125) , so the money is no big deal.. Sure England are known to lay eggs .. ..Betting on lazy soccer is brutal .. Very little pressure on the ball , no real pace , no sense of urgency , playing for the draw ... I'd rather watch, and bet on paint drying .. Looking forward to fading this fraud squad in the Knockout round . This game has nothing to do with future matches.
Do you think a squad that's only scored 1 goal in 2 games againist inferior opponents will magically turn it on vs better teams??
England has a nice Collection of individual talent , but team vs Team I'd bet on at least 10+ teams to beat them , especially given their inflated odds.
if not for a english defender being at the right place at the right time on the goal line to save a sure goal, Scotland should have won this game but if they win their next game, this tie won't ruin their chances.
While watching their lackluster effort I began rooting for Scotland...That play and the Pickford save definitely altered the result ...Sure Englands header could have went in , but they didnt conjure up much else...Lots of needless passes and click wasting
BEST OF HEALTH, HAPPINESS,WEALTH, BLESSINGS and LUCK TO ALL !!
0
Quote Originally Posted by packersbackers:
if not for a english defender being at the right place at the right time on the goal line to save a sure goal, Scotland should have won this game but if they win their next game, this tie won't ruin their chances.
While watching their lackluster effort I began rooting for Scotland...That play and the Pickford save definitely altered the result ...Sure Englands header could have went in , but they didnt conjure up much else...Lots of needless passes and click wasting
Means nothing in terms of outcome of this tournament. BOL fading them based on this game.
I'll fade them based on the first 2 games ...Maybe having Chelsea and Man city players arrive late to training is a big issue for chemistry....
Fading them in the Knockout round is a must for me ..There is only about 6 teams in the whole tournament that I think they would beat by more than a goal the way they're playing...
Best of luck Brother..
BEST OF HEALTH, HAPPINESS,WEALTH, BLESSINGS and LUCK TO ALL !!
1
Quote Originally Posted by benhogan76:
Means nothing in terms of outcome of this tournament. BOL fading them based on this game.
I'll fade them based on the first 2 games ...Maybe having Chelsea and Man city players arrive late to training is a big issue for chemistry....
Fading them in the Knockout round is a must for me ..There is only about 6 teams in the whole tournament that I think they would beat by more than a goal the way they're playing...
I feel you bro but if you been watching football or soccer like me for the past 25 years, you know England is absolutely one of the worst teams to bet on in terms of spread or ML. They are under bangers for the most part, for example, i have been noticing how Southgate has been using 4 at the back instead of 3 at thr back that worked out so well in the world cap. The 3 at the back was a revelation for a team like England who had never really implemented that system. Why to back to the back 4 now? no one knows. I noticed this last year the switch to back 4 and ever since the change they been lethargic. Made a point to bet their under as long as they stuck to that coz that's what England is known for. If Southgate had the balls to play Grealish and Sancho starting, I would not play that over
0
@DoubleUp4Life
I feel you bro but if you been watching football or soccer like me for the past 25 years, you know England is absolutely one of the worst teams to bet on in terms of spread or ML. They are under bangers for the most part, for example, i have been noticing how Southgate has been using 4 at the back instead of 3 at thr back that worked out so well in the world cap. The 3 at the back was a revelation for a team like England who had never really implemented that system. Why to back to the back 4 now? no one knows. I noticed this last year the switch to back 4 and ever since the change they been lethargic. Made a point to bet their under as long as they stuck to that coz that's what England is known for. If Southgate had the balls to play Grealish and Sancho starting, I would not play that over
everybody griping about how the Lions played. yeah i was on them too. but skimming through this forum and havent seen ONE single person commend the effort the Scots put forth. everyone has blinders on. yeah sure, Lions played miserable, but to have the mindset to go up to Wembley and attack them and play the way they did was quite impressive. holding possession for almost 2 minutes there right before the end of the half gave them a ton of confidence coming out of the break. people find anything to blame and not give some of the credit where its due.
but heres what gets me, "Do you think a squad that's only scored 1 goal in 2 games againist inferior opponents will magically turn it on vs better teams??"
France found the net just 3 times during Group Stages (1 of them was an own goal, and another a PK for godsakes- and needed it to beat a team 40 places lower than them. 1 goal during the run of play in 270+ minutes. with THAT roster??? what did they do? ohhh, nothing much.... just went on to win the WC. and Griez even won the Boot too.
two years & Portugal finished level FIVE straight times before they got tired of playing 30 extra minutes & won Euros. Germans with a chance to advance and rest couldnt beat an african side and even conceded twice to settle for a draw. what they end up doing? ohh, nothing much, just thump Sambas in THEIR own backyard and go on to win the WC. cazzo!! everyone freaking out over one result.
they may very well just fold over but this match means absolutely nothing to their chances for the remainder of the tourney. unreal.
"England did a good job disappointing all soccer fans today all over the world" laughing. they were celebrating in Scotland. and if you think England (like Italy) is beloved throughout europe you better have a second thought on that.
0
everybody griping about how the Lions played. yeah i was on them too. but skimming through this forum and havent seen ONE single person commend the effort the Scots put forth. everyone has blinders on. yeah sure, Lions played miserable, but to have the mindset to go up to Wembley and attack them and play the way they did was quite impressive. holding possession for almost 2 minutes there right before the end of the half gave them a ton of confidence coming out of the break. people find anything to blame and not give some of the credit where its due.
but heres what gets me, "Do you think a squad that's only scored 1 goal in 2 games againist inferior opponents will magically turn it on vs better teams??"
France found the net just 3 times during Group Stages (1 of them was an own goal, and another a PK for godsakes- and needed it to beat a team 40 places lower than them. 1 goal during the run of play in 270+ minutes. with THAT roster??? what did they do? ohhh, nothing much.... just went on to win the WC. and Griez even won the Boot too.
two years & Portugal finished level FIVE straight times before they got tired of playing 30 extra minutes & won Euros. Germans with a chance to advance and rest couldnt beat an african side and even conceded twice to settle for a draw. what they end up doing? ohh, nothing much, just thump Sambas in THEIR own backyard and go on to win the WC. cazzo!! everyone freaking out over one result.
they may very well just fold over but this match means absolutely nothing to their chances for the remainder of the tourney. unreal.
"England did a good job disappointing all soccer fans today all over the world" laughing. they were celebrating in Scotland. and if you think England (like Italy) is beloved throughout europe you better have a second thought on that.
Quote Originally Posted by benhogan76: Quote Originally Posted by DoubleUp4Life: Do you think a squad that's only scored 1 goal in 2 games againist inferior opponents will magically turn it on vs better teams?? .
Sooo France?? That’s who you’re describing basically. They’ve scored 2, 2 goals. Croatia 1, Spain 1. Sweden is leading the group with 1 goal scored. Hell, Portugal won the last Euro basically not scoring goals until AFTER full time. My sentiment on this matter has no bearing on how I feel England played today or how far they will go in the tournament. I’m just pointing out how much you don’t understand any of this tournament, these teams or how’s it’s played.
everyone always comes in here complaining after the team with the name on the shirt (the only name on the shirt they know) loses. No difference here.
0
Quote Originally Posted by DoubleUp4Life:
Quote Originally Posted by benhogan76: Quote Originally Posted by DoubleUp4Life: Do you think a squad that's only scored 1 goal in 2 games againist inferior opponents will magically turn it on vs better teams?? .
Sooo France?? That’s who you’re describing basically. They’ve scored 2, 2 goals. Croatia 1, Spain 1. Sweden is leading the group with 1 goal scored. Hell, Portugal won the last Euro basically not scoring goals until AFTER full time. My sentiment on this matter has no bearing on how I feel England played today or how far they will go in the tournament. I’m just pointing out how much you don’t understand any of this tournament, these teams or how’s it’s played.
everyone always comes in here complaining after the team with the name on the shirt (the only name on the shirt they know) loses. No difference here.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.