Seriously, i dont give a rats what anyone says,
Backing penalty goal as the 1st scoring play is NO where near, no where near as dodgy as betting arguably the strongest team in the last 5 years to run last.
If people dont think the NRL is one crooked animal, then seriously u need to get your head checked.
Seriously, i dont give a rats what anyone says,
Backing penalty goal as the 1st scoring play is NO where near, no where near as dodgy as betting arguably the strongest team in the last 5 years to run last.
If people dont think the NRL is one crooked animal, then seriously u need to get your head checked.
This is the point rostos. The ASX is not an efficient market, so how the fuck is the NRL market ever going ot be efficient? As mentioned above, there is a world of difference between acting on information before it is public, and conspiring to fix an outcome.
I think you are all missing the point with what i am trying to make.
How the F### do the NRL dismiss the storm spoon betting plunge as nothing and attempt to put Elias in the firing squad?
They are both crimes
No one in there right mind no matter how much they hate money would have put money to bet the storm for the spoon last year. But it was dismissed as nothing.
It just proves to me what the NRL is.
That roosters cows game the year before, i am telling you now was just as dodgy as the Tandy scandal, yet that was thrown out as nothing.
All what i am saying is that the NRL is just a hypocritical organisation that has favourites. All the way from Gallop to his referees
Even the bookmakers said with the Roosters game, the amount of money betted on the option was extrodinary for that option. All the way up the eastern sea board.
Roosters were winning 16-0 as well i watched that game, i have never seen so many cold dropped balls by the roosters that day.
About 3-4 Roosters players were seen at a particular brothel a few days before the game as well
So when a player pulls out of a game and the market reacts (the game still needs to be played and we have all seen upsets when the game gets played etc etc) to a ruling where the action or information is a GUARANTEED win if you bet on it?
Are u insane? Dugan and Orford are out, yes, but they still have a good chance they will win, the game still needs to be played. It is still a bet.
When people got wind of the storm and knew the NRLs action, it was GUARANTEED they would cash there bets.
You cannot compare the 2.
Furthermore, you have stated nothing on the Roosters Cows game? Why, cause Gallop and the NRL say it was ok? Just like it is ok for Carney to get off a drinking ban for his 50th offense to jake friend getting his contract torn up for the same offense which was his 1st?
So when a player pulls out of a game and the market reacts (the game still needs to be played and we have all seen upsets when the game gets played etc etc) to a ruling where the action or information is a GUARANTEED win if you bet on it?
Are u insane? Dugan and Orford are out, yes, but they still have a good chance they will win, the game still needs to be played. It is still a bet.
When people got wind of the storm and knew the NRLs action, it was GUARANTEED they would cash there bets.
You cannot compare the 2.
Furthermore, you have stated nothing on the Roosters Cows game? Why, cause Gallop and the NRL say it was ok? Just like it is ok for Carney to get off a drinking ban for his 50th offense to jake friend getting his contract torn up for the same offense which was his 1st?
Established in 1995,
Hot Forum Topics
