RD2 Valero

Question

bradley -135 v LairdBradley played very well rd1 at -4 and it could&#x2019;ve been even better. He missed 6 putts inside 10&#x2019;. Bradley hit 78% GIR to 50% Laird. Horschel Even v SergioHorschel 83% GIR and 78% fairways. Beat Sergio by 6 rd1 The thing is I watched an interview with Horschel last week and he said he found something on the range practicing, just a little tweak, and he felt it made all the difference and he felt he was finally hitting it good again. He did well last week Yesterday listening to rd1 in car the announcers were saying that NOBODY hit the ball as good as Billy rd1. I know he isn&#x2019;t as good as Sergio in general but when Billy is playing well he is good and Sergio just had his kid and seems disinterested

sacker17 · Answer

bradley -135 v LairdBradley played very well rd1 at -4 and it could&#x2019;ve been even better. He missed 6 putts inside 10&#x2019;. Bradley hit 78% GIR to 50% Laird. Horschel Even v SergioHorschel 83% GIR and 78% fairways. Beat Sergio by 6 rd1 The thing is I watched an interview with Horschel last week and he said he found something on the range practicing, just a little tweak, and he felt it made all the difference and he felt he was finally hitting it good again. He did well last week Yesterday listening to rd1 in car the announcers were saying that NOBODY hit the ball as good as Billy rd1. I know he isn&#x2019;t as good as Sergio in general but when Billy is playing well he is good and Sergio just had his kid and seems disinterested

sacker17 · Answer

well that is some startBradley &#x2B;1 (2) while laird -1(2)Horschel &#x2B;2 (4) F#CK ME!Seriously this will be my last post for some time if they both lose

sacker17 · Answer

Just one other thing I&#x27;ve noticed and that is that daily round bets are damn near impossible to win.  From day to day any pro can play well or not so well.  The juice will get you

JBender · Answer

Hey man, I love reading your analysis and you should be paid off on your bets. One thing I’ve found helpful is looking back on their historical performance. For example.... Kuchar has shown to start rounds pretty low while Paul Casey starts slow and picks up steam...

Just a helpful tip ....GL man

LeRinkRat · Answer

YES that was a GREAT call on "Fade Casey" @ RBC 1st round vs the "Poulter-geist" last week, JBender

sacker17 · Answer

Thanks Bender, I will throw that variable in the mix. And luv the moniker and the movie!

Well, at least Horschel v Garcia came through for me to get the split, although I got juiced on Bradley (-135).

Horschel started slow at +2 and was down 3 on back 9 so feeling fortunate.

Really stupid bet on Bradley for a number of reasons:

1. too much juice for a guy like Bradley who can be very good at times but is so unreliable

2. Laird has been pretty solid lately (I actually have a Laird v Holmes tourney bet at -115 which was the line when it 1st came out and it ended up at -140, so I'm hoping that will hit)

3. NEVER EVER should bet Bradley as a favorite in a daily bet! If there is one guy who is up and down it's him.

4. I hate Bradley.

RBTrojan · Answer

Side note- How was JB Holmes favored -220 vs anybody? I get it if its Bowditch or something but come on. I let that one slip through my fingers today. Good to see you post Sacker... I generally find we are thinking along the same lines in these match ups...

RD2 Valero

Hot Forum Topics