Looks like this should be a 3-1 or 4-2 type affair with the Sox coming out ahead on the back of Lester. Lackey can pitch like an ace on occasion, but more often than not he seems to give up 3-4 runs. He won't be given a lot of rope given the situation, but Lester has been too good lately to spot a 3 run edge and expect to win. My play is Sox and under plus a small parlay.
0
Looks like this should be a 3-1 or 4-2 type affair with the Sox coming out ahead on the back of Lester. Lackey can pitch like an ace on occasion, but more often than not he seems to give up 3-4 runs. He won't be given a lot of rope given the situation, but Lester has been too good lately to spot a 3 run edge and expect to win. My play is Sox and under plus a small parlay.
Angels weakness- they cant play fenway well. Jakoby got a 3 run single last night and the left fielder dropped a rutine fly ball scared of the monster. Sox rally huge tonight- Lester is their #1 and the sox bats are hot. Im a homer.
Sox weakness- leavin guys on base. all that rallyin' might not pay off but if they take the lead early, expect them to hold it.
0
Angels weakness- they cant play fenway well. Jakoby got a 3 run single last night and the left fielder dropped a rutine fly ball scared of the monster. Sox rally huge tonight- Lester is their #1 and the sox bats are hot. Im a homer.
Sox weakness- leavin guys on base. all that rallyin' might not pay off but if they take the lead early, expect them to hold it.
Playoff numbers are 14-0 due to doubling and tripling up. There has not been a game yet that has not scored a run within the first three innings. As far as pure 1st inning runs are concerned 8 wins 6 losses.
0
Bloodyshredder,
Playoff numbers are 14-0 due to doubling and tripling up. There has not been a game yet that has not scored a run within the first three innings. As far as pure 1st inning runs are concerned 8 wins 6 losses.
LACKEY is 3-8 when starting against BOSTON with an ERA of 5.36
LESTER is 2-1 when starting against LA ANGELS with an ERA of 5.74
can you say...late night
Exactly! This important stat cant be ingored. LAAoA is tired and mentally beat...lackey will see this and will not bring his A game. Thats all the advantage I need to take the over. Desperate measures for LAA will contribute to the over. I see this one going the same way the CHW/Rays game is unfolding right now...just replace TB with BOS.
OVER 4.5 5 inn OVER 8.5 .25 parlay on OVER with BOS RL
0
Quote Originally Posted by movinunits:
LACKEY is 3-8 when starting against BOSTON with an ERA of 5.36
LESTER is 2-1 when starting against LA ANGELS with an ERA of 5.74
can you say...late night
Exactly! This important stat cant be ingored. LAAoA is tired and mentally beat...lackey will see this and will not bring his A game. Thats all the advantage I need to take the over. Desperate measures for LAA will contribute to the over. I see this one going the same way the CHW/Rays game is unfolding right now...just replace TB with BOS.
OVER 4.5 5 inn OVER 8.5 .25 parlay on OVER with BOS RL
Playoff numbers are 14-0 due to doubling and tripling up. There has not been a game yet that has not scored a run within the first three innings. As far as pure 1st inning runs are concerned 8 wins 6 losses.
Clock I will look into it further, you might have the first fool proof trend. I dont like the attitude but hey thats your baggage..... If the trend works its good for all. I find more often than not people who talk about how much money they have or how much they make or how the BBC is following them around for a scoop....USUALLY have nothing but a swelled head...Try humility my friend
0
Quote Originally Posted by Watch:
Bloodyshredder,
Playoff numbers are 14-0 due to doubling and tripling up. There has not been a game yet that has not scored a run within the first three innings. As far as pure 1st inning runs are concerned 8 wins 6 losses.
Clock I will look into it further, you might have the first fool proof trend. I dont like the attitude but hey thats your baggage..... If the trend works its good for all. I find more often than not people who talk about how much money they have or how much they make or how the BBC is following them around for a scoop....USUALLY have nothing but a swelled head...Try humility my friend
lester is 11-1 at home this year with an era of 2.49 lester is 14-3 at night with an era of 2.94 sox know that this is it, if they dont win here chances of winning in Anaheim are slim, they will take this one 4-2
0
lester is 11-1 at home this year with an era of 2.49 lester is 14-3 at night with an era of 2.94 sox know that this is it, if they dont win here chances of winning in Anaheim are slim, they will take this one 4-2
[Quote: Originally Posted by dencol] Who are you talking to...When you start talking to yourself you need to take a vacation.... Watch...do you think if your system worked that 4 million gamblers would be doing it...I just check 25 random scores from 3 random MLB days during season, and you know what your out 11 units.......Do it yourself and see....3
I thought it only fair that in order for you to understand my retort that i paraphrase how our debate started in the first place. You do remember typping the words above don't you?
With that out of the way, i don't like your attitude and how you approached me in the first place, just so that you'll know. And secondly this is not a system. it's just what i do. I don't brag about how much money I have. That's not my style. I'm only answering questions, pal.
My record is above with no cut on it. You speak of humility. You need to try that hat on yourself, especially when you referred to me as "clock", knowing fully well that that isn't my handle.
I don't have a swelled head or any of the other things that you may or may not feel I have. I am merely sharing what works for me, free of charge. You may or may not use it for yourself. But please, refer to me as "Watch" in the future.
Thank You
0
[Quote: Originally Posted by dencol] Who are you talking to...When you start talking to yourself you need to take a vacation.... Watch...do you think if your system worked that 4 million gamblers would be doing it...I just check 25 random scores from 3 random MLB days during season, and you know what your out 11 units.......Do it yourself and see....3
I thought it only fair that in order for you to understand my retort that i paraphrase how our debate started in the first place. You do remember typping the words above don't you?
With that out of the way, i don't like your attitude and how you approached me in the first place, just so that you'll know. And secondly this is not a system. it's just what i do. I don't brag about how much money I have. That's not my style. I'm only answering questions, pal.
My record is above with no cut on it. You speak of humility. You need to try that hat on yourself, especially when you referred to me as "clock", knowing fully well that that isn't my handle.
I don't have a swelled head or any of the other things that you may or may not feel I have. I am merely sharing what works for me, free of charge. You may or may not use it for yourself. But please, refer to me as "Watch" in the future.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.