I am against both parties but I am forced to side with Obama.
there is no cult like support on the right that rivals obamas
nice try![]()
I am against both parties but I am forced to side with Obama.
there is no cult like support on the right that rivals obamas
nice try![]()
I am against both parties but I am forced to side with Obama.
there is no cult like support on the right that rivals obamas
nice try![]()
the gop sheep may support what lies they have been sold as a general platform, but please link an individual on the right side of the spectrum that has enjoyed the cult like celebrity status of obama
you cant![]()
now run along
the gop sheep may support what lies they have been sold as a general platform, but please link an individual on the right side of the spectrum that has enjoyed the cult like celebrity status of obama
you cant![]()
now run along
he came to mind after i hit submit![]()
he came to mind after i hit submit![]()
he came to mind after i hit submit![]()
he came to mind after i hit submit![]()
And the same can be said for blindly hating the man.
Look, Reagan certainly had his faults and bad policies, but overall, he certainly cannot be called a disaster.
The Reagan/Haig doctrine of foreign policy was brilliant. He didn't care if his positions seemed hypocritical (Contras, Sandinistas, etc.). He did what was in the US's best interest. And he certainly knew that the paper tiger economy of the USSR would crumble if forced to continue to spend what didn't exist.
Plenty of faults with him, but certainly not a disaster. ![]()
And the same can be said for blindly hating the man.
Look, Reagan certainly had his faults and bad policies, but overall, he certainly cannot be called a disaster.
The Reagan/Haig doctrine of foreign policy was brilliant. He didn't care if his positions seemed hypocritical (Contras, Sandinistas, etc.). He did what was in the US's best interest. And he certainly knew that the paper tiger economy of the USSR would crumble if forced to continue to spend what didn't exist.
Plenty of faults with him, but certainly not a disaster. ![]()
And the same can be said for blindly hating the man.
Look, Reagan certainly had his faults and bad policies, but overall, he certainly cannot be called a disaster.
The Reagan/Haig doctrine of foreign policy was brilliant. He didn't care if his positions seemed hypocritical (Contras, Sandinistas, etc.). He did what was in the US's best interest. And he certainly knew that the paper tiger economy of the USSR would crumble if forced to continue to spend what didn't exist.
Plenty of faults with him, but certainly not a disaster. ![]()
And the same can be said for blindly hating the man.
Look, Reagan certainly had his faults and bad policies, but overall, he certainly cannot be called a disaster.
The Reagan/Haig doctrine of foreign policy was brilliant. He didn't care if his positions seemed hypocritical (Contras, Sandinistas, etc.). He did what was in the US's best interest. And he certainly knew that the paper tiger economy of the USSR would crumble if forced to continue to spend what didn't exist.
Plenty of faults with him, but certainly not a disaster. ![]()
your support of obama is based on the this?
nice try![]()
please do tell of your objective observations
my objective observation is that both parties are more alike than different
![]()
your support of obama is based on the this?
nice try![]()
please do tell of your objective observations
my objective observation is that both parties are more alike than different
![]()
so you are telling me obama is better than ron paul from an ideological standpoint?
obama is very similiar to bush![]()
youre not forced to do anything![]()
nice try![]()
so you are telling me obama is better than ron paul from an ideological standpoint?
obama is very similiar to bush![]()
youre not forced to do anything![]()
nice try![]()
he may not stand a chance but he refutes your position and deserves your support
you dont have to chose the winning side or be on the winning team in an election
you vote for the candidate who best represents trust ![]()
he may not stand a chance but he refutes your position and deserves your support
you dont have to chose the winning side or be on the winning team in an election
you vote for the candidate who best represents trust ![]()
he may not stand a chance but he refutes your position and deserves your support
you dont have to chose the winning side or be on the winning team in an election
you vote for the candidate who best represents trust ![]()
he may not stand a chance but he refutes your position and deserves your support
you dont have to chose the winning side or be on the winning team in an election
you vote for the candidate who best represents trust ![]()
i do not understand your logic![]()
your racist fears are not palpable, one look at his voting record and sponsored legislation will show there is no kool-aid drinking or anything racially motivated
i'd take joe rogans word for it![]()
i do not understand your logic![]()
your racist fears are not palpable, one look at his voting record and sponsored legislation will show there is no kool-aid drinking or anything racially motivated
i'd take joe rogans word for it![]()
i do not understand your logic![]()
your racist fears are not palpable, one look at his voting record and sponsored legislation will show there is no kool-aid drinking or anything racially motivated
i'd take joe rogans word for it![]()
i do not understand your logic![]()
your racist fears are not palpable, one look at his voting record and sponsored legislation will show there is no kool-aid drinking or anything racially motivated
i'd take joe rogans word for it![]()
If there ever was a Dude, it would be Obama.
The Clint Eastwood of Presidents...... with a soft side. Can even sing Al Green.
Good Night !
![]()
Is that good enough?
If there ever was a Dude, it would be Obama.
The Clint Eastwood of Presidents...... with a soft side. Can even sing Al Green.
Good Night !
![]()
Is that good enough?
not sarcasm, the truth
you say all repub are the same, then you say one is different
you believe propaganda and talking points rather than looking at his voting record
then you laughingly say he doesnt have a chance to win
youd vote for an ideological liar rather than someones actions and track records
you use joe rogan to bolster your pro marijuana stance but ignore his logical support of ron paul, this is the most telling
you then say you wont consider the other side until they have a chance of winning?
like i said, i do not understand your logic
not sarcasm, the truth
you say all repub are the same, then you say one is different
you believe propaganda and talking points rather than looking at his voting record
then you laughingly say he doesnt have a chance to win
youd vote for an ideological liar rather than someones actions and track records
you use joe rogan to bolster your pro marijuana stance but ignore his logical support of ron paul, this is the most telling
you then say you wont consider the other side until they have a chance of winning?
like i said, i do not understand your logic
not sarcasm, the truth
you say all repub are the same, then you say one is different
you believe propaganda and talking points rather than looking at his voting record
then you laughingly say he doesnt have a chance to win
youd vote for an ideological liar rather than someones actions and track records
you use joe rogan to bolster your pro marijuana stance but ignore his logical support of ron paul, this is the most telling
you then say you wont consider the other side until they have a chance of winning?
like i said, i do not understand your logic
not sarcasm, the truth
you say all repub are the same, then you say one is different
you believe propaganda and talking points rather than looking at his voting record
then you laughingly say he doesnt have a chance to win
youd vote for an ideological liar rather than someones actions and track records
you use joe rogan to bolster your pro marijuana stance but ignore his logical support of ron paul, this is the most telling
you then say you wont consider the other side until they have a chance of winning?
like i said, i do not understand your logic
... those GOP sheep you mentioned promote Reagan's lies as a general platform, idolize him beyond belief, and are gearing up to vote for all of it again, despite it's disastrous track record.
![]()
![]()
![]()
Yes, because as we all know, having the misery index go away and 20 million jobs created is "disasterous"!!!!
You are a non-stop beclowning show.
... those GOP sheep you mentioned promote Reagan's lies as a general platform, idolize him beyond belief, and are gearing up to vote for all of it again, despite it's disastrous track record.
![]()
![]()
![]()
Yes, because as we all know, having the misery index go away and 20 million jobs created is "disasterous"!!!!
You are a non-stop beclowning show.
the gop sheep may support what lies they have been sold as a general platform, but please link an individual on the right side of the spectrum that has enjoyed the cult like celebrity status of obama
the gop sheep may support what lies they have been sold as a general platform, but please link an individual on the right side of the spectrum that has enjoyed the cult like celebrity status of obama

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.