State Attorney Angela Corey Press conference & Zimmerman missing

My point is noone saw what was happening when Z pulled the trigger & therefore there is no evidence or witness that shows or proves that Z could even reasonably fear death or great bodily harm at the time he chose to use deadly force. The injuries do not do it & neither do the witnesses who said Martin was on top beating Z -

That said, I would think it will be a tough case for the prosecution with the SYG statute because the burden of beyond a reasonable doubt will remain entirely with them, but Corey must feel she has enough to get a conviction. 

One of the 911 calls should show that there was no pause in the screaming until after the shot was fired.

'John' the witness reportedly saw MOST of the physical fight and reported that the guy on the bottom who was wearing a red 'sweater' was screaming for him to help. By the time he went in his house and made it to his upstairs window Trayvon was dead.

Cashin 100% of your story is unstated. There is nobody that saw the fight that says Trayvon was on the bottom. NOBODY! NOBODY!

I guarantee you that you can die or become brain damaged from having your head bashed in the concrete.

So far, the only witness that said they were looking at the 2 guys at the time of the shot, is an unidentified woman who said she thought at time that it was the larger guy on top & the kid who was screaming. And that right after it was this larger guy that was walking closer to her. Make of that what you will -

Well, I haven't heard any witness say they saw Z's head slammed into the sidewalk. Not 1 - only Z himself. Not saying it didn't happen & obviously he had abrasions on his head, but even if it did, that is no proof of self defense because noone can say it was happening just before he shot & killed Martin.

And the only witnesses to the fight I've heard or seen, all say everything they saw took place on the grass. 

And the only witnesses to the fight I've heard or seen, all say everything they saw took place on the grass.

So you're saying that his lacerations on the back of his head were caused by grass?

Damn, use some logic every now and then.

No, I'm saying the abrasions don't show or prove self defense as you well know. You can google the unidentified witness who police questioned for a short time. She called them back later, but they didn't return her calls - 

I guarantee you that you can die or become brain damaged from having your head bashed in the concrete.

Seems to me the first thing you're going to do if someone is bashing your head off the concrete repeatedly is use both hands to stop him. You're not thinking about drawing a weapon when your dazed(from getting your head bashed). I tend to believe that the weapon was already out before the altercation. That brings a whole new scenario into play.

They show a more liklihood of self defense than not. Also helps corroborate Zimmermans account, especially since there is nothing that contradicts his story.