Yeah, I guess the historians must be lying.
historians/politicians/"news" reporters
all liars
Watch a movie about MLK or Armistad and then tell me who the real heroes are. We know you hate intellectuals, so certainly you aren't going to say those who led the legal battles.
Right.
Commending our ancestors for ending a 3000-year barbaric practice is detracting from MLK.
What’s that? Liberal logic 101.
Facing water hoses and police dogs is certainly admirable.
Somehow it doesn’t quite rise to the level of getting your balls blown off at Gettysburg.
We lost more men in our slavery ending war than in almost all our other wars combined.
Please don’t tell me who the real heroes are, buddy.
Intellectuals? You mean liberal intellectuals?
I don’t hate liberal intellectuals.
I pity the fools.
Deluded egoists with an inordinate sense of moral and intellectual superiority; whose creative spark and contribution is devising new ways to piss through other people’s money.
“As an aside”, your Anglophobia has metastasized, my friend. Perhaps some taxpayer-subsidized sensitivity training might be apropos.
Watch a movie about MLK or Armistad and then tell me who the real heroes are. We know you hate intellectuals, so certainly you aren't going to say those who led the legal battles.
Right.
Commending our ancestors for ending a 3000-year barbaric practice is detracting from MLK.
What’s that? Liberal logic 101.
Facing water hoses and police dogs is certainly admirable.
Somehow it doesn’t quite rise to the level of getting your balls blown off at Gettysburg.
We lost more men in our slavery ending war than in almost all our other wars combined.
Please don’t tell me who the real heroes are, buddy.
Intellectuals? You mean liberal intellectuals?
I don’t hate liberal intellectuals.
I pity the fools.
Deluded egoists with an inordinate sense of moral and intellectual superiority; whose creative spark and contribution is devising new ways to piss through other people’s money.
“As an aside”, your Anglophobia has metastasized, my friend. Perhaps some taxpayer-subsidized sensitivity training might be apropos.
Right.
Commending our ancestors for ending a 3000-year barbaric practice is detracting from MLK.
What’s that? Liberal logic 101.
Facing water hoses and police dogs is certainly admirable.
Somehow it doesn’t quite rise to the level of getting your balls blown off at Gettysburg.
We lost more men in our slavery ending war than in almost all our other wars combined.
Please don’t tell me who the real heroes are, buddy.
Intellectuals? You mean liberal intellectuals?
I don’t hate liberal intellectuals.
I pity the fools.
Deluded egoists with an inordinate sense of moral and intellectual superiority; whose creative spark and contribution is devising new ways to piss through other people’s money.
“As an aside”, your Anglophobia has metastasized, my friend. Perhaps some taxpayer-subsidized sensitivity training might be apropos.
Right.
Commending our ancestors for ending a 3000-year barbaric practice is detracting from MLK.
What’s that? Liberal logic 101.
Facing water hoses and police dogs is certainly admirable.
Somehow it doesn’t quite rise to the level of getting your balls blown off at Gettysburg.
We lost more men in our slavery ending war than in almost all our other wars combined.
Please don’t tell me who the real heroes are, buddy.
Intellectuals? You mean liberal intellectuals?
I don’t hate liberal intellectuals.
I pity the fools.
Deluded egoists with an inordinate sense of moral and intellectual superiority; whose creative spark and contribution is devising new ways to piss through other people’s money.
“As an aside”, your Anglophobia has metastasized, my friend. Perhaps some taxpayer-subsidized sensitivity training might be apropos.
Right.
Commending our ancestors for ending a 3000-year barbaric practice is detracting from MLK.
What’s that? Liberal logic 101.
Facing water hoses and police dogs is certainly admirable.
Somehow it doesn’t quite rise to the level of getting your balls blown off at Gettysburg.
We lost more men in our slavery ending war than in almost all our other wars combined.
Please don’t tell me who the real heroes are, buddy.
Intellectuals? You mean liberal intellectuals?
I don’t hate liberal intellectuals.
I pity the fools.
Deluded egoists with an inordinate sense of moral and intellectual superiority; whose creative spark and contribution is devising new ways to piss through other people’s money.
“As an aside”, your Anglophobia has metastasized, my friend. Perhaps some taxpayer-subsidized sensitivity training might be apropos.
Interesting.
So the Civil War was solely about slavery huh? You must think Lincoln is a hero then. Many threads on this board have dealt with criticism of Lincoln, whom is often referred to as a fascist and authoritarian. Interesting how you haven't come to his defense, given how you view the Civil War.
Oh, and I have many heroes. When it comes to my intellectual heroes, I don't pay attention to their political beliefs. Unlike you, I actually read about all viewpoints and come to my conclusions of views without typecasting. I realize you prefer the intellectual shortcut by reading The Heritage Foundation so you know how to think.
You should watch Mississippi Burning, especially the scene where Gene Hackman is talking about his dad..you know, the one who shot his black neighbors mule because of jealousy.
Jealousy of others who are different because of your lack of success is simply just another way of defining hatred, bigotry, and prejudice.
Right.
Commending our ancestors for ending a 3000-year barbaric practice is detracting from MLK.
What’s that? Liberal logic 101.
Facing water hoses and police dogs is certainly admirable.
Somehow it doesn’t quite rise to the level of getting your balls blown off at Gettysburg.
We lost more men in our slavery ending war than in almost all our other wars combined.
Please don’t tell me who the real heroes are, buddy.
Intellectuals? You mean liberal intellectuals?
I don’t hate liberal intellectuals.
I pity the fools.
Deluded egoists with an inordinate sense of moral and intellectual superiority; whose creative spark and contribution is devising new ways to piss through other people’s money.
“As an aside”, your Anglophobia has metastasized, my friend. Perhaps some taxpayer-subsidized sensitivity training might be apropos.
Interesting.
So the Civil War was solely about slavery huh? You must think Lincoln is a hero then. Many threads on this board have dealt with criticism of Lincoln, whom is often referred to as a fascist and authoritarian. Interesting how you haven't come to his defense, given how you view the Civil War.
Oh, and I have many heroes. When it comes to my intellectual heroes, I don't pay attention to their political beliefs. Unlike you, I actually read about all viewpoints and come to my conclusions of views without typecasting. I realize you prefer the intellectual shortcut by reading The Heritage Foundation so you know how to think.
You should watch Mississippi Burning, especially the scene where Gene Hackman is talking about his dad..you know, the one who shot his black neighbors mule because of jealousy.
Jealousy of others who are different because of your lack of success is simply just another way of defining hatred, bigotry, and prejudice.
The Black Panther Party (originally the Black Panther Party for Self-Defense) was an African-American revolutionary leftist organization active in the United States from 1966 until 1982. The Black Panther Party achieved national and international notoriety through its involvement in the Black Power movement and U.S. politics of the 1960s and 1970s. The group's "provocative rhetoric, militant posture, and cultural and political flourishes permanently altered the contours of American Identity."[1]
Founded in Oakland, California by Huey Newton and Bobby Seale on October 15, 1966, the organization initially set forth a doctrine calling primarily for the protection of African-American neighborhoods from police brutality.[2] The organization's leaders espoused socialist and communist (largely Maoist) doctrines; however, the Party's early black nationalist reputation attracted a diverse membership.[3] The Black Panther Party's objectives and philosophy expanded and evolved rapidly during the party's existence, making ideological consensus within the party difficult to achieve, and causing some prominent members to openly disagree with the views of the leaders.
The Black Panther Party (originally the Black Panther Party for Self-Defense) was an African-American revolutionary leftist organization active in the United States from 1966 until 1982. The Black Panther Party achieved national and international notoriety through its involvement in the Black Power movement and U.S. politics of the 1960s and 1970s. The group's "provocative rhetoric, militant posture, and cultural and political flourishes permanently altered the contours of American Identity."[1]
Founded in Oakland, California by Huey Newton and Bobby Seale on October 15, 1966, the organization initially set forth a doctrine calling primarily for the protection of African-American neighborhoods from police brutality.[2] The organization's leaders espoused socialist and communist (largely Maoist) doctrines; however, the Party's early black nationalist reputation attracted a diverse membership.[3] The Black Panther Party's objectives and philosophy expanded and evolved rapidly during the party's existence, making ideological consensus within the party difficult to achieve, and causing some prominent members to openly disagree with the views of the leaders.
should have phrased that different
would zimmerman have been admitted to the kkk? would they take him today?
should have phrased that different
would zimmerman have been admitted to the kkk? would they take him today?
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.