As President Obama laid out his “strategy” last night for dealing with ISIS in Iraq and Syria, and as bipartisan leadership in Congress push to approve as much as $4 billion to arm the Syrian “rebels,” it should be noted that the keystone to his anti-Assad policy — the “vetted moderate” Free Syrian Army (FSA) — is now admitting that they, too, are working with the Islamic State.
As President Obama laid out his “strategy” last night for dealing with ISIS in Iraq and Syria, and as bipartisan leadership in Congress push to approve as much as $4 billion to arm the Syrian “rebels,” it should be noted that the keystone to his anti-Assad policy — the “vetted moderate” Free Syrian Army (FSA) — is now admitting that they, too, are working with the Islamic State.
So what would you specifically do?
You, along with the right wingers, will criticize if he wants more military action or less military action.
So what is your plan of action?
Afghanistan, Iraq, Egypt, Libya and now Syria.
Terrorists that hate Americans have been in Syria long before the American people heard about ISIS. Propaganda works huh? It didn't take the American media long to convince the American people that going after ISIS was a matter of national security.
Who are we backing in Syria and what is our problem with Assad and the Syrian Armed Forces? They're the only group protecting Syria's 2,000,000 Christians (I think I have that right ... it's a little confusing).
How long do you think it will take for this new war against ISIS to spread into Iran?
We're going to have the citizens of every country in the Middle East and N Africa hating us within the next decade (they probably already do).
Who is going to benefit from this? Not the American people. The Members of the Council on Foreign Relations have made out pretty good for the most part. Especially the founders and the presidents circle members.
I can't really think of anyone else that these wars have been good for ... can you?
Congress is going to vote on the 16th I think. Not only will they support it but it will be a more aggressive plan than Obama laid out. They will want to spend big bucks to train and equip Syrian rebels. I hope that makes you feel better.
I just meant any of the threads about the issue. Didn't know if you wanted to answer in this thread. Aren't you a lawyer?
So, when you say between employer and Rice---is that a legal opinion? I guess the part I don't understand legally is can a job fire you for something like this if the police do not charge you? I understand the NFL code of conduct thing, similar to the Stirling thing in NBA. But what about a normal job? It just seems to me the media and folks are wanting the NFL to sort of do the job of the police. Am I way off or not understanding the legal part? Thanks. 
Syrian Armed Forces, National Defense Force, Syrian Resistance, Ba'ath Brigades, Hezbollah, Liwa Abu al-Fadhal al-Abbas, Badr Organization Kata'ib Hezbollah
vs
Islamic Front, Free Syrian Army, Al Nusra Front, Ajnad al Sham Islamic Union, Authenticity and Development Front, Army of Mujahedeen
vs
Islamic State
I think the US is going to back the middle group. The US doesn't like IS or Assad's Syrian Armed Forces.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_armed_groups_in_the_Syrian_Civil_War
What could possibly go wrong? We should solve that problem in no time. I'm sure they're going to be thrilled with the US hopping in the middle of a civil war.
That's right ..The United States should not be the Air Force for the Iraq Army ..an Army that had two full divisions of soldiers throw down their arms and desert .
Unless,, ISIS poses a direct threat to the United States we should do nothing. There is nothing the US can do in Iraq ,but get pulled into a long drawn out war ..Doing nothing at this time is better than Obama doomed strategy.. No boots on the ground is a blueprint for failure.
Congress is going to vote on the 16th I think. Not only will they support it but it will be a more aggressive plan than Obama laid out. They will want to spend big bucks to train and equip Syrian rebels. I hope that makes you feel better.
I just meant any of the threads about the issue. Didn't know if you wanted to answer in this thread. Aren't you a lawyer?
So, when you say between employer and Rice---is that a legal opinion? I guess the part I don't understand legally is can a job fire you for something like this if the police do not charge you? I understand the NFL code of conduct thing, similar to the Stirling thing in NBA. But what about a normal job? It just seems to me the media and folks are wanting the NFL to sort of do the job of the police. Am I way off or not understanding the legal part? Thanks.
The US is going to topple Assad, install a puppet government and eventually go into Iran. The Saudis (really the US) have been backing the Free Syrian Army and Iran (really Russia) has been backing Assad and the Syrian government.
That is what is going to happen. The people above the politicians want it that way. If they can use propaganda and get the American people to support it than it will go to congress ... If the propaganda doesn't work than it won't go to congress.
It has to do with pipe lines, oil and the petrodollar.
ISIS is a JV team. ISIS is a pawn in the chess game. Russia is the varsity team.
Gotcha. Thanks. Never heard of this before. I assumed if no charges were warranted, employer couldn't or wouldn't fire you anyway.
Because what else are they going to do for millions?
Actually, NFL players, unlike coaches, almost never have guaranteed contracts for multiple years, rather just for the year.
Because what else are they going to do for millions?
Actually, NFL players, unlike coaches, almost never have guaranteed contracts for multiple years, rather just for the year.
I had no idea of this. Good to learn something everyday.
Established in 1995,
Hot Forum Topics
