Zimmerman's story sounds like a stoner tale. It's just like when my mom caught me stoned 16 years ago and I just made up all kinds of bullshit to get her to back off. You go in full on panic mode and will say anything to get out of trouble.
His ass was on the line and he didn't want his cherry popped in prison and I don't blame him because I would make up shit to get out of jail too. Ive been stopped by the cops and I bullshit my way out and I always say to myself, I can't believe they bought it.
Yep
But evidently Serino didn't buy it & neither does the prosecution. Tragic, but an interesting case in alot of ways...
Zimmerman's story sounds like a stoner tale. It's just like when my mom caught me stoned 16 years ago and I just made up all kinds of bullshit to get her to back off. You go in full on panic mode and will say anything to get out of trouble.
His ass was on the line and he didn't want his cherry popped in prison and I don't blame him because I would make up shit to get out of jail too. Ive been stopped by the cops and I bullshit my way out and I always say to myself, I can't believe they bought it.
Yep
But evidently Serino didn't buy it & neither does the prosecution. Tragic, but an interesting case in alot of ways...
But evidently Serino didn't buy it & neither does the prosecution. Tragic, but an interesting case in alot of ways...
You shouldn't have mentioned the name serino because now bowlslit is going to use it against you. It turns out serino changed his story and all of a sudden believed Z's story all along. It only took him a over a month to tell the media that though.
But evidently Serino didn't buy it & neither does the prosecution. Tragic, but an interesting case in alot of ways...
You shouldn't have mentioned the name serino because now bowlslit is going to use it against you. It turns out serino changed his story and all of a sudden believed Z's story all along. It only took him a over a month to tell the media that though.
When asked if they had evidence that Z lied in his original statement to police, Gilbreath also said, "Yes".
This is true ..............transcript in bond hearing :
UNIDENTIFIED MALE: And he gave -- he the defendant gave numerous interviews to the police did he not.
GILBREATH: Yes.
UNIDENTIFIED MALE: And isn't it true that a lot of statements that he made do not make sense in terms of the injuries that he described. Did he not describe to the police that Mr. Martin had him on the ground and kept bashing his head on the concrete over and over and just physically beating him with his hands?
GILBREATH: He has said that, yes.
UNIDENTIFIED MALE: And isn't it true that there is evidence that indicates that's not true?
GILBREATH: Yes.
On redirect of the state's attorney investigator :
O'MARA: The injuries seem to be consistent with his story, though, don't they?
Dale; The injuries are consistent with a harder object striking the back of his head than his head was.
O'MARA: Could that be cement?
GILBREATH: Could be.
O'MARA: Did you just say it was consistent or did you say it wasn't consistent?
GILBREATH: I said it was.
O'MARA: Ok. Have you ever had your nose broken?
GILBREATH: No.
O'MARA: Have you ever had your nose fractured or broken.
GILBREATH: No.
O'MARA: You know that that was an injury that Mr. Zimmerman sustained, correct?
GILBREATH: I know that that is an injury that is reported to have sustained. I haven't seen any medical records to indicate that.
O'MARA: Have you asked him for them?
GILBREATH: Have I asked him for them? No.
O'MARA: Do you want a copy of them?
GILBREATH: Sure.
O'MARA: I'll give them to the state. It's a more appropriate way to do it. If you haven't had them yet, I don't want to cross you on them.
Nothing further, thank you, your honor.
*******
Gilbreath hasn't seen the injury report,medical records or even asked for them ..but he can say lot of statements that Zimmerman made do not make sense in terms of the injuries that Zimmerman described......and than agree's that Zimmermans injuries were consistant with a hard object [ could be cement] striking the back of his head...
Sounds like there are more contradiction coming from Gilbreath than Zimmerman ...
When asked if they had evidence that Z lied in his original statement to police, Gilbreath also said, "Yes".
This is true ..............transcript in bond hearing :
UNIDENTIFIED MALE: And he gave -- he the defendant gave numerous interviews to the police did he not.
GILBREATH: Yes.
UNIDENTIFIED MALE: And isn't it true that a lot of statements that he made do not make sense in terms of the injuries that he described. Did he not describe to the police that Mr. Martin had him on the ground and kept bashing his head on the concrete over and over and just physically beating him with his hands?
GILBREATH: He has said that, yes.
UNIDENTIFIED MALE: And isn't it true that there is evidence that indicates that's not true?
GILBREATH: Yes.
On redirect of the state's attorney investigator :
O'MARA: The injuries seem to be consistent with his story, though, don't they?
Dale; The injuries are consistent with a harder object striking the back of his head than his head was.
O'MARA: Could that be cement?
GILBREATH: Could be.
O'MARA: Did you just say it was consistent or did you say it wasn't consistent?
GILBREATH: I said it was.
O'MARA: Ok. Have you ever had your nose broken?
GILBREATH: No.
O'MARA: Have you ever had your nose fractured or broken.
GILBREATH: No.
O'MARA: You know that that was an injury that Mr. Zimmerman sustained, correct?
GILBREATH: I know that that is an injury that is reported to have sustained. I haven't seen any medical records to indicate that.
O'MARA: Have you asked him for them?
GILBREATH: Have I asked him for them? No.
O'MARA: Do you want a copy of them?
GILBREATH: Sure.
O'MARA: I'll give them to the state. It's a more appropriate way to do it. If you haven't had them yet, I don't want to cross you on them.
Nothing further, thank you, your honor.
*******
Gilbreath hasn't seen the injury report,medical records or even asked for them ..but he can say lot of statements that Zimmerman made do not make sense in terms of the injuries that Zimmerman described......and than agree's that Zimmermans injuries were consistant with a hard object [ could be cement] striking the back of his head...
Sounds like there are more contradiction coming from Gilbreath than Zimmerman ...
You are really reaching for justification here....rather implausible.
Zimmerman is the provoker in this entire situation. That is indisputable. Had he remained in his vehicle and obeyed the instructions he was given not to do anything....Trayvon would be alive.
Life is more precious than anything else, lest we forget.
If Trayvon had continued on his path to were he was staying [ as he was ahead of Zimmerman] ...Trayvon would also be alive ..
You are really reaching for justification here....rather implausible.
Zimmerman is the provoker in this entire situation. That is indisputable. Had he remained in his vehicle and obeyed the instructions he was given not to do anything....Trayvon would be alive.
Life is more precious than anything else, lest we forget.
If Trayvon had continued on his path to were he was staying [ as he was ahead of Zimmerman] ...Trayvon would also be alive ..
If Trayvon had continued on his path to were he was staying [ as he was ahead of Zimmerman] ...Trayvon would also be alive ..
When an unknown, unidentified grown man is stalking you at night and then confronts you and you feel threatened, what would you do Sarasota? What would any of us do? It's difficult to project unless we are in Trayvon's shoes.
Stand your ground? Martin was doing nothing besides going home with candy and iced tea. He had every right to be where he was. Should he have run as fast he could? Maybe, but this is a completely subjective, in the moment decision, which neither of us has any right to conjecture on.
Trayvon likely made a decision that many on this forum would---he stood his ground, unarmed, and paid the price with his life. Zimmerman always knew he carried a weapon and Trayvon knew he didn't have one on his person. There is huge difference in perspective when one party is armed and the other one unarmed, with neither knowing the other's status.
We don't know, and likely never will, what exactly happened between these 2 men. However, only one is left to tell his version of the tale...hence why this is going to trial and always should have. Whether Zimmerman ultimately goes free or not, this case clearly warranted further investigation than what was done prior to the protests.
If Trayvon had continued on his path to were he was staying [ as he was ahead of Zimmerman] ...Trayvon would also be alive ..
When an unknown, unidentified grown man is stalking you at night and then confronts you and you feel threatened, what would you do Sarasota? What would any of us do? It's difficult to project unless we are in Trayvon's shoes.
Stand your ground? Martin was doing nothing besides going home with candy and iced tea. He had every right to be where he was. Should he have run as fast he could? Maybe, but this is a completely subjective, in the moment decision, which neither of us has any right to conjecture on.
Trayvon likely made a decision that many on this forum would---he stood his ground, unarmed, and paid the price with his life. Zimmerman always knew he carried a weapon and Trayvon knew he didn't have one on his person. There is huge difference in perspective when one party is armed and the other one unarmed, with neither knowing the other's status.
We don't know, and likely never will, what exactly happened between these 2 men. However, only one is left to tell his version of the tale...hence why this is going to trial and always should have. Whether Zimmerman ultimately goes free or not, this case clearly warranted further investigation than what was done prior to the protests.
When an unknown, unidentified grown man is stalking you at night and then confronts you and you feel threatened, what would you do Sarasota? What would any of us do? It's difficult to project unless we are in Trayvon's shoes.
Stand your ground? Martin was doing nothing besides going home with candy and iced tea. He had every right to be where he was. Should he have run as fast he could? Maybe, but this is a completely subjective, in the moment decision, which neither of us has any right to conjecture on.
Trayvon likely made a decision that many on this forum would---he stood his ground, unarmed, and paid the price with his life. Zimmerman always knew he carried a weapon and Trayvon knew he didn't have one on his person. There is huge difference in perspective when one party is armed and the other one unarmed, with neither knowing the other's status.
We don't know, and likely never will, what exactly happened between these 2 men. However, only one is left to tell his version of the tale...hence why this is going to trial and always should have. Whether Zimmerman ultimately goes free or not, this case clearly warranted further investigation than what was done prior to the protests.
When an unknown, unidentified grown man is stalking you at night and then confronts you and you feel threatened, what would you do Sarasota? What would any of us do? It's difficult to project unless we are in Trayvon's shoes.
Stand your ground? Martin was doing nothing besides going home with candy and iced tea. He had every right to be where he was. Should he have run as fast he could? Maybe, but this is a completely subjective, in the moment decision, which neither of us has any right to conjecture on.
Trayvon likely made a decision that many on this forum would---he stood his ground, unarmed, and paid the price with his life. Zimmerman always knew he carried a weapon and Trayvon knew he didn't have one on his person. There is huge difference in perspective when one party is armed and the other one unarmed, with neither knowing the other's status.
We don't know, and likely never will, what exactly happened between these 2 men. However, only one is left to tell his version of the tale...hence why this is going to trial and always should have. Whether Zimmerman ultimately goes free or not, this case clearly warranted further investigation than what was done prior to the protests.
When an unknown, unidentified grown man is stalking you at night and then confronts you and you feel threatened, what would you do Sarasota? What would any of us do? It's difficult to project unless we are in Trayvon's shoes.
Stand your ground? Martin was doing nothing besides going home with candy and iced tea. He had every right to be where he was. Should he have run as fast he could? Maybe, but this is a completely subjective, in the moment decision, which neither of us has any right to conjecture on.
Trayvon likely made a decision that many on this forum would---he stood his ground, unarmed, and paid the price with his life. Zimmerman always knew he carried a weapon and Trayvon knew he didn't have one on his person. There is huge difference in perspective when one party is armed and the other one unarmed, with neither knowing the other's status.
We don't know, and likely never will, what exactly happened between these 2 men. However, only one is left to tell his version of the tale...hence why this is going to trial and always should have. Whether Zimmerman ultimately goes free or not, this case clearly warranted further investigation than what was done prior to the protests.
WTF?
Sucker punching a dude when he just wants to find out what you are up to goes beyond standing your ground. Without the sucker punch they both are still alive.
When an unknown, unidentified grown man is stalking you at night and then confronts you and you feel threatened, what would you do Sarasota? What would any of us do? It's difficult to project unless we are in Trayvon's shoes.
Stand your ground? Martin was doing nothing besides going home with candy and iced tea. He had every right to be where he was. Should he have run as fast he could? Maybe, but this is a completely subjective, in the moment decision, which neither of us has any right to conjecture on.
Trayvon likely made a decision that many on this forum would---he stood his ground, unarmed, and paid the price with his life. Zimmerman always knew he carried a weapon and Trayvon knew he didn't have one on his person. There is huge difference in perspective when one party is armed and the other one unarmed, with neither knowing the other's status.
We don't know, and likely never will, what exactly happened between these 2 men. However, only one is left to tell his version of the tale...hence why this is going to trial and always should have. Whether Zimmerman ultimately goes free or not, this case clearly warranted further investigation than what was done prior to the protests.
WTF?
Sucker punching a dude when he just wants to find out what you are up to goes beyond standing your ground. Without the sucker punch they both are still alive.
Sucker punching a dude when he just wants to find out what you are up to goes beyond standing your ground. Without the sucker punch they both are still alive.
What makes you believe there even was a sucker punch? Because Z says so, lol? Why couldn't have Martin punched his nose when they were on the ground & he was supposedly on top of him? It's interesting that even tho noone has said so far that they know or saw how the fight started, you seem to automatically believe what the shooter & only 1 left alive says.
Sucker punching a dude when he just wants to find out what you are up to goes beyond standing your ground. Without the sucker punch they both are still alive.
What makes you believe there even was a sucker punch? Because Z says so, lol? Why couldn't have Martin punched his nose when they were on the ground & he was supposedly on top of him? It's interesting that even tho noone has said so far that they know or saw how the fight started, you seem to automatically believe what the shooter & only 1 left alive says.
Sucker punching a dude when he just wants to find out what you are up to goes beyond standing your ground. Without the sucker punch they both are still alive.
How exactly is Martin to know what Zimmerman "wants" when he is being followed by an unidentified, grown man at night? Is he just supposed to understand Zimmerman's "innocent" actions towards him? How? Under what pretense?
Would you stop and talk to a man who you do not know and who you potentially feel threatened by? I know I wouldn't.
How do you know that's exactly what went down? Did anyone witness a "sucker" punch? Is it only because Zimmerman said so? What if Martin had a different version of events?
Unfortunately, Martin is not around to tell his story. That's why this needs to go to trial. A young man is dead for committing no crime.
Sucker punching a dude when he just wants to find out what you are up to goes beyond standing your ground. Without the sucker punch they both are still alive.
How exactly is Martin to know what Zimmerman "wants" when he is being followed by an unidentified, grown man at night? Is he just supposed to understand Zimmerman's "innocent" actions towards him? How? Under what pretense?
Would you stop and talk to a man who you do not know and who you potentially feel threatened by? I know I wouldn't.
How do you know that's exactly what went down? Did anyone witness a "sucker" punch? Is it only because Zimmerman said so? What if Martin had a different version of events?
Unfortunately, Martin is not around to tell his story. That's why this needs to go to trial. A young man is dead for committing no crime.
What makes you believe there even was a sucker punch? Because Z says so, lol? Why couldn't have Martin punched his nose when they were on the ground & he was supposedly on top of him? It's interesting that even tho noone has said so far that they know or saw how the fight started, you seem to automatically believe what the shooter & only 1 left alive says.
A sucker punch is usually what it takes to break somones nose. Much harder for a fist to get to the nose if the hand gets in the way.
What makes you believe there even was a sucker punch? Because Z says so, lol? Why couldn't have Martin punched his nose when they were on the ground & he was supposedly on top of him? It's interesting that even tho noone has said so far that they know or saw how the fight started, you seem to automatically believe what the shooter & only 1 left alive says.
A sucker punch is usually what it takes to break somones nose. Much harder for a fist to get to the nose if the hand gets in the way.
How exactly is Martin to know what Zimmerman "wants" when he is being followed by an unidentified, grown man at night? Is he just supposed to understand Zimmerman's "innocent" actions towards him? How? Under what pretense?
Would you stop and talk to a man who you do not know and who you potentially feel threatened by? I know I wouldn't.
How do you know that's exactly what went down? Did anyone witness a "sucker" punch? Is it only because Zimmerman said so? What if Martin had a different version of events?
Unfortunately, Martin is not around to tell his story. That's why this needs to go to trial. A young man is dead for committing no crime.
You don't go around confronting people with your fists and then ask questions later. He had to have known that he was an unfamiliar in an unknown place. He had to have known that his presence may raise questions to people that live in the neighborhood.
When it becomes acceptable to swing first and ask questions later no matter what our whole society will suffer great concequences.
I do feel that he may have been scared when Z was following him. He may even have the right to punch him in the face and pin him to the ground while asking him what his intentions were. The second he crossed the line to slam his head into the pavement repeatedly is how you and I see things very differently. And I know that I am right and you're not right.
How exactly is Martin to know what Zimmerman "wants" when he is being followed by an unidentified, grown man at night? Is he just supposed to understand Zimmerman's "innocent" actions towards him? How? Under what pretense?
Would you stop and talk to a man who you do not know and who you potentially feel threatened by? I know I wouldn't.
How do you know that's exactly what went down? Did anyone witness a "sucker" punch? Is it only because Zimmerman said so? What if Martin had a different version of events?
Unfortunately, Martin is not around to tell his story. That's why this needs to go to trial. A young man is dead for committing no crime.
You don't go around confronting people with your fists and then ask questions later. He had to have known that he was an unfamiliar in an unknown place. He had to have known that his presence may raise questions to people that live in the neighborhood.
When it becomes acceptable to swing first and ask questions later no matter what our whole society will suffer great concequences.
I do feel that he may have been scared when Z was following him. He may even have the right to punch him in the face and pin him to the ground while asking him what his intentions were. The second he crossed the line to slam his head into the pavement repeatedly is how you and I see things very differently. And I know that I am right and you're not right.
A sucker punch is usually what it takes to break somones nose. Much harder for a fist to get to the nose if the hand gets in the way.
You are grossly in error in your assessment of facial trauma. It does not take a lot of force to break someone's nose. In addition, there are a variety of ways to fracture the nasal bones, not just a "sucker" punch".
A sucker punch is usually what it takes to break somones nose. Much harder for a fist to get to the nose if the hand gets in the way.
You are grossly in error in your assessment of facial trauma. It does not take a lot of force to break someone's nose. In addition, there are a variety of ways to fracture the nasal bones, not just a "sucker" punch".
You don't go around confronting people with your fists and then ask questions later. He had to have known that he was an unfamiliar in an unknown place. He had to have known that his presence may raise questions to people that live in the neighborhood.
When it becomes acceptable to swing first and ask questions later no matter what our whole society will suffer great concequences.
I do feel that he may have been scared when Z was following him. He may even have the right to punch him in the face and pin him to the ground while asking him what his intentions were. The second he crossed the line to slam his head into the pavement repeatedly is how you and I see things very differently. And I know that I am right and you're not right.
Wow. Please tell me you are not actually in law enforcement? That is scary commentary.
You don't go around confronting people with your fists and then ask questions later. He had to have known that he was an unfamiliar in an unknown place. He had to have known that his presence may raise questions to people that live in the neighborhood.
When it becomes acceptable to swing first and ask questions later no matter what our whole society will suffer great concequences.
I do feel that he may have been scared when Z was following him. He may even have the right to punch him in the face and pin him to the ground while asking him what his intentions were. The second he crossed the line to slam his head into the pavement repeatedly is how you and I see things very differently. And I know that I am right and you're not right.
Wow. Please tell me you are not actually in law enforcement? That is scary commentary.
You are grossly in error in your assessment of facial trauma. It does not take a lot of force to break someone's nose. In addition, there are a variety of ways to fracture the nasal bones, not just a "sucker" punch".
Conjecture.
You don't know if I'm in error or not. My assessment could be very accurate. You're right. It doesn't take a serious blow to break the cartilage in the nose, but that doesn't mean anything. There is nothing to contradict Zimmermans story, which is in essence my story.
I am right about the head slamming. Once he started slamming Z's head into the sidewalk he crossed the line.
You are grossly in error in your assessment of facial trauma. It does not take a lot of force to break someone's nose. In addition, there are a variety of ways to fracture the nasal bones, not just a "sucker" punch".
Conjecture.
You don't know if I'm in error or not. My assessment could be very accurate. You're right. It doesn't take a serious blow to break the cartilage in the nose, but that doesn't mean anything. There is nothing to contradict Zimmermans story, which is in essence my story.
I am right about the head slamming. Once he started slamming Z's head into the sidewalk he crossed the line.
Based on your opinion nothing on the 911 call contradicts his story.
I came up with 15+ different holes in Z's story, which I have presented to you and you immediately chose to deny based on your opinions.
It's going to be opinion vs opinion in this trial. We will see who's opinion is more believable.
I'm curious to see what the prosecution has up their sleeve to believe that they have a chance to get a conviction.
Its difficult to take you seriously when you paint Zimmerman as a racist as well as all Republicans.
Zimmerman reportedly menors a couple of black kids and goes out of his way to do so. Republicans, unlike democrats don't oppress minorities with their policies.
Based on your opinion nothing on the 911 call contradicts his story.
I came up with 15+ different holes in Z's story, which I have presented to you and you immediately chose to deny based on your opinions.
It's going to be opinion vs opinion in this trial. We will see who's opinion is more believable.
I'm curious to see what the prosecution has up their sleeve to believe that they have a chance to get a conviction.
Its difficult to take you seriously when you paint Zimmerman as a racist as well as all Republicans.
Zimmerman reportedly menors a couple of black kids and goes out of his way to do so. Republicans, unlike democrats don't oppress minorities with their policies.
Its difficult to take you seriously when you paint Zimmerman as a racist as well as all Republicans.
Zimmerman reportedly menors a couple of black kids and goes out of his way to do so. Republicans, unlike democrats don't oppress minorities with their policies.
I believe the solid majority of republicans are. There are republicans out there like Ron Paul who are not. My family is filled with republicans. My favorite uncle is a republican and he's married to a black chick. Finding a republican that's not racist is like seeing an albino man or native american family at red lobster. It's very rare.
Democrats don't oppress shit. Democrats are just bad parents that's all. They spoil people and make people depend on the government too much with their spoiled rotten policies. That doesn't make democrats bad people. It's just means they suck at parenting.
Its difficult to take you seriously when you paint Zimmerman as a racist as well as all Republicans.
Zimmerman reportedly menors a couple of black kids and goes out of his way to do so. Republicans, unlike democrats don't oppress minorities with their policies.
I believe the solid majority of republicans are. There are republicans out there like Ron Paul who are not. My family is filled with republicans. My favorite uncle is a republican and he's married to a black chick. Finding a republican that's not racist is like seeing an albino man or native american family at red lobster. It's very rare.
Democrats don't oppress shit. Democrats are just bad parents that's all. They spoil people and make people depend on the government too much with their spoiled rotten policies. That doesn't make democrats bad people. It's just means they suck at parenting.
I believe the solid majority of republicans are. There are republicans out there like Ron Paul who are not. My family is filled with republicans. My favorite uncle is a republican and he's married to a black chick. Finding a republican that's not racist is like seeing an albino man or native american family at red lobster. It's very rare.
Democrats don't oppress shit. Democrats are just bad parents that's all. They spoil people and make people depend on the government too much with their spoiled rotten policies. That doesn't make democrats bad people. It's just means they suck at parenting.
I believe the solid majority of republicans are. There are republicans out there like Ron Paul who are not. My family is filled with republicans. My favorite uncle is a republican and he's married to a black chick. Finding a republican that's not racist is like seeing an albino man or native american family at red lobster. It's very rare.
Democrats don't oppress shit. Democrats are just bad parents that's all. They spoil people and make people depend on the government too much with their spoiled rotten policies. That doesn't make democrats bad people. It's just means they suck at parenting.
Affirmative action is intended to promote equal opportunity. I’m undecided on affirmative action. I see it hurts and helps. Just like the rooney rule. I think it hurts more than it helps though in today’s times.
Every time I think we are evolving as a country, like I did when Obama was elected, I see racism get worse and think we need affirmative action.
If republicans would stop being bigots and racist and stop thinking the south will rise again and democrats would stop trying to baby people. We wouldn’t need affirmative action policies or food stamps.
Affirmative action is intended to promote equal opportunity. I’m undecided on affirmative action. I see it hurts and helps. Just like the rooney rule. I think it hurts more than it helps though in today’s times.
Every time I think we are evolving as a country, like I did when Obama was elected, I see racism get worse and think we need affirmative action.
If republicans would stop being bigots and racist and stop thinking the south will rise again and democrats would stop trying to baby people. We wouldn’t need affirmative action policies or food stamps.
He clearly suffers from grandiosity, which refers to an unrealistic sense of superiority, a sustained view of oneself as better than others.
Bowlslit exaggerates capacity in an unrealistic way This narcissist believes that he knows what happened on 26-Feb-2012 and keeps on making assumptions.
Here is a short list of his assumptions =============================
There is nothing to contradict Zimmermans story, which is in essence my story.
The second he crossed the line to slam his head into the pavement repeatedly is how you and I see things very differently. And I know that I am right and you're not right.
Based on that shoddy affidavit there should be no trial and this will get uglier than we've ever imagined.
Nothing on the 911 call contradicts his account. Nothing.
He clearly suffers from grandiosity, which refers to an unrealistic sense of superiority, a sustained view of oneself as better than others.
Bowlslit exaggerates capacity in an unrealistic way This narcissist believes that he knows what happened on 26-Feb-2012 and keeps on making assumptions.
Here is a short list of his assumptions =============================
There is nothing to contradict Zimmermans story, which is in essence my story.
The second he crossed the line to slam his head into the pavement repeatedly is how you and I see things very differently. And I know that I am right and you're not right.
Based on that shoddy affidavit there should be no trial and this will get uglier than we've ever imagined.
Nothing on the 911 call contradicts his account. Nothing.
I'm guilty on making assumptions as well. I think both sides are. This case is going to be decided in court with assumptions and opinions.
The people who see it from Z’s side have Z’s point of view and think Z was a victim and believe Z's account and interpret the 911 call in a different way than most and there is some racial element to it as well.
The people who see it from M’s point of view see themselves as M and believe M had every right to do what he was doing and be where he was and see holes in Z’s story.
I believe if any man approaches me the way Z did, I’m taking his ass out because the only people who have the right to target, talk to me and profile me are people with law enforcement credentials.
I'm guilty on making assumptions as well. I think both sides are. This case is going to be decided in court with assumptions and opinions.
The people who see it from Z’s side have Z’s point of view and think Z was a victim and believe Z's account and interpret the 911 call in a different way than most and there is some racial element to it as well.
The people who see it from M’s point of view see themselves as M and believe M had every right to do what he was doing and be where he was and see holes in Z’s story.
I believe if any man approaches me the way Z did, I’m taking his ass out because the only people who have the right to target, talk to me and profile me are people with law enforcement credentials.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.