• Forums
  • Best Betting Sites
  • Sportsbook Promos
  • Best Sports Betting Apps
  • NFL Betting Forum
  • NBA Betting Forum
  • MLB Betting Forum
  • NHL Betting Forum
  • NCAAF Betting Forum
  • NCAAB Betting Forum
  • Soccer Betting Forum
  • Tennis Betting Forum
  • General Discussion
  • Help Forum
  • Guidelines
  • FAQ
  • Forum Updates
    Covers Logo
    Covers App
    Faster picks. Smarter bets.
    All in the NEW Covers App
    Download on the App Store Download on the Google Play Store
    • Sports
      • NFL
        • Back
        • NFL
        • NFL Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NFL Picks
        • Weather
        • Injuries
      • NCAAF
        • Back
        • NCAAF
        • NCAAF Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NCAAF Picks
        • Weather
        • Injuries
      • NBA
        • Back
        • NBA
        • NBA Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NBA Picks
        • Injuries
      • NCAAB
        • Back
        • NCAAB
        • NCAAB Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • NCAAB Picks
        • Injuries
      • MLB
        • Back
        • MLB
        • MLB Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • MLB Picks
        • Weather
        • Injuries
      • NHL
        • Back
        • NHL
        • NHL Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NHL Picks
        • Injuries
      • Soccer
      • UFC
      • WNBA
        • Back
        • WNBA
        • WNBA Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • WNBA Picks
        • Injuries
      • CFL
        • Back
        • CFL
        • CFL Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • CFL Picks
      • Golf
        • Back
        • Golf
        • Golf Home
        • Golf Odds
        • Masters Odds
        • PGA Championship Odds
        • US Open Odds
        • British Open Odds
        • Ryder Cup Odds
        • Golf Picks
    • Odds
      • All Odds
      • NFL
      • NCAAF
      • NBA
      • NCAAB
      • MLB
      • NHL
      • Golf
      • Soccer Odds
        • Back
        • Soccer Odds
        • MLS Odds
        • Champions League Odds
        • Premier League Odds
      • UFC
      • WNBA
      • CFL
      • Election Odds
      • Futures
        • Back
        • Futures
        • NFL
        • NBA
        • MLB
        • NHL
        • NCAAB
        • NCAAF
      • Sports Odds History
    • Picks
      • All Picks
      • NFL
      • NBA
      • NHL
      • MLB
      • NCAAF
      • NCAAB
      • Golf
      • WNBA
      • CFL
      • User Picks
      • Team User Picks
      • Consensus Picks
        • Back
        • Consensus Picks
        • All Consensus Picks
        • NFL
        • NBA
        • NHL
        • MLB
        • NCAAF
        • NCAAB
        • CFL
        • WNBA
        • Consensus FAQ
        • Public Money
    • Prop Projections
      • NFL
      • NBA
      • MLB
      • NHL
    • Betting
      • US Betting Sites
      • Canada Betting Sites
      • Sportsbook Reviews
      • States
        • Back
        • States
        • US Legal Tracker
        • Revenue Tracker
        • Arizona
        • Arkansas
        • California
        • Colorado
        • Connecticut
        • DC
        • Florida
        • Georgia
        • Illinois
        • Indiana
        • Iowa
        • Kansas
        • Kentucky
        • Louisiana
        • Maine
        • Maryland
        • Massachusetts
        • Michigan
        • Mississippi
        • Missouri
        • Nevada
        • New Hampshire
        • New Jersey
        • New York
        • North Carolina
        • Ohio
        • Oregon
        • Pennsylvania
        • Tennessee
        • Texas
        • Vermont
        • Virginia
        • West Virginia
        • Wyoming
      • Provinces
        • Back
        • Provinces
        • Alberta
        • British Columbia
        • Manitoba
        • New Brunswick
        • Newfoundland and Labrador
        • Northwest Territories
        • Nova Scotia
        • Nunavut
        • Ontario
        • Prince Edward Island
        • Quebec (English)
        • Quebec (francais)
        • Saskatchewan
        • Yukon
      • By Sport
        • Back
        • By Sport
        • Baseball
        • Basketball
        • Boxing
        • College Football
        • F1
        • Football
        • Super Bowl
        • Golf
        • Hockey
        • Horse Racing
        • March Madness
        • Soccer
        • UFC
        • World Cup
      • Betting Apps
        • Back
        • Betting Apps
        • Best Sports Betting Apps USA
        • Ontario Sports Betting Apps
      • Rest of World
        • Back
        • Rest of World
        • UK Betting Offers
          • Back
          • UK Betting Offers
          • UK Betting Sites
          • bet365 Bonus Code UK
          • 888Sport Promo Code UK
          • William Hill Sign up Offer
          • Betway Sign up Offer
          • BetVictor Bonus Code UK
      • Betting Guides
        • Back
        • Betting Guides
        • All Guides
        • Glossary
        • Betting Calculators
          • Back
          • Betting Calculators
          • Odds Converter
          • Parlay Calculator
        • Futures Betting Guide
        • Moneyline Betting Guide
        • Over/Under Betting Guide
        • Parlay Betting Guide
        • Point Spread Betting Guide
        • Prop Betting Guide
        • Sports Betting Guides
          • Back
          • Sports Betting Guides
          • How To Bet On Sports Guide
          • NFL Betting Guide
          • NHL Betting Guide
          • NBA Betting Guide
          • MLB Betting Guide
          • NCAAB Betting Guide
          • NCAAF Betting Guide
          • Golf Betting Guide
          • Tennis Betting Guide
        • Teaser Betting Guide
      • Betting News
        • Back
        • Betting News
        • All News
        • Industry News
        • Podcasts
        • Covers Videos
        • Covers Writers
        • Offers & Boosts
    • Promos
      • Sportsbook Promos
      • Canada Sportsbook Promos
      • Bonuses By Sportsbook
        • Back
        • Bonuses By Sportsbook
        • bet365 Bonus Code
        • BET99 Promo Code
        • BetMGM Bonus Code
        • BetRivers Bonus Code
        • Caesars Sportsbook Promo
        • DraftKings Promo Code
        • Fanatics Sportsbook Promo
        • FanDuel Promo Code
        • Hard Rock Bet Promo Code
        • Sports Interaction Promo
        • Stake Promo Code
        • theScore Bet Promo Code
        • TonyBet Promo Code
      • Bonuses By Region
        • Back
        • Bonuses By Region
        • Arkansas Promos
        • Arizona Promos
        • Colorado Promos
        • Connecticut Promos
        • DC Promos
        • Illinois Promos
        • Indiana Promos
        • Iowa Promos
        • Kansas Promos
        • Kentucky Promos
        • Louisiana Promos
        • Maine Promos
        • Maryland Promos
        • Massachusetts Promos
        • Michigan Promos
        • Missouri Promos
        • New Jersey Promos
        • New York Promos
        • North Carolina Promos
        • Ohio Promos
        • Pennsylvania Promos
        • Tennessee Promos
        • Vermont Promos
        • Virginia Promos
        • West Virginia Promos
        • Wyoming Promos
    • Forum & Contests
      • All Forums
      • NFL Betting Forum
      • MLB Betting Forum
      • NCAAB Betting Forum
      • NCAAF Betting Forum
      • NBA Betting Forum
      • NHL Betting Forum
      • Soccer Betting Forum
      • Contests
        • Back
        • Contests
        • Contests Home
        • Streak Survivor
        • King of Covers
        • My Contests
    • Casino
      • Sweepstakes Casino
        • Back
        • Sweepstakes Casino
        • Sweepstakes Casino
        • Sweepstakes No-Deposit Bonuses
        • Sweepstakes Promos
          • Back
          • Sweepstakes Promos
          • Card Crush
          • Casino.click
          • Chanced Casino
          • Crown Coins Casino
          • FreeSpin Casino
          • LoneStar
          • McLuck
          • Mega Bonanza Casino
          • PlayFame
          • Pulsz
          • Stake.us
      • US Casinos
        • Back
        • US Casinos
        • US Online Casinos
        • US Online Casino Bonuses
        • Casino Promos
          • Back
          • Casino Promos
          • bet365 Casino Promo Code
          • BetRivers Casino Promo
          • Borgata Casino Bonus Code
          • Caesars Casino Bonus Code
          • DraftKings Casino Promo
          • Fanatics Casino Promo
          • FanDuel Casino Promo Code
          • Golden Nugget Casino Promo
          • Hard Rock Bet Casino Promo
          • Hollywood Casino Promo Code
      • Canada Casinos
        • Back
        • Canada Casinos
        • Canada Online Casinos
        • Provinces
          • Back
          • Provinces
          • Alberta Online Casino
          • BC Online Casino
          • Ontario Online Casinos
        • Casino Promos
          • Back
          • Casino Promos
          • BC.GAME Bonus Code
          • Cloudbet Promo Code
          • RainBet Promo Code
          • Roobet Promo Code
          • Shuffle Promo Code
          • Thrill Promo Code
    • Prediction Markets
      • Prediction Markets
      • Prediction Market Apps
      • Prediction Market Promos
      • Kalshi Promo Code
      • Kalshi Referral Code
      • Polymarket Promo Code
      • Polymarket Referral Code
      • DraftKings Predictions Promo Code
      • Novig Promo Code
      • ProphetX Promo Code
      • Underdog Promo Code
      • Betr Promo Code
      • OG Promo Code
      • Fanatics Markets Promo Code
      • Plus500 Promo Code
      • Gemini Predictions Promo Code
    • NFL Week 3
      NFL Week 3
      • NFL Odds
      • NFL Picks
      • NFL Prediction Markets
      • NFL Betting Sites
    Covers Account
    Log in Create account
    Join free Log in
    All Forums | Politics

    James Shields getting screwed by taxes.

    123 Next Last»
    bowlslit
    I_Need_A_Detox
    Danrules24
    eeyore76
    mattbrot
    ...
    Participants:
    Search
    Views: 1283
    Posts: 55
    123 Next Last»
     
    bowlslit
    bowlslit
    Banned
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Oct, 2008
    Posts: 5625
    Posted: Feb. 12, 2015 - 10:08 PM ET #1

    https://sports.yahoo.com/blogs/mlb-big-league-stew/james-shields-will-get-less-than--40m-from-his--75m-contract-after-taxes-190227192.html


    Does the goobermint really need that much?
    Reply
    To remove first post, remove entire topic.
    https://sports.yahoo.com/blogs/mlb-big-league-stew/james-shields-will-get-less-than--40m-from-his--75m-contract-after-taxes-190227192.html


    Does the goobermint really need that much?
     
    I_Need_A_Detox
    I_Need_A_Detox
    Banned
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Feb, 2011
    Posts: 27139
    Posted: Feb. 12, 2015 - 10:54 PM ET #2


    I'll be sure to keep him in my prayers. 
    Reply

    I'll be sure to keep him in my prayers. 
     
    Danrules24
    Danrules24
    Captain
    Participation Meter
    Joined: May, 2012
    Posts: 5921
    Posted: Feb. 13, 2015 - 1:22 AM ET #3

    As I understand it, players have to pay taxes in each state they play/earn money in. Players on teams that play in the NL West pay more because they not only pay for their home games, in this case SD, but they will play more games in CA since they have LA and SF in their division. A player on the Rangers gets half his salary at no state income tax since Texas has no state income taxes (assuming the player lives in texas).

    Either way, I'm sure Shields will be just fine and to answer the question, yes the govt does need that much due to govt waste and overspending. Now if you asked if the govt should steal that much from him, well that's different.

    Stay disciplined and manage your bankroll
    Reply

    As I understand it, players have to pay taxes in each state they play/earn money in. Players on teams that play in the NL West pay more because they not only pay for their home games, in this case SD, but they will play more games in CA since they have LA and SF in their division. A player on the Rangers gets half his salary at no state income tax since Texas has no state income taxes (assuming the player lives in texas).

    Either way, I'm sure Shields will be just fine and to answer the question, yes the govt does need that much due to govt waste and overspending. Now if you asked if the govt should steal that much from him, well that's different.

     
    eeyore76
    eeyore76
    All-Star
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Aug, 2005
    Posts: 11129
    Posted: Feb. 13, 2015 - 8:28 AM ET #4

      nailed it Dan

    Reply
      nailed it Dan

     
    mattbrot
    mattbrot
    Captain
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jan, 2005
    Posts: 6840
    Posted: Feb. 13, 2015 - 10:35 AM ET #5

    I do not understand the question. Focus on the % he is paying and not on the absolute dollar amount. 

    He makes a sh!t ton of money. So by definition he will pay a sh!t ton in taxes 
    Reply
    I do not understand the question. Focus on the % he is paying and not on the absolute dollar amount. 

    He makes a sh!t ton of money. So by definition he will pay a sh!t ton in taxes 
     
    bowlslit
    bowlslit
    Banned
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Oct, 2008
    Posts: 5625
    Posted: Feb. 13, 2015 - 11:02 AM ET #6

    Quote Originally Posted by mattbrot:

    I do not understand the question. Focus on the % he is paying and not on the absolute dollar amount. 

    He makes a sh!t ton of money. So by definition he will pay a sh!t ton in taxes 

    It's so easy to say that when it's someone else. 

    If that were you things would be different.

    Just for the record...you lean left on this issue too. We'll be keeping track mr independent. ; )
    Reply
    Quote Originally Posted by mattbrot:

    I do not understand the question. Focus on the % he is paying and not on the absolute dollar amount. 

    He makes a sh!t ton of money. So by definition he will pay a sh!t ton in taxes 

    It's so easy to say that when it's someone else. 

    If that were you things would be different.

    Just for the record...you lean left on this issue too. We'll be keeping track mr independent. ; )
     
    mattbrot
    mattbrot
    Captain
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jan, 2005
    Posts: 6840
    Posted: Feb. 13, 2015 - 11:09 AM ET #7

    Quote Originally Posted by bowlslit:


    It's so easy to say that when it's someone else. 

    If that were you things would be different.

    Just for the record...you lean left on this issue too. We'll be keeping track mr independent. ; )

    Bowl -- I really do not get it. So because he makes a lot of $ and in turn pays a larger absolute amount of $ in taxes means that his % should be adjusted so that he pays a smaller %age? 

    strange to say the least.

    does that mean that people who make much 25k a year should actually be paying a larger %age since their absolute $ amount is less?
    Reply
    Quote Originally Posted by bowlslit:


    It's so easy to say that when it's someone else. 

    If that were you things would be different.

    Just for the record...you lean left on this issue too. We'll be keeping track mr independent. ; )

    Bowl -- I really do not get it. So because he makes a lot of $ and in turn pays a larger absolute amount of $ in taxes means that his % should be adjusted so that he pays a smaller %age? 

    strange to say the least.

    does that mean that people who make much 25k a year should actually be paying a larger %age since their absolute $ amount is less?
     
    mattbrot
    mattbrot
    Captain
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jan, 2005
    Posts: 6840
    Posted: Feb. 13, 2015 - 11:12 AM ET #8

    And how is this a right or left thing? We are not discussing the if he should be paying at a higher tax rate etc. Those are right / left issues.

    This is just saying that his absolute contribution is going to be high by the very definition that his income is very high.

    30% (or whatever rate he pays) of 75 mil is by definition more than 30% of 50K.

    Basic stuff man.
    Reply
    And how is this a right or left thing? We are not discussing the if he should be paying at a higher tax rate etc. Those are right / left issues.

    This is just saying that his absolute contribution is going to be high by the very definition that his income is very high.

    30% (or whatever rate he pays) of 75 mil is by definition more than 30% of 50K.

    Basic stuff man.
     
    mattbrot
    mattbrot
    Captain
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jan, 2005
    Posts: 6840
    Posted: Feb. 13, 2015 - 11:14 AM ET #9

    sometimes I wonder if you are just pulling bits and schtick on us and the last laugh is on me for continuing to get sucked in. 
    Reply
    sometimes I wonder if you are just pulling bits and schtick on us and the last laugh is on me for continuing to get sucked in. 
     
    bowlslit
    bowlslit
    Banned
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Oct, 2008
    Posts: 5625
    Posted: Feb. 13, 2015 - 11:24 AM ET #10

    Quote Originally Posted by mattbrot:


    Bowl -- I really do not get it. So because he makes a lot of $ and in turn pays a larger absolute amount of $ in taxes means that his % should be adjusted so that he pays a smaller %age? 

    strange to say the least.

    does that mean that people who make much 25k a year should actually be paying a larger %age since their absolute $ amount is less?


    Of course you would like to deflect on the percentage he is paying because he is paying close to 50%.

    Are you paying 50% right now? Would you think 50% is fair?

    Just because he makes a high amount that makes us drool does not mean that is fair or equitable.

    As I said...if you had to write out and sign his tax check you would probably be sick inside too.

    It's funny how you libs don't have a problem showing emotion for death row inmates but distance yourself as far as possible from rich people.
    Reply
    Quote Originally Posted by mattbrot:


    Bowl -- I really do not get it. So because he makes a lot of $ and in turn pays a larger absolute amount of $ in taxes means that his % should be adjusted so that he pays a smaller %age? 

    strange to say the least.

    does that mean that people who make much 25k a year should actually be paying a larger %age since their absolute $ amount is less?


    Of course you would like to deflect on the percentage he is paying because he is paying close to 50%.

    Are you paying 50% right now? Would you think 50% is fair?

    Just because he makes a high amount that makes us drool does not mean that is fair or equitable.

    As I said...if you had to write out and sign his tax check you would probably be sick inside too.

    It's funny how you libs don't have a problem showing emotion for death row inmates but distance yourself as far as possible from rich people.
     
    ClubDirt
    ClubDirt
    Hall of Fame
    Participation Meter
    Joined: May, 2003
    Posts: 28196
    Posted: Feb. 13, 2015 - 11:33 AM ET #11

    i'm not sure what the death penalty has to do with this discussion, but put me down for feeling more sympathetic for these death row inmates than james shields.

    https://www.deathpenaltyinfo.org/innocence-list-those-freed-death-row
    Reply
    i'm not sure what the death penalty has to do with this discussion, but put me down for feeling more sympathetic for these death row inmates than james shields.

    https://www.deathpenaltyinfo.org/innocence-list-those-freed-death-row
     
    Danrules24
    Danrules24
    Captain
    Participation Meter
    Joined: May, 2012
    Posts: 5921
    Posted: Feb. 13, 2015 - 11:42 AM ET #12

    I think Shields would gladly give up some of that money for a decent defensive OF once he sees the current liabilities that will be roaming the SD outfield. 
    Stay disciplined and manage your bankroll
    Reply
    I think Shields would gladly give up some of that money for a decent defensive OF once he sees the current liabilities that will be roaming the SD outfield. 
     
    Ktrain
    Ktrain
    Captain
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Oct, 2009
    Posts: 6580
    Posted: Feb. 13, 2015 - 1:01 PM ET #13

    Quote Originally Posted by bowlslit:

    https://sports.yahoo.com/blogs/mlb-big-league-stew/james-shields-will-get-less-than--40m-from-his--75m-contract-after-taxes-190227192.html


    Does the goobermint really need that much?

    Do you actually read the articles that you link? Do you actually read the articles/papers that your links reference? 
    Reply
    Quote Originally Posted by bowlslit:

    https://sports.yahoo.com/blogs/mlb-big-league-stew/james-shields-will-get-less-than--40m-from-his--75m-contract-after-taxes-190227192.html


    Does the goobermint really need that much?

    Do you actually read the articles that you link? Do you actually read the articles/papers that your links reference? 
     
    bowlslit
    bowlslit
    Banned
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Oct, 2008
    Posts: 5625
    Posted: Feb. 13, 2015 - 1:11 PM ET #14

    Quote Originally Posted by Ktrain:


    Do you actually read the articles that you link? Do you actually read the articles/papers that your links reference? 


    Absolutely,

    Why don't you just quit poossyfooting around and cut to the chase.

    Did you have a specific question for me?
    Reply
    Quote Originally Posted by Ktrain:


    Do you actually read the articles that you link? Do you actually read the articles/papers that your links reference? 


    Absolutely,

    Why don't you just quit poossyfooting around and cut to the chase.

    Did you have a specific question for me?
     
    Ktrain
    Ktrain
    Captain
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Oct, 2009
    Posts: 6580
    Posted: Feb. 13, 2015 - 1:29 PM ET #15

    Quote Originally Posted by bowlslit:



    Absolutely,

    Why don't you just quit poossyfooting around and cut to the chase.

    Did you have a specific question for me?

    Somehow I doubt that. 

    Why do you think Shields took the Padres offer? 


    Reply
    Quote Originally Posted by bowlslit:



    Absolutely,

    Why don't you just quit poossyfooting around and cut to the chase.

    Did you have a specific question for me?

    Somehow I doubt that. 

    Why do you think Shields took the Padres offer? 


     
    bowlslit
    bowlslit
    Banned
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Oct, 2008
    Posts: 5625
    Posted: Feb. 13, 2015 - 1:35 PM ET #16

    Quote Originally Posted by Ktrain:


    Somehow I doubt that. 

    Why do you think Shields took the Padres offer? 




    You've been wrong before...you're young....and lean left its allowed...and rather expected.

    He took the offer probably because it was the highest offer and his tax % would be the same regardless.

    Like I said if it was you cutting the check I think you'd suddenly agree with me.




    Reply
    Quote Originally Posted by Ktrain:


    Somehow I doubt that. 

    Why do you think Shields took the Padres offer? 




    You've been wrong before...you're young....and lean left its allowed...and rather expected.

    He took the offer probably because it was the highest offer and his tax % would be the same regardless.

    Like I said if it was you cutting the check I think you'd suddenly agree with me.




     
    Ktrain
    Ktrain
    Captain
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Oct, 2009
    Posts: 6580
    Posted: Feb. 13, 2015 - 1:44 PM ET #17

    Quote Originally Posted by bowlslit:



    You've been wrong before...you're young....and lean left its allowed...and rather expected.

    He took the offer probably because it was the highest offer and his tax % would be the same regardless.

    Like I said if it was you cutting the check I think you'd suddenly agree with me.





    I thought you said you read the articles and the links the articles provide? If you did, you wouldn't have to say "probably". You would know the specific reasons why Shields chose the Padres over a team like the Cubs. 

    Bowl, we've all been wrong before and we will all be wrong again in this life time. The difference is most people try to learn from being wrong, you seem to double down on it. Not everything in this world deals in leaning left or right. 
    Reply
    Quote Originally Posted by bowlslit:



    You've been wrong before...you're young....and lean left its allowed...and rather expected.

    He took the offer probably because it was the highest offer and his tax % would be the same regardless.

    Like I said if it was you cutting the check I think you'd suddenly agree with me.





    I thought you said you read the articles and the links the articles provide? If you did, you wouldn't have to say "probably". You would know the specific reasons why Shields chose the Padres over a team like the Cubs. 

    Bowl, we've all been wrong before and we will all be wrong again in this life time. The difference is most people try to learn from being wrong, you seem to double down on it. Not everything in this world deals in leaning left or right. 
     
    Ktrain
    Ktrain
    Captain
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Oct, 2009
    Posts: 6580
    Posted: Feb. 13, 2015 - 2:37 PM ET #18

    https://www.covers.com/postingforum/post01/showmessage.aspx?spt=87&sub=102065728&page=3

    Post 75.

    Bowl, you consider 45% to be a "fair" amount for the government to take. Personally I think this is too high, but that's another debate. 

    In this thread, you contend that 50% is too high for someone to pay. 

    Can you elaborate on the difference of that extra 5% please? What makes 45% fair and 50% too high? 
    Reply
    https://www.covers.com/postingforum/post01/showmessage.aspx?spt=87&sub=102065728&page=3

    Post 75.

    Bowl, you consider 45% to be a "fair" amount for the government to take. Personally I think this is too high, but that's another debate. 

    In this thread, you contend that 50% is too high for someone to pay. 

    Can you elaborate on the difference of that extra 5% please? What makes 45% fair and 50% too high? 
     
    bowlslit
    bowlslit
    Banned
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Oct, 2008
    Posts: 5625
    Posted: Feb. 13, 2015 - 2:40 PM ET #19

    Quote Originally Posted by Ktrain:


    I thought you said you read the articles and the links the articles provide? If you did, you wouldn't have to say "probably". You would know the specific reasons why Shields chose the Padres over a team like the Cubs. 

    Bowl, we've all been wrong before and we will all be wrong again in this life time. The difference is most people try to learn from being wrong, you seem to double down on it. Not everything in this world deals in leaning left or right. 


    So because I used the word probably then you absolutely believe I didn't read the article.

    Talk about hypocrite.

    I can promise you that I read the article before I posted it. Why does it even matter. I believe he is getting screwed on his taxes...federal and state taxes regardless of him taking the deal.

    He is getting screwed and only a liberal hack would disagree.
    Reply
    Quote Originally Posted by Ktrain:


    I thought you said you read the articles and the links the articles provide? If you did, you wouldn't have to say "probably". You would know the specific reasons why Shields chose the Padres over a team like the Cubs. 

    Bowl, we've all been wrong before and we will all be wrong again in this life time. The difference is most people try to learn from being wrong, you seem to double down on it. Not everything in this world deals in leaning left or right. 


    So because I used the word probably then you absolutely believe I didn't read the article.

    Talk about hypocrite.

    I can promise you that I read the article before I posted it. Why does it even matter. I believe he is getting screwed on his taxes...federal and state taxes regardless of him taking the deal.

    He is getting screwed and only a liberal hack would disagree.
     
    bowlslit
    bowlslit
    Banned
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Oct, 2008
    Posts: 5625
    Posted: Feb. 13, 2015 - 2:43 PM ET #20

    Maybe he took the offer because hed rather be pooped on by San Diego Seagulls. I don't give a fuq about that.

    He is getting screwed by taxes and you even admitted you think it's high.

    All this other bs is just that...I never said he shouldn't have taken the deal.

    HE SHOULDN'T HAVE TO PAY 50% OF WHAT HE MAKES NO MATTER WHERE HE LIVES....

    YOU GET IT?
    Reply
    Maybe he took the offer because hed rather be pooped on by San Diego Seagulls. I don't give a fuq about that.

    He is getting screwed by taxes and you even admitted you think it's high.

    All this other bs is just that...I never said he shouldn't have taken the deal.

    HE SHOULDN'T HAVE TO PAY 50% OF WHAT HE MAKES NO MATTER WHERE HE LIVES....

    YOU GET IT?
     
    Ktrain
    Ktrain
    Captain
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Oct, 2009
    Posts: 6580
    Posted: Feb. 13, 2015 - 2:52 PM ET #21

    Quote Originally Posted by bowlslit:

    Maybe he took the offer because hed rather be pooped on by San Diego Seagulls. I don't give a fuq about that.

    He is getting screwed by taxes and you even admitted you think it's high.

    All this other bs is just that...I never said he shouldn't have taken the deal.

    HE SHOULDN'T HAVE TO PAY 50% OF WHAT HE MAKES NO MATTER WHERE HE LIVES....

    YOU GET IT?

    But 45% would be ok? 
    Reply
    Quote Originally Posted by bowlslit:

    Maybe he took the offer because hed rather be pooped on by San Diego Seagulls. I don't give a fuq about that.

    He is getting screwed by taxes and you even admitted you think it's high.

    All this other bs is just that...I never said he shouldn't have taken the deal.

    HE SHOULDN'T HAVE TO PAY 50% OF WHAT HE MAKES NO MATTER WHERE HE LIVES....

    YOU GET IT?

    But 45% would be ok? 
     
    mattbrot
    mattbrot
    Captain
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jan, 2005
    Posts: 6840
    Posted: Feb. 13, 2015 - 2:58 PM ET #22

    Bowl -- I applaud your commitment to being narrow minded and refusing to think outside of your box. and your commitment to sticking to the stance your started out with.  
    Reply
    Bowl -- I applaud your commitment to being narrow minded and refusing to think outside of your box. and your commitment to sticking to the stance your started out with.  
     
    Ktrain
    Ktrain
    Captain
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Oct, 2009
    Posts: 6580
    Posted: Feb. 13, 2015 - 2:58 PM ET #23

    Quote Originally Posted by bowlslit:



    So because I used the word probably then you absolutely believe I didn't read the article.

    Talk about hypocrite.

    I can promise you that I read the article before I posted it. Why does it even matter. I believe he is getting screwed on his taxes...federal and state taxes regardless of him taking the deal.

    He is getting screwed and only a liberal hack would disagree.


    You're right, why would reading the article that you referenced matter at all? Who cares what's inside that article or any explanation about what title means. That's all filler anyways! As long as the title says something, what else matters?!?!?

    Thanks Bowl, I didn't think anyone could make me laugh that much today. 

    Reply
    Quote Originally Posted by bowlslit:



    So because I used the word probably then you absolutely believe I didn't read the article.

    Talk about hypocrite.

    I can promise you that I read the article before I posted it. Why does it even matter. I believe he is getting screwed on his taxes...federal and state taxes regardless of him taking the deal.

    He is getting screwed and only a liberal hack would disagree.


    You're right, why would reading the article that you referenced matter at all? Who cares what's inside that article or any explanation about what title means. That's all filler anyways! As long as the title says something, what else matters?!?!?

    Thanks Bowl, I didn't think anyone could make me laugh that much today. 

     
    bowlslit
    bowlslit
    Banned
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Oct, 2008
    Posts: 5625
    Posted: Feb. 13, 2015 - 3:00 PM ET #24

    Quote Originally Posted by Ktrain:


    But 45% would be ok? 


    I said in another thread that 45 cents of every dollar is the limit where I lose the will to fight. I think it is high but I can accept it.

    I hope you saw that thread. I think you did.
    Reply
    Quote Originally Posted by Ktrain:


    But 45% would be ok? 


    I said in another thread that 45 cents of every dollar is the limit where I lose the will to fight. I think it is high but I can accept it.

    I hope you saw that thread. I think you did.
     
     
    bowlslit
    bowlslit
    Banned
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Oct, 2008
    Posts: 5625
    Posted: Feb. 13, 2015 - 3:04 PM ET #25

    Quote Originally Posted by mattbrot:

    Bowl -- I applaud your commitment to being narrow minded and refusing to think outside of your box. and your commitment to sticking to the stance your started out with.  


    I'm glad you joined the discussion. We could use another liberal voice in here.


    Reply
    Quote Originally Posted by mattbrot:

    Bowl -- I applaud your commitment to being narrow minded and refusing to think outside of your box. and your commitment to sticking to the stance your started out with.  


    I'm glad you joined the discussion. We could use another liberal voice in here.


    All Forums | Politics
    123 Next Last»

    Hot Forums IconHot Forum Topics

    • 🤢🥴💩_ Fubah's risky baseball bets _🥶😲🥵 449,931
    • Thursday 09/24/2026 686
    • I'm embarrassed for Trump supporters 58,440
    • Falcons vs Packers TNF in-game live 2,149
    • NFL LOCKED IN! 100,333
    • ***Macwesties * Thur. * Sun. Sept. 24, 27, 2026 * Week #3 * NFL Football Plays* 4,193
    • PART DEUX 339
    • Happening just recently . . . 34,755
    • NCAA FOOTBALL. 151 24,624
    • ?? KBO Plays 🥎 15,255

    Warning - External Link

    Report User

    Thank you for reporting
    This content is abusive or harmful
    This post is spam
    An error has occurred
    This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

    Delete Post

    Are you sure you would like to remove this post?

    Remove Thread

    Are you sure you would like to remove this thread?

    Scan Results

    Login/Register

    Happy to have you join the conversation. To do so, please login or create an account.
    Accounts are free and easy to create.

    Search


    Loading…

    Loading…

    About Us
    Contact Us
    Careers
    Our Team
    Brand
    Testimonials
    Betting Guides
    Sportsbook Reviews
    Betting News
    Podcasts
    Responsible Gambling
    Betting Sites
    US Betting Sites
    Canada Betting Sites
    Canada Casinos
    Best Betting Apps
    Contests
    Streak Survivor
    King of Covers
    Ultimate Race
    Office Pools
    The Covers community has
    810,221
    lifetime members worldwide
    Join our community today
    Covers 30 Years Logo Established in 1995,
    Covers is the world
    leader in sports
    betting information.
    21+
    Gambling problem? Call 1-800-GAMBLER
    Help Privacy Terms of Service Cookies Sitemap Forum
    YouTube logo
    Facebook logo
    Twitter logo
    Instagram logo
    LinkedIn logo
    Google News logo
    Covers is verified safe by:
    Evalon Logo Logo GPWA Logo GDPR logo Logo GeoTrust logo Logo PCI DSS logo Logo
    Copyright © 1995 - 2026 Genius Sports. All Rights Reserved.
    If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.