but the federal bailout of Fannie and Freddie is the beginning of the end for the US as a nation
privatizing profit and socializing risk
fannie and freddie have about 5.3 trillion in debt that is currently not on the USA's balance sheet (even though its implicitly guaranteed by the feds) and deficit of 9 trillion.......our GDP is roughly 14 trillion
what happens when we suddenly owe more than we're worth? or our debt is greater than our GDP?
-AAA credit rating becomes very questionable -those mortgage rates at 6% will jump 3-4 points -if you want to loan the us government money through the purchase of bonds you can probably get more than 4.3% (if you can find bonds to buy) on the 30 year which means...we can no longer just auction off $50b worth of notes on a wednesday b/c we need cash. the interest payments will be too great for the country to bear
i dont know if it's ever happened to a G8 country but this can trace back to when nixon took us off the gold standard because our debt was more than the amount of gold we had in reserves
read Panzner, read Nouriel Roubini, read Ron Paul
they know whats coming...cash is king. have a great sunday and dont let those talking heads on tv tell you this is a good thing. this is as awful as can possibly be. (aaaa1 and macman know what i'm talking about)
fannie and freddie are government sponsored sub prime lenders and should have never been authorized at all. they need to be dissolved and their assets auctioned off to the private sector. they cannot be politicized...for the long term economic health of the country, they mus be dissolved ASAP
0
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
but the federal bailout of Fannie and Freddie is the beginning of the end for the US as a nation
privatizing profit and socializing risk
fannie and freddie have about 5.3 trillion in debt that is currently not on the USA's balance sheet (even though its implicitly guaranteed by the feds) and deficit of 9 trillion.......our GDP is roughly 14 trillion
what happens when we suddenly owe more than we're worth? or our debt is greater than our GDP?
-AAA credit rating becomes very questionable -those mortgage rates at 6% will jump 3-4 points -if you want to loan the us government money through the purchase of bonds you can probably get more than 4.3% (if you can find bonds to buy) on the 30 year which means...we can no longer just auction off $50b worth of notes on a wednesday b/c we need cash. the interest payments will be too great for the country to bear
i dont know if it's ever happened to a G8 country but this can trace back to when nixon took us off the gold standard because our debt was more than the amount of gold we had in reserves
read Panzner, read Nouriel Roubini, read Ron Paul
they know whats coming...cash is king. have a great sunday and dont let those talking heads on tv tell you this is a good thing. this is as awful as can possibly be. (aaaa1 and macman know what i'm talking about)
fannie and freddie are government sponsored sub prime lenders and should have never been authorized at all. they need to be dissolved and their assets auctioned off to the private sector. they cannot be politicized...for the long term economic health of the country, they mus be dissolved ASAP
mikael ...you CANNOT assume that productivity will stay the same when you punish success. just like in denmark, when you have a top tax rate of 63%, those who have earning potential will leave the country. check my brain drain articles from the other day on denmark
tax hikes never raise revenues ever. they never have in this country
the answer is to cut spending for FY09 and cut it from everywhere...25% off the top....salaries, benefits, everything and pay down the debt
0
mikael ...you CANNOT assume that productivity will stay the same when you punish success. just like in denmark, when you have a top tax rate of 63%, those who have earning potential will leave the country. check my brain drain articles from the other day on denmark
tax hikes never raise revenues ever. they never have in this country
the answer is to cut spending for FY09 and cut it from everywhere...25% off the top....salaries, benefits, everything and pay down the debt
The answer to this particular problem has nothing to do with tax cuts, especially when the unemployment rate is rising. Cutting spending is the answer, in particular non-essential spending, suspending things like the "Vision for Space Exploration, and pulling out of Iraq
I see one candidate supports the takeover, and the other has no position.
0
The answer to this particular problem has nothing to do with tax cuts, especially when the unemployment rate is rising. Cutting spending is the answer, in particular non-essential spending, suspending things like the "Vision for Space Exploration, and pulling out of Iraq
I see one candidate supports the takeover, and the other has no position.
At a rally in Colorado Springs, Col., Republican vice presidential nominee
Sarah Palin said, "They've gotten too big and too expensive to the
taxpayers. The McCain-Palin administration will make them smaller and
smarter and more effective for homeowners who need help."
she understands that they are a huge drain on the US
Obama's quote:
"These entities are so big and they're so tied into the housing market
that it is probably true that we have to take steps to make sure they
don't just collapse, because the housing market, which is already
weakened, would be in even worse shape if we didn't take some steps." ------------- mikael - do you see the difference here. i think Palin gets it. Obama does not. we just wrote fnm/fre a blank check up to $300b...for their entire existence, their line of credit with the US government was $2b. they need more? how much barack? where are you getting the money?
mccain has no quote on it yet but we know he is not an economic savant however given that the overriding theme to his government is smaller and smarter government; he should focus on getting rid of the fat
0
palin's quote:
At a rally in Colorado Springs, Col., Republican vice presidential nominee
Sarah Palin said, "They've gotten too big and too expensive to the
taxpayers. The McCain-Palin administration will make them smaller and
smarter and more effective for homeowners who need help."
she understands that they are a huge drain on the US
Obama's quote:
"These entities are so big and they're so tied into the housing market
that it is probably true that we have to take steps to make sure they
don't just collapse, because the housing market, which is already
weakened, would be in even worse shape if we didn't take some steps." ------------- mikael - do you see the difference here. i think Palin gets it. Obama does not. we just wrote fnm/fre a blank check up to $300b...for their entire existence, their line of credit with the US government was $2b. they need more? how much barack? where are you getting the money?
mccain has no quote on it yet but we know he is not an economic savant however given that the overriding theme to his government is smaller and smarter government; he should focus on getting rid of the fat
Cutting spending is the answer, in particular non-essential spending, suspending things like the "Vision for Space Exploration, and pulling out of Iraq
hoping iraq will be over soon or at least a lot of our boys out of there
mikael - raising taxes does not widen the tax base. mandating a higher cost for business will force them to cut costs or leave the US...your choice b/c they arent going to absorb the hit
0
Quote Originally Posted by SecondAgain:
Cutting spending is the answer, in particular non-essential spending, suspending things like the "Vision for Space Exploration, and pulling out of Iraq
hoping iraq will be over soon or at least a lot of our boys out of there
mikael - raising taxes does not widen the tax base. mandating a higher cost for business will force them to cut costs or leave the US...your choice b/c they arent going to absorb the hit
At a rally in Colorado Springs, Col., Republican vice presidential nominee
Sarah Palin said, "They've gotten too big and too expensive to the
taxpayers. The McCain-Palin administration will make them smaller and
smarter and more effective for homeowners who need help."
she understands that they are a huge drain on the US
Obama's quote:
"These entities are so big and they're so tied into the housing market
that it is probably true that we have to take steps to make sure they
don't just collapse, because the housing market, which is already
weakened, would be in even worse shape if we didn't take some steps." ------------- mikael - do you see the difference here. i think Palin gets it. Obama does not. we just wrote fnm/fre a blank check up to $300b...for their entire existence, their line of credit with the US government was $2b. they need more? how much barack? where are you getting the money?
mccain has no quote on it yet but we know he is not an economic savant however given that the overriding theme to his government is smaller and smarter government; he should focus on getting rid of the fat
She said she would do it up here when she was elected as Governor and she did... She is alot smarter than people are giving her credit for.
0
Quote Originally Posted by KOAJ:
palin's quote:
At a rally in Colorado Springs, Col., Republican vice presidential nominee
Sarah Palin said, "They've gotten too big and too expensive to the
taxpayers. The McCain-Palin administration will make them smaller and
smarter and more effective for homeowners who need help."
she understands that they are a huge drain on the US
Obama's quote:
"These entities are so big and they're so tied into the housing market
that it is probably true that we have to take steps to make sure they
don't just collapse, because the housing market, which is already
weakened, would be in even worse shape if we didn't take some steps." ------------- mikael - do you see the difference here. i think Palin gets it. Obama does not. we just wrote fnm/fre a blank check up to $300b...for their entire existence, their line of credit with the US government was $2b. they need more? how much barack? where are you getting the money?
mccain has no quote on it yet but we know he is not an economic savant however given that the overriding theme to his government is smaller and smarter government; he should focus on getting rid of the fat
She said she would do it up here when she was elected as Governor and she did... She is alot smarter than people are giving her credit for.
At a rally in Colorado Springs, Col., Republican vice presidential nominee
Sarah Palin said, "They've gotten too big and too expensive to the
taxpayers. The McCain-Palin administration will make them smaller and
smarter and more effective for homeowners who need help."
she understands that they are a huge drain on the US
Obama's quote:
"These entities are so big and they're so tied into the housing market
that it is probably true that we have to take steps to make sure they
don't just collapse, because the housing market, which is already
weakened, would be in even worse shape if we didn't take some steps." ------------- mikael - do you see the difference here. i think Palin gets it. Obama does not. we just wrote fnm/fre a blank check up to $300b...for their entire existence, their line of credit with the US government was $2b. they need more? how much barack? where are you getting the money?
mccain has no quote on it yet but we know he is not an economic savant however given that the overriding theme to his government is smaller and smarter government; he should focus on getting rid of the fat
Read it again, KOAJ.
"They've gotten too big and too expensive to the
taxpayers"
I thought they were PRIVATE companies.
0
Quote Originally Posted by KOAJ:
palin's quote:
At a rally in Colorado Springs, Col., Republican vice presidential nominee
Sarah Palin said, "They've gotten too big and too expensive to the
taxpayers. The McCain-Palin administration will make them smaller and
smarter and more effective for homeowners who need help."
she understands that they are a huge drain on the US
Obama's quote:
"These entities are so big and they're so tied into the housing market
that it is probably true that we have to take steps to make sure they
don't just collapse, because the housing market, which is already
weakened, would be in even worse shape if we didn't take some steps." ------------- mikael - do you see the difference here. i think Palin gets it. Obama does not. we just wrote fnm/fre a blank check up to $300b...for their entire existence, their line of credit with the US government was $2b. they need more? how much barack? where are you getting the money?
mccain has no quote on it yet but we know he is not an economic savant however given that the overriding theme to his government is smaller and smarter government; he should focus on getting rid of the fat
Read it again, KOAJ.
"They've gotten too big and too expensive to the
taxpayers"
"They've gotten too big and too expensive to the
taxpayers"
I thought they were PRIVATE companies.
lol private...an implicit government guarantee is as good as explicit which is what we got this morning as a certainty
this was PIMCO's bailout....google bill gross and fannie. he owns a shitload of fannie/freddie debt knowing the govt would make good on it and eliminate shareholder equity in the process
if you never believed taxpayers funded these GSE's then now you know for sure...we're now on the hook for 200b at a minimum to bailout two institutions that should have never been created in the first place.
fannie, freddie, social security, medicare, medicaid
we have no more money.
0
Quote Originally Posted by RJSmith:
Read it again, KOAJ.
"They've gotten too big and too expensive to the
taxpayers"
I thought they were PRIVATE companies.
lol private...an implicit government guarantee is as good as explicit which is what we got this morning as a certainty
this was PIMCO's bailout....google bill gross and fannie. he owns a shitload of fannie/freddie debt knowing the govt would make good on it and eliminate shareholder equity in the process
if you never believed taxpayers funded these GSE's then now you know for sure...we're now on the hook for 200b at a minimum to bailout two institutions that should have never been created in the first place.
fannie, freddie, social security, medicare, medicaid
KOAJ: I don't really understand why all these mortgage companies, Fannie Mae et al are biting the bullet, going bankrupt, having to be bailed out. It seems to me if they were giving massive amounts of mortgages on property without the buyer's making downpayments or having the ability to make payments there must have been a lot of fraud by the lenders otherwise the foreclosures would not have caused all these problems. Say the property was only worth 80% or what was charged or even less, that does not mean that these massive hits in the hundreds of billions should come. I just don't understand. There are evidently a bunch of crooks in the woodpile, otherwise this crisis would not have happened. Some banks and mortgage companies would take large hits but they should have a lot of reserves after all the money they have been making. I know someone that Washington Mutual defrauded in CA, she paid $80,000 down and they refused to refinance when her three years was up. She had made all her payments, too.
0
KOAJ: I don't really understand why all these mortgage companies, Fannie Mae et al are biting the bullet, going bankrupt, having to be bailed out. It seems to me if they were giving massive amounts of mortgages on property without the buyer's making downpayments or having the ability to make payments there must have been a lot of fraud by the lenders otherwise the foreclosures would not have caused all these problems. Say the property was only worth 80% or what was charged or even less, that does not mean that these massive hits in the hundreds of billions should come. I just don't understand. There are evidently a bunch of crooks in the woodpile, otherwise this crisis would not have happened. Some banks and mortgage companies would take large hits but they should have a lot of reserves after all the money they have been making. I know someone that Washington Mutual defrauded in CA, she paid $80,000 down and they refused to refinance when her three years was up. She had made all her payments, too.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.