• Forums
  • Best Betting Sites
  • Sportsbook Promos
  • Best Sports Betting Apps
  • NFL Betting Forum
  • NBA Betting Forum
  • MLB Betting Forum
  • NHL Betting Forum
  • NCAAF Betting Forum
  • NCAAB Betting Forum
  • Soccer Betting Forum
  • Tennis Betting Forum
  • General Discussion
  • Help Forum
  • Guidelines
  • FAQ
  • Forum Updates
    Covers Logo
    Covers App
    Faster picks. Smarter bets.
    All in the NEW Covers App
    Download on the App Store Download on the Google Play Store
    • Sports
      • NFL
        • Back
        • NFL
        • NFL Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NFL Picks
        • Weather
        • Injuries
      • NCAAF
        • Back
        • NCAAF
        • NCAAF Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NCAAF Picks
        • Weather
        • Injuries
      • NBA
        • Back
        • NBA
        • NBA Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NBA Picks
        • Injuries
      • NCAAB
        • Back
        • NCAAB
        • NCAAB Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • NCAAB Picks
        • Injuries
      • MLB
        • Back
        • MLB
        • MLB Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • MLB Picks
        • Weather
        • Injuries
      • NHL
        • Back
        • NHL
        • NHL Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NHL Picks
        • Injuries
      • Soccer
      • UFC
      • WNBA
        • Back
        • WNBA
        • WNBA Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • WNBA Picks
        • Injuries
      • CFL
        • Back
        • CFL
        • CFL Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • CFL Picks
      • Golf
        • Back
        • Golf
        • Golf Home
        • Golf Odds
        • Masters Odds
        • PGA Championship Odds
        • US Open Odds
        • British Open Odds
        • Ryder Cup Odds
        • Golf Picks
    • Odds
      • All Odds
      • NFL
      • NCAAF
      • NBA
      • NCAAB
      • MLB
      • NHL
      • Golf
      • Soccer Odds
        • Back
        • Soccer Odds
        • MLS Odds
        • Champions League Odds
        • Premier League Odds
      • UFC
      • WNBA
      • CFL
      • Election Odds
      • Futures
        • Back
        • Futures
        • NFL
        • NBA
        • MLB
        • NHL
        • NCAAB
        • NCAAF
      • Sports Odds History
    • Picks
      • All Picks
      • NFL
      • NBA
      • NHL
      • MLB
      • NCAAF
      • NCAAB
      • Golf
      • WNBA
      • CFL
      • User Picks
      • Team User Picks
      • Consensus Picks
        • Back
        • Consensus Picks
        • All Consensus Picks
        • NFL
        • NBA
        • NHL
        • MLB
        • NCAAF
        • NCAAB
        • CFL
        • WNBA
        • Consensus FAQ
        • Public Money
    • Prop Projections
      • NFL
      • NBA
      • MLB
      • NHL
    • Betting
      • US Betting Sites
      • Canada Betting Sites
      • Sportsbook Reviews
      • States
        • Back
        • States
        • US Legal Tracker
        • Revenue Tracker
        • Arizona
        • Arkansas
        • California
        • Colorado
        • Connecticut
        • DC
        • Florida
        • Georgia
        • Illinois
        • Indiana
        • Iowa
        • Kansas
        • Kentucky
        • Louisiana
        • Maine
        • Maryland
        • Massachusetts
        • Michigan
        • Mississippi
        • Missouri
        • Nevada
        • New Hampshire
        • New Jersey
        • New York
        • North Carolina
        • Ohio
        • Oregon
        • Pennsylvania
        • Tennessee
        • Texas
        • Vermont
        • Virginia
        • West Virginia
        • Wyoming
      • Provinces
        • Back
        • Provinces
        • Alberta
        • British Columbia
        • Manitoba
        • New Brunswick
        • Newfoundland and Labrador
        • Northwest Territories
        • Nova Scotia
        • Nunavut
        • Ontario
        • Prince Edward Island
        • Quebec (English)
        • Quebec (francais)
        • Saskatchewan
        • Yukon
      • By Sport
        • Back
        • By Sport
        • Baseball
        • Basketball
        • Boxing
        • College Football
        • F1
        • Football
        • Super Bowl
        • Golf
        • Hockey
        • Horse Racing
        • March Madness
        • Soccer
        • UFC
        • World Cup
      • Betting Apps
        • Back
        • Betting Apps
        • Best Sports Betting Apps USA
        • Ontario Sports Betting Apps
      • Rest of World
        • Back
        • Rest of World
        • UK Betting Offers
          • Back
          • UK Betting Offers
          • UK Betting Sites
          • bet365 Bonus Code UK
          • 888Sport Promo Code UK
          • William Hill Sign up Offer
          • Betway Sign up Offer
          • BetVictor Bonus Code UK
      • Betting Guides
        • Back
        • Betting Guides
        • All Guides
        • Glossary
        • Betting Calculators
          • Back
          • Betting Calculators
          • Odds Converter
          • Parlay Calculator
        • Futures Betting Guide
        • Moneyline Betting Guide
        • Over/Under Betting Guide
        • Parlay Betting Guide
        • Point Spread Betting Guide
        • Prop Betting Guide
        • Sports Betting Guides
          • Back
          • Sports Betting Guides
          • How To Bet On Sports Guide
          • NFL Betting Guide
          • NHL Betting Guide
          • NBA Betting Guide
          • MLB Betting Guide
          • NCAAB Betting Guide
          • NCAAF Betting Guide
          • Golf Betting Guide
          • Tennis Betting Guide
        • Teaser Betting Guide
      • Betting News
        • Back
        • Betting News
        • All News
        • Industry News
        • Podcasts
        • Covers Videos
        • Covers Writers
        • Offers & Boosts
    • Promos
      • Sportsbook Promos
      • Canada Sportsbook Promos
      • Bonuses By Sportsbook
        • Back
        • Bonuses By Sportsbook
        • bet365 Bonus Code
        • BET99 Promo Code
        • BetMGM Bonus Code
        • BetRivers Bonus Code
        • Caesars Sportsbook Promo
        • DraftKings Promo Code
        • Fanatics Sportsbook Promo
        • FanDuel Promo Code
        • Hard Rock Bet Promo Code
        • Sports Interaction Promo
        • Stake Promo Code
        • theScore Bet Promo Code
        • TonyBet Promo Code
      • Bonuses By Region
        • Back
        • Bonuses By Region
        • Arkansas Promos
        • Arizona Promos
        • Colorado Promos
        • Connecticut Promos
        • DC Promos
        • Illinois Promos
        • Indiana Promos
        • Iowa Promos
        • Kansas Promos
        • Kentucky Promos
        • Louisiana Promos
        • Maine Promos
        • Maryland Promos
        • Massachusetts Promos
        • Michigan Promos
        • Missouri Promos
        • New Jersey Promos
        • New York Promos
        • North Carolina Promos
        • Ohio Promos
        • Pennsylvania Promos
        • Tennessee Promos
        • Vermont Promos
        • Virginia Promos
        • West Virginia Promos
        • Wyoming Promos
    • Forum & Contests
      • All Forums
      • NFL Betting Forum
      • MLB Betting Forum
      • NCAAB Betting Forum
      • NCAAF Betting Forum
      • NBA Betting Forum
      • NHL Betting Forum
      • Soccer Betting Forum
      • Contests
        • Back
        • Contests
        • Contests Home
        • Streak Survivor
        • King of Covers
        • My Contests
    • Casino
      • Sweepstakes Casino
        • Back
        • Sweepstakes Casino
        • Sweepstakes Casino
        • Sweepstakes No-Deposit Bonuses
        • Sweepstakes Promos
          • Back
          • Sweepstakes Promos
          • Card Crush
          • Casino.click
          • Chanced Casino
          • Crown Coins Casino
          • FreeSpin Casino
          • LoneStar
          • McLuck
          • Mega Bonanza Casino
          • PlayFame
          • Pulsz
          • Stake.us
      • US Casinos
        • Back
        • US Casinos
        • US Online Casinos
        • US Online Casino Bonuses
        • Casino Promos
          • Back
          • Casino Promos
          • bet365 Casino Promo Code
          • BetRivers Casino Promo
          • Borgata Casino Bonus Code
          • Caesars Casino Bonus Code
          • DraftKings Casino Promo
          • Fanatics Casino Promo
          • FanDuel Casino Promo Code
          • Golden Nugget Casino Promo
          • Hard Rock Bet Casino Promo
          • Hollywood Casino Promo Code
      • Canada Casinos
        • Back
        • Canada Casinos
        • Canada Online Casinos
        • Provinces
          • Back
          • Provinces
          • Alberta Online Casino
          • BC Online Casino
          • Ontario Online Casinos
        • Casino Promos
          • Back
          • Casino Promos
          • BC.GAME Bonus Code
          • Cloudbet Promo Code
          • RainBet Promo Code
          • Roobet Promo Code
          • Shuffle Promo Code
          • Thrill Promo Code
    • Prediction Markets
      • Prediction Markets
      • Prediction Market Apps
      • Prediction Market Promos
      • Kalshi Promo Code
      • Polymarket Promo Code
      • DraftKings Predictions Promo Code
      • Novig Promo Code
      • ProphetX Promo Code
      • Underdog Promo Code
      • OG Promo Code
      • Fanatics Markets Promo Code
      • Plus500 Promo Code
    • NFL Week 1
      NFL Week 1
      • NFL Picks
      • NFL Odds
      • NFL Prediction Markets
      • NFL Betting Sites
    Covers Account
    Log in Create account
    Join free Log in
    All Forums | Politics

    Georgia enacts tough immigration law, expects to lose $300 million

    «First Previous 1234 Next Last»
    Crusher13
    wallstreetcappers
    rooster010
    ClubDirt
    jinvegas
    ...
    Participants:
    Search model icon
    Views: 2004
    Posts: 88
    «First Previous 1234 Next Last»
     
    Crusher13
    Crusher13
    Captain
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Nov, 2009
    Posts: 8046
    Posted: Aug. 23, 2011 - 8:47 PM ET #51

    Quote Originally Posted by canovsp:

    Jeff and Rooster:

    Both of you are making a HUGE mistake.

    Your plans make too much sense.

    It's not about improving the economy. It's about getting votes. If the unemployed can no longer sit at home to collect that check it will piss them off and they may not vote in the next election. We CAN'T have that!



    I personally, VEHEMENTLY, nominate this POST for the MOST ACCURATE DEAD ON comment EVER in the POLITICS FORUM for one's Relection of B.O.H      .     
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Quote Originally Posted by canovsp:

    Jeff and Rooster:

    Both of you are making a HUGE mistake.

    Your plans make too much sense.

    It's not about improving the economy. It's about getting votes. If the unemployed can no longer sit at home to collect that check it will piss them off and they may not vote in the next election. We CAN'T have that!



    I personally, VEHEMENTLY, nominate this POST for the MOST ACCURATE DEAD ON comment EVER in the POLITICS FORUM for one's Relection of B.O.H      .     
     
    wallstreetcappers
    wallstreetcappers
    Covers Linesmen
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Feb, 2003
    Posts: 58406
    Posted: Aug. 23, 2011 - 9:00 PM ET #52

    Quote Originally Posted by rooster010:

    free be easy


    I promise that when the Cards hit 7 wins this season I will positively let him out.

    You wont be boxed unless you keep attacking members, which is against the rules.

    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Quote Originally Posted by rooster010:

    free be easy


    I promise that when the Cards hit 7 wins this season I will positively let him out.

    You wont be boxed unless you keep attacking members, which is against the rules.

     
    rooster010
    rooster010
    All-Star
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jun, 2007
    Posts: 10911
    Posted: Aug. 23, 2011 - 9:19 PM ET #53

    I promise that when the Cards hit 7 wins this season I will positively let him out.

    You wont be boxed unless you keep attacking members, which is against the rules.
     
     
    the rules
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    I promise that when the Cards hit 7 wins this season I will positively let him out.

    You wont be boxed unless you keep attacking members, which is against the rules.
     
     
    the rules
     
    wallstreetcappers
    wallstreetcappers
    Covers Linesmen
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Feb, 2003
    Posts: 58406
    Posted: Aug. 23, 2011 - 9:31 PM ET #54

    Quote Originally Posted by rooster010:

    I promise that when the Cards hit 7 wins this season I will positively let him out.

    You wont be boxed unless you keep attacking members, which is against the rules.
     
     
    the rules

    Keep it up and we can enforce them on ya too!

    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Quote Originally Posted by rooster010:

    I promise that when the Cards hit 7 wins this season I will positively let him out.

    You wont be boxed unless you keep attacking members, which is against the rules.
     
     
    the rules

    Keep it up and we can enforce them on ya too!

     
    ClubDirt
    ClubDirt
    Hall of Fame
    Participation Meter
    Joined: May, 2003
    Posts: 28196
    Posted: Aug. 23, 2011 - 9:44 PM ET #55

    jinvgeas, for some reason you're reaching to play stupid word games with me, but my point hasn't changed throughout this thread.  
    wallstreet, who understands the issue well, summed up my points.  i don't know how else to explain it.   unlike some people on this forum, i'm always open to be proven wrong.  because i can't speak intelligently about each of the thousands of pesticides, i'm not going to say i know the effects of all of them.  sufice it to say, i don't know of any pesticides that make food healthier, and i know plenty about foods and chemicals.  if you think we are wrong and there are pesticides that make food healthier, again i invite you to present the information and we can all evaluate it.  

    the other point implied by my question about apples is this.  not only are pesticides and chemicals harmful for humans to ingest, they have a negative effect on the soil and, as a result, the fruit adn vegetables that grow from the soil.

    the usda tests the nutritional value of different foods, along with others who have done independent studies.  partly because these pesticides and chemicals basically kill everything in the soil
    these fruits and vegetables have lost a significant amount of nutritional value in terms of vitamins and minerals over the last several decades since pesticides and chemicals have been put to greater use.  for instance, since 1975, the vitamin a content of apples is down 41%, of broccoli, 50% and so on.  

    this is another example of the negative effects of pesticides, although mutation and overtaxing the soil are also responsible for this.  

    finally, i don't know what the hell you are trying to say in response to the mcdonalds french fries video, but in the simplest terms, if you watch that video and can't see there's something seriously unnatural about what mcdonalds does to their potatoes, then i highly recommend you pick up a book that teaches you about food.  here's one.  
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    jinvgeas, for some reason you're reaching to play stupid word games with me, but my point hasn't changed throughout this thread.  
    wallstreet, who understands the issue well, summed up my points.  i don't know how else to explain it.   unlike some people on this forum, i'm always open to be proven wrong.  because i can't speak intelligently about each of the thousands of pesticides, i'm not going to say i know the effects of all of them.  sufice it to say, i don't know of any pesticides that make food healthier, and i know plenty about foods and chemicals.  if you think we are wrong and there are pesticides that make food healthier, again i invite you to present the information and we can all evaluate it.  

    the other point implied by my question about apples is this.  not only are pesticides and chemicals harmful for humans to ingest, they have a negative effect on the soil and, as a result, the fruit adn vegetables that grow from the soil.

    the usda tests the nutritional value of different foods, along with others who have done independent studies.  partly because these pesticides and chemicals basically kill everything in the soil
    these fruits and vegetables have lost a significant amount of nutritional value in terms of vitamins and minerals over the last several decades since pesticides and chemicals have been put to greater use.  for instance, since 1975, the vitamin a content of apples is down 41%, of broccoli, 50% and so on.  

    this is another example of the negative effects of pesticides, although mutation and overtaxing the soil are also responsible for this.  

    finally, i don't know what the hell you are trying to say in response to the mcdonalds french fries video, but in the simplest terms, if you watch that video and can't see there's something seriously unnatural about what mcdonalds does to their potatoes, then i highly recommend you pick up a book that teaches you about food.  here's one.  
     
    rooster010
    rooster010
    All-Star
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jun, 2007
    Posts: 10911
    Posted: Aug. 24, 2011 - 7:26 AM ET #56

    do what you want

    i dont care

    your threats do not scare me

    you can selectively enforce whatever rules you make up

    you have before and you will continue to run off some of the best posters covers has had or will have

    it will be your little utopia where everyone runs around kissing your ass and chirping in agreement

     

    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User

    do what you want

    i dont care

    your threats do not scare me

    you can selectively enforce whatever rules you make up

    you have before and you will continue to run off some of the best posters covers has had or will have

    it will be your little utopia where everyone runs around kissing your ass and chirping in agreement

     

     
    wallstreetcappers
    wallstreetcappers
    Covers Linesmen
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Feb, 2003
    Posts: 58406
    Posted: Aug. 24, 2011 - 11:00 AM ET #57

    Quote Originally Posted by rooster010:

    do what you want

    i dont care

    your threats do not scare me

    you can selectively enforce whatever rules you make up

    you have before and you will continue to run off some of the best posters covers has had or will have

    it will be your little utopia where everyone runs around kissing your ass and chirping in agreement

     


    For such a seemingly mature person, you sure whine a great deal.

    If you cannot be respectful in how you post, then you know what can happen. 

    Bashing me has worked wonders over the years hasnt it? How about leave the personal remarks out and stick to content? Some here seem able to do so, you just arent one of them.

    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Quote Originally Posted by rooster010:

    do what you want

    i dont care

    your threats do not scare me

    you can selectively enforce whatever rules you make up

    you have before and you will continue to run off some of the best posters covers has had or will have

    it will be your little utopia where everyone runs around kissing your ass and chirping in agreement

     


    For such a seemingly mature person, you sure whine a great deal.

    If you cannot be respectful in how you post, then you know what can happen. 

    Bashing me has worked wonders over the years hasnt it? How about leave the personal remarks out and stick to content? Some here seem able to do so, you just arent one of them.

     
    jinvegas
    jinvegas
    Rookie
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jun, 2011
    Posts: 526
    Posted: Aug. 24, 2011 - 9:00 PM ET #58

    Quote Originally Posted by wallstreetcappers:

    jinvegas,

    I understood him completely..how about stop picking a fight with the guy?

    He said that pesticides have not been properly tested as to their effects on us, which is true.

    You are also quite wrong about the net effect of pesticides and making food healthier. It does not make food healthier, it keeps bugs away, that does not increase the HEALTH of the food, rather it protects it from bugs eating it.

    Adding health to a food is increasing the intrinsic, existing ingredients and values, not keeping bugs out.

    Pesticides increase the profits for farmers and companies by increasing yields, extending shelf life and capabilities for longer distance travel. That has nothing to do with the health qualities of the food in question.

    Also, there are negative effects of extending and manipulating shelf life, that is another thing he said, and he was correct.

    There are BENEFITS of extending the shelf life, that the product looks better, lasts longer..but with those benefits come costs, and there is absolutely ZERO health benefits to pesticides, they do not increase the health of the food..not at all.


    hey wallstreet, how about you do yourself a favor an go back and READ what i actually wrote on the subject.  obviously you and clubdirt arent listening, you should pay special attention to post 13.

    i feel like im talking to a bunch of idiots with their hands over their ears yelling nanananna i cant hear you.

    if an "organic" last 5 days before it is no longer healthy for human consumption, but a "chemically treated" banana lasts 10 days, how can you say the later is not healthier than the former, especially from days 6-10????

    thats all ive been saying this entire time, but for some ungodly reason, you and clubdirt just dont want to hear anything that may make their moronic views inaccurate.
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Quote Originally Posted by wallstreetcappers:

    jinvegas,

    I understood him completely..how about stop picking a fight with the guy?

    He said that pesticides have not been properly tested as to their effects on us, which is true.

    You are also quite wrong about the net effect of pesticides and making food healthier. It does not make food healthier, it keeps bugs away, that does not increase the HEALTH of the food, rather it protects it from bugs eating it.

    Adding health to a food is increasing the intrinsic, existing ingredients and values, not keeping bugs out.

    Pesticides increase the profits for farmers and companies by increasing yields, extending shelf life and capabilities for longer distance travel. That has nothing to do with the health qualities of the food in question.

    Also, there are negative effects of extending and manipulating shelf life, that is another thing he said, and he was correct.

    There are BENEFITS of extending the shelf life, that the product looks better, lasts longer..but with those benefits come costs, and there is absolutely ZERO health benefits to pesticides, they do not increase the health of the food..not at all.


    hey wallstreet, how about you do yourself a favor an go back and READ what i actually wrote on the subject.  obviously you and clubdirt arent listening, you should pay special attention to post 13.

    i feel like im talking to a bunch of idiots with their hands over their ears yelling nanananna i cant hear you.

    if an "organic" last 5 days before it is no longer healthy for human consumption, but a "chemically treated" banana lasts 10 days, how can you say the later is not healthier than the former, especially from days 6-10????

    thats all ive been saying this entire time, but for some ungodly reason, you and clubdirt just dont want to hear anything that may make their moronic views inaccurate.
     
    jinvegas
    jinvegas
    Rookie
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jun, 2011
    Posts: 526
    Posted: Aug. 24, 2011 - 9:01 PM ET #59

    Quote Originally Posted by wallstreetcappers:


    Oh quit crying..for such a tough guy you sure seem to turn things personal quite quickly.

    Reasonable to what market labor rates are, not illegal slave wages.



    so rooster is a tough guy and can handle personal attacks, this must make clubdirt a wuss who cannot handle civilized debate.  do different rules apply to different posters?
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Quote Originally Posted by wallstreetcappers:


    Oh quit crying..for such a tough guy you sure seem to turn things personal quite quickly.

    Reasonable to what market labor rates are, not illegal slave wages.



    so rooster is a tough guy and can handle personal attacks, this must make clubdirt a wuss who cannot handle civilized debate.  do different rules apply to different posters?
     
    jinvegas
    jinvegas
    Rookie
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jun, 2011
    Posts: 526
    Posted: Aug. 24, 2011 - 9:10 PM ET #60

    Quote Originally Posted by ClubDirt:

    jinvgeas, for some reason you're reaching to play stupid word games with me, but my point hasn't changed throughout this thread.  
    wallstreet, who understands the issue well, summed up my points.  i don't know how else to explain it.   unlike some people on this forum, i'm always open to be proven wrong.  because i can't speak intelligently about each of the thousands of pesticides, i'm not going to say i know the effects of all of them.  sufice it to say, i don't know of any pesticides that make food healthier, and i know plenty about foods and chemicals.  if you think we are wrong and there are pesticides that make food healthier, again i invite you to present the information and we can all evaluate it.  

    the other point implied by my question about apples is this.  not only are pesticides and chemicals harmful for humans to ingest, they have a negative effect on the soil and, as a result, the fruit adn vegetables that grow from the soil.

    the usda tests the nutritional value of different foods, along with others who have done independent studies.  partly because these pesticides and chemicals basically kill everything in the soil
    these fruits and vegetables have lost a significant amount of nutritional value in terms of vitamins and minerals over the last several decades since pesticides and chemicals have been put to greater use.  for instance, since 1975, the vitamin a content of apples is down 41%, of broccoli, 50% and so on.  

    this is another example of the negative effects of pesticides, although mutation and overtaxing the soil are also responsible for this.  

    finally, i don't know what the hell you are trying to say in response to the mcdonalds french fries video, but in the simplest terms, if you watch that video and can't see there's something seriously unnatural about what mcdonalds does to their potatoes, then i highly recommend you pick up a book that teaches you about food.  here's one.  


    im done addressing the pesticides issue with you bc you flat out arent listening, see my reply to wallstreet in post 58

    as to mcdonalds, there are so many things wrong with the comparison.

    1) comparing PROCESSED food to unprocessed food is not the same as comparing organic to non
    2) you have to be an idiot to think mcdonalds does nothing to the potatoes, after they are harvested. 

    lets just start with the basics, mcds food is covered in salt, and surely (eh, maybe you dont) you know that salt is a preservative.

    now lets dig a little deeper, from mcds website

    ingredients of french fries
    Potatoes, vegetable oil (canola oil, hydrogenated soybean oil, natural beef flavor [wheat and milk derivatives]*, citric acid [preservative]), dextrose, sodium acid
    pyrophosphate (maintain color), salt. Prepared in vegetable oil (Canola oil, corn oil, soybean oil, hydrogenated soybean oil with TBHQ and citric acid added to
    preserve freshness). Dimethylpolysiloxane added as an antifoaming agent.

    seems to me like theres just a tad more involved than grabbing a potato from the ground and frying it.

    anything else you want to be shown the light on????

    and just in case its not obvious, in no way am i saying processed food is good for you, im merely pointing out the lunacy of your "comparison"

    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Quote Originally Posted by ClubDirt:

    jinvgeas, for some reason you're reaching to play stupid word games with me, but my point hasn't changed throughout this thread.  
    wallstreet, who understands the issue well, summed up my points.  i don't know how else to explain it.   unlike some people on this forum, i'm always open to be proven wrong.  because i can't speak intelligently about each of the thousands of pesticides, i'm not going to say i know the effects of all of them.  sufice it to say, i don't know of any pesticides that make food healthier, and i know plenty about foods and chemicals.  if you think we are wrong and there are pesticides that make food healthier, again i invite you to present the information and we can all evaluate it.  

    the other point implied by my question about apples is this.  not only are pesticides and chemicals harmful for humans to ingest, they have a negative effect on the soil and, as a result, the fruit adn vegetables that grow from the soil.

    the usda tests the nutritional value of different foods, along with others who have done independent studies.  partly because these pesticides and chemicals basically kill everything in the soil
    these fruits and vegetables have lost a significant amount of nutritional value in terms of vitamins and minerals over the last several decades since pesticides and chemicals have been put to greater use.  for instance, since 1975, the vitamin a content of apples is down 41%, of broccoli, 50% and so on.  

    this is another example of the negative effects of pesticides, although mutation and overtaxing the soil are also responsible for this.  

    finally, i don't know what the hell you are trying to say in response to the mcdonalds french fries video, but in the simplest terms, if you watch that video and can't see there's something seriously unnatural about what mcdonalds does to their potatoes, then i highly recommend you pick up a book that teaches you about food.  here's one.  


    im done addressing the pesticides issue with you bc you flat out arent listening, see my reply to wallstreet in post 58

    as to mcdonalds, there are so many things wrong with the comparison.

    1) comparing PROCESSED food to unprocessed food is not the same as comparing organic to non
    2) you have to be an idiot to think mcdonalds does nothing to the potatoes, after they are harvested. 

    lets just start with the basics, mcds food is covered in salt, and surely (eh, maybe you dont) you know that salt is a preservative.

    now lets dig a little deeper, from mcds website

    ingredients of french fries
    Potatoes, vegetable oil (canola oil, hydrogenated soybean oil, natural beef flavor [wheat and milk derivatives]*, citric acid [preservative]), dextrose, sodium acid
    pyrophosphate (maintain color), salt. Prepared in vegetable oil (Canola oil, corn oil, soybean oil, hydrogenated soybean oil with TBHQ and citric acid added to
    preserve freshness). Dimethylpolysiloxane added as an antifoaming agent.

    seems to me like theres just a tad more involved than grabbing a potato from the ground and frying it.

    anything else you want to be shown the light on????

    and just in case its not obvious, in no way am i saying processed food is good for you, im merely pointing out the lunacy of your "comparison"

     
    ClubDirt
    ClubDirt
    Hall of Fame
    Participation Meter
    Joined: May, 2003
    Posts: 28196
    Posted: Aug. 24, 2011 - 9:13 PM ET #61

    jinvegas, let's just agree that wallstreet and i on one side and you on the other are operating on compeltely different planes that are so far apart that common thinking is not possible, and end this at that.  
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    jinvegas, let's just agree that wallstreet and i on one side and you on the other are operating on compeltely different planes that are so far apart that common thinking is not possible, and end this at that.  
     
    Stiln
    Stiln
    Captain
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Dec, 2010
    Posts: 6431
    Posted: Aug. 24, 2011 - 9:33 PM ET #62

    Steveshane that's enough bro, you're an idiot.
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Steveshane that's enough bro, you're an idiot.
     
    rooster010
    rooster010
    All-Star
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jun, 2007
    Posts: 10911
    Posted: Aug. 24, 2011 - 9:56 PM ET #63

    Quote Originally Posted by Stiln:

    Steveshane that's enough bro, you're an idiot.

    you better watch out, thats attacking another member

    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User

    Quote Originally Posted by Stiln:

    Steveshane that's enough bro, you're an idiot.

    you better watch out, thats attacking another member

     
    wallstreetcappers
    wallstreetcappers
    Covers Linesmen
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Feb, 2003
    Posts: 58406
    Posted: Aug. 24, 2011 - 10:37 PM ET #64

    j,

    I dont know how to say it any different than has been said several times. I do know that I wont be calling your views moronic, nor will I be attacking you in my response.

    You keep saying that lengthening shelf life= adding health to the product, that just isnt true.

    Adding longer shelf life means there is more SUPPLY, it has no relevance on the quality or health of the supply, in fact organic in general will have less genetic manipulation which some (me included) think is more "healthy" aside from chemicals. I consider foods that have not been messed around with scientifically to increase yield and profit to be more likely to be better for you.

    Healthy qualities are what protein, vitamins, minerals, fiber, nutrients that a product has, not how MUCH there is or if it lasts longer before needing to be tossed.

    I dont see the difficulty in this concept, the health of a product is not improved from spraying pesticides on it..the YIELD is allegedly increased, but that has no relevance to the healthy qualities of the fruit or veggie.
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    j,

    I dont know how to say it any different than has been said several times. I do know that I wont be calling your views moronic, nor will I be attacking you in my response.

    You keep saying that lengthening shelf life= adding health to the product, that just isnt true.

    Adding longer shelf life means there is more SUPPLY, it has no relevance on the quality or health of the supply, in fact organic in general will have less genetic manipulation which some (me included) think is more "healthy" aside from chemicals. I consider foods that have not been messed around with scientifically to increase yield and profit to be more likely to be better for you.

    Healthy qualities are what protein, vitamins, minerals, fiber, nutrients that a product has, not how MUCH there is or if it lasts longer before needing to be tossed.

    I dont see the difficulty in this concept, the health of a product is not improved from spraying pesticides on it..the YIELD is allegedly increased, but that has no relevance to the healthy qualities of the fruit or veggie.
     
    captjohn67
    captjohn67
    Banned
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Apr, 2008
    Posts: 12821
    Posted: Aug. 24, 2011 - 11:19 PM ET #65

    the yield is not allegedly increased, it most certainly is...though i am not a propent of such. But how else will you feed the ever invreasing masses with the ever decreasing tillable acreage??

    If i am remembering right, Alabama comes into play on the first of the month. They will suffer the same fate (feel quite sure it is already happening) Illegals are indoctrinated into the fabric of our nation and were quite some time ago. To think or wish (which i must admit i do) differently will not address the issue as we should. But i don't have the answers  

    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User

    the yield is not allegedly increased, it most certainly is...though i am not a propent of such. But how else will you feed the ever invreasing masses with the ever decreasing tillable acreage??

    If i am remembering right, Alabama comes into play on the first of the month. They will suffer the same fate (feel quite sure it is already happening) Illegals are indoctrinated into the fabric of our nation and were quite some time ago. To think or wish (which i must admit i do) differently will not address the issue as we should. But i don't have the answers  

     
    Jetjeff12
    Jetjeff12
    Rookie
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jan, 2011
    Posts: 718
    Posted: Aug. 25, 2011 - 1:45 AM ET #66

    It is really hard to come up with the answers, These are minimum wage jobs where you have to work really hard. A person from another country is motivated to do a minimum wage job because it is a lot more money then they can make in this country. An american really doesn't gain anything by taking one of these jobs when they can receive almost as much collecting unemployment.

    Also there seems to be less high school kids taking these jobs like my friends and I did when we were in high school. I am not sure why that is. I don't think it is all because they are lazy. The seems the summer break is shorter, if you play sports there are a lot of club teams in the off seasons, you almost have to play on the club teams if you want to compete.

    Maybe part of it is money doesn't go as far as it used to. When I was in high school and made minimum wage I could buy 4 gallons of gas with 1 hour of work (now it is more like 2 - 2 1/2 gallons) It only took 3 - 4 hours to buy a concert ticket or a ticket to an NBA game.

    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User

    It is really hard to come up with the answers, These are minimum wage jobs where you have to work really hard. A person from another country is motivated to do a minimum wage job because it is a lot more money then they can make in this country. An american really doesn't gain anything by taking one of these jobs when they can receive almost as much collecting unemployment.

    Also there seems to be less high school kids taking these jobs like my friends and I did when we were in high school. I am not sure why that is. I don't think it is all because they are lazy. The seems the summer break is shorter, if you play sports there are a lot of club teams in the off seasons, you almost have to play on the club teams if you want to compete.

    Maybe part of it is money doesn't go as far as it used to. When I was in high school and made minimum wage I could buy 4 gallons of gas with 1 hour of work (now it is more like 2 - 2 1/2 gallons) It only took 3 - 4 hours to buy a concert ticket or a ticket to an NBA game.

     
    TIMBER9
    TIMBER9
    Captain
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jan, 2008
    Posts: 5481
    Posted: Aug. 25, 2011 - 8:23 AM ET #67

    A few things

    "low paying jobs"  While 7$-8$ an hour may be "low" to some it may be quite High for another. 

    All farm labor is not "hard work" At some will you do somethin that causes you to sweat a lil? you bet!  My first job was picking peas when i was 11.  Mostly this is still done by hand so yeah you gone have a sore back and hands at the end of the day.  But this is seasonal, its not like its a job you do 24/7 all year long.

    While this new bill is gone hurt alot of my friends and neighbors it is a step in the right direction for this great state and our country as a whole.

    Chemicals      Thats right yall... lets do away with them all.

    We'll just eat tree bark and bird shit    If you want to be chemical free you best find you a remote island to move to.  Because Chemicals are used in EVERYTHING!   95% of what you own and use daily was aided by a chemical in some form or fashion.

    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User

    A few things

    "low paying jobs"  While 7$-8$ an hour may be "low" to some it may be quite High for another. 

    All farm labor is not "hard work" At some will you do somethin that causes you to sweat a lil? you bet!  My first job was picking peas when i was 11.  Mostly this is still done by hand so yeah you gone have a sore back and hands at the end of the day.  But this is seasonal, its not like its a job you do 24/7 all year long.

    While this new bill is gone hurt alot of my friends and neighbors it is a step in the right direction for this great state and our country as a whole.

    Chemicals      Thats right yall... lets do away with them all.

    We'll just eat tree bark and bird shit    If you want to be chemical free you best find you a remote island to move to.  Because Chemicals are used in EVERYTHING!   95% of what you own and use daily was aided by a chemical in some form or fashion.

     
    ClubDirt
    ClubDirt
    Hall of Fame
    Participation Meter
    Joined: May, 2003
    Posts: 28196
    Posted: Aug. 25, 2011 - 8:41 AM ET #68

    Quote Originally Posted by TIMBER9:

    A few things

    "low paying jobs"  While 7$-8$ an hour may be "low" to some it may be quite High for another. 

    All farm labor is not "hard work" At some will you do somethin that causes you to sweat a lil? you bet!  My first job was picking peas when i was 11.  Mostly this is still done by hand so yeah you gone have a sore back and hands at the end of the day.  But this is seasonal, its not like its a job you do 24/7 all year long.

    While this new bill is gone hurt alot of my friends and neighbors it is a step in the right direction for this great state and our country as a whole.

    Chemicals      Thats right yall... lets do away with them all.

    We'll just eat tree bark and bird shit    If you want to be chemical free you best find you a remote island to move to.  Because Chemicals are used in EVERYTHING!   95% of what you own and use daily was aided by a chemical in some form or fashion.

    no one is saying to get rid of chemicals.  no one is saying chemicals don't serve a purpose to some people on this planet by giving them extra access to food, although much less healthy food.  in fact, we've all said the opposite. 

    in any case, when you have choices, learning about food and what is done to your food isn't a bad thing.  and if you decide you don't want to consume dangerous chemicals day after day after day or give them to your kids day after day after day, you can just eat bark and bird shit like i can only assume they do in rural georgia (although be careful, some trees are also sprayed with similar chemicals), but an alternative might be to travel to a bigger city like atlanta or savannah and explore fruit and vegetables options that are not treated with dangerous and unhealthy pesticides/chemicals or at least are treated with much fewer of them. 

    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Quote Originally Posted by TIMBER9:

    A few things

    "low paying jobs"  While 7$-8$ an hour may be "low" to some it may be quite High for another. 

    All farm labor is not "hard work" At some will you do somethin that causes you to sweat a lil? you bet!  My first job was picking peas when i was 11.  Mostly this is still done by hand so yeah you gone have a sore back and hands at the end of the day.  But this is seasonal, its not like its a job you do 24/7 all year long.

    While this new bill is gone hurt alot of my friends and neighbors it is a step in the right direction for this great state and our country as a whole.

    Chemicals      Thats right yall... lets do away with them all.

    We'll just eat tree bark and bird shit    If you want to be chemical free you best find you a remote island to move to.  Because Chemicals are used in EVERYTHING!   95% of what you own and use daily was aided by a chemical in some form or fashion.

    no one is saying to get rid of chemicals.  no one is saying chemicals don't serve a purpose to some people on this planet by giving them extra access to food, although much less healthy food.  in fact, we've all said the opposite. 

    in any case, when you have choices, learning about food and what is done to your food isn't a bad thing.  and if you decide you don't want to consume dangerous chemicals day after day after day or give them to your kids day after day after day, you can just eat bark and bird shit like i can only assume they do in rural georgia (although be careful, some trees are also sprayed with similar chemicals), but an alternative might be to travel to a bigger city like atlanta or savannah and explore fruit and vegetables options that are not treated with dangerous and unhealthy pesticides/chemicals or at least are treated with much fewer of them. 

     
    ClubDirt
    ClubDirt
    Hall of Fame
    Participation Meter
    Joined: May, 2003
    Posts: 28196
    Posted: Aug. 25, 2011 - 8:43 AM ET #69

    there may still be hope for an agricultural industry in georgia
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    there may still be hope for an agricultural industry in georgia
     
    TIMBER9
    TIMBER9
    Captain
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jan, 2008
    Posts: 5481
    Posted: Aug. 25, 2011 - 8:49 AM ET #70

    If healthy food is truly your concern then why travel anywhere?

    Get a lil dirt under your nails and grow your own.

    Any dumbass can do it....well any dumbass thats willing to work a lil. Which is few and far between these days. 

    What chemical is used on peanuts grown in GA that would concern you?

    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User

    If healthy food is truly your concern then why travel anywhere?

    Get a lil dirt under your nails and grow your own.

    Any dumbass can do it....well any dumbass thats willing to work a lil. Which is few and far between these days. 

    What chemical is used on peanuts grown in GA that would concern you?

     
    TIMBER9
    TIMBER9
    Captain
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jan, 2008
    Posts: 5481
    Posted: Aug. 25, 2011 - 8:54 AM ET #71

    bad start
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    bad start
     
    ClubDirt
    ClubDirt
    Hall of Fame
    Participation Meter
    Joined: May, 2003
    Posts: 28196
    Posted: Aug. 25, 2011 - 10:12 AM ET #72

    we do grow some of our own.  i handle the fruits- grapefruit, oranges, lemons, pomegranite and the wife handles the vegetables.  i'm not sure exactly what she has in there. 

    i don't know what chemicals are sprayed on peanuts in georgia. 

    as to the other question, i found this about florida.  of course, you don't have to worry as much about a product protected by a hard shell like peanuts.

    Chemical Management

    Effective insect management depends on a combination of cultural and chemical practices. Insecticide products commonly used on peanut include phorate, chlorpyrifos, aldicarb, methomyl, esfenvalerate, cyhalothrin, and carbaryl (11,12). The use of systemic insecticides helps to eliminate the need for additional foliar insecticide sprays, unless pests such as worms or mites become a problem late in the season. Systemic insecticides are applied in furrow at the time of planting. Granular formulations are applied with a special row-type granular applicator that can be calibrated to deliver proper rates. Other insecticides/miticides registered for use on peanut in Florida in 2007 were: acephate, azadirachtin, cyfluthrin, diflubenzuron, disulfoton, fenpropathrin, indoxacarb, propargite, pyrethrins +/- rotenone, spinosad, sulfur, and zeta-cypermethrin.

    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User

    we do grow some of our own.  i handle the fruits- grapefruit, oranges, lemons, pomegranite and the wife handles the vegetables.  i'm not sure exactly what she has in there. 

    i don't know what chemicals are sprayed on peanuts in georgia. 

    as to the other question, i found this about florida.  of course, you don't have to worry as much about a product protected by a hard shell like peanuts.

    Chemical Management

    Effective insect management depends on a combination of cultural and chemical practices. Insecticide products commonly used on peanut include phorate, chlorpyrifos, aldicarb, methomyl, esfenvalerate, cyhalothrin, and carbaryl (11,12). The use of systemic insecticides helps to eliminate the need for additional foliar insecticide sprays, unless pests such as worms or mites become a problem late in the season. Systemic insecticides are applied in furrow at the time of planting. Granular formulations are applied with a special row-type granular applicator that can be calibrated to deliver proper rates. Other insecticides/miticides registered for use on peanut in Florida in 2007 were: acephate, azadirachtin, cyfluthrin, diflubenzuron, disulfoton, fenpropathrin, indoxacarb, propargite, pyrethrins +/- rotenone, spinosad, sulfur, and zeta-cypermethrin.

     
    jinvegas
    jinvegas
    Rookie
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jun, 2011
    Posts: 526
    Posted: Aug. 26, 2011 - 12:36 AM ET #73

    Quote Originally Posted by wallstreetcappers:

    j,

    I dont know how to say it any different than has been said several times. I do know that I wont be calling your views moronic, nor will I be attacking you in my response.

    You keep saying that lengthening shelf life= adding health to the product, that just isnt true.

    Adding longer shelf life means there is more SUPPLY, it has no relevance on the quality or health of the supply, in fact organic in general will have less genetic manipulation which some (me included) think is more "healthy" aside from chemicals. I consider foods that have not been messed around with scientifically to increase yield and profit to be more likely to be better for you.

    Healthy qualities are what protein, vitamins, minerals, fiber, nutrients that a product has, not how MUCH there is or if it lasts longer before needing to be tossed.

    I dont see the difficulty in this concept, the health of a product is not improved from spraying pesticides on it..the YIELD is allegedly increased, but that has no relevance to the healthy qualities of the fruit or veggie.


    holy cow,

    so you really think that a rotting and/or insect infested "organic" piece of fruit is the same or more healthy than a ripe "treated" piece of fruit????  theres no way you can be that dumb.

    this is the only thing ive been saying this entire thread, something you obviously are unable to comprehend, given your earlier posts.

    i really dont know what else to say to someone who just wont listen.  do you at least recognize by now that im not saying pesticides explicitly make the food healthier??? will you at least concede me that point?

    as for the moron comment, why wouldnt i call someone a moron whos evidence of pesticide use in foods being unhealthy is a PROCESSED foods lack of decomposition?  you have to be a moron to think mcdonlads simply takes a potato, cuts its, fries it, then serves it.  even if you had no clue what they do "behind the scenes", surely one would realize there is a copious amount of salt on the fries.

    i cannot even think of an analogy to use for what clubdirt did, the only think i can think of thats remotely close is saying powerade is worse for an athlete than gatorade and citing the negative effects of coca-cola instead.
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Quote Originally Posted by wallstreetcappers:

    j,

    I dont know how to say it any different than has been said several times. I do know that I wont be calling your views moronic, nor will I be attacking you in my response.

    You keep saying that lengthening shelf life= adding health to the product, that just isnt true.

    Adding longer shelf life means there is more SUPPLY, it has no relevance on the quality or health of the supply, in fact organic in general will have less genetic manipulation which some (me included) think is more "healthy" aside from chemicals. I consider foods that have not been messed around with scientifically to increase yield and profit to be more likely to be better for you.

    Healthy qualities are what protein, vitamins, minerals, fiber, nutrients that a product has, not how MUCH there is or if it lasts longer before needing to be tossed.

    I dont see the difficulty in this concept, the health of a product is not improved from spraying pesticides on it..the YIELD is allegedly increased, but that has no relevance to the healthy qualities of the fruit or veggie.


    holy cow,

    so you really think that a rotting and/or insect infested "organic" piece of fruit is the same or more healthy than a ripe "treated" piece of fruit????  theres no way you can be that dumb.

    this is the only thing ive been saying this entire thread, something you obviously are unable to comprehend, given your earlier posts.

    i really dont know what else to say to someone who just wont listen.  do you at least recognize by now that im not saying pesticides explicitly make the food healthier??? will you at least concede me that point?

    as for the moron comment, why wouldnt i call someone a moron whos evidence of pesticide use in foods being unhealthy is a PROCESSED foods lack of decomposition?  you have to be a moron to think mcdonlads simply takes a potato, cuts its, fries it, then serves it.  even if you had no clue what they do "behind the scenes", surely one would realize there is a copious amount of salt on the fries.

    i cannot even think of an analogy to use for what clubdirt did, the only think i can think of thats remotely close is saying powerade is worse for an athlete than gatorade and citing the negative effects of coca-cola instead.
     
    ClubDirt
    ClubDirt
    Hall of Fame
    Participation Meter
    Joined: May, 2003
    Posts: 28196
    Posted: Aug. 26, 2011 - 8:54 AM ET #74

    jinvegas, your ignorance on this issue has gone from frustrating to fascinating, assuming you're over the age of 7, a point i'm not willing to concede.  all we can do at this point is redirect you to posts # 61 and # 62 and request that you let the adults do most of the posting in this forum from now on. 
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    jinvegas, your ignorance on this issue has gone from frustrating to fascinating, assuming you're over the age of 7, a point i'm not willing to concede.  all we can do at this point is redirect you to posts # 61 and # 62 and request that you let the adults do most of the posting in this forum from now on. 
     
     
    jinvegas
    jinvegas
    Rookie
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jun, 2011
    Posts: 526
    Posted: Aug. 26, 2011 - 4:17 PM ET #75

    Quote Originally Posted by ClubDirt:

    jinvegas, your ignorance on this issue has gone from frustrating to fascinating, assuming you're over the age of 7, a point i'm not willing to concede.  all we can do at this point is redirect you to posts # 61 and # 62 and request that you let the adults do most of the posting in this forum from now on. 


    ahh, post 60, where you referred to wallstreets response to me, where he went out of his way to decry me by saying pesticides dont implicitly give food more health benefits, EVEN THOUGH i said the same from the start.  yep, lets cheer on wallstreet who never bothered to read what my argument was and made a fool of himself.

    dont you think its funny that neither you nor wallstreet will answer a simply question thats been asked countless times in this thread?

    yes or no, do you really think that a rotting and/or insect infested "organic" piece of fruit is the same or more healthy than a ripe "treated" piece of fruit?

    the only thing worse than being ignorant is refusing to acknowledge ones ignorance when presented with factual evidence.


    btw, given the evidence of all the PRESERVATIVES used in mcdonalds french fries, do you at least acknowledge that your comparison between those, and a regular french fry has no bearing on the discussion of the used of pesticides on crops?
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Quote Originally Posted by ClubDirt:

    jinvegas, your ignorance on this issue has gone from frustrating to fascinating, assuming you're over the age of 7, a point i'm not willing to concede.  all we can do at this point is redirect you to posts # 61 and # 62 and request that you let the adults do most of the posting in this forum from now on. 


    ahh, post 60, where you referred to wallstreets response to me, where he went out of his way to decry me by saying pesticides dont implicitly give food more health benefits, EVEN THOUGH i said the same from the start.  yep, lets cheer on wallstreet who never bothered to read what my argument was and made a fool of himself.

    dont you think its funny that neither you nor wallstreet will answer a simply question thats been asked countless times in this thread?

    yes or no, do you really think that a rotting and/or insect infested "organic" piece of fruit is the same or more healthy than a ripe "treated" piece of fruit?

    the only thing worse than being ignorant is refusing to acknowledge ones ignorance when presented with factual evidence.


    btw, given the evidence of all the PRESERVATIVES used in mcdonalds french fries, do you at least acknowledge that your comparison between those, and a regular french fry has no bearing on the discussion of the used of pesticides on crops?
    All Forums | Politics
    «First Previous 1234 Next Last»

    Hot Forums IconHot Forum Topics

    • Monday 9/14/2026 641 Covers arrow
    • I'm embarrassed for Trump supporters 57,671 Covers arrow
    • NFL LOCKED IN! 97,161 Covers arrow
    • Trump's legacy? 25,357 Covers arrow
    • Week One-Post Week One Plays Here 1,781 Covers arrow
    • Couple Beers 1,312 Covers arrow
    • Betting NFL isnt the same anymore Tapping out. 1,046 Covers arrow
    • We have picked a terrible time to have the stupidest president ever 26,733 Covers arrow
    • People trying to say NFL isn’t scripted….. 1,899 Covers arrow
    • NCAA FOOTBALL. 151 19,189 Covers arrow

    Warning - External Link

    Report User

    Thank you for reporting
    This content is abusive or harmful
    This post is spam
    An error has occurred
    This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

    Delete Post

    Are you sure you would like to remove this post?

    Remove Thread

    Are you sure you would like to remove this thread?

    Scan Results

    Login/Register

    Happy to have you join the conversation. To do so, please login or create an account.
    Accounts are free and easy to create.

    Search


    Loading…

    Loading…

    About Us
    Contact Us
    Careers
    Our Team
    Brand
    Testimonials
    Betting Guides
    Sportsbook Reviews
    Betting News
    Podcasts
    Responsible Gambling
    Betting Sites
    US Betting Sites
    Canada Betting Sites
    Canada Casinos
    Best Betting Apps
    Contests
    Streak Survivor
    King of Covers
    Ultimate Race
    Office Pools
    The Covers community has
    810,221
    lifetime members worldwide
    Join our community today
    Covers 30 Years Logo Established in 1995,
    Covers is the world
    leader in sports
    betting information.
    21+
    Gambling problem? Call 1-800-GAMBLER
    Help Privacy Terms of Service Cookies Sitemap Forum
    YouTube logo
    Facebook logo
    Twitter logo
    Instagram logo
    LinkedIn logo
    Google News logo
    Covers is verified safe by:
    Evalon Logo Logo GPWA Logo GDPR logo Logo GeoTrust logo Logo PCI DSS logo Logo
    Copyright © 1995 - 2026 CS Media Ltd. All Rights Reserved.
    If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.