So you admit that MS is a SAF?
Gap between CEO and workers is much worse than you realize
So you admit that MS is a SAF?
So you admit that MS is a SAF?
I am not sure much gets better as a result.
I know protectionist policies would have a net benefit for the middle class. With the Deflation we are seeing relative to other countries since weening back a bit on the QE firehose, protectionist policies could possibly work great. First thought is that our cheap exports would be more expensive, but I am not sure that is true at all. Especially with China entering a downturn.
I am not sure much gets better as a result.
I know protectionist policies would have a net benefit for the middle class. With the Deflation we are seeing relative to other countries since weening back a bit on the QE firehose, protectionist policies could possibly work great. First thought is that our cheap exports would be more expensive, but I am not sure that is true at all. Especially with China entering a downturn.
Jerry?
Jerry?
So you admit that MS is a SAF?
So you admit that MS is a SAF?
Golden Goose, you are so right, the middle class has been getting screwed for 30 years. And the gullible right wing middle class fall for the con job every election, mainly because of gun control.
Golden Goose, you are so right, the middle class has been getting screwed for 30 years. And the gullible right wing middle class fall for the con job every election, mainly because of gun control.
CEO's and bankers have too much power. The middle class used to stick together. Unions were stronger. Now people live in fear, keep their heads down and try to move up the ladder.
People in the past would support the local guy, now they just think of themselves and go to big box stores to save a few dollars.
Nobody cares anymore. There's no pride. People don't support each other. Co workers will see someone getting treated like crap and look the other way.
There's a disconnect between the people in this country. People knew everyone in their neighborhood ... share salt, butter, a few eggs, milk etc.. People used to wave to each other. People kept an eye out for the old lady in the neighborhood.
This country will be better off if there's a serious crash and everyone gets a chance to reevaluate what's really important to them.
CEO's and bankers have too much power. The middle class used to stick together. Unions were stronger. Now people live in fear, keep their heads down and try to move up the ladder.
People in the past would support the local guy, now they just think of themselves and go to big box stores to save a few dollars.
Nobody cares anymore. There's no pride. People don't support each other. Co workers will see someone getting treated like crap and look the other way.
There's a disconnect between the people in this country. People knew everyone in their neighborhood ... share salt, butter, a few eggs, milk etc.. People used to wave to each other. People kept an eye out for the old lady in the neighborhood.
This country will be better off if there's a serious crash and everyone gets a chance to reevaluate what's really important to them.
“If the American people ever allow private banks to control the issue of their money, first by inflation and then by deflation, the banks and corporations that will grow up around them, will deprive the people of their property until their children will wake up homeless on the continent their fathers conquered.” - Thomas Jefferson
"By remaining behind the scenes, they (the Rothschilds) were able to avoid the brunt of public anger which was directed, instead, at the political figures which they largely controlled. This is a technique which has been practiced by financial manipulators ever since, and it is fully utilized by those who operate the Federal Reserve System today."- G. Edward Griffin
![]()
“If the American people ever allow private banks to control the issue of their money, first by inflation and then by deflation, the banks and corporations that will grow up around them, will deprive the people of their property until their children will wake up homeless on the continent their fathers conquered.” - Thomas Jefferson
"By remaining behind the scenes, they (the Rothschilds) were able to avoid the brunt of public anger which was directed, instead, at the political figures which they largely controlled. This is a technique which has been practiced by financial manipulators ever since, and it is fully utilized by those who operate the Federal Reserve System today."- G. Edward Griffin
![]()
I am not saying that corporate fuks are not a problem, I am saying that the "solutions" of confiscation, arbitrary caps on pay and other such nonsense is not only illegal, but it has worse consequences than the wage gap. the "solution" would cause more pain than the perceived problem.
I think one of the only things that I disagree with the left about is the idea that taking the power away from corporations and giving it solely to government is a worse Idea than having the corruption split between the two.
I am not saying that corporate fuks are not a problem, I am saying that the "solutions" of confiscation, arbitrary caps on pay and other such nonsense is not only illegal, but it has worse consequences than the wage gap. the "solution" would cause more pain than the perceived problem.
I think one of the only things that I disagree with the left about is the idea that taking the power away from corporations and giving it solely to government is a worse Idea than having the corruption split between the two.
We have seen capital flight from places that are anti business, and capital flight to places that are pro business.
There is a reason that 60% of Apple's income as one of the largest companies in the world will never see American soil. It is routed to Ireland.
We have seen capital flight from places that are anti business, and capital flight to places that are pro business.
There is a reason that 60% of Apple's income as one of the largest companies in the world will never see American soil. It is routed to Ireland.
Couldn't agree more. I think that when I read the creature from Jeckyll island it was a major turning point for me, concerning everything i believed about the world.
I am not saying that corporate fuks are not a problem, I am saying that the "solutions" of confiscation, arbitrary caps on pay and other such nonsense is not only illegal, but it has worse consequences than the wage gap. the "solution" would cause more pain than the perceived problem.
I think one of the only things that I disagree with the left about is the idea that taking the power away from corporations and giving it solely to government is a worse Idea than having the corruption split between the two.
Couldn't agree more. I think that when I read the creature from Jeckyll island it was a major turning point for me, concerning everything i believed about the world.
I am not saying that corporate fuks are not a problem, I am saying that the "solutions" of confiscation, arbitrary caps on pay and other such nonsense is not only illegal, but it has worse consequences than the wage gap. the "solution" would cause more pain than the perceived problem.
I think one of the only things that I disagree with the left about is the idea that taking the power away from corporations and giving it solely to government is a worse Idea than having the corruption split between the two.
Inequality is the greater issue, not your fear laden power grab theory.
I think there is more fear mongering of the Koch brothers and rich people screwing the little guy as if it is some zero sum game. Just because someone makes a ton of money does not mean that they are taking it directly out of the pocket of the low earner.
In Europe the ratios of top pay vs median pay are much better, I think there needs to be LESS incentive to profit off stock market measures..that is short term negative thinking and that comes at a cost to the business and society.
I don't understand your guy's fetish with the top pay vs median pay statistic. You are taking less than a thousand people (in America it is 491 billionaires) and comparing it to the rest of the work force 100+ million people. It is skewed and I think you know it.
When you reward risky behavior and give too much incentive to one or two positions that for sure is not beneficial to society as a whole.
We are talking about two things. Risky behavior and income inequality, they are popular topics, but not as connected as people make them. People get paid at a higher rate when they reach the apex of their profession. Kind of like the Football or Basketball analogy. Not everyone can play in the NFL, there are tons of people who never get paid to play the game, but those who do get paid are vastly better off than those who don't.
And on the risk side, sure I agree with you. I am all for restoring limits on what investment banks can do with depositors money, and out of the two of us, I am dead set against bailouts. That are the ultimate reward for Crappy risky investment.
Inequality is the greater issue, not your fear laden power grab theory.
I think there is more fear mongering of the Koch brothers and rich people screwing the little guy as if it is some zero sum game. Just because someone makes a ton of money does not mean that they are taking it directly out of the pocket of the low earner.
In Europe the ratios of top pay vs median pay are much better, I think there needs to be LESS incentive to profit off stock market measures..that is short term negative thinking and that comes at a cost to the business and society.
I don't understand your guy's fetish with the top pay vs median pay statistic. You are taking less than a thousand people (in America it is 491 billionaires) and comparing it to the rest of the work force 100+ million people. It is skewed and I think you know it.
When you reward risky behavior and give too much incentive to one or two positions that for sure is not beneficial to society as a whole.
We are talking about two things. Risky behavior and income inequality, they are popular topics, but not as connected as people make them. People get paid at a higher rate when they reach the apex of their profession. Kind of like the Football or Basketball analogy. Not everyone can play in the NFL, there are tons of people who never get paid to play the game, but those who do get paid are vastly better off than those who don't.
And on the risk side, sure I agree with you. I am all for restoring limits on what investment banks can do with depositors money, and out of the two of us, I am dead set against bailouts. That are the ultimate reward for Crappy risky investment.
What is this supposed to be, a final term paper essay that you want me to write?
Re: the ratio between CEO and lowest worker pay in the 60's vs. in 2014 -- I wonder if revenues increased during that time frame as well? I would imagine that has a lot to do with your inquiry.
I don't have a problem with them making whatever they can. They all scream "Capitalism" when things are well but turns to "Socialism" when things are bad(bailouts). They WANT and RECIEVE handouts all the time just like some of the welfare receipents but somehow they get a free-pass.
What is this supposed to be, a final term paper essay that you want me to write?
Re: the ratio between CEO and lowest worker pay in the 60's vs. in 2014 -- I wonder if revenues increased during that time frame as well? I would imagine that has a lot to do with your inquiry.
I don't have a problem with them making whatever they can. They all scream "Capitalism" when things are well but turns to "Socialism" when things are bad(bailouts). They WANT and RECIEVE handouts all the time just like some of the welfare receipents but somehow they get a free-pass.
Inequality is the greater issue, not your fear laden power grab theory.
I think there is more fear mongering of the Koch brothers and rich people screwing the little guy as if it is some zero sum game. Just because someone makes a ton of money does not mean that they are taking it directly out of the pocket of the low earner.
In Europe the ratios of top pay vs median pay are much better, I think there needs to be LESS incentive to profit off stock market measures..that is short term negative thinking and that comes at a cost to the business and society.
I don't understand your guy's fetish with the top pay vs median pay statistic. You are taking less than a thousand people (in America it is 491 billionaires) and comparing it to the rest of the work force 100+ million people. It is skewed and I think you know it.
When you reward risky behavior and give too much incentive to one or two positions that for sure is not beneficial to society as a whole.
We are talking about two things. Risky behavior and income inequality, they are popular topics, but not as connected as people make them. People get paid at a higher rate when they reach the apex of their profession. Kind of like the Football or Basketball analogy. Not everyone can play in the NFL, there are tons of people who never get paid to play the game, but those who do get paid are vastly better off than those who don't.
And on the risk side, sure I agree with you. I am all for restoring limits on what investment banks can do with depositors money, and out of the two of us, I am dead set against bailouts. That are the ultimate reward for Crappy risky investment.
Inequality is the greater issue, not your fear laden power grab theory.
I think there is more fear mongering of the Koch brothers and rich people screwing the little guy as if it is some zero sum game. Just because someone makes a ton of money does not mean that they are taking it directly out of the pocket of the low earner.
In Europe the ratios of top pay vs median pay are much better, I think there needs to be LESS incentive to profit off stock market measures..that is short term negative thinking and that comes at a cost to the business and society.
I don't understand your guy's fetish with the top pay vs median pay statistic. You are taking less than a thousand people (in America it is 491 billionaires) and comparing it to the rest of the work force 100+ million people. It is skewed and I think you know it.
When you reward risky behavior and give too much incentive to one or two positions that for sure is not beneficial to society as a whole.
We are talking about two things. Risky behavior and income inequality, they are popular topics, but not as connected as people make them. People get paid at a higher rate when they reach the apex of their profession. Kind of like the Football or Basketball analogy. Not everyone can play in the NFL, there are tons of people who never get paid to play the game, but those who do get paid are vastly better off than those who don't.
And on the risk side, sure I agree with you. I am all for restoring limits on what investment banks can do with depositors money, and out of the two of us, I am dead set against bailouts. That are the ultimate reward for Crappy risky investment.
You want a model? A good model? Look at the Japanese.
Exec income is regulated... and if they don't produce?
They are shamed in society to the point where some commit suicide.
You want a model? A good model? Look at the Japanese.
Exec income is regulated... and if they don't produce?
They are shamed in society to the point where some commit suicide.
I don't have a problem with them making whatever they can. They all scream "Capitalism" when things are well but turns to "Socialism" when things are bad(bailouts). They WANT and RECIEVE handouts all the time just like some of the welfare receipents but somehow
they get a free-pass.
I have been touting this for YEARS.
Nobody seems to notice. Nobody seems to care.
I don't have a problem with them making whatever they can. They all scream "Capitalism" when things are well but turns to "Socialism" when things are bad(bailouts). They WANT and RECIEVE handouts all the time just like some of the welfare receipents but somehow
they get a free-pass.
I have been touting this for YEARS.
Nobody seems to notice. Nobody seems to care.
Fuk that.
The best thing we could do is have more protectionist policies to keep U.S. money in the country, and prevent capital flight.
I don't think our taxes should be as high for corporations, but I don't think we should provide incentive for outsourcing, and flight of capital.
We shouldn't hand GM billions so they can send it (and a ton of US jobs) to Mexico.
Fuk that.
The best thing we could do is have more protectionist policies to keep U.S. money in the country, and prevent capital flight.
I don't think our taxes should be as high for corporations, but I don't think we should provide incentive for outsourcing, and flight of capital.
We shouldn't hand GM billions so they can send it (and a ton of US jobs) to Mexico.
Hot Forum Topics
-
🤢🥴💩_ Fubah's risky baseball bets _🥶😲🥵
446,013
-
🏈🏈🏈 “To BEt, or not to BEt, that is the question” ...Fubah2's risky bets
301,802
-
🏈🏈🏈 Fubah2's risky CFB bets
253,447
-
Patriots vs Seahawks in-game live season kickoff
1,444
-
Thursday 09/10/2026
857
-
PART TROIS
283
-
NFL LOCKED IN!
95,231
-
9/10 Fast Cash Five 💰??🔥
3,342
-
9/9 🫣🫣🔥🔥🔥
4,823
-
PART DEUX
350
Warning - External Link
Report User
This post is spam
Delete Post
Remove Thread
Scan Results
Login/Register
Accounts are free and easy to create.
Search
