A) Create jobs although jobs are created on their own accord. creating jobs that no one needs just so someone can make some money that came from my tax dollars...
B) Raise the minimum wages (half those making minimum wage would then fired. how about prevent illegals from obtaining employment...doesnt matter if theres a min wage if illegals work for less anyway.)
C) Cheaper Health Care unfortunately we can't agree on how to make it cheaper, you seem to think that giving it away to poor people will make it cheaper...
D) Increased benefits (again, you cant just give people benefits, people have to earn them and they have to be paid out of the employers pocket (just out of repulsed curiosity... increase benefits across the board or for a certain industry or pay scale??)
E) Prolong unemployment benefits (why not indefinitely...)
F) Expand the food stamp program (seriously man)
G) And the most important of them all "RAISE TAXES" on all making more than 250.000$ (how much money you make should not determine how much taxes you pay. everybody should pay the same percent)
----------
you just keep proposing more handouts to everybody... its not sustainable, not in real life, not in imaginationland and not in America.
what part of communism do you not agree with?
0
A) Create jobs although jobs are created on their own accord. creating jobs that no one needs just so someone can make some money that came from my tax dollars...
B) Raise the minimum wages (half those making minimum wage would then fired. how about prevent illegals from obtaining employment...doesnt matter if theres a min wage if illegals work for less anyway.)
C) Cheaper Health Care unfortunately we can't agree on how to make it cheaper, you seem to think that giving it away to poor people will make it cheaper...
D) Increased benefits (again, you cant just give people benefits, people have to earn them and they have to be paid out of the employers pocket (just out of repulsed curiosity... increase benefits across the board or for a certain industry or pay scale??)
E) Prolong unemployment benefits (why not indefinitely...)
F) Expand the food stamp program (seriously man)
G) And the most important of them all "RAISE TAXES" on all making more than 250.000$ (how much money you make should not determine how much taxes you pay. everybody should pay the same percent)
----------
you just keep proposing more handouts to everybody... its not sustainable, not in real life, not in imaginationland and not in America.
the article clearly states one out of seven, not that it makes a huge difference. st
A) i would impose tarrifs that require certain things to be taxed when imported into this country so that the jobs would not be shipped overseas just so the CEO can make more money while improving the economy overseas but destroying it here. of course this would impose problems as our prices of goods would go up but more people would have money to spend on said goods.
B) ALL illegals immediately booted out of the country. you can come back but you are going to do so legally. put our troops on the border...
C) impose a flat income tax on everybody whether you make 15 thousand or 15 million. i dont know the math but i would think a flat 30% income tax from everybody should do it i would think.
D) i suppose you could 'expand' the food stamp program. but by expand i mean contract. no more buying junk shit food or anything of the sort. only natural food thats good for you. two birds, one stone. obesity and foodstamp/welfare costs. (maybe youve never seen people use food stamps but they buy pop-tarts and fruit roll-ups, and then pull out cash to buy ciggarettes. and you wanna expand this program...
E) if you want to go on welfare then you are going to live significantly differently than everyone else. you are not going to decide where you live or what you eat. you are not going to have cash to spend.
0
the article clearly states one out of seven, not that it makes a huge difference. st
A) i would impose tarrifs that require certain things to be taxed when imported into this country so that the jobs would not be shipped overseas just so the CEO can make more money while improving the economy overseas but destroying it here. of course this would impose problems as our prices of goods would go up but more people would have money to spend on said goods.
B) ALL illegals immediately booted out of the country. you can come back but you are going to do so legally. put our troops on the border...
C) impose a flat income tax on everybody whether you make 15 thousand or 15 million. i dont know the math but i would think a flat 30% income tax from everybody should do it i would think.
D) i suppose you could 'expand' the food stamp program. but by expand i mean contract. no more buying junk shit food or anything of the sort. only natural food thats good for you. two birds, one stone. obesity and foodstamp/welfare costs. (maybe youve never seen people use food stamps but they buy pop-tarts and fruit roll-ups, and then pull out cash to buy ciggarettes. and you wanna expand this program...
E) if you want to go on welfare then you are going to live significantly differently than everyone else. you are not going to decide where you live or what you eat. you are not going to have cash to spend.
I refuse to believe this study. Certainly if that many people were going hungry the overall population wouldn't be so fat. Mik, I'm not surprised you fell for this ridiculous article. Additionally if we didn't have 20-30 million illegals here, we'd have less hungry people.
0
I refuse to believe this study. Certainly if that many people were going hungry the overall population wouldn't be so fat. Mik, I'm not surprised you fell for this ridiculous article. Additionally if we didn't have 20-30 million illegals here, we'd have less hungry people.
this is all bs.......1st of all every state as food stamps and if you are that poor then you can get food stamps.....may not be prime rib but roman noodles will do...also many people decide to do drugs,cigarettes,alcohol, gambling with their money instead of eating.....so i don't want to hear the BS about this..there are also homeless shelters who give out food all of the time. This is america not africa (atleast for now) any bum even if they didnt get food stamps can panhandle 1 or 2 bucks for a meal for the day utter bs about this study...problem is i guess these people want the food delivered to them by government workers hot and ready
0
this is all bs.......1st of all every state as food stamps and if you are that poor then you can get food stamps.....may not be prime rib but roman noodles will do...also many people decide to do drugs,cigarettes,alcohol, gambling with their money instead of eating.....so i don't want to hear the BS about this..there are also homeless shelters who give out food all of the time. This is america not africa (atleast for now) any bum even if they didnt get food stamps can panhandle 1 or 2 bucks for a meal for the day utter bs about this study...problem is i guess these people want the food delivered to them by government workers hot and ready
Since Koaj most likely will call me a communist now i would like to here how he and the like minded will put food on the table for the 50 million who can not.
I assume you do not advocate it being good for them, you know sort of a diet.
the MOST IMPORTANT of all (not raising fucking taxes b/c that does nothing but rob the private sector)...did you know the government pays farmers NOT to grow crops to control prices?!?!?!?!?!?!
and we have 50m hungry in this country and millions around the world
see what government intervention does mikael??? also last year remember the big ethanol craze? well government pushed farmers towards biodiesel fuels...ethanol paid more than regular food did so farmers sold their corn to ethanol producers
THIS IS GOVERNMENT INTERVENTION AT ITS FINEST
sorry for caps...but when people dont see who the true barrier to prosperity really is, it bothers me
0
Quote Originally Posted by Mikael99:
Since Koaj most likely will call me a communist now i would like to here how he and the like minded will put food on the table for the 50 million who can not.
I assume you do not advocate it being good for them, you know sort of a diet.
the MOST IMPORTANT of all (not raising fucking taxes b/c that does nothing but rob the private sector)...did you know the government pays farmers NOT to grow crops to control prices?!?!?!?!?!?!
and we have 50m hungry in this country and millions around the world
see what government intervention does mikael??? also last year remember the big ethanol craze? well government pushed farmers towards biodiesel fuels...ethanol paid more than regular food did so farmers sold their corn to ethanol producers
THIS IS GOVERNMENT INTERVENTION AT ITS FINEST
sorry for caps...but when people dont see who the true barrier to prosperity really is, it bothers me
Well, we can save alot of money on welfare if we started drug testing the people who get it, if your positive for any drugs, you loose it. It is unfair that the hard working american, (who's taxes pay welfare) have to get tested, not all but most. But the paople who reep the benefits do not. Yes it will cost money to test, but i believe over the long run, it will pay for itself. Just something that always bugged me.
0
Well, we can save alot of money on welfare if we started drug testing the people who get it, if your positive for any drugs, you loose it. It is unfair that the hard working american, (who's taxes pay welfare) have to get tested, not all but most. But the paople who reep the benefits do not. Yes it will cost money to test, but i believe over the long run, it will pay for itself. Just something that always bugged me.
Mikeal what i find disturbing is that you believe this misinformation, and also that you likely feel it's the gov't job to find a 'solution' when it is the gov't that causes the problem
For the longest time i had thought that there was unintended consequences, but when you think about it the gov't is in the business of creating problems and then selling you that they can do something to 'fix' them if only they can get some more money
0
Mikeal what i find disturbing is that you believe this misinformation, and also that you likely feel it's the gov't job to find a 'solution' when it is the gov't that causes the problem
For the longest time i had thought that there was unintended consequences, but when you think about it the gov't is in the business of creating problems and then selling you that they can do something to 'fix' them if only they can get some more money
Mikeal what i find disturbing is that you believe this misinformation, and also that you likely feel it's the gov't job to find a 'solution' when it is the gov't that causes the problem
For the longest time i had thought that there was unintended consequences, but when you think about it the gov't is in the business of creating problems and then selling you that they can do something to 'fix' them if only they can get some more money
Most inteligent thing I have read on covers today. The government is trying to take every ounce of power and control every little thing they possibly can. Socialism dead ahead
0
Quote Originally Posted by be easy:
Mikeal what i find disturbing is that you believe this misinformation, and also that you likely feel it's the gov't job to find a 'solution' when it is the gov't that causes the problem
For the longest time i had thought that there was unintended consequences, but when you think about it the gov't is in the business of creating problems and then selling you that they can do something to 'fix' them if only they can get some more money
Most inteligent thing I have read on covers today. The government is trying to take every ounce of power and control every little thing they possibly can. Socialism dead ahead
It is interesting. I post some solutions, come up with some opinions and the town queen has posted several times now, but will not debate the issue. I guess he has nothing to say.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Mikael99:
It is interesting. I post some solutions, come up with some opinions and the town queen has posted several times now, but will not debate the issue. I guess he has nothing to say.
Every 6 person in USA are having problems getting enough to eat. USA is not the worlds richest nation, in some aspects it is soon aspiring to be a 2 rate country.
That is what happens folks when the right wing republiklan party are in power.
Or as Cafferty said today on his Cafferty File, it is a disgrace. I agree with the man.
A) Create jobs****** Obama Has Already Created 1,000,000+ jobs. Just Ask Him. He Will Tell You******* B) Raise the minimum wages*****Raise Cost of Doing Business Even More Than Just Raising Taxes. Fewer Jobs, Higher Costs To End Users Seems Like A Bad Idea******** C) Cheaper Health Care*****Don't We All Want This? We Just Disagree On How To Accomplish This************ D) Increased benefits *****For Who And How************** E) Prolong unemployment benefits*********Already At All Time Highs. Why Is This Necessary If Obama Is Creating So Many Jobs?********* F) Expand the food stamp program******How About Make It More Specific Like WIC? It Would Be More Effective If These EBT Cards Could Not Be Used On Junk Food And Sodas. Will Also Help With The Obesity Epidedmic********** G) And the most important of them all "RAISE TAXES" on all making more than 250.000$. ********Seems To Be The Liberal Answer To Every Program They Are Trying To Ram Through Congress Before They Lose Their Majority.***********
0
Quote Originally Posted by Mikael99:
Every 6 person in USA are having problems getting enough to eat. USA is not the worlds richest nation, in some aspects it is soon aspiring to be a 2 rate country.
That is what happens folks when the right wing republiklan party are in power.
Or as Cafferty said today on his Cafferty File, it is a disgrace. I agree with the man.
A) Create jobs****** Obama Has Already Created 1,000,000+ jobs. Just Ask Him. He Will Tell You******* B) Raise the minimum wages*****Raise Cost of Doing Business Even More Than Just Raising Taxes. Fewer Jobs, Higher Costs To End Users Seems Like A Bad Idea******** C) Cheaper Health Care*****Don't We All Want This? We Just Disagree On How To Accomplish This************ D) Increased benefits *****For Who And How************** E) Prolong unemployment benefits*********Already At All Time Highs. Why Is This Necessary If Obama Is Creating So Many Jobs?********* F) Expand the food stamp program******How About Make It More Specific Like WIC? It Would Be More Effective If These EBT Cards Could Not Be Used On Junk Food And Sodas. Will Also Help With The Obesity Epidedmic********** G) And the most important of them all "RAISE TAXES" on all making more than 250.000$. ********Seems To Be The Liberal Answer To Every Program They Are Trying To Ram Through Congress Before They Lose Their Majority.***********
I am so hungryyyyy! I could not afford lunch today even though there are HELP WANTED signs all over the place. Please Obama come buy my food for me, pay my rent for me, buy my gasoline and health care for me. I am sooooo hungry
0
I am so hungryyyyy! I could not afford lunch today even though there are HELP WANTED signs all over the place. Please Obama come buy my food for me, pay my rent for me, buy my gasoline and health care for me. I am sooooo hungry
I agree with some of your solutions but it does not solve the problems. You say no jobs, nothing must be given out on your taxpayer money. However you are already paying to all of that right now with the flawed system. So why not try to fix it?
You say you want lower taxes on everyone. Well let me ask you this a lower tax of nothing or very little, how will that make people afford food, health care ect?
All you republicans base your solutions out of everyone have money and just lower taxes then every might be fine. NOT WORKING. If a person only earns 20.000 dollars, lowering the persons tax a bit will not make a difference in their lives when they other costs are not lowered (which they are not due to the profit driven and flawed system you have there).
The state needs to be a reliable mediator for its citizens and secure a level playing field. That is why social liberalism works well.
Slim
The number is in the range of 49-50 million and therefore borderline 6-7. Some sites say 6, others say 7.
Rooster010
Same shit in EU. There they also stock up food, might as well just give it away to people in Africa who really struggle when their crop fail every now and then.
ApacheM
You might want to reverse that statement.
Go hungry means food insecurity.
What do hunger and food insecurity mean in the United States? Very
simply, hunger is defined as the uneasy or painful sensation caused by
lack of food. When we talk about hunger in America, we refer to the
ability of people to obtain sufficient food for their household. Some
people may find themselves skipping meals or cutting back on the
quality or quantity of food they purchase at the stores. This recurring
and involuntary lack of access to food can lead to malnutrition over
time.
Add to that 25% of the population of Taxas has no health insurance.
0
William Wallace
I agree with some of your solutions but it does not solve the problems. You say no jobs, nothing must be given out on your taxpayer money. However you are already paying to all of that right now with the flawed system. So why not try to fix it?
You say you want lower taxes on everyone. Well let me ask you this a lower tax of nothing or very little, how will that make people afford food, health care ect?
All you republicans base your solutions out of everyone have money and just lower taxes then every might be fine. NOT WORKING. If a person only earns 20.000 dollars, lowering the persons tax a bit will not make a difference in their lives when they other costs are not lowered (which they are not due to the profit driven and flawed system you have there).
The state needs to be a reliable mediator for its citizens and secure a level playing field. That is why social liberalism works well.
Slim
The number is in the range of 49-50 million and therefore borderline 6-7. Some sites say 6, others say 7.
Rooster010
Same shit in EU. There they also stock up food, might as well just give it away to people in Africa who really struggle when their crop fail every now and then.
ApacheM
You might want to reverse that statement.
Go hungry means food insecurity.
What do hunger and food insecurity mean in the United States? Very
simply, hunger is defined as the uneasy or painful sensation caused by
lack of food. When we talk about hunger in America, we refer to the
ability of people to obtain sufficient food for their household. Some
people may find themselves skipping meals or cutting back on the
quality or quantity of food they purchase at the stores. This recurring
and involuntary lack of access to food can lead to malnutrition over
time.
Add to that 25% of the population of Taxas has no health insurance.
All you republicans base your solutions out of everyone have money and just lower taxes then every might be fine. NOT WORKING. If a person only earns 20.000 dollars, lowering the persons tax a bit will not make a difference in their lives when they other costs are not lowered (which they are not due to the profit driven and flawed system you have there).
The state needs to be a reliable mediator for its citizens and secure a level playing field. That is why social liberalism works well.
Slim
The number is in the range of 49-50 million and therefore borderline 6-7. Some sites say 6, others say 7.
Rooster010
Same shit in EU. There they also stock up food, might as well just give it away to people in Africa who really struggle when their crop fail every now and then.
ApacheM
You might want to reverse that statement.
Go hungry means food insecurity.
What do hunger and food insecurity mean in the United States? Very simply, hunger is defined as the uneasy or painful sensation caused by lack of food. When we talk about hunger in America, we refer to the ability of people to obtain sufficient food for their household. Some people may find themselves skipping meals or cutting back on the quality or quantity of food they purchase at the stores. This recurring and involuntary lack of access to food can lead to malnutrition over time.
Add to that 25% of the population of Texas has no health insurance.
Probably the 25% you speak of are illegals. Keep something in mind that I have said many times,"I'll give a man a hand up, but not a handout." There will always be some less fortunate than others, that's just the way it is. Don't try to make me feel guilty, I've worked hard my entire life for what I have and have given my fair share to charities.(SPCA, Salvation Army, and Masonic home for kids.) Trying to make everyone equal is an impossibe feat except in the eyes of the Lord. Some people are willing to work and some would rather sit on their butt and wait for the government to take care of them. One last thing about your healthcare rant, the deadbeats would rather spend what they've got or get on beer or wine than insurance. they 've realized after 40yrs of suckin' on the government tit that the bleedin' hearts will take care of them.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Mikael99:
All you republicans base your solutions out of everyone have money and just lower taxes then every might be fine. NOT WORKING. If a person only earns 20.000 dollars, lowering the persons tax a bit will not make a difference in their lives when they other costs are not lowered (which they are not due to the profit driven and flawed system you have there).
The state needs to be a reliable mediator for its citizens and secure a level playing field. That is why social liberalism works well.
Slim
The number is in the range of 49-50 million and therefore borderline 6-7. Some sites say 6, others say 7.
Rooster010
Same shit in EU. There they also stock up food, might as well just give it away to people in Africa who really struggle when their crop fail every now and then.
ApacheM
You might want to reverse that statement.
Go hungry means food insecurity.
What do hunger and food insecurity mean in the United States? Very simply, hunger is defined as the uneasy or painful sensation caused by lack of food. When we talk about hunger in America, we refer to the ability of people to obtain sufficient food for their household. Some people may find themselves skipping meals or cutting back on the quality or quantity of food they purchase at the stores. This recurring and involuntary lack of access to food can lead to malnutrition over time.
Add to that 25% of the population of Texas has no health insurance.
Probably the 25% you speak of are illegals. Keep something in mind that I have said many times,"I'll give a man a hand up, but not a handout." There will always be some less fortunate than others, that's just the way it is. Don't try to make me feel guilty, I've worked hard my entire life for what I have and have given my fair share to charities.(SPCA, Salvation Army, and Masonic home for kids.) Trying to make everyone equal is an impossibe feat except in the eyes of the Lord. Some people are willing to work and some would rather sit on their butt and wait for the government to take care of them. One last thing about your healthcare rant, the deadbeats would rather spend what they've got or get on beer or wine than insurance. they 've realized after 40yrs of suckin' on the government tit that the bleedin' hearts will take care of them.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.