Did anyone catch the spread or ML price on the debate the other night since people in the political forum, and those on the news, think that Harris won the debate? I mean, if there was a declared winner there must have been odds, right?
Trump winning the election went from 1.88 (before the debate) now it is 2.14
Don't mention the frogs - we don't want to scare the toddler - we want him to sleep
@ABooksNightmare
Quote Originally Posted by ABooksNightmare:
Did anyone catch the spread or ML price on the debate the other night since people in the political forum, and those on the news, think that Harris won the debate? I mean, if there was a declared winner there must have been odds, right?
Trump winning the election went from 1.88 (before the debate) now it is 2.14
to have a winner and a loser it must be definitive not an assumption or perception...you cannot have a winner of a Presidential debate in terns of a winner or a loser because it is not a competition...you can certainly have an assumption or perception that one did better or one did worse than the other, but there is not and never will be a clear cut winner or loser in a Presidential debate...to think otherwise, in actual terms of what a winner and loser actually is, would be delusional...
To think this has to be explained to people on a betting site where winners and losers are defined daily is just pure comedy...if you want to win a debate, join a debate team, and when you do you will see specific criteria that is laid out and an objective to be met to declare any such team a winner or a loser...no Presidential debate ever does this...the winner and loser of any Presidential due process is only determined on election night...
I guess with everyone's theory I should call my book and debate that the Dodgers didn't lose last nights game and if I win that debate with the operator they should refund anyone who lost betting the Cubs...
COVERS allows u to tell someone they are sexually frustrated so long as ur hands are clean
nobody won a debate...
to have a winner and a loser it must be definitive not an assumption or perception...you cannot have a winner of a Presidential debate in terns of a winner or a loser because it is not a competition...you can certainly have an assumption or perception that one did better or one did worse than the other, but there is not and never will be a clear cut winner or loser in a Presidential debate...to think otherwise, in actual terms of what a winner and loser actually is, would be delusional...
To think this has to be explained to people on a betting site where winners and losers are defined daily is just pure comedy...if you want to win a debate, join a debate team, and when you do you will see specific criteria that is laid out and an objective to be met to declare any such team a winner or a loser...no Presidential debate ever does this...the winner and loser of any Presidential due process is only determined on election night...
I guess with everyone's theory I should call my book and debate that the Dodgers didn't lose last nights game and if I win that debate with the operator they should refund anyone who lost betting the Cubs...
Are you high? Of course there can be a winner and a loser in a debate - does that mean Trump lost the election - no - but he had the debate to make it more likely - meaning he lost the debate as it had the opposite effect of what he wanted - which also explains why he doesnt want another one
Don't mention the frogs - we don't want to scare the toddler - we want him to sleep
Are you high? Of course there can be a winner and a loser in a debate - does that mean Trump lost the election - no - but he had the debate to make it more likely - meaning he lost the debate as it had the opposite effect of what he wanted - which also explains why he doesnt want another one
Quote Originally Posted by ABooksNightmare: Did anyone catch the spread or ML price on the debate the other night since people in the political forum, and those on the news, think that Harris won the debate? I mean, if there was a declared winner there must have been odds, right? A Haitian couple moved into neighborhood thinking of inviting them over for dinner.
That's a good look on you, brody. I, on the other hand, will continue to be on some Clayton Bigsby hype around my neck of the woods. Definitely not inviting any random Haitians to dinner. They're probably Zoes. I sometimes feel bad but I be on some nimby.
R.I.P. #94 MARSHAWN KNEELAND - DC4L
Quote Originally Posted by benhogan76:
Quote Originally Posted by ABooksNightmare: Did anyone catch the spread or ML price on the debate the other night since people in the political forum, and those on the news, think that Harris won the debate? I mean, if there was a declared winner there must have been odds, right? A Haitian couple moved into neighborhood thinking of inviting them over for dinner.
That's a good look on you, brody. I, on the other hand, will continue to be on some Clayton Bigsby hype around my neck of the woods. Definitely not inviting any random Haitians to dinner. They're probably Zoes. I sometimes feel bad but I be on some nimby.
nobody won a debate...
Hot Forum Topics
