Posted:
#26
@chic-cardinals
You are back to that "narrative" because the Chiefs are kicking the 49ers ass!
Where are you Bro? You said Herbert was better than Garoppolo?
Posted:
#28
Quote Originally Posted by IsThisReality17:
Let's put it this way, chic. If the Niners could trade Jimmy for Herbert, they would do it immediately. End of discussion because everyone besides you agrees on that.
Let's put it this way, chic. If the Niners could trade Jimmy for Herbert, they would do it immediately. End of discussion because everyone besides you agrees on that.
I told him the exact same thing yesterday. He said numerology is more telling than strength of schedule.
He said the Chiefs would lose because they've lost 5 in a row in SF. They've played in SF twice in the last 20 years. 
Posted:
#30
Quote Originally Posted by DaniloGold23:
Quote Originally Posted by chic-cardinals: It's still early. The cliche late comebacks can happen. But all the accounts knocking Garoppolo and praising Herbert last night. Where youz at, yo!?
Quote Originally Posted by chic-cardinals: It's still early. The cliche late comebacks can happen. But all the accounts knocking Garoppolo and praising Herbert last night. Where youz at, yo!?
wow the cocaine flowing on a sunday. love it!
Nope, never
Posted:
#42
Quote Originally Posted by IsThisReality17:
Let's put it this way, chic. If the Niners could trade Jimmy for Herbert, they would do it immediately. End of discussion because everyone besides you agrees on that.
Let's put it this way, chic. If the Niners could trade Jimmy for Herbert, they would do it immediately. End of discussion because everyone besides you agrees on that.
It won't be the end because he would just say something else for the attention.
Posted:
#44
Quote Originally Posted by the1toturn2:
Quote Originally Posted by chic-cardinals: Quote Originally Posted by the1toturn2: I thought he played QB not any position on defense Lol and there you go. Pointless and stupid circular sporfs argument.
Quote Originally Posted by chic-cardinals: Quote Originally Posted by the1toturn2: I thought he played QB not any position on defense Lol and there you go. Pointless and stupid circular sporfs argument.
Apparently my perspective is too complex for you as you just keep repeating yourself
Like I said. Pointless stupid circular sporfs debate. You didn't say anything that hasn't been said a million times. I've watched sports for 4 decades. I've if course uttered the same stupid phrase
Posted:
#45
Quote Originally Posted by IsThisReality17:
@chic-cardinals Huh? Is this some kind of conspiracy theory I'm unaware of? Can you elaborate for me? I'm afraid to ask but you managed to pique my interest.
@chic-cardinals Huh? Is this some kind of conspiracy theory I'm unaware of? Can you elaborate for me? I'm afraid to ask but you managed to pique my interest.
What theory? If teams were actually trying to win. They wouldn't keep or get sub par QBs for years. They wouldn't let Brady or Manning walk out if a stadium healthy for a decade. They wouldn't go on fourth and waste points in FG range.
I obviously don't care which QB is better or think Garoppolo is that good. Just joined the sports debate party to help people feel good.
But Herbert list too. At home,To a older ,back up QB. ( To be fare,I might be working in 3 game clock minutes lol)
So I'm not entirely wrong either lol
Posted:
#46
Quote Originally Posted by chic-cardinals:
Quote Originally Posted by IsThisReality17: @chic-cardinals Huh? Is this some kind of conspiracy theory I'm unaware of? Can you elaborate for me? I'm afraid to ask but you managed to pique my interest. What theory? If teams were actually trying to win. They wouldn't keep or get sub par QBs for years. They wouldn't let Brady or Manning walk out if a stadium healthy for a decade. They wouldn't go on fourth and waste points in FG range. I obviously don't care which QB is better or think Garoppolo is that good. Just joined the sports debate party to help people feel good. But Herbert list too. At home,To a older ,back up QB. ( To be fare,I might be working in 3 game clock minutes lol) So I'm not entirely wrong either lol
Quote Originally Posted by IsThisReality17: @chic-cardinals Huh? Is this some kind of conspiracy theory I'm unaware of? Can you elaborate for me? I'm afraid to ask but you managed to pique my interest. What theory? If teams were actually trying to win. They wouldn't keep or get sub par QBs for years. They wouldn't let Brady or Manning walk out if a stadium healthy for a decade. They wouldn't go on fourth and waste points in FG range. I obviously don't care which QB is better or think Garoppolo is that good. Just joined the sports debate party to help people feel good. But Herbert list too. At home,To a older ,back up QB. ( To be fare,I might be working in 3 game clock minutes lol) So I'm not entirely wrong either lol
Teams have salary caps to deal with. As for QBs signing one year contracts; what if they suck, what if they blow a knee?
Posted:
#47
Quote Originally Posted by Jimmy_Cats:
Quote Originally Posted by chic-cardinals: Quote Originally Posted by IsThisReality17: @chic-cardinals Huh? Is this some kind of conspiracy theory I'm unaware of? Can you elaborate for me? I'm afraid to ask but you managed to pique my interest. What theory? If teams were actually trying to win. They wouldn't keep or get sub par QBs for years. They wouldn't let Brady or Manning walk out if a stadium healthy for a decade. They wouldn't go on fourth and waste points in FG range. I obviously don't care which QB is better or think Garoppolo is that good. Just joined the sports debate party to help people feel good. But Herbert list too. At home,To a older ,back up QB. ( To be fare,I might be wrong in 3 game clock minutes lol) So I'm not entirely wrong either lol
Quote Originally Posted by chic-cardinals: Quote Originally Posted by IsThisReality17: @chic-cardinals Huh? Is this some kind of conspiracy theory I'm unaware of? Can you elaborate for me? I'm afraid to ask but you managed to pique my interest. What theory? If teams were actually trying to win. They wouldn't keep or get sub par QBs for years. They wouldn't let Brady or Manning walk out if a stadium healthy for a decade. They wouldn't go on fourth and waste points in FG range. I obviously don't care which QB is better or think Garoppolo is that good. Just joined the sports debate party to help people feel good. But Herbert list too. At home,To a older ,back up QB. ( To be fare,I might be wrong in 3 game clock minutes lol) So I'm not entirely wrong either lol
Teams have salary caps to deal with. As for QBs signing one year contracts; what if they suck, what if they blow a knee?
Salary caps are pure fiction. No armchair fan has any actual clue what teams are paying out to anyone.
What if they blow out a knee...? You should be asking why it doesn't happen more often in the first place. It would probably, if you weren't watching WWE pretend football.
Hot Forum Topics
