Posted:
#76
I like the way the Ravens have been playing as of late. Usually a game I would stay away from but being that it is Monday Night and I'm a degenerate I'll take:
Ravens +4 and over 43
0
*****My Biggest Play Of My Life*****
Posted:
#77
Quote Originally Posted by WinningUnits:
I hit my NFL goy, CFB goy, and NFL play of the decade last week. I have a posted record of 7-2 and this will be the biggest play of my life.
A lot of people are on GB and I can see why. They have the 2nd rated defense in the NFL, 6th rated offense, playing at home, and they have a winning record at 7-4. etc etc etc etc. Baltimore on the other hand sit at 6-5. Their offense has been struggling as of late and they lost a few key defensive players in Suggs and Washington.
GB's record is at 7-4 and have the 2nd best defense in the NFL. This is nothing but pure smoke and mirrors. They only played 3 teams with a winning record. The three teams are Minnesota (twice), Cincinnati and Dallas. That would be a total of 4 out of their 11 games were aganist teams with a winning record. Their record would be 1-3 including THREE of those losses were at home. Most impressive win to date? Beating Dallas 17-7 at home. Although is beating Dallas anything worth of praise? Not so sure about that. The rest of the teams they played have a combined record of 24-52! Add to the fact that those teams have an average rank of 26.6 in total defense in the NFL.
Baltimore's record is 6-5. Look into their record and they could EASILY be at 8-2 and maybe even 9-1. The first loss came @NE. With just 40 seconds left on the clock, Mason dropped a pass on the 4th down that would have given the Ravens a first down. They get that first down and most likely win that game. The second lost came to Cinn. In went down to the final few seconds. Ray Lewis late hit on Ocho Cinco might have costed the game. Cinn drove the field in the last few minutes and took the lead. The third loss was to Minn and probably the toughest loss this year. Former kicker Steve Hauschka missed a 41 yard field goal in the final few seconds. Their 4th loss was a striaght up smash. They lost to Cinn 17-0. The lastest lost came to Indy. A late INT by Joe Flacco caused them a go ahead lead with just minutes left on the clock.
With all of that they sit at 6-5. If boucnes go their way, who really knows what their record would be. With all of that, Baltimore has played one of the toughest schedules in the NFL. Out of the 11 games they played, 8 games were aganist teams with a record of 500 or better. They played 6 different teams with a winning record and 1 team that sits at 500. All 6 of those teams very well could make the playoffs.
The Ravens have one of the most talented O-line in all of the NFL. Give them a few more years and this very well could be the best O-line in all of the NFL. They have been playing really well as of late. They gashed the league's best rush defense in Pitt last week for 132 yards. I think the loss of multiple time Pro Bowler Aaron Kampman is a big time loss both in the run defense and pass rush. Take it for what it's worth
It's Primetime on MNF and don't think for a second the Ravens will laydown for anyone. Ray Lewis, Ed Reed, and his boys getting a bunch of points. Play the Ravens and play it BIG.
Ravens (+4 buy hook) 1000 Units
Ravens (ML +175) 200 Units
I see a lot of signs pointing toward greenbay, but I can't get away from the ravens either. I hope were right!
0
Posted:
#78
Quote Originally Posted by IgetMoney101:
I
got all trends that trump any other. This year (these %'s are based
from vegasinsider) if joe public has won on SNF they lost on MNF and if
they lost on SNF they won on MNF. Well that trend is 13-0 this year.
There were 2 MNF games week 1 but there was no SNF during the World
Series. 13-0 is that a coincidence? I think not!! Joe public lost last night on Minn well that means they will hit on GB HERE IS ONE OF MY REASONS
I agree on everyone and there mothers on Minny last night and it was a complete one sided game! i loved it cuz i was on the cards!!! thses trends are not meaningless and 13-0 IS NOT TO BE IGNORED!!!! and joe public is all over balt 2nite! shit i like balt 2nite but this is an impressive trend!!!!!!!!Rookie
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 876
Location: Michigan
#26
Posted: 12/7/2009 12:13:16 PM0
Posted:
#80
Quote Originally Posted by WinningUnits:
I'm not making no excuses for Baltimore. Cinn is a better team then Balitmore. Funny how GB is just 1 game better then Balitmore's record yet played the EASIEST schedule in the NFL. Ravens is the side I'm on. Who do think you are anyway? Come in my thread and bash me like your god? STFU and get out of here 
well you just bashed me far more than I "bashed" you
I said you sound ridiculous, as does everyone else when they say PLAY OF THE YEAR, PLAY OF THE DECADE, PLAY OF THE CENTURY....PLAY OF MILLENIUM and so on....
then I debated your statement of the Ravens should be 8-1/9-1 because they aren't so why should they be....close games doesn't mean they should be wins.....
The Steelers should be 10-1 then since almost every loss has been close and at the end of the game but they aren't because they aren't as good as last year....
I haven't made a pick yet on the game....for all I know I may be on the Ravens once I get home and can look at information. I never bashed the pick just those 2 statements so you and your boy Xtreme dude can pipe down and use common sense to read and decifer the english language....
0
Posted:
#82
Quote Originally Posted by HarryBalls:
1) this guy isn't wrong he is just misleading you people with the wrong understanding of the facts.....
2) no one bets 1000 units.......come on!!!!!!!!
3) lastly, the Ravens can't score and Flacco can't pass for a TD no matter who they play..........
4) If you're going to choose a team tonight don't follow this line of thinking....
Please come see me after the game. Balt shows up tonight
0
Posted:
#85
Quote Originally Posted by R13:
I agree on everyone and there mothers on Minny last night and it was a complete one sided game! i loved it cuz i was on the cards!!! thses trends are not meaningless and 13-0 IS NOT TO BE IGNORED!!!! and joe public is all over balt 2nite! shit i like balt 2nite but this is an impressive trend!!!!!!!!
I agree on everyone and there mothers on Minny last night and it was a complete one sided game! i loved it cuz i was on the cards!!! thses trends are not meaningless and 13-0 IS NOT TO BE IGNORED!!!! and joe public is all over balt 2nite! shit i like balt 2nite but this is an impressive trend!!!!!!!!
Acutally Joe public is GB. Everyone is on GB. Believe me it takes a bunch of money to move the line off of 3 and it did for this game.
0
Posted:
#86
Quote Originally Posted by Xtreme81:
HaHa you sound ridiculous....so just because the Bengals beat the Ravens they are the better team? This is the freakin NFL....So are the Raiders better then the Steelers? Or the Bengals for that matter? I can go on and on....but if you're gonna bash someone for the way they worded a post, don't word yours like a moron.
People on here crack me up...you don't like the thread, move on. It's cool to express your opinion on the game, but to bash people on an internet thread is just straight ignorant
0
Posted:
#90
The second lost came to Cinn. In went down
to the final few seconds. Ray Lewis late hit on Ocho Cinco might have
costed the game. Cinn drove the field in the last few minutes and took
the lead
Lol I watched that entire game and Cincy dominated the shit out of Baltimore. Baltimore had two lucky plays that kept them in the game. A pick six by Ed Reed and a Ray Rice long TD where a Cincy lineman was held with no call. Not that Cincy compares to GB but just don't tell me how close Baltimore was to winning that first game in Baltimore against Cincy when they were actually completely dominated and would have been shutout minus two plays. Two miscues by the Bengals or else they would have been blanked twice by the Bungels.
I am just saying facts can be presented anyway you want to make your point. Just like if you read Men's Health Magazine Baltimore is the 5th fittest city in the U.S. and if you read Men's Journal Magazine Baltimore is 4th fattest.
LOL I would still take the 3.5 and pick the Ravens.
Lol I watched that entire game and Cincy dominated the shit out of Baltimore. Baltimore had two lucky plays that kept them in the game. A pick six by Ed Reed and a Ray Rice long TD where a Cincy lineman was held with no call. Not that Cincy compares to GB but just don't tell me how close Baltimore was to winning that first game in Baltimore against Cincy when they were actually completely dominated and would have been shutout minus two plays. Two miscues by the Bengals or else they would have been blanked twice by the Bungels.
I am just saying facts can be presented anyway you want to make your point. Just like if you read Men's Health Magazine Baltimore is the 5th fittest city in the U.S. and if you read Men's Journal Magazine Baltimore is 4th fattest.
LOL I would still take the 3.5 and pick the Ravens.
0
Posted:
#91
WU makes valid points on Ravens close losses,but to be objective,one must examine their wins also. KC and CLEV twice need no explaination. They narrowly won at SAND when the team was struggling,beat Rothlisberger-less Pitt. The most impressive of their wins was at home versus Broncos when DENV was in the midst of a brief losing streak. This Suggs-less defense is very ordinary and Pack defense would no doubt like to show who is the better unit.
0
Posted:
#93
Adding fuel to the Ravens fire. I love it. I think the Ravens are good, I think they are no better than the Packers, in fact, they are worse in skill positions with the exception of Ray Rice.
I can't look much more beyond the deep line that people are in to put their money on these guys. I think the Packers beat them by double digits.
I can't look much more beyond the deep line that people are in to put their money on these guys. I think the Packers beat them by double digits.
0
Posted:
#94
ed reed is shaken up. suggs is out. woodson vs mason...mason doesn't have enough speed to beat woodson one on one...who is flacco gonna throw to? don't tell me mark clayton and kelly washington. baltimore will be one dimensional tonight running the ball. people just need to realize this defense isn't the same. although rodgers has been sacked many times he handles blitzes well. baltimore also ranks very low in sacks. with time rodgers is dangerous. green bay will win this one.
0
also note:
Posted:
#99
Quote Originally Posted by patslover:
here is a true bet. GL Balt backers. Packers backers will go broke after tonight
| 12/07/09 01:02 ET | |
| Result: Pending | |
| 12/07/09(20:40 ET) | |
| Ravens(Baltimore) +3.5 |
I just looked at your bet on my book and to win 450 would cost me 468 for Baltimore +3.5. I thought my book was bad. U should shop around for a new one. I guess the line could have moved. It's at -104 for Balt +3.5.
BOL
0
Hot Forum Topics
