Lets be clear that I am not against starwink... I have no bad history with him in the past or currently...
what you can see by the thread is BMA trying to encourage more divisiveness and splitting...
It could be said that the occupy movement caused the meltdown and terrorist attacks... I could also be said that the occupy movement is in response to the terrorist attacks... I think the two fed off of each other...
but once the site saw BMA for what he really is things changed for ever
Covers knows
0
Lets be clear that I am not against starwink... I have no bad history with him in the past or currently...
what you can see by the thread is BMA trying to encourage more divisiveness and splitting...
It could be said that the occupy movement caused the meltdown and terrorist attacks... I could also be said that the occupy movement is in response to the terrorist attacks... I think the two fed off of each other...
but once the site saw BMA for what he really is things changed for ever
I have no idea what you are talking about. Nor do I care. You and your gang have been running wild with accusations, threats, uncontrolled whining and just general nonsense for weeks now.
STFU. You guys have lost most of my respect. It's sad too because I'm basically a progressive like yourself.
Lay off with all the bullshit with BMA. He has a right to his opinion of world affairs, just as much as you do, to yours. You accomplish nothing with your continual attacks.
Interesting.... this is starting to seem like a case of noble cause just bad timing ...out of all the people that have been unfairly badgered, forced , mob attacked out of covers just in the time I have been here... but now Starwink is losing respect for the "posse" over BMA out of all posters.
Out of everyone and a couple Ive thought didnt deserve to be hated like they did.... its BMA that upets him to the point that he has made this thread over.
That is flawed logic if you ask me. Plus I have seen a couple comments on what I have read so far of people coming in so far saying dont let them get to ya Starwink????? How does that once again make sense. This thread was made with questionable intentions in the first place...so the people that have made a comment are now the shit starters and not the person who created the thread.
Never had a problem with ya Starwinks... never gave us a reason really. But why you chose BMA out of everyone to go out of your way to do this so mind boggling I am unable to grasp it in the slightest. This is one of those things where the intentions are true... just very poor when looked on from a situational standpoint
0
Quote Originally Posted by starwink:
I have no idea what you are talking about. Nor do I care. You and your gang have been running wild with accusations, threats, uncontrolled whining and just general nonsense for weeks now.
STFU. You guys have lost most of my respect. It's sad too because I'm basically a progressive like yourself.
Lay off with all the bullshit with BMA. He has a right to his opinion of world affairs, just as much as you do, to yours. You accomplish nothing with your continual attacks.
Interesting.... this is starting to seem like a case of noble cause just bad timing ...out of all the people that have been unfairly badgered, forced , mob attacked out of covers just in the time I have been here... but now Starwink is losing respect for the "posse" over BMA out of all posters.
Out of everyone and a couple Ive thought didnt deserve to be hated like they did.... its BMA that upets him to the point that he has made this thread over.
That is flawed logic if you ask me. Plus I have seen a couple comments on what I have read so far of people coming in so far saying dont let them get to ya Starwink????? How does that once again make sense. This thread was made with questionable intentions in the first place...so the people that have made a comment are now the shit starters and not the person who created the thread.
Never had a problem with ya Starwinks... never gave us a reason really. But why you chose BMA out of everyone to go out of your way to do this so mind boggling I am unable to grasp it in the slightest. This is one of those things where the intentions are true... just very poor when looked on from a situational standpoint
And on top of that I do not understand this posse shit anyways... and apparently it is directed at people who are against from the posts in this thread. There isnt a posse ... and if there is I sure have missed the conference calls cuz this for me was all about what BMA was and is to this site.
I didnt really have a problem or knew shit bout GBP until Hugh started to point things out. I looked into some threads and started reading old GBP threads I never cared to read more then a page or so back in the day when they were made.
Well once I got to reading the threads and how GBP acted.... GBP is the one that made me dislike GBP ... I have said this before when I said I see why he posts and pastes everything.... its because his rhetoric has gotten him banned 5 or so other times on this exact site !!!!!!!!!
But now since things have not been going his way Ive seen untamed traces of the old GBP in unhealthy doses. He could quite personally be worse at the same thing that got him banned countless times.
Been here since 2008 and have always been against people being banned. Cant think of a person I have really agreed with having banned in the end.... I never hardly talk about saf shit in any thread until recently. That is the dif in all this to me. I hate seeing people banned but this BMA fella is the exception to that rule..
My question has always been this.... kind of like my question towards you Starwink when it comes to BMA..... why BMA out of all the people who have been banned once and allowed to come back... all the people who have came along and all the situations that have developed over last so many years...
1. Why BMA allowed to come back on 6th name to stay regardless of how he is getting along with the majority of the people on the forum. I do not think there is a logical answer that can be given to thatt specific question.
0
And on top of that I do not understand this posse shit anyways... and apparently it is directed at people who are against from the posts in this thread. There isnt a posse ... and if there is I sure have missed the conference calls cuz this for me was all about what BMA was and is to this site.
I didnt really have a problem or knew shit bout GBP until Hugh started to point things out. I looked into some threads and started reading old GBP threads I never cared to read more then a page or so back in the day when they were made.
Well once I got to reading the threads and how GBP acted.... GBP is the one that made me dislike GBP ... I have said this before when I said I see why he posts and pastes everything.... its because his rhetoric has gotten him banned 5 or so other times on this exact site !!!!!!!!!
But now since things have not been going his way Ive seen untamed traces of the old GBP in unhealthy doses. He could quite personally be worse at the same thing that got him banned countless times.
Been here since 2008 and have always been against people being banned. Cant think of a person I have really agreed with having banned in the end.... I never hardly talk about saf shit in any thread until recently. That is the dif in all this to me. I hate seeing people banned but this BMA fella is the exception to that rule..
My question has always been this.... kind of like my question towards you Starwink when it comes to BMA..... why BMA out of all the people who have been banned once and allowed to come back... all the people who have came along and all the situations that have developed over last so many years...
1. Why BMA allowed to come back on 6th name to stay regardless of how he is getting along with the majority of the people on the forum. I do not think there is a logical answer that can be given to thatt specific question.
umm.... I was talking to starwink... not you BMA...
you okay? like seriously? are you started to unravel?
Perhaps what I posted is bothering you... if not you woudl not have responded to a post that was for starwink
It seems that you concede that your failed attempt at trying to pretend a doctor is over and you have been reduced to emoticons and links... your bot imitation is much more believable...
dont worry BMA... every poster on covers has their kyptonite... I just happen to me your's
you bumped all the threads in here and in Polotics
you are a proven and habitual thread bumper
Dude_Abides kept telling you about your obseession with thread bumping
it will end in your demise
d136
0
Quote Originally Posted by dl36:
umm.... I was talking to starwink... not you BMA...
you okay? like seriously? are you started to unravel?
Perhaps what I posted is bothering you... if not you woudl not have responded to a post that was for starwink
It seems that you concede that your failed attempt at trying to pretend a doctor is over and you have been reduced to emoticons and links... your bot imitation is much more believable...
dont worry BMA... every poster on covers has their kyptonite... I just happen to me your's
you bumped all the threads in here and in Polotics
you are a proven and habitual thread bumper
Dude_Abides kept telling you about your obseession with thread bumping
...so the people that have made a comment are now the shit starters and not the person who created the thread. 
We are leaving en masse. 
Hot Forum Topics
