Wait, I said I would only respond to Scal with one of two stock answers.
Scal, you came in last in your own capping contest.
Jets are priced as the slight fav to win the cup right now at B365...so i truly think Jets to win this series at -145 is the best wagering option at the moment...beating Nashville on the road in game 7 is what championship teams need to go thru to come together and believe this is their year...i know Vegas' story is the most unique in sports history in the modern era, however the Jets were expected to be here as a legit conference contender preseason, and Vegas was not...home ice advantage is huge now, and Winnipeg has it.
Go Jets Go.
Jets are priced as the slight fav to win the cup right now at B365...so i truly think Jets to win this series at -145 is the best wagering option at the moment...beating Nashville on the road in game 7 is what championship teams need to go thru to come together and believe this is their year...i know Vegas' story is the most unique in sports history in the modern era, however the Jets were expected to be here as a legit conference contender preseason, and Vegas was not...home ice advantage is huge now, and Winnipeg has it.
Go Jets Go.
Good luck...full disclaimer im not a hockey expert...but i have a good feeling for series wagers depsite never posting them in NHL...last one went pretty smoothly with the Pens -160 to beat Philly...but Vegas is a tough out as proven all year long...this series should play out as Offense (Jets) vs Defense (Knights)...but as proven already, Jets can D up pretty good as well.
Good luck...full disclaimer im not a hockey expert...but i have a good feeling for series wagers depsite never posting them in NHL...last one went pretty smoothly with the Pens -160 to beat Philly...but Vegas is a tough out as proven all year long...this series should play out as Offense (Jets) vs Defense (Knights)...but as proven already, Jets can D up pretty good as well.
Too early to say, but this series should come down to Fleury vs Hellybuck...with Schieffle and Laine being the wildcards.
Too early to say, but this series should come down to Fleury vs Hellybuck...with Schieffle and Laine being the wildcards.
He doesn't have to admit anything to me. Again, you're making a joke out of something I said very sincerely. Lord knows Scal and I have had our moments but his last few posts were about regular stuff. Talking bout tennis. Talking bout the Jets. Why fire it back up?
He doesn't have to admit anything to me. Again, you're making a joke out of something I said very sincerely. Lord knows Scal and I have had our moments but his last few posts were about regular stuff. Talking bout tennis. Talking bout the Jets. Why fire it back up?
Whoa, where did I say I have a problem with Hugh? I don't. Truth be told, I don't have a problem with you either.
Joseph "Sabanesque" Goebbels is the only person I have a problem with on covers.
Whoa, where did I say I have a problem with Hugh? I don't. Truth be told, I don't have a problem with you either.
Joseph "Sabanesque" Goebbels is the only person I have a problem with on covers.
Scal says i'm isolated. A man with no wife, no girlfriend, no friends at all, who lives alone in the Pine Barrens. Find me any racism in the box since you left. Find anyone insulting me personally on this site besides you. Your whole shtick is old and paper thin.
Scal says i'm isolated. A man with no wife, no girlfriend, no friends at all, who lives alone in the Pine Barrens. Find me any racism in the box since you left. Find anyone insulting me personally on this site besides you. Your whole shtick is old and paper thin.
Calling it like I see it. I've used that line on Scal several times to see if he catches it. Trying to guage his age. I doubt they listen to much Lyte as a rock in the Pine Barrens of New Jersey tho. I've never been but from what I hear it's pretty rural and isolated. Just makes it all the more ironic that he thinks i'm isolated. I've got a family, been with the same woman for 12 years and can still party my friends who are in their 20s clear under the table.
Calling it like I see it. I've used that line on Scal several times to see if he catches it. Trying to guage his age. I doubt they listen to much Lyte as a rock in the Pine Barrens of New Jersey tho. I've never been but from what I hear it's pretty rural and isolated. Just makes it all the more ironic that he thinks i'm isolated. I've got a family, been with the same woman for 12 years and can still party my friends who are in their 20s clear under the table.
Scal and I have had this back and forth for a while and it's stupid. I'm over it, I think he is too. He used to sit here and "battle" with all the "bigots" of covers and I always thought it was kinda stupid and pointless. That was part of our problem. I know in the past guys used to say some foul sh!t. Still do sometimes. I've always taken the stance that this is an internet chat forum and I couldn't care less what these people think. Now with Sabanesque, I notice myself going back and forth like Scal used to.
Scal and I have had this back and forth for a while and it's stupid. I'm over it, I think he is too. He used to sit here and "battle" with all the "bigots" of covers and I always thought it was kinda stupid and pointless. That was part of our problem. I know in the past guys used to say some foul sh!t. Still do sometimes. I've always taken the stance that this is an internet chat forum and I couldn't care less what these people think. Now with Sabanesque, I notice myself going back and forth like Scal used to.
Whoa, where did I say I have a problem with Hugh? I don't. Truth be told, I don't have a problem with you either.
Joseph "Sabanesque" Goebbels is the only person I have a problem with on covers.
Whoa, where did I say I have a problem with Hugh? I don't. Truth be told, I don't have a problem with you either.
Joseph "Sabanesque" Goebbels is the only person I have a problem with on covers.
I guess you saw a portmanteau of your screen name and seized on it and never paid attention to what the thread was actually about. Again, i've never had an issue with Hugh. I know he's a bigot according to you. I guess i'll havs to take your word for it because he's never said anything foul around me. He's been here a long time and I know how it used to be so I can believe it bit that's not enough to get me up in arms. Sabanesque, on the other hand....
I guess you saw a portmanteau of your screen name and seized on it and never paid attention to what the thread was actually about. Again, i've never had an issue with Hugh. I know he's a bigot according to you. I guess i'll havs to take your word for it because he's never said anything foul around me. He's been here a long time and I know how it used to be so I can believe it bit that's not enough to get me up in arms. Sabanesque, on the other hand....
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.