Posted:
#101
Hey Scal, do us a favor. Can you tell us all or the 3467th time how well you did or those TWO years out of a 11?
Histrionic personality disorder. It's sad
0
I'M THROWING DOWN THE GAUNTLET SCALAJABRONEE STYLE: STU VS. SABANESQUE. LOSER LEAVES COVERS FOREVER
Posted:
#103
Quote Originally Posted by BIGfnPOO:
That Wyoming in the snow storm getting + points to Nm st? was one of my better picks.wow..you guys got some memory.
Aweome job. I was SHOCKED, just SCHOCKED, that it snowed in Wyoming in November of of all months
That Wyoming in the snow storm getting + points to Nm st? was one of my better picks.wow..you guys got some memory.
Histrionic personality disorder. It's sad
0
Posted:
#105
So let’s see how infantile their “insult” about 9 years of losing is and you can assess the general level of intelligence of the posters:
If someone posted an alleged nine YEARS of under .500 capping
(statistically improbable in general and statistically impossible given the sharp are accusing):
(statistically improbable in general and statistically impossible given the sharp are accusing):Wouldn’t it make sense someone got BETTER as the years went on???
So in -15 and -16 I would have refined my capping craft to become quote/unquote “a syndicate target”.
Hence the 9 “down” years culminating in two glorious capping years would make SENSE.
It’s like criticizing an expansion team for having a bad year when they first entered the league. They are supposed to be underwhelming! (Excluding what is going on with Vegas which is mind boggling).
That’s just a single LAYER of how iditioc their INSULTS are.
Don Rickles, they are not....
Do I have to keep doing this? Seriously. It’s not only insulting but it takes MY time away from YOUR winners!
0
Posted:
#107
Of course I have winners.
And even when I lose, I win....Fairfield -1.5 over St Peter’s as an example with a meaningless three point chuck at the horn to lose by 1.
Lost in the box score on the Bellagio betting board. Won in the box score...of life.
And THAT’S LIFE!
Thaaaaats LIIIIIIFE! That’s what all the cappers say,
I’m riding high in April, your SHOT DOWN in May,
And if you’re still gonna give capping a tryyyyyy,
You’re better off rolling yourself up, in a big ball
To CRYYYYYYYYYYYYY!
My inner Sammy Davis Jr. came out there (twice the singer of Ol Blue Eyes). I don’t know what came over me!
0
Posted:
#108
FYI,
Now?
1,020 views and 108 posts.
Scalabrine: A betting brand unto himself.
Paging Mark Cuban and Mr Wonderful on Shark Tank for equity shares. $5,000 for 1%. Take it or leave it baby.
You want views in your threads?
You want massive amounts participation?
You want it bumped so continually touts will use it to advertise for their site before getting banned?
Have Scalabrine stroll into it...and start commenting about just about...anything.
All this advertising? Free of charge.
Absolutely
Incredible....
0
Posted:
#109
Scal, you don't have to say quote/unquote when you insert the actual quotation marks. And you don't have to do either when you're quoting yourself. You're the only one who has ever called yourself a "syndicate target".(return)
As far as your two up years, 62% is far from glorious. It's a winning season, true. Let's leave it a that. What's most likely is you sucked for 9 years, got luck for two, and now you're reverting back to the mean. The 9 years can be disputed but by your own admission you were at 50% last year. You are down this year. Those aren't the numbers of a wunderkind.(return)
To use your expansion team analogy, you're not the Arizona Diamondbacks. You don't have rings. You're not the Panthers. H3ll, you're not even the Toronto Craptors. You're the Vancouver Grizzlies. You're the Devil Rays. You're the Jacksonville Jaguars. You may have had a winning year or two but the fact is you suck. You finished 3rd out of 3 in a contest you proposed. So spare us all of the self aggrandizing.
R.I.P. #94 MARSHAWN KNEELAND - DC4L
0
Posted:
#110
You are so sad and delusional. You are one of the few people on this site who cares about view and post counts. You claim to not care about what people on this site think but when you brag about meaningless things like view counts you prove that not caring is just another one of your lies. (return)
The only reason post counts go up when you insert yourself in a thread is because so many people hate you and love to take any opportunity to remind you of how much you suck. Of all these post you brag about, how many are "Pro Scal"? Where are all the trumpets heralding the King?(Crickets)(return)
Lastly. No, Scal, you don't win even when you lose. You lose when you lose. You sound like a child, or at very least, a habitual loser. You're full of excuses. "Whaaaah! Last second shots. It snowed in Wyoming." Winners take losses and move on. Losers dwell. You are a loser. You lost your own contest, yet here you are. You lose every debate you claim to win. I'm willing to bet you are losing at life.
R.I.P. #94 MARSHAWN KNEELAND - DC4L
0
Posted:
#111
And Scal. Do yourself a favor. Come out of the closet. Live your best life and that starts with being honest with yourself. All of this false Brovado, that's not you. That's not anybody. It's a mask. A shield. All of the insults, the bragging about your capping prowess, it's a shield. Nobody that is mentally and emotionally stable talks the way you do.
R.I.P. #94 MARSHAWN KNEELAND - DC4L
0
Posted:
#112
When you lose a bet, you win Both the funniest and dumbest things I have read in a long time. He thinks because he spews some stupid wordy write-up, it means he is good. Plus he is paying attention to the post counts? How phucking old are you? 12?
"Mommy, I went into covers again (yes I know Mommy, I lied to everyone and did not leave) and I made some of my infamous hypocritical lying post and I got people to talk to me Mommy!! I feel SOOOOOO special today Mommy"
Histrionic personality disorder. It's sad
0
Posted:
#114
Isn’t it absolutely incredible and the height of all lunacy when a poster mockingly labastes someone for caring about VIEW COUNTS and REPLIES, when he himself made a thread for the SOLE PURPOSE of:
1) Having it VIEWED by as many people as possible
2) Read
3) REPLIED to.
And worse he mocks those three things in the very thread HE CREATED to have those three things occur!!?????
Paging person Clark and Ed McMahon on for Covers TV Bloopers and Practical Jones. I cannot stop laughing. This guy is amazing.
Slob I guess I am. Time will tell. Having it vacant with out CC was an improvement period.
0
Posted:
#116
don rickles ...scal, give you credit for that one.... he is one funny man... capping.... on the other hand, sorry.... snow in wyoming in november???? who would have thought??? obviously not cover's self proclaimed best capper...."scal" ....i laugh every time when i think of that... thank you "syndicate target"
0
Posted:
#117
Ya see Scooby it’s not just a casual reference.
It’s citing a master of expert insult, and doing it in a very deft way.
So if Stump and WMI want to improve their ability to poke fun/gibe, they will leave the thread and through the glorious wonder of modern day technology, watch Don Rickles routine.
But they won’t do this.
Because they won’t make the efforts to improve themselves as a whole.
And that is why I write the threads in near endless fashion that I do.
To help them understand HOW to cap WIN or LOSE (mostly win but you get the point).
That is why he is dust in the wind in this life. Poof! No self-improvement, no advancement, no capping offerings on this site of worth and wildly poor insults.
What can ya do but just try to help them...all I can do is try...
And now since I’ve been signing all day today I’ll continue (blows in kazoo for a flat C note). Alanis Morisette this time (talk about diverse music knowledge! From Sinatra to Morisette?? Wow!):
And I try!
Oh my god do I try!
I try all the time!!!!!!
To help them cap welll!!!
0
Posted:
#118
Quote Originally Posted by scalabrine:
Isn’t it absolutely incredible and the height of all lunacy when a poster mockingly labastes someone for caring about VIEW COUNTS and REPLIES, when he himself made a thread for the SOLE PURPOSE of:1) Having it VIEWED by as many people as possible2) Read3) REPLIED to.And worse he mocks those three things in the very thread HE CREATED to have those three things occur!!?????Paging person Clark and Ed McMahon on for Covers TV Bloopers and Practical Jones. I cannot stop laughing. This guy is amazing. Slob I guess I am. Time will tell. Having it vacant with out CC was an improvement period.
Isn’t it absolutely incredible and the height of all lunacy when a poster mockingly labastes someone for caring about VIEW COUNTS and REPLIES, when he himself made a thread for the SOLE PURPOSE of:1) Having it VIEWED by as many people as possible2) Read3) REPLIED to.And worse he mocks those three things in the very thread HE CREATED to have those three things occur!!?????Paging person Clark and Ed McMahon on for Covers TV Bloopers and Practical Jones. I cannot stop laughing. This guy is amazing. Slob I guess I am. Time will tell. Having it vacant with out CC was an improvement period.
Get over yourself, Scal. I made this thread to be viewed by one person. Sabanesque. Using your screen name, or a portmanteau there of, was to pay homage. It wasn't click bait. And when it became clear that the one person I cared about responding wasn't, I said I was over it.(return)
I couldn't care less about views. You are the only man child who puts value in such things. You are literally the only person on covers i've ever heard mention it. I've always thought you were old but now I realize that you are part of this facebook generation that measures self worth in "likes". And the funny thing is I did you a favor. You would've faded into oblivion had I not mentioned you. No one misssd you.You weren't the subject of a single post. It doesn't matter if you've been here for 2 years or 20. Once you're gone, you're gone. Scalabrine? Much like your namesake, you're barely a footnote.
R.I.P. #94 MARSHAWN KNEELAND - DC4L
0
Posted:
#119
And Scal, I don't need help from a one-legged man in an @ss kicking contest. You're a documented loser and completely delusional. You came in last in your own capping contest. I rest my case. Trying to reason with you is fruitless. From this point on I will respond to you with one of two stock answers.
1. Scal, you came in last in your own capping contest.
2. Scal, be your best you. Come out of the closet.
R.I.P. #94 MARSHAWN KNEELAND - DC4L
0
Posted:
#120
LOL! Scal YOU and only YOU create threads with the purpose of and caring about getting views! Wow! I never have nor will I pay attention to views. LOL! Are you 12?
"Mommy, will you please log onto covers and click on my threads!?! Please mommy! Please! I want and it so bad to see I got a bunch of views Mommy!"
As for capping? You tell 'em Mr 40% 
Histrionic personality disorder. It's sad
0
Posted:
#121
"But, Gosh Golly Gee, I wrote a five page write up that the coaches dog had fleas that she caught while outside of the opponents stadium. These fleas come from the underground camp of the pickled feet brigade. The pickled feet brigade when they itch, they get more irritated and want the project they are working on to end sooner, so they work hard to get it done and done right. So since the dog has these fleas, she has been around the team and now they have them and are working hard as ever to get it done so they can go have an oatmeal bath. Since they have this malady they should cover the spread easily because the dog will be barking up a storm. Seventeen times in the last 40 years this has happened to dogs that went outside of this stadium and then played fetch with the team they were associated with. 16 times the team covered."
Histrionic personality disorder. It's sad
0
Posted:
#122
Quote Originally Posted by scalabrine:
Well my “units” are my wins and losses by default.
So when a person says X team "HUGE" that counts the same as a hotdog eating contest?
Well my “units” are my wins and losses by default.
And that’s for honesty purposes (since ANYONE can Martingale with fake units, which this site is, I.e. lose 50 units make the next bet for 100).
So I’m 12 L’s (units) back. And just like last year all the hysteria will go bye bye when I hit .500 again.
1.35 trillion
0
Posted:
#123
If it pays out the same OF COURSE it counts the same
And why oh why are you so concerned about my records and units like KVS was, spending his Friday night going through reems and reems of posts just to get my record documented down to every solitary game (with footnotes)?
I mean look at Stump:
He actually has documented in his demented noggin that Packers took a pic of his back double bicep pose with his shirt off and I didn’t reply! That’s a “loss” in his mind.
Think about that!
Think about finding that thread and having such a post seared into your brain like Terry Funk’s branding iron with a Covers post on it.
So much so you recall it MONTHS later as an “insult” to the “offended.” Lol. For what? You have that little going on in your life???
I mean, having a celebrity obsession among the masses on a Covers on this site has its benefits (syndicates have taken notice and made offers in the past) but when it gets to near stalking levels I have to ask people to reassess their lives and how they spend their time! I’m not Elvis. Don’t throw your panties at the foot of my mic stand!
0
Posted:
#124
Quote Originally Posted by scalabrine:
If it pays out the same OF COURSE it counts the same And why oh why are you so concerned about my records and units like KVS was, spending his Friday night going through reems and reems of posts just to get my record documented down to every solitary game (with footnotes)?I mean look at Stump:He actually has documented in his demented noggin that Packers took a pic of his back double bicep pose with his shirt off and I didn’t reply! That’s a “loss” in his mind.Think about that!Think about finding that thread and having such a post seared into your brain like Terry Funk’s branding iron with a Covers post on it.So much so you recall it MONTHS later as an “insult” to the “offended.” Lol. For what? You have that little going on in your life???I mean, having a celebrity obsession among the masses on a Covers on this site has its benefits (syndicates have taken notice and made offers in the past) but when it gets to near stalking levels I have to ask people to reassess their lives and how they spend their time! I’m not Elvis. Don’t throw your panties at the foot of my mic stand!
If it pays out the same OF COURSE it counts the same And why oh why are you so concerned about my records and units like KVS was, spending his Friday night going through reems and reems of posts just to get my record documented down to every solitary game (with footnotes)?I mean look at Stump:He actually has documented in his demented noggin that Packers took a pic of his back double bicep pose with his shirt off and I didn’t reply! That’s a “loss” in his mind.Think about that!Think about finding that thread and having such a post seared into your brain like Terry Funk’s branding iron with a Covers post on it.So much so you recall it MONTHS later as an “insult” to the “offended.” Lol. For what? You have that little going on in your life???I mean, having a celebrity obsession among the masses on a Covers on this site has its benefits (syndicates have taken notice and made offers in the past) but when it gets to near stalking levels I have to ask people to reassess their lives and how they spend their time! I’m not Elvis. Don’t throw your panties at the foot of my mic stand!
You came in last in your own capping contest.
R.I.P. #94 MARSHAWN KNEELAND - DC4L
0
Hot Forum Topics
