"In June and July, Fox News was the highest-rated television channel in the prime-time hours of 8 to 11 p.m. Not just on cable. Not just among news networks. Allof television. The average live Fox News viewership in those hours outstripped cable rivals like CNN, MSNBC and ESPN, as well as the broadcast networks ABC, CBS and NBC, according to Nielsen," the Times' Michael Grynebaum reported.
0
"In June and July, Fox News was the highest-rated television channel in the prime-time hours of 8 to 11 p.m. Not just on cable. Not just among news networks. Allof television. The average live Fox News viewership in those hours outstripped cable rivals like CNN, MSNBC and ESPN, as well as the broadcast networks ABC, CBS and NBC, according to Nielsen," the Times' Michael Grynebaum reported.
"In June and July, Fox News was the highest-rated television channel in the prime-time hours of 8 to 11 p.m. Not just on cable. Not just among news networks. All of television. The average live Fox News viewership in those hours outstripped cable rivals like CNN, MSNBC and ESPN, as well as the broadcast networks ABC, CBS and NBC, according to Nielsen," the Times' Michael Grynebaum reported.
Yes, that is correct.
Conservatives have only ONE significant choice for CONSERVATIVE views on TV, so they watch FOX.
Liberals have multiple choices - *OBVIOUSLY* - since that is the common cry from the right (Liberal media bias) And therefore the audiences for LIBERAL views are split among all the choices. As long as FOX has no real competition for conservative audiences then by default they will ALWAYS have the highest number of viewership.
Regardless how good or bad the programmiing may be, CONSERVATIVE viewers have no choice but FOX.
2
Quote Originally Posted by SarasotaSlim:
"In June and July, Fox News was the highest-rated television channel in the prime-time hours of 8 to 11 p.m. Not just on cable. Not just among news networks. All of television. The average live Fox News viewership in those hours outstripped cable rivals like CNN, MSNBC and ESPN, as well as the broadcast networks ABC, CBS and NBC, according to Nielsen," the Times' Michael Grynebaum reported.
Yes, that is correct.
Conservatives have only ONE significant choice for CONSERVATIVE views on TV, so they watch FOX.
Liberals have multiple choices - *OBVIOUSLY* - since that is the common cry from the right (Liberal media bias) And therefore the audiences for LIBERAL views are split among all the choices. As long as FOX has no real competition for conservative audiences then by default they will ALWAYS have the highest number of viewership.
Regardless how good or bad the programmiing may be, CONSERVATIVE viewers have no choice but FOX.
It's not just Republicans that watch Fox News...Around a quarter of Democrats (23%), including 29% of conservative or moderate Democrats and 15% of liberals, said in November that they had gotten political news from Fox News in the past week.
It's not just Republicans that watch Fox News...Around a quarter of Democrats (23%), including 29% of conservative or moderate Democrats and 15% of liberals, said in November that they had gotten political news from Fox News in the past week.
It's not just Republicans that watch Fox News...Around a quarter of Democrats (23%), including 29% of conservative or moderate Democrats and 15% of liberals, said in November that they had gotten political news from Fox News in the past week. www.pewresearch.org/.../08/five-facts-about-fox-news
Sure! ME INCLUDED!!! For different rasons of course -- mostly to laugh at the lies and spins on trump's blunders, etc. but I have gotten political news from Fox News in the past week.
It works in reverse too, for CNN and MSNBC and other stations.
Nevertheless, it's still empirically evident that CONSEVATIVES have only one real choice for TV and spend the bulk of their "news watching time" on FOX -- because that is their only choice for conservative news.
Whereas for LIBERALS, they obviously have multiple choices.
Moderate ares somewhere in between but as the polls show they favor CNN the most AND choose a LIBERAL-bias cable news network by about 2 to 1 over CONSERVATIVE-bias cable news (by default only Fox)
Again, this is irrespective of whether or not the programming is good or bad. Conservative viewers have no choice for conservative-bias TV news but FOX.
1
Quote Originally Posted by SarasotaSlim:
It's not just Republicans that watch Fox News...Around a quarter of Democrats (23%), including 29% of conservative or moderate Democrats and 15% of liberals, said in November that they had gotten political news from Fox News in the past week. www.pewresearch.org/.../08/five-facts-about-fox-news
Sure! ME INCLUDED!!! For different rasons of course -- mostly to laugh at the lies and spins on trump's blunders, etc. but I have gotten political news from Fox News in the past week.
It works in reverse too, for CNN and MSNBC and other stations.
Nevertheless, it's still empirically evident that CONSEVATIVES have only one real choice for TV and spend the bulk of their "news watching time" on FOX -- because that is their only choice for conservative news.
Whereas for LIBERALS, they obviously have multiple choices.
Moderate ares somewhere in between but as the polls show they favor CNN the most AND choose a LIBERAL-bias cable news network by about 2 to 1 over CONSERVATIVE-bias cable news (by default only Fox)
Again, this is irrespective of whether or not the programming is good or bad. Conservative viewers have no choice for conservative-bias TV news but FOX.
Whereas for LIBERALS, they obviously have multiple choices. Moderate ares somewhere in between but as the polls show they favor CNN the most AND choose a LIBERAL-bias cable news network by about 2 to 1 over CONSERVATIVE-bias cable news (by default only Fox) Again, this is irrespective of whether or not the programming is good or bad. Conservative viewers have no choice for conservative-bias TV news but FOX.
Not so, OAN...
0
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2:
Whereas for LIBERALS, they obviously have multiple choices. Moderate ares somewhere in between but as the polls show they favor CNN the most AND choose a LIBERAL-bias cable news network by about 2 to 1 over CONSERVATIVE-bias cable news (by default only Fox) Again, this is irrespective of whether or not the programming is good or bad. Conservative viewers have no choice for conservative-bias TV news but FOX.
Ha. Not a serious choice. Limited availability. Strictly minor league in terms of viewership.
They are to "cable news networks" like the last place team in division 3 football compared with SEC football, and so they are not even worthy of consideration.
Maybe some day in the future though. But not now.
0
OAN?
Ha. Not a serious choice. Limited availability. Strictly minor league in terms of viewership.
They are to "cable news networks" like the last place team in division 3 football compared with SEC football, and so they are not even worthy of consideration.
In March 2019, Comscore data shows that of the networks categorized exclusively as Cable, News/ Business/ Info networks, OAN ranked as the fourth-highest service in that genre, behind Fox News Channel, MSNBC, and CNN.
OAN outperformed CNN Headline News, Fox Business Channel, CNBC, BBC World News, Fusion, Bloomberg and others, per the same March 2019 data..
I would think that's pretty serious..
0
Not a serious choice you say ..ok!
In March 2019, Comscore data shows that of the networks categorized exclusively as Cable, News/ Business/ Info networks, OAN ranked as the fourth-highest service in that genre, behind Fox News Channel, MSNBC, and CNN.
OAN outperformed CNN Headline News, Fox Business Channel, CNBC, BBC World News, Fusion, Bloomberg and others, per the same March 2019 data..
Not a serious choice you say ..ok! In March 2019, Comscore data shows that of the networks categorized exclusively as Cable, News/ Business/ Info networks, OAN ranked as the fourth-highest service in that genre, behind Fox News Channel, MSNBC, and CNN.
OAN outperformed CNN Headline News, Fox Business Channel, CNBC, BBC World News, Fusion, Bloomberg and others, per the same March 2019 data.. I would think that's pretty serious..
I wouldn't. All weak performers to be sure AND OAN is not ranked by the GOLD STANDARD in TV ratings: Neilsen Ratings
Their credibility is impeccable. Other "alleged" rankings can be suspect for improper research methods, and target bias.
UNLESS it's rated by Neilsen, I give it no credence.
0
Quote Originally Posted by SarasotaSlim:
Not a serious choice you say ..ok! In March 2019, Comscore data shows that of the networks categorized exclusively as Cable, News/ Business/ Info networks, OAN ranked as the fourth-highest service in that genre, behind Fox News Channel, MSNBC, and CNN.
OAN outperformed CNN Headline News, Fox Business Channel, CNBC, BBC World News, Fusion, Bloomberg and others, per the same March 2019 data.. I would think that's pretty serious..
I wouldn't. All weak performers to be sure AND OAN is not ranked by the GOLD STANDARD in TV ratings: Neilsen Ratings
Their credibility is impeccable. Other "alleged" rankings can be suspect for improper research methods, and target bias.
UNLESS it's rated by Neilsen, I give it no credence.
I wouldn't. All weak performers to be sure AND OAN is not ranked by the GOLD STANDARD in TV ratings: Neilsen Ratings Their credibility is impeccable. Other "alleged" rankings can be suspect for improper research methods, and target bias. UNLESS it's rated by Neilsen, I give it no credence.
I believe you are referring to the Nielsen Ratings and not the Neisen Ratings correct?
So, Nielsen Ratings only ranks the very top TV cable networks ..and not all the cable networks ..
0
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2:
I wouldn't. All weak performers to be sure AND OAN is not ranked by the GOLD STANDARD in TV ratings: Neilsen Ratings Their credibility is impeccable. Other "alleged" rankings can be suspect for improper research methods, and target bias. UNLESS it's rated by Neilsen, I give it no credence.
I believe you are referring to the Nielsen Ratings and not the Neisen Ratings correct?
So, Nielsen Ratings only ranks the very top TV cable networks ..and not all the cable networks ..
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: I wouldn't. All weak performers to be sure AND OAN is not ranked by the GOLD STANDARD in TV ratings: Neilsen Ratings Their credibility is impeccable. Other "alleged" rankings can be suspect for improper research methods, and target bias. UNLESS it's rated by Neilsen, I give it no credence.
I believe you are referring to the Nielsen Ratings and not the Neisen Ratings correct?
If,it's the Nielsen Ratings you are talking about ...were does OAN stand in their latest ratings ?
I believe it is "where does OAN stand...," not "were does the OAN stand..." correct?
IF it is "where does the OAN stand..." and that is information YOU want,
by all means feel free to check and present your findings with links to source.
BTW, rankings are of little value unless accompanied with "magnitude" (ie. rating level, NOT rank)
Illustration about useless and *misleading* football rankings:
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: I wouldn't. All weak performers to be sure AND OAN is not ranked by the GOLD STANDARD in TV ratings: Neilsen Ratings Their credibility is impeccable. Other "alleged" rankings can be suspect for improper research methods, and target bias. UNLESS it's rated by Neilsen, I give it no credence.
I believe you are referring to the Nielsen Ratings and not the Neisen Ratings correct?
If,it's the Nielsen Ratings you are talking about ...were does OAN stand in their latest ratings ?
I believe it is "where does OAN stand...," not "were does the OAN stand..." correct?
IF it is "where does the OAN stand..." and that is information YOU want,
by all means feel free to check and present your findings with links to source.
BTW, rankings are of little value unless accompanied with "magnitude" (ie. rating level, NOT rank)
Illustration about useless and *misleading* football rankings:
Quote Originally Posted by THEMUGG: LOL, if you're a lib than yeah, FOX is the least trusted..... ....people generally want the truth.
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2:
Agreed! And so when those who are NEITHER Liberal nor Conservative are asked: **MODERATES said: 22% ... CNN13% .... FOX 6% .... MSNBC
Neither liberal nor conservative are asked...but who they did ask were the dummies that still watch cable news for their information.. who cares what they trust..
0
Quote Originally Posted by THEMUGG: LOL, if you're a lib than yeah, FOX is the least trusted..... ....people generally want the truth.
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2:
Agreed! And so when those who are NEITHER Liberal nor Conservative are asked: **MODERATES said: 22% ... CNN13% .... FOX 6% .... MSNBC
Neither liberal nor conservative are asked...but who they did ask were the dummies that still watch cable news for their information.. who cares what they trust..
Neither liberal nor conservative are asked...but who they did ask were the dummies that still watch cable news for their information.. who cares what they trust..
13% .... FOX
0
Quote Originally Posted by SarasotaSlim:
**MODERATES said:
22% ... CNN 13% .... FOX 6% .... MSNBC
Neither liberal nor conservative are asked...but who they did ask were the dummies that still watch cable news for their information.. who cares what they trust..
Neither liberal nor conservative are asked...but who they did ask were the dummies that still watch cable news for their information.. who cares what they trust..[/Quote]
0
[Quote: Originally Posted by SarasotaSlim
Neither liberal nor conservative are asked...but who they did ask were the dummies that still watch cable news for their information.. who cares what they trust..[/Quote]
Quote Originally Posted by SarasotaSlim: **MODERATES said: 22% ... CNN13% .... FOX 6% .... MSNBC Neither liberal nor conservative are asked...but who they did ask were the dummies that still watch cable news for their information.. who cares what they trust.. 13% .... FOX
I find it hard to believe that those polls target true moderates. They target democrats that claim they are non-partisaned. If they targeted ttue moderates than CNN would be in single digits, about equal with FOX, and possibly lower. I'd guess both would wall somewhere around 7-9% though these numbers are admittedly totally arbitrary.
TIME TO BRING BACK THE OBAMA CAGES!
0
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2:
Quote Originally Posted by SarasotaSlim: **MODERATES said: 22% ... CNN13% .... FOX 6% .... MSNBC Neither liberal nor conservative are asked...but who they did ask were the dummies that still watch cable news for their information.. who cares what they trust.. 13% .... FOX
I find it hard to believe that those polls target true moderates. They target democrats that claim they are non-partisaned. If they targeted ttue moderates than CNN would be in single digits, about equal with FOX, and possibly lower. I'd guess both would wall somewhere around 7-9% though these numbers are admittedly totally arbitrary.
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: Quote Originally Posted by SarasotaSlim: **MODERATES said: 22% ... CNN13% .... FOX 6% .... MSNBC Neither liberal nor conservative are asked...but who they did ask were the dummies that still watch cable news for their information.. who cares what they trust.. 13% .... FOX I find it hard to believe that those polls target true moderates. They target democrats that claim they are non-partisaned. If they targeted ttue moderates than CNN would be in single digits, about equal with FOX, and possibly lower. I'd guess both would wall somewhere around 7-9% though these numbers are admittedly totally arbitrary.
It is interesting, yes.
The survey was of 1,495 Americans.
When the aggregate of ALL voters was tallied it was:
19% ...CNN 18% ...Fox 9% ...MSNBC
But those aggregate numbers INCLUDE the biases of both Liberals and Conservative viewers!! So to rule out known biases I just show that subsection of the survey listing MODERATE's votes.
Listing only MODERATES also rules out the "poll bias" if either left or
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: Quote Originally Posted by SarasotaSlim: **MODERATES said: 22% ... CNN13% .... FOX 6% .... MSNBC Neither liberal nor conservative are asked...but who they did ask were the dummies that still watch cable news for their information.. who cares what they trust.. 13% .... FOX I find it hard to believe that those polls target true moderates. They target democrats that claim they are non-partisaned. If they targeted ttue moderates than CNN would be in single digits, about equal with FOX, and possibly lower. I'd guess both would wall somewhere around 7-9% though these numbers are admittedly totally arbitrary.
It is interesting, yes.
The survey was of 1,495 Americans.
When the aggregate of ALL voters was tallied it was:
19% ...CNN 18% ...Fox 9% ...MSNBC
But those aggregate numbers INCLUDE the biases of both Liberals and Conservative viewers!! So to rule out known biases I just show that subsection of the survey listing MODERATE's votes.
Listing only MODERATES also rules out the "poll bias" if either left or
Quote Originally Posted by StumpTownStu: Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: Quote Originally Posted by SarasotaSlim: **MODERATES said: 22% ... CNN13% .... FOX 6% .... MSNBC Neither liberal nor conservative are asked...but who they did ask were the dummies that still watch cable news for their information.. who cares what they trust.. 13% .... FOX I find it hard to believe that those polls target true moderates. They target democrats that claim they are non-partisaned. If they targeted ttue moderates than CNN would be in single digits, about equal with FOX, and possibly lower. I'd guess both would wall somewhere around 7-9% though these numbers are admittedly totally arbitrary. It is interesting, yes. The survey was of 1,495 Americans. When the aggregate of ALL voters was tallied it was: 19% ...CNN18% ...Fox 9% ...MSNBC But those aggregate numbers INCLUDE the biases of both Liberals and Conservative viewers!! So to rule out known biasesI just show that subsection of the survey listing MODERATE's votes. Listing only MODERATES also rules out the "poll bias" if either left or right is OVER-represented in the total numbers. **MODERATES said: 22% ... CNN13% .... FOX 6% .... MSNBC Source: https://tinyurl.com/y3e85fgj
lloks like fox is slipping . your last update had them at 17% but they r down to 13 now
"I'm the MOST HONEST human being that GOD EVER created!" - Donald "the felon" Trump
0
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2:
Quote Originally Posted by StumpTownStu: Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: Quote Originally Posted by SarasotaSlim: **MODERATES said: 22% ... CNN13% .... FOX 6% .... MSNBC Neither liberal nor conservative are asked...but who they did ask were the dummies that still watch cable news for their information.. who cares what they trust.. 13% .... FOX I find it hard to believe that those polls target true moderates. They target democrats that claim they are non-partisaned. If they targeted ttue moderates than CNN would be in single digits, about equal with FOX, and possibly lower. I'd guess both would wall somewhere around 7-9% though these numbers are admittedly totally arbitrary. It is interesting, yes. The survey was of 1,495 Americans. When the aggregate of ALL voters was tallied it was: 19% ...CNN18% ...Fox 9% ...MSNBC But those aggregate numbers INCLUDE the biases of both Liberals and Conservative viewers!! So to rule out known biasesI just show that subsection of the survey listing MODERATE's votes. Listing only MODERATES also rules out the "poll bias" if either left or right is OVER-represented in the total numbers. **MODERATES said: 22% ... CNN13% .... FOX 6% .... MSNBC Source: https://tinyurl.com/y3e85fgj
lloks like fox is slipping . your last update had them at 17% but they r down to 13 now
It doesn't change the fact that Nate Silver who in 2008 got 49/50 states right while the polling average got 48/50 states right and believes ...and by his polling that moderates are more likely to be Democrats.
0
It doesn't change the fact that Nate Silver who in 2008 got 49/50 states right while the polling average got 48/50 states right and believes ...and by his polling that moderates are more likely to be Democrats.
It doesn't change the fact that Nate Silver who in 2008 got 49/50 states right while the polling average got 48/50 states right and believes ...and by his polling that moderates are more likely to be Democrats.
Maybe more likely. Sure. More likely.
So what?????
Doesn't mean THEY ARE!!! Just more likely.
Republicans are more likely to be FASCISTS, ftm. Doesn't mean they ARE!
Like someone said earlier: there is NO GUARANTEE
1
Quote Originally Posted by SarasotaSlim:
It doesn't change the fact that Nate Silver who in 2008 got 49/50 states right while the polling average got 48/50 states right and believes ...and by his polling that moderates are more likely to be Democrats.
Maybe more likely. Sure. More likely.
So what?????
Doesn't mean THEY ARE!!! Just more likely.
Republicans are more likely to be FASCISTS, ftm. Doesn't mean they ARE!
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.