Quote Originally Posted by Getty3: I strongly suggest putting next week's newsletter in the NFL Forum. I'm not being sarcastic, We're gonna need a urine sample from Mr Getty, pronto
CD NFL Newsletter #5
Quote Originally Posted by Getty3: I strongly suggest putting next week's newsletter in the NFL Forum. I'm not being sarcastic, We're gonna need a urine sample from Mr Getty, pronto
Quote Originally Posted by Getty3: I strongly suggest putting next week's newsletter in the NFL Forum. I'm not being sarcastic, We're gonna need a urine sample from Mr Getty, pronto
Quote Originally Posted by Getty3: I strongly suggest putting next week's newsletter in the NFL Forum. I'm not being sarcastic, We're gonna need a urine sample from Mr Getty, pronto
Quote Originally Posted by Getty3: I strongly suggest putting next week's newsletter in the NFL Forum. I'm not being sarcastic, We're gonna need a urine sample from Mr Getty, pronto
@Biscuiteater1
Thanks for the response.
Now if you could answer why the Shrimp are so awful in the 2H, I'm all ears.
Warren Sharp posted interesting Lamar stats with and without Rashod Bateman on the field.
https://mobile.twitter.com/SharpFootball/status/1578516525769641985
@Biscuiteater1
Thanks for the response.
Now if you could answer why the Shrimp are so awful in the 2H, I'm all ears.
Warren Sharp posted interesting Lamar stats with and without Rashod Bateman on the field.
https://mobile.twitter.com/SharpFootball/status/1578516525769641985
@Hugh_Jorgan
Any thoughts on them boys at Sofi?
CD would advise me for the middle attempt, but I think they have a legitimate chance at winning outright.
@Hugh_Jorgan
Any thoughts on them boys at Sofi?
CD would advise me for the middle attempt, but I think they have a legitimate chance at winning outright.
Quote Originally Posted by Hugh_Jorgan: Quote Originally Posted by Getty3: I strongly suggest putting next week's newsletter in the NFL Forum. I'm not being sarcastic, We're gonna need a urine sample from Mr Getty, pronto Where is your sense of adventure, heck it wouldn't be written in stone and could always come back home. But i do kinda get an uneasy feeling thinking about it.
It should be done. We'll have a democratic vote on it, kind of a town hall aye or nay as if we were all living in Bolton, Vermont where voters can actually choose whether the highway department purchases an excavator for 110k. This is small life. We are bigger than this. Make it happen.
Quote Originally Posted by Hugh_Jorgan: Quote Originally Posted by Getty3: I strongly suggest putting next week's newsletter in the NFL Forum. I'm not being sarcastic, We're gonna need a urine sample from Mr Getty, pronto Where is your sense of adventure, heck it wouldn't be written in stone and could always come back home. But i do kinda get an uneasy feeling thinking about it.
It should be done. We'll have a democratic vote on it, kind of a town hall aye or nay as if we were all living in Bolton, Vermont where voters can actually choose whether the highway department purchases an excavator for 110k. This is small life. We are bigger than this. Make it happen.
@Biscuiteater1 Thanks for the response. Now if you could answer why the Shrimp are so awful in the 2H, I'm all ears. Warren Sharp posted interesting Lamar stats with and without Rashod Bateman on the field. https://mobile.twitter.com/SharpFootball/status/1578516525769641985
@Biscuiteater1 Thanks for the response. Now if you could answer why the Shrimp are so awful in the 2H, I'm all ears. Warren Sharp posted interesting Lamar stats with and without Rashod Bateman on the field. https://mobile.twitter.com/SharpFootball/status/1578516525769641985
@Hugh_Jorgan Any thoughts on them boys at Sofi? CD would advise me for the middle attempt, but I think they have a legitimate chance at winning outright.
@Hugh_Jorgan Any thoughts on them boys at Sofi? CD would advise me for the middle attempt, but I think they have a legitimate chance at winning outright.
Quote Originally Posted by Biscuiteater1: Quote Originally Posted by Hugh_Jorgan: Quote Originally Posted by Getty3: I strongly suggest putting next week's newsletter in the NFL Forum. I'm not being sarcastic, We're gonna need a urine sample from Mr Getty, pronto Where is your sense of adventure, heck it wouldn't be written in stone and could always come back home. But i do kinda get an uneasy feeling thinking about it. It should be done. We'll have a democratic vote on it, kind of a town hall aye or nay as if we were all living in Bolton, Vermont where voters can actually choose whether the highway department purchases an excavator for 110k. This is small life. We are bigger than this. Make it happen.
Quote Originally Posted by Biscuiteater1: Quote Originally Posted by Hugh_Jorgan: Quote Originally Posted by Getty3: I strongly suggest putting next week's newsletter in the NFL Forum. I'm not being sarcastic, We're gonna need a urine sample from Mr Getty, pronto Where is your sense of adventure, heck it wouldn't be written in stone and could always come back home. But i do kinda get an uneasy feeling thinking about it. It should be done. We'll have a democratic vote on it, kind of a town hall aye or nay as if we were all living in Bolton, Vermont where voters can actually choose whether the highway department purchases an excavator for 110k. This is small life. We are bigger than this. Make it happen.
@Hugh_Jorgan Any thoughts on them boys at Sofi?
CD would advise me for the middle attempt, but I think they have a legitimate chance at winning outright
.
This is the analytical analysis ...
On DallasCowboys.com, 4 writers have picked the game for many years. Over those years the writers have changed, but 4 of them making their picks on that weeks games has remained the same. On the rare occasion that all 4 have agreed, their winning % is probably less than 10. This week all 4 have picked the Cowboys to win outright
The best unit on the field is the Cowboys D. That unit leads the league in QB pressures, and the Rams O-line is not good.
The Rams are the home team, but the stadium will be close to 50% Cowboys fans.
Dallas special teams has been really good, and their offense has taken care of the ball.
With all of that said, I defer to the impressive history of the 4 writers.
@Hugh_Jorgan Any thoughts on them boys at Sofi?
CD would advise me for the middle attempt, but I think they have a legitimate chance at winning outright
.
This is the analytical analysis ...
On DallasCowboys.com, 4 writers have picked the game for many years. Over those years the writers have changed, but 4 of them making their picks on that weeks games has remained the same. On the rare occasion that all 4 have agreed, their winning % is probably less than 10. This week all 4 have picked the Cowboys to win outright
The best unit on the field is the Cowboys D. That unit leads the league in QB pressures, and the Rams O-line is not good.
The Rams are the home team, but the stadium will be close to 50% Cowboys fans.
Dallas special teams has been really good, and their offense has taken care of the ball.
With all of that said, I defer to the impressive history of the 4 writers.
NFL 18-9-2 (+9.49)
MLB 3-6-2 (-2.91)
Cowboys +7(-115) *1.00/.87
Seahawks +5(-110) *1.10/1.00
Jaguars -7(-110) *2.20/2.00
Jaguars -10(+128) *.80/1.02
Patriots -3(-115) *1.15/1.00
Chargers 1H -.5(-103) *1.03/1.00
Chargers 1H TT O12.5(-115) *1.15/1.00
Wrote some stuff earlier about this game. The Browns are going to be a popular touted play tomorrow. So I got that going against me.
Look for the Bolts to do some damage against a shitty Browns secondary, and a d-line that has a "?" tag next to every guy. The Chargers have not used many 2 TE sets this year, and no 3 TE sets. They get Donald Parham Jr back for the first time this season. He brings a 6'8 255lb frame to the party. Starting TE Gerald Everett has been doing a nice job so far. The addition of Parham should improve their run blocking and only enhance their passing options.
While most people who are taking the Browns in this contest, they are all relying on the same premise. And that is: the Chargers are bad against the run, Nick Chub will run all over them and control the clock. That's just too obvious for me. Will the Browns still keep this strategy going if the Bolts consistently score and hold a lead?
There is an anomalous stat about said Chargers run D when it comes to their d line. The LAC d line is #15 in run stopping by adjusted line yards(4.43). But they are allowing 6.08 RB yards per carry(#32).
So the main problem is on the second level and in the open field. Is this a product of "bend don't break"? Can some of it be from playing with a lead where they are using more Nickel? I don't know.
I just can't see the Browns will their way a victory via the ground n pound. While holding back a real good passing attack from a QB of this caliber, which they haven't even come close to seeing yet this year.
Denzel Ward vs Michael Williams might be one of the biggest CB vs WR matchups of the year to date.
NFL 18-9-2 (+9.49)
MLB 3-6-2 (-2.91)
Cowboys +7(-115) *1.00/.87
Seahawks +5(-110) *1.10/1.00
Jaguars -7(-110) *2.20/2.00
Jaguars -10(+128) *.80/1.02
Patriots -3(-115) *1.15/1.00
Chargers 1H -.5(-103) *1.03/1.00
Chargers 1H TT O12.5(-115) *1.15/1.00
Wrote some stuff earlier about this game. The Browns are going to be a popular touted play tomorrow. So I got that going against me.
Look for the Bolts to do some damage against a shitty Browns secondary, and a d-line that has a "?" tag next to every guy. The Chargers have not used many 2 TE sets this year, and no 3 TE sets. They get Donald Parham Jr back for the first time this season. He brings a 6'8 255lb frame to the party. Starting TE Gerald Everett has been doing a nice job so far. The addition of Parham should improve their run blocking and only enhance their passing options.
While most people who are taking the Browns in this contest, they are all relying on the same premise. And that is: the Chargers are bad against the run, Nick Chub will run all over them and control the clock. That's just too obvious for me. Will the Browns still keep this strategy going if the Bolts consistently score and hold a lead?
There is an anomalous stat about said Chargers run D when it comes to their d line. The LAC d line is #15 in run stopping by adjusted line yards(4.43). But they are allowing 6.08 RB yards per carry(#32).
So the main problem is on the second level and in the open field. Is this a product of "bend don't break"? Can some of it be from playing with a lead where they are using more Nickel? I don't know.
I just can't see the Browns will their way a victory via the ground n pound. While holding back a real good passing attack from a QB of this caliber, which they haven't even come close to seeing yet this year.
Denzel Ward vs Michael Williams might be one of the biggest CB vs WR matchups of the year to date.
@Hugh_Jorgan
Thanks. I'll be looking to buy out/middle on Dallas tomorrow, maybe on the Seahawks too. I don't like that Dalton is starting, he's better than Jameis.
@Hugh_Jorgan
Thanks. I'll be looking to buy out/middle on Dallas tomorrow, maybe on the Seahawks too. I don't like that Dalton is starting, he's better than Jameis.
NFL 18-9-2 (+9.49) MLB 3-6-2 (-2.91) Cowboys +7(-115) *1.00/.87 Seahawks +5(-110) *1.10/1.00 Jaguars -7(-110) *2.20/2.00 Jaguars -10(+128) *.80/1.02 Patriots -3(-115) *1.15/1.00 Chargers 1H -.5(-103) *1.03/1.00 Chargers 1H TT O12.5(-115) *1.15/1.00 Wrote some stuff earlier about this game. The Browns are going to be a popular touted play tomorrow. So I got that going against me. Look for the Bolts to do some damage against a shitty Browns secondary, and a d-line that has a "?" tag next to every guy. The Chargers have not used many 2 TE sets this year, and no 3 TE sets. They get Donald Parham Jr back for the first time this season. He brings a 6'8 255lb frame to the party. Starting TE Gerald Everett has been doing a nice job so far. The addition of Parham should improve their run blocking and only enhance their passing options. While most people who are taking the Browns in this contest, they are all relying on the same premise. And that is: the Chargers are bad against the run, Nick Chub will run all over them and control the clock. That's just too obvious for me. Will the Browns still keep this strategy going if the Bolts consistently score and hold a lead? There is an anomalous stat about said Chargers run D when it comes to their d line. The LAC d line is #15 in run stopping by adjusted line yards(4.43). But they are allowing 6.08 RB yards per carry(#32). So the main problem is on the second level and in the open field. Is this a product of "bend don't break"? Can some of it be from playing with a lead where they are using more Nickel? I don't know. I just can't see the Browns will their way a victory via the ground n pound. While holding back a real good passing attack from a QB of this caliber, which they haven't even come close to seeing yet this year. Denzel Ward vs Michael Williams might be one of the biggest CB vs WR matchups of the year to date.
wrong, you have that going FOR you ![]()
NFL 18-9-2 (+9.49) MLB 3-6-2 (-2.91) Cowboys +7(-115) *1.00/.87 Seahawks +5(-110) *1.10/1.00 Jaguars -7(-110) *2.20/2.00 Jaguars -10(+128) *.80/1.02 Patriots -3(-115) *1.15/1.00 Chargers 1H -.5(-103) *1.03/1.00 Chargers 1H TT O12.5(-115) *1.15/1.00 Wrote some stuff earlier about this game. The Browns are going to be a popular touted play tomorrow. So I got that going against me. Look for the Bolts to do some damage against a shitty Browns secondary, and a d-line that has a "?" tag next to every guy. The Chargers have not used many 2 TE sets this year, and no 3 TE sets. They get Donald Parham Jr back for the first time this season. He brings a 6'8 255lb frame to the party. Starting TE Gerald Everett has been doing a nice job so far. The addition of Parham should improve their run blocking and only enhance their passing options. While most people who are taking the Browns in this contest, they are all relying on the same premise. And that is: the Chargers are bad against the run, Nick Chub will run all over them and control the clock. That's just too obvious for me. Will the Browns still keep this strategy going if the Bolts consistently score and hold a lead? There is an anomalous stat about said Chargers run D when it comes to their d line. The LAC d line is #15 in run stopping by adjusted line yards(4.43). But they are allowing 6.08 RB yards per carry(#32). So the main problem is on the second level and in the open field. Is this a product of "bend don't break"? Can some of it be from playing with a lead where they are using more Nickel? I don't know. I just can't see the Browns will their way a victory via the ground n pound. While holding back a real good passing attack from a QB of this caliber, which they haven't even come close to seeing yet this year. Denzel Ward vs Michael Williams might be one of the biggest CB vs WR matchups of the year to date.
wrong, you have that going FOR you ![]()
Sunday
Bucs FH TT o14.5 +105
Bucs FG TT o28.5 -105
Steelers +14.5 -115
Phins Jets o45 -105
10 pt tease still pending
Niners +8 ( win )
Titans +7.5
Bengals Ravens o38
GL gents
Sunday
Bucs FH TT o14.5 +105
Bucs FG TT o28.5 -105
Steelers +14.5 -115
Phins Jets o45 -105
10 pt tease still pending
Niners +8 ( win )
Titans +7.5
Bengals Ravens o38
GL gents
MADDEN 23 MADDEN SUGGESTED WAGERS (16-6-1 ATS )
CHARGERS -1.5
SEAHAWKS. +5
RAMS. -5.5
CARDINALS +5.5
BENGALS. +3.5
RAIDERS. +7
POINT SPREAD RATINGS SUGGESTED WAGERS. (8-3 ATS )
RAMS -5.5
CARDINALS +5.5
BENGALS. +3.5
MADDEN 23 MADDEN SUGGESTED WAGERS (16-6-1 ATS )
CHARGERS -1.5
SEAHAWKS. +5
RAMS. -5.5
CARDINALS +5.5
BENGALS. +3.5
RAIDERS. +7
POINT SPREAD RATINGS SUGGESTED WAGERS. (8-3 ATS )
RAMS -5.5
CARDINALS +5.5
BENGALS. +3.5
@DoubleUp4Life Post in your own thread
Nope , thick skin is required, if continued racism is only worth a week ban , I'm definitely posting in here...Might write next week's newsletter too ....
.if you want to argue about it we can
@DoubleUp4Life Post in your own thread
Nope , thick skin is required, if continued racism is only worth a week ban , I'm definitely posting in here...Might write next week's newsletter too ....
.if you want to argue about it we can
ML Parlay: Titans/Chargers/49ers/Bengals +849
Nice odds
Would have guessed much lower .
ML Parlay: Titans/Chargers/49ers/Bengals +849
Nice odds
Would have guessed much lower .
@DoubleUp4Life Seriously . No one wants you here
C'est la vie...
If blatant racists are welcomed , then us blacks will be here too !
@DoubleUp4Life Seriously . No one wants you here
C'est la vie...
If blatant racists are welcomed , then us blacks will be here too !
@DoubleUp4Life NO one wants you here . Doesnt matter your race . Stick to your threads in the mains
Nope , let it go , and I'll barely post in here ..Keep talking BS , and I'll respond everytime
Tell me to go to the mains again , and I'll create more threads in the box ...
You don't control anything.
Thick skin is required
@DoubleUp4Life NO one wants you here . Doesnt matter your race . Stick to your threads in the mains
Nope , let it go , and I'll barely post in here ..Keep talking BS , and I'll respond everytime
Tell me to go to the mains again , and I'll create more threads in the box ...
You don't control anything.
Thick skin is required
NFL 18-9-2 (+9.49)
MLB 3-6-2 (-2.91)
Cowboys +7(-115) *1.00/.87
Seahawks +5(-110) *1.10/1.00
Jaguars -7(-110) *2.20/2.00
Jaguars -10(+128) *.80/1.02
Patriots -3(-115) *1.15/1.00
Chargers 1H -.5(-103) *1.03/1.00
Chargers 1H TT O12.5(-115) *1.15/1.00
Falcons +10(-105) *1.05/1.00
I said that they should be set to auto bet every week, I'm glad that I disabled that option and let this line get to here.
Bears +7.5(-107) *1.07/1.00
Got to fade another "after London" team and see what happens. The Vikings had a fugazzi win last week. The Bears have the best 2H defense in the nfl, I'll take that hook on the 7.
I will be adding more to Chargers 1H as $ keeps pouring in on the Browns uncontrollably.
![]()
NFL 18-9-2 (+9.49)
MLB 3-6-2 (-2.91)
Cowboys +7(-115) *1.00/.87
Seahawks +5(-110) *1.10/1.00
Jaguars -7(-110) *2.20/2.00
Jaguars -10(+128) *.80/1.02
Patriots -3(-115) *1.15/1.00
Chargers 1H -.5(-103) *1.03/1.00
Chargers 1H TT O12.5(-115) *1.15/1.00
Falcons +10(-105) *1.05/1.00
I said that they should be set to auto bet every week, I'm glad that I disabled that option and let this line get to here.
Bears +7.5(-107) *1.07/1.00
Got to fade another "after London" team and see what happens. The Vikings had a fugazzi win last week. The Bears have the best 2H defense in the nfl, I'll take that hook on the 7.
I will be adding more to Chargers 1H as $ keeps pouring in on the Browns uncontrollably.
![]()
Hot Forum Topics
- Friday 11/13/2026 627
- Serious Streak Survivor Strategies 1,918,789
- 🏈🏈🏈 Fubah2's risky CFB bets 302,940
- I'm embarrassed for Trump supporters 63,612
- SKINS/GIANTS live in game comments welcome 615
- Dallas Mavericks +6 2,716
- PART DEUX 139
- Week 11 Money 6,759
- Florida Man Thursday 4,341
- The TRUTH if you can take it!! 24,647
Warning - External Link
Report User
This post is spam
Delete Post
Remove Thread
Scan Results
Login/Register
Accounts are free and easy to create.
Search
