@bigred84
Campbell promises they going all out for win
Now he didn't promise if that would be starters for the full game...
But thats why
Hes insane to play starters for more than 1st half...but he is insane...so starters might play full game
@bigred84
Campbell promises they going all out for win
Now he didn't promise if that would be starters for the full game...
But thats why
Hes insane to play starters for more than 1st half...but he is insane...so starters might play full game
@bigred84
Campbell promises they going all out for win
Now he didn't promise if that would be starters for the full game...
But thats why
Hes insane to play starters for more than 1st half...but he is insane...so starters might play full game
Yup he is the one coach who i could see playing starters full game in this situation
Guy is a lunatic with decision making
Side note..do we like TB -14.0?? Similar game to the TB-car game yesterday ? Backdoor more open but panthers offense much more potent than saints of late
Yup he is the one coach who i could see playing starters full game in this situation
Guy is a lunatic with decision making
Side note..do we like TB -14.0?? Similar game to the TB-car game yesterday ? Backdoor more open but panthers offense much more potent than saints of late
@dubz4dummyz
Just one time I would like to hear a coach say I could care less about the score of a game that is meaningless to our organization. ![]()
@dubz4dummyz
Just one time I would like to hear a coach say I could care less about the score of a game that is meaningless to our organization. ![]()
![]()
Too late Rubber.....
Campbell is cool coach.....
But it's not Play Station....![]()
![]()
Too late Rubber.....
Campbell is cool coach.....
But it's not Play Station....![]()
@Biscuiteater1
Serious or sarcasm?
I agree. Just say we are getting bench players their time in the spotlight...spin it as positive lol
If sarcasm. See bills and chiefs next week
@Biscuiteater1
Serious or sarcasm?
I agree. Just say we are getting bench players their time in the spotlight...spin it as positive lol
If sarcasm. See bills and chiefs next week
Week 17 recap:
Commanders -3 -115 $115/$100 W
Vikings +1 -110 $110/$100 W
Vikings ML +100 $100/$100 W
Bills -10 -110 $110/$100 W
4-0 on Sunday, putting me back over 1k. Hit most of my leans too, but either didn't play them or added to a parlay that eventually lost.
Updated record:
Sides/Totals: 27-17-3 (+$826)
Parlays: 3-2 (+$239)
Props: 2-2 (+$37.50)
Overall: 32-21-3 (+$1102.50)
Week 17 recap:
Commanders -3 -115 $115/$100 W
Vikings +1 -110 $110/$100 W
Vikings ML +100 $100/$100 W
Bills -10 -110 $110/$100 W
4-0 on Sunday, putting me back over 1k. Hit most of my leans too, but either didn't play them or added to a parlay that eventually lost.
Updated record:
Sides/Totals: 27-17-3 (+$826)
Parlays: 3-2 (+$239)
Props: 2-2 (+$37.50)
Overall: 32-21-3 (+$1102.50)
The books can prolly make up all/any loses AND come out well ahead with a Frisco win.
I'm already with the books in a couple open pars.
The books can prolly make up all/any loses AND come out well ahead with a Frisco win.
I'm already with the books in a couple open pars.
No, we never back a team to smash the spread b2b weeks. That's the rules of playing gambling.
![]()
No, we never back a team to smash the spread b2b weeks. That's the rules of playing gambling.
![]()
So in the mains, there's a fabulous argument if the Lions care or don't about this game. Not just one thread, but several.
Terrific handicapping going on there.
TW, you would 100% miss my money maker and get it in my hair. I'm sick of it
So in the mains, there's a fabulous argument if the Lions care or don't about this game. Not just one thread, but several.
Terrific handicapping going on there.
TW, you would 100% miss my money maker and get it in my hair. I'm sick of it
-3.5 game
- 3 halftime...
Booooooooooo....![]()
-3.5 game
- 3 halftime...
Booooooooooo....![]()
