Bad news Detox, the caviar shipment for your Super Bowl party is on one of those trucks in Canada parked on the bridge that you support so much. Guess you'll have to all your friends to find somewh..... 
Sorry, I thought I could keep a straight face while saying that last part, but we all know he has no friends.
I'm going to be cracking up when the truckers lose their jobs to self driving trucks in 2-5 years..
Hopefully when people start feeling bad for them the current videos resurface..
I love getting dressed knowing that I have a massive bet that is going to hit in a few hours. It puts a lot of pep in my step. This type of bet doesn’t come around often. It reminds me of buying real estate in 2010 … or backing up the truck to load up on crypto in 2019.
I suggest all of you poor people start scrolling through your phones to ask people to borrow money to maximize your exposure. Max out your credit cards. Do whatever you have to do.
Congrats on your coin flip winner. Don Juan's reasoning really was spot on! But the fools went for a 2pt conversion in the 1st half when it made zero sense and that made the possibility of OT very real by the 4th quarter. Putting that Xtra PT back on the board makes your "bet of the century" a winner that was saved by the hook. 
Use your winnings to offset your stock market losses that will result when the FED gets down to doing it's dirty business. HONK HONK - LETS GO BRANDEAU
mcdumbass doesn't even know what happened in the game
About time you hit one Patty Poo. And you only had to bump it a few times to get attention from someone else!
Point is that Xtra PT. botch was huge.
The nerve of the Cover's unwashed masses entering my thread. I just barely covered "the bet of the century" and I told "all the poor's to take out loans and max out their exposure because this type of bet doesn't come around often." And this is the kind of backtalk I get as one of the pseudo-elites on Covers?
George Soros: "I admit that I have always harbored an exaggerated view of self-importance - to put it bluntly, I fancy myself as some kind of God."
Maybe 'bet of the century' was hyperbole. But the bet was rarely in doubt.
The Bengals covered for the majority of the game. The Rams covered for less than 13 minutes of the game. For almost the entire second half the Rams would have needed two unanswered scores to cover -- at least a TD and a FG. In fact, for a portion of the 3rd Q the Rams needed 2 unanswered TDs to cover -- and that was never going to happen.
In fact, the Bengals very easily could have won the game outright.
When you have a bet that is covering for 80% of the game and for 95% of the second half -- I would say you had a pretty solid bet!
When, at the end of the game, the only way you can lose is a pick-six or go to OT and lose with a TD by the opposition -- I would say that was a very solid pick.
It was at no point really 'barely covered'.
@Raiders22
Nope: First off, I'm just f'ing with the OP. The humorous thread title opened the door to that. And while I respect D-tox's knowledge, all paid posters deserve to get ribbed once in a while, whether you are here to do click bait, propaganda, or a tout. He's smart but is still just a blue-pilled normie who got vaxxed and likes to invest in corruption (legal) if it makes him money.
2nd off, you got to give the first half of the game to LAR because the botched X-tra PT. was the difference between a push and a win. The 2nd half line was -1/2 (Rams). The score ended at 10-10. That's called barely covering. The whole game was a coin flip type of game based upon the spread and match up. The Rams took the 1st qt. Cindy the 2nd at. and 3rd qt. and the Rams the 4th. That's called a split. And like I said, the X-tra PT. (if made) gives the Bengals the cover by just a hook. The you have the refs getting involved as usual which just adds to the coin flip dynamic. So, your perception of what you want to see, just doesn't reflect the reality that played out. It was a close down to the wire game that was Always In Doubt, including the point spread.
Gotcha. Didn't know you were ribbing him.
But as I pointed out, the original 4.5 was never in doubt. He was not talking about betting each Q or each H, etc. One bet, for the entire game, that was covered for 80% of the game and the ENTIRE second half. Again, when you need 2 unanswered scores to lose -- it is about as easy a win as you will get in NFL SB.
You can argue the missed extra point. They still would NOT have covered. It might have changed some of the game continuation. But, instead of needing a FG to tie the game at 13, the Bengals would have needed a TD to take the lead 17-14. The Bengals scored a TD anyway to take a 17-13 lead. Then after that the missed extra point meant the Rams needed a FG and a TD to WIN the game instead of two FGs or a TD and EP. But, IN NEITHER of those situations would they have covered EVEN with the missed EP. However, that was very early and you can argue other things. For example, Bengals going for it on fourth down at the beginning of the game -- that sort of backfired and spotted the Rams an early score, Mixon should have got the ball on 3rd and 1 on last the drive and maybe even on 4th and 1, Joe B missed an open guy on the down on a missed read on left side, etc. But what you cannot argue, is that even after the missed extra point, the Rams built enough of a lead to cover AND could not put the hammer down! Bottom line is that the Bengals came all around winning that game and, but for a few missed chances, would have.
For, maybe, 20% of the game you could consider it a coinflip TO COVER for the Rams -- basically when they had a 7-0 and a 13-3 lead. But that was so early it did not matter. During the flow of the rest of the game, the Bengals covered with EASE. You can argue the Bengals dug themselves into a hole and came out quickly. If they had played field position early -- maybe they have the lead to start and the Bengals have NO problem winning -- let alone covering. The Bengals didn't take advantage of their lead well enough nor take advantage of Mixon well enough.
With almost 6:00 left in the 1st half the Bengals began to cover AND were never in doubt to cover the REST of the game. Unless it had gone to OT and they lost by a TD only or a pick-six.
The game may have come 'down to the wire' as far as who was going to WIN the game; it did NOT come 'down to the wire' as far as who would COVER. That is the difference.
If every game in NFL were this easy to watch when you had a bet on this side it would make it much more comfortable to watch. Again, this is about as easy a cover as you can ask for in the NFL -- especially on an 'underdog' in the SB.
On the other topic(s) -- you know I mostly agree with you on the idiotic 'vaccine' coercion stuff. 
But as far as this one game stuff I cannot agree with you.
Established in 1995,
Hot Forum Topics
