$1 million dollar checks................

2 one million dollar checks and he lost a state election where Trump won.... he didn't spend enough to buy them judges I reckon .....

@nature1970

If, Musk was attempting to buy the judges he would have spent a lot more than 2 million ....instead of just giving out $1 million checks to just two Wisconsin voters.

The payments were not intended to advocate for or against any candidate....

Elon Musk was exercising his free speech rights with the giveaways and any attempt to restrict that would violate both the Wisconsin and U.S. constitutions. As a result it was legal..  Case Closed ..

Musk opening statement stated it was a cost saving measure. He stated " I stated I gave the checks to drive legacy media crazy...I could buy this type of publicity , " as he pointed to rhe camera crews from the networks . " for a mere 1 million.".... it came off flar to the real audience the swing voters who decided the election.

Slim... what happened think it through breath how on earth did someone else get you to react. Are you in charge or is the environment always going to pull the strings press the buttons wind you up and watch you go back here...

.don't be played bro

@nature1970

I am not your bro...not even a distant relative..

WS C'rers comment in the mains that....."Diversity is what makes society better and stronger and more accepting of everyone and that truth is being destroyed through the villainizing of the purpose by portraying the concept with only the outliers and extremes."

No doubt there is genius in the diversity pool ..however, that does not represent the totality of the pool ....and excepting the whole pool as making society better and stronger is poppycock.. and nonsense used to be misleading or deceptive.....

Diversity is not good for America..

Individuals  should be selected by there own merit and not because of there affiliation with a select group..

Oh...

You are bit a human not an American you didn't go to public school . Not apart of soiciety.... or you saying your not masculine...I should call you a sister instead?

Let's walk through logic here slim and start with the structure of your being.

Are you not made up of subatomic particles. The basic building blocks of atoms. Are you here not interwoven in quantum physics to be assembled as atoms. These atoms are apart of larger clusters known as molecules such as water h2o or glycerin c6h12o6 do you own any of these things or is your body utilizing these resources. These molecules combined with nitrogen create amino acids they then form cells with your unique DNA is encoded the cells become tissue and tissue organs the organs an organ system such as your brain your heart your liver... again all those things are needed to create unique being. Is it much different than mine?

We then form a population that lives in a community and apart of an ecosystem.... do you live on land breath air and walk is any of this ability yours. You purchased you own or more you utilize in this biosphere earth. Now this is physical let's go over to thoughts reasoning collective conscious.

are you human are you apart of the same gentic make up as all other human beings are you conscious of how you think awaken become aware . More would unite us as brothers than divide us as adveraries.

maybe the term countryman would be a better approach with you

Pointing out that my faith my god built all of this and all humans are bothers and sisters to me. Turn to the Bible Job during their talk. He placed the cornerstone to form the world. We live because he made it.

Look at this guy post history - it takes less than 1 minute to conclude he isn’t masculine (he is an easy to offend crybaby snitch) 

I am aware of slim. Glad to see he is back

 I am a neutral being and understand his frustration with noble goals.of diversity. Midnight is a great person and is slim just different opinions and soon slim w I ll be able to articulate his thoughts with reasonable degree of eloquence and not sound like orange man right aoc bad....

@nature1970

 humans are bothers and sisters to me.

To be fair, ‘brother’ and ‘bro’ have two different connotations.  
‘Bro’ itself is used very differently.  It can easily be used as a put down or as a connection.  It can be dismissive or even derisive.  
‘Friend’ works much better in most settings, unless you are a teenager.

Thank you for the clarification raiders

Friend as a pronoun is great suggestion .

@nature1970

I’d call him a c.unt but he lacks the depth and warmth

My posts here was how easily he can be triggered to behave irrationally 

 By making him aware of how easily he being played gives him time to adjust to approach in counter statements in highly contested and emotional political debates. When his emotions become over stimulated he has no recourse that to be devolved to hatred and aggressive tactics he completely loses his points and becomes ingrossed in name calling ridicules semeanor and he is boxed

 It is an effective strategy against those who unaware of the approach. As raiders summed up as rhey are only words to him he is a attorney who I believe has seen possibly used the strategy in past court room proceedings I felt a more let's get into the weeds approach was needed.

Instead ofi ain't your brother he could of stated I don't remember you at the kitchen table when I was growing up.... meaning to me there was no white faces there....

@nature1970

 Welcome back good sir 

Glad to be out