Anyone not see value in taking the pairing of Ross/Kessy over May/Walsh? I know that May/Walsh had not lost a set in Olympic history but at +300 with the young guns I feel almost compelled to take a shot. I doubt Ross/Kessy just rolls over to the legends. Thoughts?
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
Anyone not see value in taking the pairing of Ross/Kessy over May/Walsh? I know that May/Walsh had not lost a set in Olympic history but at +300 with the young guns I feel almost compelled to take a shot. I doubt Ross/Kessy just rolls over to the legends. Thoughts?
"Anyone not see value in taking the pairing of Ross/Kessy over May/Walsh? I know that May/Walsh had not lost a set in Olympic history but at +300 with the young guns I feel almost compelled to take a shot. I doubt Ross/Kessy just rolls over to the legends. Thoughts?"
Actually they did lose a set earlier in this olympics
"Anyone not see value in taking the pairing of Ross/Kessy over May/Walsh? I know that May/Walsh had not lost a set in Olympic history but at +300 with the young guns I feel almost compelled to take a shot. I doubt Ross/Kessy just rolls over to the legends. Thoughts?"
Actually they did lose a set earlier in this olympics
pie... my bad. Bottom line is that I know they have been consistently good. The #1 team was the Brazilians and they were taken out by Ross/Kessy. I just don't get the odds.
pie... my bad. Bottom line is that I know they have been consistently good. The #1 team was the Brazilians and they were taken out by Ross/Kessy. I just don't get the odds.
pie... my bad. Bottom line is that I know they have been consistently good. The #1 team was the Brazilians and they were taken out by Ross/Kessy. I just don't get the odds.
who u like, brasil or usa
Quote Originally Posted by jesron1269:
pie... my bad. Bottom line is that I know they have been consistently good. The #1 team was the Brazilians and they were taken out by Ross/Kessy. I just don't get the odds.