Quote Originally Posted by Cowbeagle: In my 50+ years of sports gambling, have seen it all, unusual plays and bad beats, the only thing that is annoying is the bad calls by the refs- anything questionable should be sent to review as they can such as Kelce’s touchdown in the first quarter, which was nullified by a facemask which was fictional This is the only logical argument one could make in my opinion. The only thing that I ever found suspicious about this whole thing is that they have the technology to review every single call. Challenges can be made to be used on penalties. The nfl absolutely refuses to do this. The specific call you’re referring to is the absolute perfect example. The phantom facemask that took a TD off the board and ultimately decided whether or not the spread was covered by KC or Indy. Not only is it now a challengable call…but nobody fcking challenged it lmao. And if it is a challengeable call…why not just use a booth review and immediately make the corrections?!? To me this is the only thing suspicious about the NFL. It’s like having a calculator in your hand but instead having your 6 year old do your taxes with pencil and paper. Just use the fcking technology. Use it on every play and every single penalty. If the game takes a little longer who gives a shit. Atleast the millions of fans can know that who won the game is actually who won the game.
Yeah and you are saying it right why you cant even use AI nowadays
0
@brn2loslive2win
Quote Originally Posted by brn2loslive2win:
Quote Originally Posted by Cowbeagle: In my 50+ years of sports gambling, have seen it all, unusual plays and bad beats, the only thing that is annoying is the bad calls by the refs- anything questionable should be sent to review as they can such as Kelce’s touchdown in the first quarter, which was nullified by a facemask which was fictional This is the only logical argument one could make in my opinion. The only thing that I ever found suspicious about this whole thing is that they have the technology to review every single call. Challenges can be made to be used on penalties. The nfl absolutely refuses to do this. The specific call you’re referring to is the absolute perfect example. The phantom facemask that took a TD off the board and ultimately decided whether or not the spread was covered by KC or Indy. Not only is it now a challengable call…but nobody fcking challenged it lmao. And if it is a challengeable call…why not just use a booth review and immediately make the corrections?!? To me this is the only thing suspicious about the NFL. It’s like having a calculator in your hand but instead having your 6 year old do your taxes with pencil and paper. Just use the fcking technology. Use it on every play and every single penalty. If the game takes a little longer who gives a shit. Atleast the millions of fans can know that who won the game is actually who won the game.
Yeah and you are saying it right why you cant even use AI nowadays
Quote Originally Posted by Cowbeagle: In my 50+ years of sports gambling, have seen it all, unusual plays and bad beats, the only thing that is annoying is the bad calls by the refs- anything questionable should be sent to review as they can such as Kelce’s touchdown in the first quarter, which was nullified by a facemask which was fictional This is the only logical argument one could make in my opinion. The only thing that I ever found suspicious about this whole thing is that they have the technology to review every single call. Challenges can be made to be used on penalties. The nfl absolutely refuses to do this. The specific call you’re referring to is the absolute perfect example. The phantom facemask that took a TD off the board and ultimately decided whether or not the spread was covered by KC or Indy. Not only is it now a challengable call…but nobody fcking challenged it lmao. And if it is a challengeable call…why not just use a booth review and immediately make the corrections?!? To me this is the only thing suspicious about the NFL. It’s like having a calculator in your hand but instead having your 6 year old do your taxes with pencil and paper. Just use the fcking technology. Use it on every play and every single penalty. If the game takes a little longer who gives a shit. Atleast the millions of fans can know that who won the game is actually who won the game.
And also we currently have cameras everywhere, why you can't just place one that will track ball
0
Quote Originally Posted by brn2loslive2win:
Quote Originally Posted by Cowbeagle: In my 50+ years of sports gambling, have seen it all, unusual plays and bad beats, the only thing that is annoying is the bad calls by the refs- anything questionable should be sent to review as they can such as Kelce’s touchdown in the first quarter, which was nullified by a facemask which was fictional This is the only logical argument one could make in my opinion. The only thing that I ever found suspicious about this whole thing is that they have the technology to review every single call. Challenges can be made to be used on penalties. The nfl absolutely refuses to do this. The specific call you’re referring to is the absolute perfect example. The phantom facemask that took a TD off the board and ultimately decided whether or not the spread was covered by KC or Indy. Not only is it now a challengable call…but nobody fcking challenged it lmao. And if it is a challengeable call…why not just use a booth review and immediately make the corrections?!? To me this is the only thing suspicious about the NFL. It’s like having a calculator in your hand but instead having your 6 year old do your taxes with pencil and paper. Just use the fcking technology. Use it on every play and every single penalty. If the game takes a little longer who gives a shit. Atleast the millions of fans can know that who won the game is actually who won the game.
And also we currently have cameras everywhere, why you can't just place one that will track ball
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.