its actually north melbourne kangaroos. yes i give roos a chance of covering the spread as the saints have not covered the last 3 matches. also coming home from gold coast, maybe abit weary.
its actually north melbourne kangaroos. yes i give roos a chance of covering the spread as the saints have not covered the last 3 matches. also coming home from gold coast, maybe abit weary.
its actually north melbourne kangaroos. yes i give roos a chance of covering the spread as the saints have not covered the last 3 matches. also coming home from gold coast, maybe abit weary.
Quote Originally Posted by melbourneboy:
its actually north melbourne kangaroos. yes i give roos a chance of covering the spread as the saints have not covered the last 3 matches. also coming home from gold coast, maybe abit weary.
I thought this thread was about the bloody rumored merger of the two sides (Roos and Dees). HAHAHAHA!
Oops.
Gun to my head, I'd take the Roos +39.5. North plays very well at Etihad and has the legs/guns to kick within that margin. Saints have shown a propensity to lay off the pedal once up nicely.
Gun to my head, that is...
I thought this thread was about the bloody rumored merger of the two sides (Roos and Dees). HAHAHAHA!
Oops.
Gun to my head, I'd take the Roos +39.5. North plays very well at Etihad and has the legs/guns to kick within that margin. Saints have shown a propensity to lay off the pedal once up nicely.