That is a huge list of OUTs for Carlton, and they are not just their depth players, they are their BEST players all out. Coming off a thumping last week there is no way Carlton can win this match with all those players out. They will actually be struggling to field a team the way they are going (Seriously).
The +13.5 about Western Bulldogs is a lock. Taking them to win at about $2.60 is close to one as well. Bet big and be confident about this one.
Get on this bet before Robinson, Jamison and possibly Scotland are named as OUTs and the price drops.
That is a huge list of OUTs for Carlton, and they are not just their depth players, they are their BEST players all out. Coming off a thumping last week there is no way Carlton can win this match with all those players out. They will actually be struggling to field a team the way they are going (Seriously).
The +13.5 about Western Bulldogs is a lock. Taking them to win at about $2.60 is close to one as well. Bet big and be confident about this one.
Get on this bet before Robinson, Jamison and possibly Scotland are named as OUTs and the price drops.
I guess this entire forum was against my bet of the round this week.
How come I just kneeeeeew when I read the title of this thread, and before clicking on it, that it was going to be the Dogs plus the points?
Maybe I got lucky, I dunno, but this round sucked from a betting perspective and the only match that for me was Carlton minus 13.5.
I don't see what people were reading into a team that has terrible ball movement, is slow on the ground and susceptible to the faster teams (Carlton), is one of the worst offenders in the league at allowing opponent marks and possessions inside their own 50 (didn't the line get covered at the death in this fashion?), and almost habitually get thrashed by a bucketful every round.
That side is your lock of the round? And against a side whose main strength (playing the ball and covering the field fairly quickly) sticks a knife directly into the Dogs' glaring weakness (poor field tempo and ball movement?)
I guess this entire forum was against my bet of the round this week.
How come I just kneeeeeew when I read the title of this thread, and before clicking on it, that it was going to be the Dogs plus the points?
Maybe I got lucky, I dunno, but this round sucked from a betting perspective and the only match that for me was Carlton minus 13.5.
I don't see what people were reading into a team that has terrible ball movement, is slow on the ground and susceptible to the faster teams (Carlton), is one of the worst offenders in the league at allowing opponent marks and possessions inside their own 50 (didn't the line get covered at the death in this fashion?), and almost habitually get thrashed by a bucketful every round.
That side is your lock of the round? And against a side whose main strength (playing the ball and covering the field fairly quickly) sticks a knife directly into the Dogs' glaring weakness (poor field tempo and ball movement?)