**Chris Judd**
0-3 = Not the start I wanted. ![]()
Isn't it funny that when you discover something that you seem to get on at the wrong time. Before today this was hitting at 81%, and after a 3rd time it is 100%...so stay turned until Sat out time ![]()
0-3 = Not the start I wanted. ![]()
Isn't it funny that when you discover something that you seem to get on at the wrong time. Before today this was hitting at 81%, and after a 3rd time it is 100%...so stay turned until Sat out time ![]()
FYI today I took couple with cricket bets.
MEMPHIS +10.5
TORONTO +10.5
Both won straight up. Not looking for huge profit just safe and easy double up winners.
FYI today I took couple with cricket bets.
MEMPHIS +10.5
TORONTO +10.5
Both won straight up. Not looking for huge profit just safe and easy double up winners.
FYI today I took couple with cricket bets.
MEMPHIS +10.5
TORONTO +10.5
Both won straight up. Not looking for huge profit just safe and easy double up winners.
fair enough tez, but just imagine if you'd bet Mem & Tor ML, or better still ats !?
the trouble with those short ones you're banging together in parlays is the terribly small return in proportion to what you're staking.
You might cruise along and hit your first 4 or 5 of these "chalk" parlays but just a couple of losses can all but wipe off your winnings.
10 points isn't a heck of a lot in basketball either, espeically not for 1.20
anyway, just my 2 cents
FYI today I took couple with cricket bets.
MEMPHIS +10.5
TORONTO +10.5
Both won straight up. Not looking for huge profit just safe and easy double up winners.
fair enough tez, but just imagine if you'd bet Mem & Tor ML, or better still ats !?
the trouble with those short ones you're banging together in parlays is the terribly small return in proportion to what you're staking.
You might cruise along and hit your first 4 or 5 of these "chalk" parlays but just a couple of losses can all but wipe off your winnings.
10 points isn't a heck of a lot in basketball either, espeically not for 1.20
anyway, just my 2 cents
Believe it or not, someone with far too much time on their hands (cough cough) did a back check on the ye olde "bet the highest over & lowest under on days with four or more games".
I lost the piece of paper I took all the results down on but from memory it went something like 152-115 last season (07/08), returning something like +25 units assuming you bet 1 unit on each o / u each day.
And every month it returned a +ve
don't think it's been hitting so well this season though. November was about .500 from memory and december has been a bit below that so far. ![]()
Believe it or not, someone with far too much time on their hands (cough cough) did a back check on the ye olde "bet the highest over & lowest under on days with four or more games".
I lost the piece of paper I took all the results down on but from memory it went something like 152-115 last season (07/08), returning something like +25 units assuming you bet 1 unit on each o / u each day.
And every month it returned a +ve
don't think it's been hitting so well this season though. November was about .500 from memory and december has been a bit below that so far. ![]()
Yes Rod, the way it is tracked means that after consecutive Over's as such their must be an Under before the play can re-set and new have another play. It's a little hard to explain but if I could show you the spreadsheets you would see what I mean.
Stay turned, there will more than likely be a play before Xmas which I will give plenty of notice in advance, and tuff beat on NJ yesterday
Yes Rod, the way it is tracked means that after consecutive Over's as such their must be an Under before the play can re-set and new have another play. It's a little hard to explain but if I could show you the spreadsheets you would see what I mean.
Stay turned, there will more than likely be a play before Xmas which I will give plenty of notice in advance, and tuff beat on NJ yesterday
ben cousins is done
lol thanks for the heads up dazza ![]()
![]()
![]()
Daz, your scoop seems wrong. Richmond signe him. No.6 pick.
ben cousins is done
lol thanks for the heads up dazza ![]()
![]()
![]()
Daz, your scoop seems wrong. Richmond signe him. No.6 pick.
Hot Forum Topics
- 🏈🏈🏈 Fubah2's risky CFB bets 289,552
- Serious Streak Survivor Strategies 1,918,652
- Saturday 10/31/2026 719
- Week 9 Money 15,979
- PART DEUX 202
- Halloween Treats 4,351
- NCAA WEEK 9 (( 151 )) 9,545
- NCAA WEEK 9 *** Wet Dream on Covers Street *** 10,142
- ***Macwesties * Sat. Oct. 31, 2026 * NCAAF * Week #9 * College Football Plays*** 4,288
- *Saturday CFB week9 – The Grind Continues EdgeHunting!** 4,310
Warning - External Link
Report User
This post is spam
Delete Post
Remove Thread
Scan Results
Login/Register
Accounts are free and easy to create.
Search
