The line has moved nearly 5 points towards the lions but I was gobsmacked to see it come out at a pick em. It would've been nice to get it then but I rarely take a bet before the teams come out.
AFL Round 8
The line has moved nearly 5 points towards the lions but I was gobsmacked to see it come out at a pick em. It would've been nice to get it then but I rarely take a bet before the teams come out.
The line has moved nearly 5 points towards the lions but I was gobsmacked to see it come out at a pick em. It would've been nice to get it then but I rarely take a bet before the teams come out.
The line has moved nearly 5 points towards the lions but I was gobsmacked to see it come out at a pick em. It would've been nice to get it then but I rarely take a bet before the teams come out.
Sorry that should ready BOG the last 3 times they have played Carlton. Also, Carlton only really has Waite that has the size to play on Brown, last time they played Brown kicked 10 goals, 9 while Waite was playing on him.
The line has moved nearly 5 points towards the lions but I was gobsmacked to see it come out at a pick em. It would've been nice to get it then but I rarely take a bet before the teams come out.
Sorry that should ready BOG the last 3 times they have played Carlton. Also, Carlton only really has Waite that has the size to play on Brown, last time they played Brown kicked 10 goals, 9 while Waite was playing on him.
I think they'll miss Cloke a lot (who's been in good form) and although they do have one of the best midfield, they'll struggle to get first possesion (without a quality ruckman) against a team who IMO has one of the best midfields too, especially in contested possesions (lead by Black and Power).
With Fev, I don't think it'll come down to one player to stop him rather, like the crows did, drop a player across to limit his leads and contest with.
Don't get me wrong Carlton will be a very good team but in 2010. They have the most inexperienced team (on average 300 games less experience than the 15th most inexperienced team). I expect Carlton to be very good in the first quarter by like you said the pressure for 4 full quarters will be the difference and wear them down.
Good luck to us buddy.
I think they'll miss Cloke a lot (who's been in good form) and although they do have one of the best midfield, they'll struggle to get first possesion (without a quality ruckman) against a team who IMO has one of the best midfields too, especially in contested possesions (lead by Black and Power).
With Fev, I don't think it'll come down to one player to stop him rather, like the crows did, drop a player across to limit his leads and contest with.
Don't get me wrong Carlton will be a very good team but in 2010. They have the most inexperienced team (on average 300 games less experience than the 15th most inexperienced team). I expect Carlton to be very good in the first quarter by like you said the pressure for 4 full quarters will be the difference and wear them down.
Good luck to us buddy.
I think they'll have their crack at the cup too but in 2010 when these kids get some meat on their bones.
I think Copeland just got omitted for better (defensive) players but Leuenberger? I initially thought cause it was going to be wet but its indoors so I guess its just to balance the side.
I'm just rapted Drummond is back, I think it was amazing to see how big of an impact he makes, or should I say (the opposite) how much of a hole he leaves when he's not there. It was obvious as soon as he was injured in the Collingwood match. They are a lot more organized in defence with him in.
Cheers guys
I think they'll have their crack at the cup too but in 2010 when these kids get some meat on their bones.
I think Copeland just got omitted for better (defensive) players but Leuenberger? I initially thought cause it was going to be wet but its indoors so I guess its just to balance the side.
I'm just rapted Drummond is back, I think it was amazing to see how big of an impact he makes, or should I say (the opposite) how much of a hole he leaves when he's not there. It was obvious as soon as he was injured in the Collingwood match. They are a lot more organized in defence with him in.
Cheers guys
Good point, with some of them out, their backline especially can get exposed. But you're right, with them in they look a lot more experienced and capable of wins.
Good point, with some of them out, their backline especially can get exposed. But you're right, with them in they look a lot more experienced and capable of wins.
The bulldogs too have their strongest team in for the year, scary for a team that hasn't lost. Coming up against a team that just got humiliated by losing to the future wooden spooners.
- Freo to win the first quarter because they will come out breathing fire after last rounds embarrasment
- and the dogs to cover the line of -4.5
The bulldogs too have their strongest team in for the year, scary for a team that hasn't lost. Coming up against a team that just got humiliated by losing to the future wooden spooners.
- Freo to win the first quarter because they will come out breathing fire after last rounds embarrasment
- and the dogs to cover the line of -4.5
Beautiful, that should dominate the ruck I hope
Beautiful, that should dominate the ruck I hope
I think Copeland just got omitted for better (defensive) players but Leuenberger? I initially thought cause it was going to be wet but its indoors so I guess its just to balance the side.
Thanks for that. I was very suprised to see him ommited but you made some good points. Lions in recent years have had lots of good tall players. I'm on Brisvegas.
![]()
I think Copeland just got omitted for better (defensive) players but Leuenberger? I initially thought cause it was going to be wet but its indoors so I guess its just to balance the side.
Thanks for that. I was very suprised to see him ommited but you made some good points. Lions in recent years have had lots of good tall players. I'm on Brisvegas.
![]()
0-10
0 = Two-Up decides the winner.
3 = I don't care if I lose, but I could win, you know.
7 = Gotta good feeling about this......but will get a bit nervous at times.
10 = I gots money in da bank, shawty what you drank!!!
0-10
0 = Two-Up decides the winner.
3 = I don't care if I lose, but I could win, you know.
7 = Gotta good feeling about this......but will get a bit nervous at times.
10 = I gots money in da bank, shawty what you drank!!!
I find it hard to see how Carlisle and Thurstons are going to stop Roughhead and Franklin, the wet weather might help them out a bit. At the other end I think Croad will easily beat Treadrea and Motlop can be a handful for anybody on his day. I like the Hawks to get a win and think the wet weather should keep it from blowing out to a big margin.
Hawks 1-39 (5 units)
I find it hard to see how Carlisle and Thurstons are going to stop Roughhead and Franklin, the wet weather might help them out a bit. At the other end I think Croad will easily beat Treadrea and Motlop can be a handful for anybody on his day. I like the Hawks to get a win and think the wet weather should keep it from blowing out to a big margin.
Hawks 1-39 (5 units)
Hot Forum Topics
Warning - External Link
Report User
This post is spam
Delete Post
Remove Thread
Scan Results
Login/Register
Accounts are free and easy to create.
Search
