read the same things elsewhere when Anaheim went into New Jersey for their game 7 of what had been nothing-but-a-home-wins series to that point in 02-03. People were eager to find an angle that pointed to the road team for once, when it didn't exist. Didn't exist for that NJY/ANA series, doesn't exist here.
For those with short memories, Anaheim crushed New Jersey 5-2 in game 6 in Anaheim, and a lot of people I know were on their nuts at good money to repeat the effort for game 7, thinking their last performance on their own home ice overshadowed their last performance on New Jersey's ice (and what was that? a game 5 3-6 loss). And what happened in that game 7? New Jersey didn't let a team who scored 5 goal in their previous meeting score at all, in a 3-0 win.
And as a stat tidbit - in that NJY/ANA series, only once did the home team score less than 2 goals, and only once did the road team score more than 2 goals. This current all-home series is even worse than that: Not once has the home team scored less than 2 goals, and not once has the road team scored more than 2 goals.
read the same things elsewhere when Anaheim went into New Jersey for their game 7 of what had been nothing-but-a-home-wins series to that point in 02-03. People were eager to find an angle that pointed to the road team for once, when it didn't exist. Didn't exist for that NJY/ANA series, doesn't exist here.
For those with short memories, Anaheim crushed New Jersey 5-2 in game 6 in Anaheim, and a lot of people I know were on their nuts at good money to repeat the effort for game 7, thinking their last performance on their own home ice overshadowed their last performance on New Jersey's ice (and what was that? a game 5 3-6 loss). And what happened in that game 7? New Jersey didn't let a team who scored 5 goal in their previous meeting score at all, in a 3-0 win.
And as a stat tidbit - in that NJY/ANA series, only once did the home team score less than 2 goals, and only once did the road team score more than 2 goals. This current all-home series is even worse than that: Not once has the home team scored less than 2 goals, and not once has the road team scored more than 2 goals.
![]()
read the same things elsewhere when Anaheim went into New Jersey for their game 7 of what had been nothing-but-a-home-wins series to that point in 02-03. People were eager to find an angle that pointed to the road team for once, when it didn't exist. Didn't exist for that NJY/ANA series, doesn't exist here.
For those with short memories, Anaheim crushed New Jersey 5-2 in game 6 in Anaheim, and a lot of people I know were on their nuts at good money to repeat the effort for game 7, thinking their last performance on their own home ice overshadowed their last performance on New Jersey's ice (and what was that? a game 5 3-6 loss). And what happened in that game 7? New Jersey didn't let a team who scored 5 goal in their previous meeting score at all, in a 3-0 win.
And as a stat tidbit - in that NJY/ANA series, only once did the home team score less than 2 goals, and only once did the road team score more than 2 goals. This current all-home series is even worse than that: Not once has the home team scored less than 2 goals, and not once has the road team scored more than 2 goals.
![]()
![]()
read the same things elsewhere when Anaheim went into New Jersey for their game 7 of what had been nothing-but-a-home-wins series to that point in 02-03. People were eager to find an angle that pointed to the road team for once, when it didn't exist. Didn't exist for that NJY/ANA series, doesn't exist here.
For those with short memories, Anaheim crushed New Jersey 5-2 in game 6 in Anaheim, and a lot of people I know were on their nuts at good money to repeat the effort for game 7, thinking their last performance on their own home ice overshadowed their last performance on New Jersey's ice (and what was that? a game 5 3-6 loss). And what happened in that game 7? New Jersey didn't let a team who scored 5 goal in their previous meeting score at all, in a 3-0 win.
And as a stat tidbit - in that NJY/ANA series, only once did the home team score less than 2 goals, and only once did the road team score more than 2 goals. This current all-home series is even worse than that: Not once has the home team scored less than 2 goals, and not once has the road team scored more than 2 goals.
![]()
what you can't throw out are those boards at the Joe which give Fleury nightmares.
what you can't throw out are those boards at the Joe which give Fleury nightmares.
read the same things elsewhere when Anaheim went into New Jersey for their game 7 of what had been nothing-but-a-home-wins series to that point in 02-03. People were eager to find an angle that pointed to the road team for once, when it didn't exist. Didn't exist for that NJY/ANA series, doesn't exist here.
For those with short memories, Anaheim crushed New Jersey 5-2 in game 6 in Anaheim, and a lot of people I know were on their nuts at good money to repeat the effort for game 7, thinking their last performance on their own home ice overshadowed their last performance on New Jersey's ice (and what was that? a game 5 3-6 loss). And what happened in that game 7? New Jersey didn't let a team who scored 5 goal in their previous meeting score at all, in a 3-0 win.
And as a stat tidbit - in that NJY/ANA series, only once did the home team score less than 2 goals, and only once did the road team score more than 2 goals. This current all-home series is even worse than that: Not once has the home team scored less than 2 goals, and not once has the road team scored more than 2 goals.
read the same things elsewhere when Anaheim went into New Jersey for their game 7 of what had been nothing-but-a-home-wins series to that point in 02-03. People were eager to find an angle that pointed to the road team for once, when it didn't exist. Didn't exist for that NJY/ANA series, doesn't exist here.
For those with short memories, Anaheim crushed New Jersey 5-2 in game 6 in Anaheim, and a lot of people I know were on their nuts at good money to repeat the effort for game 7, thinking their last performance on their own home ice overshadowed their last performance on New Jersey's ice (and what was that? a game 5 3-6 loss). And what happened in that game 7? New Jersey didn't let a team who scored 5 goal in their previous meeting score at all, in a 3-0 win.
And as a stat tidbit - in that NJY/ANA series, only once did the home team score less than 2 goals, and only once did the road team score more than 2 goals. This current all-home series is even worse than that: Not once has the home team scored less than 2 goals, and not once has the road team scored more than 2 goals.
Detroit faced Anaheim in a home game 7 just over 3 of weeks ago - you consider that a long time ago?
.It was 3-3 headed into the last 5 mins, and Detroit won without needing OT. A better experience for this game 7 than Pitts easy romp over Washington that was never in doubt after the 1st period was done with.
Detroit faced Anaheim in a home game 7 just over 3 of weeks ago - you consider that a long time ago?
.It was 3-3 headed into the last 5 mins, and Detroit won without needing OT. A better experience for this game 7 than Pitts easy romp over Washington that was never in doubt after the 1st period was done with.
read the same things elsewhere when Anaheim went into New Jersey for their game 7 of what had been nothing-but-a-home-wins series to that point in 02-03. People were eager to find an angle that pointed to the road team for once, when it didn't exist. Didn't exist for that NJY/ANA series, doesn't exist here.
For those with short memories, Anaheim crushed New Jersey 5-2 in game 6 in Anaheim, and a lot of people I know were on their nuts at good money to repeat the effort for game 7, thinking their last performance on their own home ice overshadowed their last performance on New Jersey's ice (and what was that? a game 5 3-6 loss). And what happened in that game 7? New Jersey didn't let a team who scored 5 goal in their previous meeting score at all, in a 3-0 win.
And as a stat tidbit - in that NJY/ANA series, only once did the home team score less than 2 goals, and only once did the road team score more than 2 goals. This current all-home series is even worse than that: Not once has the home team scored less than 2 goals, and not once has the road team scored more than 2 goals.
read the same things elsewhere when Anaheim went into New Jersey for their game 7 of what had been nothing-but-a-home-wins series to that point in 02-03. People were eager to find an angle that pointed to the road team for once, when it didn't exist. Didn't exist for that NJY/ANA series, doesn't exist here.
For those with short memories, Anaheim crushed New Jersey 5-2 in game 6 in Anaheim, and a lot of people I know were on their nuts at good money to repeat the effort for game 7, thinking their last performance on their own home ice overshadowed their last performance on New Jersey's ice (and what was that? a game 5 3-6 loss). And what happened in that game 7? New Jersey didn't let a team who scored 5 goal in their previous meeting score at all, in a 3-0 win.
And as a stat tidbit - in that NJY/ANA series, only once did the home team score less than 2 goals, and only once did the road team score more than 2 goals. This current all-home series is even worse than that: Not once has the home team scored less than 2 goals, and not once has the road team scored more than 2 goals.
Detroit faced Anaheim in a home game 7 just over 3 of weeks ago - you consider that a long time ago?
.It was 3-3 headed into the last 5 mins, and Detroit won without needing OT. A better experience for this game 7 than Pitts easy romp over Washington that was never in doubt after the 1st period was done with.
My memory must be shot. I thought that went 6. ![]()
Detroit faced Anaheim in a home game 7 just over 3 of weeks ago - you consider that a long time ago?
.It was 3-3 headed into the last 5 mins, and Detroit won without needing OT. A better experience for this game 7 than Pitts easy romp over Washington that was never in doubt after the 1st period was done with.
My memory must be shot. I thought that went 6. ![]()
Detroit faced Anaheim in a home game 7 just over 3 of weeks ago - you consider that a long time ago?
.It was 3-3 headed into the last 5 mins, and Detroit won without needing OT. A better experience for this game 7 than Pitts easy romp over Washington that was never in doubt after the 1st period was done with.
Right after the Canucks lost. Obviously wasn't paying much attention to pucks. My mistake.
Detroit faced Anaheim in a home game 7 just over 3 of weeks ago - you consider that a long time ago?
.It was 3-3 headed into the last 5 mins, and Detroit won without needing OT. A better experience for this game 7 than Pitts easy romp over Washington that was never in doubt after the 1st period was done with.
Right after the Canucks lost. Obviously wasn't paying much attention to pucks. My mistake.
ok MR PM......OK![]()
good to see you're contributing here again![]()
![]()
ok MR PM......OK![]()
good to see you're contributing here again![]()
![]()
flyers also beat pretty much the same team last year in game 7 and the rags almost beat them as well this year but lundqvist gave federov a "goodbye nhl" present...if anything...winning in DC in 7 is not a difficult thing to do
flyers also beat pretty much the same team last year in game 7 and the rags almost beat them as well this year but lundqvist gave federov a "goodbye nhl" present...if anything...winning in DC in 7 is not a difficult thing to do

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.