All Forums | NHL Betting Forum

NHL 10|11

Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 20042
Posts: 206
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jun, 2010
Posts: 179
Posted: #76

NY Rangers - Edmonton 2.65 ( S1 - 500; S2 - 921.19 )

Washington - Atlanta 3.3 ( S1 - 500; S2 - 921.19 )

unofficial

NY Rangers - Edmonton +1.5

Washington - Atlanta +1.5

GL

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jun, 2010
Posts: 179
Posted: #77
Quote Originally Posted by SaVaG:

NY Rangers - Edmonton LOSE

Washington - Atlanta LOSE

unofficial

NY Rangers - Edmonton +1.5 LOSE

Washington - Atlanta +1.5 LOSE

S1: + 505 ; S2: - 701.11

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jun, 2010
Posts: 179
Posted: #78

Buffalo - Vancouver 1.93 ( S1 - 500; S2 - 644.83 )

unofficial

Philadelphia - Ottawa

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jun, 2010
Posts: 179
Posted: #79
Quote Originally Posted by SaVaG:

Buffalo - Vancouver LOSE

S1: + 5 ; S2: -1345.95

unofficial

Philadelphia - Ottawa WIN

Montreal - Philadelphia 2.1 ( S1 - 500; S2 - 548.11 )

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jun, 2010
Posts: 179
Posted: #80
Quote Originally Posted by SaVaG:

Montreal - Philadelphia LOSE

S1: -495 ; S2: -1894.06

unofficial

Washington - Buffalo
Detroit - St. Louis
Minnesota - Anaheim
Calgary - Phoenix
Edmonton - Chicago
Los Angeles - Columbus

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jun, 2010
Posts: 179
Posted: #81
Quote Originally Posted by SaVaG:

unofficial

Washington - Buffalo WIN
Detroit - St. Louis WIN
Minnesota - Anaheim  WIN
Calgary - Phoenix LOSE
Edmonton - Chicago WIN
Los Angeles - Columbus LOSE

Philadelphia - Tampa Bay 1.46 ( S1 - 500; S2 - 465.89 )
Montreal - Nashville 1.69 ( S1 - 500; S2 - 465.89 ) hot
Dallas - San Jose 1.99 ( S1 - 500; S2 - 465.89 )

unofficial

Boston - Florida
Toronto - New Jersey

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jun, 2010
Posts: 179
Posted: #82
Quote Originally Posted by SaVaG:

Philadelphia - Tampa Bay LOSE

Montreal - Nashville LOSE

Dallas - San Jose LOSE

S1: -1995 ; S2: -3291.73

unofficial

Boston - Florida WIN

Toronto - New Jersey LOSE

unofficial

St. Louis - Ottawa

Edmonton - Phoenix

Anaheim - Columbus

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jun, 2010
Posts: 179
Posted: #83
Quote Originally Posted by SaVaG:

unofficial

St. Louis - Ottawa WIN

Edmonton - Phoenix WIN

Anaheim - Columbus WIN

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jun, 2010
Posts: 179
Posted: #84

Atlanta - NY Islanders 1.53 ( S1 - 500; S2 - 256.24 )

Detroit - Calgary 1.46 ( S1 - 500; S2 - 256.24 )

Anaheim - Edmonton 1.56 ( S1 - 500; S2 - 256.24 )

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jun, 2010
Posts: 179
Posted: #85
Quote Originally Posted by SaVaG:

Atlanta - NY Islanders WIN

Detroit - Calgary WIN

Anaheim - Edmonton LOSE

S1: -2000 ; S2: -3294.29

Philadelphia - Montreal 1.65 ( S1 - 500; S2 - 255.86 )

Ottawa - Los Angeles 1.97 ( S1 - 500; S2 - 255.86 )

 

 

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jun, 2010
Posts: 179
Posted: #86
Quote Originally Posted by SaVaG:

Philadelphia - Montreal WIN

Ottawa - Los Angeles LOSE (i made mistake)

S1: -2175 ; S2: -3383.84

Phoenix - Edmonton 1.52 ( S1 - 500; S2 - 242.42 )

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jun, 2010
Posts: 179
Posted: #87
Quote Originally Posted by SaVaG:

Phoenix - Edmonton WIN

S1: -1915 ; S2: -3257.78

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jun, 2010
Posts: 179
Posted: #88
Buffalo - Pittsburgh 1.78 ( S1 - 500; S2 - 261.33 )
Atlanta - Detroit 1.7 ( S1 - 500; S2 - 261.33 )
Ottawa - Dallas 2.2 ( S1 - 500; S2 - 261.33 )
Nashville - St. Louis 2.00 ( S1 - 500; S2 - 261.33 )
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jun, 2010
Posts: 179
Posted: #89

Buffalo - Pittsburgh WIN

Atlanta - Detroit LOSE

Ottawa - Dallas WIN

Nashville - St. Louis WIN

 

S1: -925 ; S2: -2740.34

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jun, 2010
Posts: 179
Posted: #90
Edmonton - Colorado 1.84 ( S1 - 500; S2 - 338.95 )
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jun, 2010
Posts: 179
Posted: #91

Quote Originally Posted by SaVaG:

Edmonton - Colorado LOSE

S1: -1425 ; S2: -3079.29

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jun, 2010
Posts: 179
Posted: #92

Philadelphia - Calgary 1.52 ( S1 - 500; S2 - 288.11 )

Pittsburgh - Ottawa 1.6 ( S1 - 500; S2 - 288.11 )

Anaheim - Chicago 1.87 ( S1 - 500; S2 - 288.11 )

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jun, 2010
Posts: 179
Posted: #93
Quote Originally Posted by SaVaG:

Philadelphia - Calgary LOSE

Pittsburgh - Ottawa WIN

Anaheim - Chicago WIN

 

S1: -1190 ; S2: -2943.88

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jun, 2010
Posts: 179
Posted: #94


https://www.covers.com/pageLoader/pageLoader.aspx?page=/data/nba/matchups/g5_overall_20.html

I know that:
consequence FG% 46.4 (Offense Chicago) is better than consequence FG% 43.5 (Offense Sacramento)

Please, prompt me the following:
which of the next consequences is better and emit it with blue color:
FG% 43.9 (Defense Chicago) or FG% 47.4 (Defense Sacramento)
3P% 36.0 (Defense Chicago) or 3P% 36.0 (Defense Sacramento)
FT% 76.8 (Defense Chicago) or FT% 76.0 (Defense Sacramento)
Rebounds 40.4 (Defense Chicago) or Rebounds 41.5(Defense Sacramento)
Steals 8.1 (Defense Chicago) or Steals 6.1 (Defense Sacramento)
% 3PA to FGA 22.6% (Defense Chicago) or % 3PA to FGA 17.9% (Defense Sacramento)
Blocks 5.5 (Defense Chicago) or Blocks 4.6 (Defense Sacramento)

Because in Ukraine it's indicated not such as yours.

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jun, 2010
Posts: 179
Posted: #95

Hello everybody! Look at this table of statistics, please:

https://www.covers.com/pageLoader/pageLoader.aspx?page=/data/nba/matchups/g5_overall_20.html

I know that:
consequence FG% 46.4 (Offense Chicago) is better than consequence FG% 43.5 (Offense Sacramento)

Please, prompt me the following:
which of the next consequences is better and emit it with blue color:
FG% 43.9 (Defense Chicago) or FG% 47.4 (Defense Sacramento)
3P% 36.0 (Defense Chicago) or 3P% 36.0 (Defense Sacramento)
FT% 76.8 (Defense Chicago) or FT% 76.0 (Defense Sacramento)
Rebounds 40.4 (Defense Chicago) or Rebounds 41.5(Defense Sacramento)
Steals 8.1 (Defense Chicago) or Steals 6.1 (Defense Sacramento)
% 3PA to FGA 22.6% (Defense Chicago) or % 3PA to FGA 17.9% (Defense Sacramento)
Blocks 5.5 (Defense Chicago) or Blocks 4.6 (Defense Sacramento)

Because in Ukraine it's indicated not such as yours.

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jun, 2010
Posts: 179
Posted: #96

Hello everybody! Look at this table of statistics, please:

https://www.covers.com/pageLoader/pageLoader.aspx?page=/data/nba/matchups/g5_overall_20.html

I know that:
consequence FG% 46.4 (Offense Chicago) is better than consequence FG% 43.5 (Offense Sacramento)

Please, prompt me the following:
which of the next consequences is better and emit it with blue color:
FG% 43.9 (Defense Chicago) or FG% 47.4 (Defense Sacramento)
3P% 36.0 (Defense Chicago) or 3P% 36.0 (Defense Sacramento)
FT% 76.8 (Defense Chicago) or FT% 76.0 (Defense Sacramento)
Rebounds 40.4 (Defense Chicago) or Rebounds 41.5(Defense Sacramento)
Steals 8.1 (Defense Chicago) or Steals 6.1 (Defense Sacramento)
% 3PA to FGA 22.6% (Defense Chicago) or % 3PA to FGA 17.9% (Defense Sacramento)
Blocks 5.5 (Defense Chicago) or Blocks 4.6 (Defense Sacramento)

Because in Ukraine it's indicated not such as yours.

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jun, 2010
Posts: 179
Posted: #97
so can anybody help me?
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jun, 2010
Posts: 179
Posted: #98

New Jersey - Philadelphia 1.82 ( S1 - 500; S2 - 308.42 )

Ottawa - Toronto 2.26 ( S1 - 500; S2 - 308.42 )

Colorado - Minnesota 1.69 ( S1 - 500; S2 - 308.42 )

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jun, 2010
Posts: 179
Posted: #99
Quote Originally Posted by SaVaG:

New Jersey - Philadelphia LOSE

Ottawa - Toronto LOSE

Colorado - Minnesota WIN

S1: -1845 ; S2: -3347.91

 

Atlanta - Boston 1.97 ( S1 - 500; S2 - 247.81 )

 
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jun, 2010
Posts: 179
Posted: #100
Quote Originally Posted by SaVaG:

Atlanta - Boston WIN

S1: -1360 ; S2: -3107.53

All Forums | NHL Betting Forum
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming
Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Office Pools
The Covers community has
810,221
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 30 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service youtube logo facebook logo twitter logo instagram logo linkedin logo google news logo
Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2026 CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.