Posted:
#26
Boo, I didn't say it was a charge. But if that wasn't a charge, what is? It looked like there was only 1 thing on Krug's mind and WE all know what that was.
0
Game 1 over reaction thread, post yours here
Posted:
#27
Quote Originally Posted by Dangerbay:
Boo, I didn't say it was a charge. But if that wasn't a charge, what is? It looked like there was only 1 thing on Krug's mind and WE all know what that was.
Boo, I didn't say it was a charge. But if that wasn't a charge, what is? It looked like there was only 1 thing on Krug's mind and WE all know what that was.
No doubt he wanted retribution on Perron. No argument whatsoever there. He would have probably taken a penalty but the hit itself was clean IMO.
0
Posted:
#29
Quote Originally Posted by BooBunny:
Distance traveled I believe refers to skating distance i.e. we were always taught more than 3 consecutive strides would be considered a charge...once you are gliding you are good.
I just went to read the way the NHL rule reads and of course it mentions nothing about specific distance or number of consecutive strides so it is waaaay to vague.
In any event...it's over and of course it was a super dirty...cheap rulebreaking...headhunting and morally corrupt hit because it was done by a Boston Bruins player.
That was kind of my point. The rule is vague. But it’s obviously more about how far you go vs some “gliding” action. Regardless, why would you think it’s a penalty, you’re a bruins fan. Idk how anyone thinks it’s an obvious call either way. Maybe “those” ppl should get their heads out their azz. Or just keep posting dumb shitt, guess I don’t really care
0
Hot Forum Topics
