Posted:
#101
I'm liking my $200 wager to win $11000 more and more and more...
The dump truck might win the SB and load my truck up with cash...
PM for the skinny on the down low
Titans to win the SB @ 50-1
Posted:
#102
If people would sit back and listen, they might learn something from someone else(why Im here at Covers). Example, in one of the other threads, I posted to take LSU to win the National Championship +127 BEFORE their semifinal game against Okla. They were big favorites in the semis(if they lose deal done). I was hoping for a blowout win and got it. I shared with the premise that since the title game was in Neworleans, I didn't think there was any way LSU would lose and if they won, there should be a hedging opportunity. I have now locked in Clemson SU +180. who do I think wins the game....still LSU...but there are many cases for clemson. Regardless, I don't care because Im sitting on a winner. Thanks Train for the teams you gave in the UDMLP: Kent St, La Tech, Iowa St., Ohio St., Oregon, Baylor, Louisville. Texas...5-3 su as dogs
Posted:
#103
Quote Originally Posted by kamphil:
Nice play on LSU/Clemson! I woulda went with Clem + points and shot for a middle. Those college dogs shoulda went 6/8....Ohio St choked!!If people would sit back and listen, they might learn something from someone else(why Im here at Covers). Example, in one of the other threads, I posted to take LSU to win the National Championship +127 BEFORE their semifinal game against Okla. They were big favorites in the semis(if they lose deal done). I was hoping for a blowout win and got it. I shared with the premise that since the title game was in Neworleans, I didn't think there was any way LSU would lose and if they won, there should be a hedging opportunity. I have now locked in Clemson SU +180. who do I think wins the game....still LSU...but there are many cases for clemson. Regardless, I don't care because Im sitting on a winner. Thanks Train for the teams you gave in the UDMLP: Kent St, La Tech, Iowa St., Ohio St., Oregon, Baylor, Louisville. Texas...5-3 su as dogs
GL brother
Posted:
#105
Unlike the Pats, the Ravens have a lot of beef on their Dline...those dudes are all 300 pound plus behemoths. I see Baltimore containing King Henry more than we would like and forcing Tannehill to the air...he is mobile and athletic so all is not lost if that is the case.
If only Tenny can force LJacks to the air rather than it being his idea he can still float up some intercepts like the first game versus Pitts in which he was intercepted 3 x and sacked 5x...psychologically it would benefit Tenny to get up on Baltimore with an early score...plant the seed of doubt and desperation so to speak. 
Posted:
#108
Hey train, just read your original post. Sorry if this was already spoken about.
Wouldn’t u possibly make out better just going ML and doubling down game to game? Rather than the straight 50-1 bet? Plus at the time, in the case they garbage the bed, you wouldn’t have a loser on a team who didn’t make the playoffs
Posted:
#109
Quote Originally Posted by glyde69:
Hey train, just read your original post. Sorry if this was already spoken about.
Maybe. They lost 2 of their last 3 and were -250 or so vs Houston in week 17.....so parlaying week 17 with them vs NE and vs Balt would be around 15-1.....I dont think they will be very big dogs to KC or Houston or whoever makes it out of the NFC....So, maybe 60-1ish to win out.....but that's with unknown futures....say they beat Balt and Hou beats KC but Waraon gets injured.....Hey train, just read your original post. Sorry if this was already spoken about.
Wouldn’t u possibly make out better just going ML and doubling down game to game? Rather than the straight 50-1 bet? Plus at the time, in the case they garbage the bed, you wouldn’t have a loser on a team who didn’t make the playoffs
I was fine with 50-1 as it represented reasonable value imo.
Posted:
#110
train. I dunno diddly squat about NFL so what I do is follow the newsletters that are better than full of shite coin flippers. There's a few, another site actually keeps records on all the newsletter and it's a great way of filtering through the mountain of BS spewing from the mouths of supposed expert cappers. Anyway out of the four games this weekend they seem to be leaning toward one bet, under on Tennessee Baltimore.
thought I'd share
Posted:
#112
Quote Originally Posted by lordzud:
train. I dunno diddly squat about NFL so what I do is follow the newsletters that are better than full of shite coin flippers. There's a few, another site actually keeps records on all the newsletter and it's a great way of filtering through the mountain of BS spewing from the mouths of supposed expert cappers. Anyway out of the four games this weekend they seem to be leaning toward one bet, under on Tennessee Baltimore. thought I'd share
train. I dunno diddly squat about NFL so what I do is follow the newsletters that are better than full of shite coin flippers. There's a few, another site actually keeps records on all the newsletter and it's a great way of filtering through the mountain of BS spewing from the mouths of supposed expert cappers. Anyway out of the four games this weekend they seem to be leaning toward one bet, under on Tennessee Baltimore. thought I'd share
Both of these teams were going over most weeks down the stretch.
Posted:
#114
Quote Originally Posted by lancer89074:
No reason to hedge now. First of all, it's not worth it in this game given the Ravens ML is so high Second, for the Titans future to hit it was a given they would have to win 4 games in a row probably as underdogs.....so, NE was hurdle 1.....Ravens are the major hurdle in terms of thinking about hedging. I fear my Titans' future is heading towards the trash can...
Tough to hedge it...have to bet a fortune on Baltimore ML...not a good idea.
Hot Forum Topics
