10) A home favorite week 1 who had less regular season wins last season than their present opponent did.....53-34 ATS.....ON Raiders, Bengals, Chiefs, (Vikings if they become the favorite)..... query text......week=1 and PRSW < o:PRSW and HF
I've always liked this one. Put in another parameter. Your home team had to have won at least six games last year and I think you'll like what you see
Thanks for all of the data sharing that you do
2
Quote Originally Posted by Indigo999:
10) A home favorite week 1 who had less regular season wins last season than their present opponent did.....53-34 ATS.....ON Raiders, Bengals, Chiefs, (Vikings if they become the favorite)..... query text......week=1 and PRSW < o:PRSW and HF
I've always liked this one. Put in another parameter. Your home team had to have won at least six games last year and I think you'll like what you see
15) A week 1 away dog who missed the playoffs last season whose cumulative against the spread margin last season was more than 50 points worse than their week 1 opponent's.
As an example, the Cardinals averaged -4 points/game versus the spread last season or -68 points (17 games played multiplied by -4 points/game). Their opponent, the Chargers were +5 for the season.....-68 minus 4 = -73
60-39 ATS.....Cardinals, Browns......if their week 1 opponent made the playoffs the season prior, this moves to 33-14 ATS (+4.0), 17-30 straight up (-2.7).
Query text....tpS(ats margin)-opS(ats margin)<-50 and week=1 and AD and tpS(playoffs)=0 and opS(playoffs)>0
0
15) A week 1 away dog who missed the playoffs last season whose cumulative against the spread margin last season was more than 50 points worse than their week 1 opponent's.
As an example, the Cardinals averaged -4 points/game versus the spread last season or -68 points (17 games played multiplied by -4 points/game). Their opponent, the Chargers were +5 for the season.....-68 minus 4 = -73
60-39 ATS.....Cardinals, Browns......if their week 1 opponent made the playoffs the season prior, this moves to 33-14 ATS (+4.0), 17-30 straight up (-2.7).
Query text....tpS(ats margin)-opS(ats margin)<-50 and week=1 and AD and tpS(playoffs)=0 and opS(playoffs)>0
15) A week 1 away dog who missed the playoffs last season whose cumulative against the spread margin last season was more than 50 points worse than their week 1 opponent's. As an example, the Cardinals averaged -4 points/game versus the spread last season or -68 points (17 games played multiplied by -4 points/game). Their opponent, the Chargers were +5 for the season.....-68 minus 4 = -73 60-39 ATS.....Cardinals, Browns......if their week 1 opponent made the playoffs the season prior, this moves to 33-14 ATS (+4.0), 17-30 straight up (-2.7). Query text....tpS(ats margin)-opS(ats margin)<-50 and week=1 and AD and tpS(playoffs)=0 and opS(playoffs)>0
great query indigo...thank you for sharing
1
Quote Originally Posted by Indigo999:
15) A week 1 away dog who missed the playoffs last season whose cumulative against the spread margin last season was more than 50 points worse than their week 1 opponent's. As an example, the Cardinals averaged -4 points/game versus the spread last season or -68 points (17 games played multiplied by -4 points/game). Their opponent, the Chargers were +5 for the season.....-68 minus 4 = -73 60-39 ATS.....Cardinals, Browns......if their week 1 opponent made the playoffs the season prior, this moves to 33-14 ATS (+4.0), 17-30 straight up (-2.7). Query text....tpS(ats margin)-opS(ats margin)<-50 and week=1 and AD and tpS(playoffs)=0 and opS(playoffs)>0
If this was already posted I apologize, but NFL QBs who were the first overall draft pick and making their first start are 2-15-1 SU this century. I'm not 100% sure of the accuracy of this stat, but I know I'm not backing the Raiders in Week One IF Mendoza makes his first start.
1
@Indigo999
If this was already posted I apologize, but NFL QBs who were the first overall draft pick and making their first start are 2-15-1 SU this century. I'm not 100% sure of the accuracy of this stat, but I know I'm not backing the Raiders in Week One IF Mendoza makes his first start.
19) Fade teams 2026, especially as favorites....VERSUS Broncos, Jaguars, Patriots, Steelers, Eagles, Lions, 20) Play ON teams 2026, especially as dogs.....NYG, Cowboys, Saints, Chiefs
Spot on except DET their SOS is beneficial
0
Quote Originally Posted by Indigo999:
19) Fade teams 2026, especially as favorites....VERSUS Broncos, Jaguars, Patriots, Steelers, Eagles, Lions, 20) Play ON teams 2026, especially as dogs.....NYG, Cowboys, Saints, Chiefs
Quote Originally Posted by Indigo999: 19) Fade teams 2026, especially as favorites....VERSUS Broncos, Jaguars, Patriots, Steelers, Eagles, Lions, 20) Play ON teams 2026, especially as dogs.....NYG, Cowboys, Saints, Chiefs Spot on except DET their SOS is beneficial
The Lions will have to convince me that their recent success wasn't just a product of of having Johnson as their offensive coordinator until last season.
1
Quote Originally Posted by jowchoo:
Quote Originally Posted by Indigo999: 19) Fade teams 2026, especially as favorites....VERSUS Broncos, Jaguars, Patriots, Steelers, Eagles, Lions, 20) Play ON teams 2026, especially as dogs.....NYG, Cowboys, Saints, Chiefs Spot on except DET their SOS is beneficial
The Lions will have to convince me that their recent success wasn't just a product of of having Johnson as their offensive coordinator until last season.
21) Play ON an away dog with less than or equal wins on the season to their present opponent, whose next game line is 3 or more points stronger than their opponent's next game line.....796-487-38 ATS (+3.5), 62%, 92-57-6 ATS in week 1 (12-18 ATS all of last season).....ON Falcons, Bucs (Packers if they become week 1 underdogs).
Example.....The Falcons are 3 point away underdogs week 1 versus the Steelers....the Falcons in week 2 are 1.5 point favorites and the Steelers are 4.5 point underdogs.
Query text....AD and n:line-on:line<=-3 and month>8 and t:wins-o:wins<1 and nn:playoffs=0
1
21) Play ON an away dog with less than or equal wins on the season to their present opponent, whose next game line is 3 or more points stronger than their opponent's next game line.....796-487-38 ATS (+3.5), 62%, 92-57-6 ATS in week 1 (12-18 ATS all of last season).....ON Falcons, Bucs (Packers if they become week 1 underdogs).
Example.....The Falcons are 3 point away underdogs week 1 versus the Steelers....the Falcons in week 2 are 1.5 point favorites and the Steelers are 4.5 point underdogs.
Query text....AD and n:line-on:line<=-3 and month>8 and t:wins-o:wins<1 and nn:playoffs=0
21) Play ON an away dog with less than or equal wins on the season to their present opponent, whose next game line is 3 or more points stronger than their opponent's next game line.....796-487-38 ATS (+3.5), 62%, 92-57-6 ATS in week 1 (12-18 ATS all of last season).....ON Falcons, Bucs (Packers if they become week 1 underdogs). Example.....The Falcons are 3 point away underdogs week 1 versus the Steelers....the Falcons in week 2 are 1.5 point favorites and the Steelers are 4.5 point underdogs. Query text....AD and n:line-on:line<=-3 and month>8 and t:wins-o:wins<1 and nn:playoffs=0
VERY IMPRESSIVE QUERY INDIGO!
thanks so much for the share especially the text.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Indigo999:
21) Play ON an away dog with less than or equal wins on the season to their present opponent, whose next game line is 3 or more points stronger than their opponent's next game line.....796-487-38 ATS (+3.5), 62%, 92-57-6 ATS in week 1 (12-18 ATS all of last season).....ON Falcons, Bucs (Packers if they become week 1 underdogs). Example.....The Falcons are 3 point away underdogs week 1 versus the Steelers....the Falcons in week 2 are 1.5 point favorites and the Steelers are 4.5 point underdogs. Query text....AD and n:line-on:line<=-3 and month>8 and t:wins-o:wins<1 and nn:playoffs=0
If you or anyone else decides to come onto my thread with angles I would appreciate it if you would explain the angle, as well as share the query text.
1
@jowchoo
If you or anyone else decides to come onto my thread with angles I would appreciate it if you would explain the angle, as well as share the query text.
Apparently Super Bowl Losers do well as Away Favorites off a strong OFF performance:
SBL and AF and p:dps > 10.2 (dps = Delta Points scored, roughly equivalent to how the team did vs. the team total --- the team scored at least 10.5 points above expectation in the previous game)
SU: 14-2 (10.6,87.5%)
ATS: 12-3-1 (5.6,80.0%) avg line is -5.34
It does not work for the other 3 categories (Away Dogs, Home Favorites, Home Dogs).
1
Apparently Super Bowl Losers do well as Away Favorites off a strong OFF performance:
SBL and AF and p:dps > 10.2 (dps = Delta Points scored, roughly equivalent to how the team did vs. the team total --- the team scored at least 10.5 points above expectation in the previous game)
SU: 14-2 (10.6,87.5%)
ATS: 12-3-1 (5.6,80.0%) avg line is -5.34
It does not work for the other 3 categories (Away Dogs, Home Favorites, Home Dogs).
23) Last season teams with a seasons wins total of >9 wins went 6-9 to the over, 2-4 OVER with a total greater than 10.
24) Last season teams with a season wins total of <8 wins went 7-6 to the over.
25) Teams since 2010 that went winless in the division the previous season went 251-185-19 ATS (+1.1), 57.6% the next season as away dogs of 7 points or less.....ON Jets, Cardinals, Titans
If they are away dogs of <=7 versus a divisional opponent this moves to 93-64 ATS, 59.2%
query text.....tpS(DIV@W, N=6)=0 and season>2010 and DIV and playoffs=0 and AD and line<=7
1
23) Last season teams with a seasons wins total of >9 wins went 6-9 to the over, 2-4 OVER with a total greater than 10.
24) Last season teams with a season wins total of <8 wins went 7-6 to the over.
25) Teams since 2010 that went winless in the division the previous season went 251-185-19 ATS (+1.1), 57.6% the next season as away dogs of 7 points or less.....ON Jets, Cardinals, Titans
If they are away dogs of <=7 versus a divisional opponent this moves to 93-64 ATS, 59.2%
query text.....tpS(DIV@W, N=6)=0 and season>2010 and DIV and playoffs=0 and AD and line<=7
a) they will be a next game underdog versus an opponent that will be a next game favorite
b) either their next, next game they will be an underdog or their present opponent's next next game they will be a favorite.....VERSUS Bengals, Steelers
20-47-2 ATS (-5.8), 33-36 straight up (-1.9)
c) if the game is a non-divisional matchup......14-28-2 ATS
d) if their present non-divisional opponent won less than 9 games last season....6-21-2 ATS (-10.8), 10-18 straight up (-6.6).....ON Falcons, Bucs
e) if their present opponent lost their last three away games last season....2-11 ATS (-13.92), 5-8 straight up (-9.92).....ON Bucs
query text....week = 1 and HF and n:D and on:F and (nn:D or onn:F) and not DIV and opS(W) < 9 and opS(W@A, N=3)
1
26) Play against a week 1 home favorite if;
a) they will be a next game underdog versus an opponent that will be a next game favorite
b) either their next, next game they will be an underdog or their present opponent's next next game they will be a favorite.....VERSUS Bengals, Steelers
20-47-2 ATS (-5.8), 33-36 straight up (-1.9)
c) if the game is a non-divisional matchup......14-28-2 ATS
d) if their present non-divisional opponent won less than 9 games last season....6-21-2 ATS (-10.8), 10-18 straight up (-6.6).....ON Falcons, Bucs
e) if their present opponent lost their last three away games last season....2-11 ATS (-13.92), 5-8 straight up (-9.92).....ON Bucs
query text....week = 1 and HF and n:D and on:F and (nn:D or onn:F) and not DIV and opS(W) < 9 and opS(W@A, N=3)
27) Since 2021, home field advantage in non-playoff games has averaged 2.1 points/game.
If January games are excluded where in some weird, probably non-sustainable incidences the home field advantage has been +5.98 points/game, the home field in non-January games has been 1.7 points/game.
query text....H and season>2020 and playoffs=0 and month!=1
Sunday games the home field advantage with the the above parameters has been 1.87 points/game, with the home team winning 52.7% of the games, covering 49% of the time.
1
27) Since 2021, home field advantage in non-playoff games has averaged 2.1 points/game.
If January games are excluded where in some weird, probably non-sustainable incidences the home field advantage has been +5.98 points/game, the home field in non-January games has been 1.7 points/game.
query text....H and season>2020 and playoffs=0 and month!=1
Sunday games the home field advantage with the the above parameters has been 1.87 points/game, with the home team winning 52.7% of the games, covering 49% of the time.
28) Teams that had at least 5 more close wins than had close losses (of 8 or less points) the previous season since 2020....Panthers were 7-2, Broncos were 11-2.
as:
a) Home favorites..... 41-56 ATS
b) Away favorites......30-31 ATS
c) Home dogs...........20-11 ATS.....Panthers week 1
Query text.....-8<=margin<=8 and playoffs=0 and team and season=2025
0
28) Teams that had at least 5 more close wins than had close losses (of 8 or less points) the previous season since 2020....Panthers were 7-2, Broncos were 11-2.
as:
a) Home favorites..... 41-56 ATS
b) Away favorites......30-31 ATS
c) Home dogs...........20-11 ATS.....Panthers week 1
From 17b)......week 1 away dogs that lost their last three away games from the previous season.....if that team won more than three games that previous season the results have been 55-27 ATS, 38-16-2 ATS if they are away non-divisional dogs.....ON Bucs
Those that won three or less games the previous season in this scenario have only been 15-17 ATS.....Cardinals, Jets
Query text.....week = 1 and tpS(W@A, N=3) = 0 and AD and tpS(W) > 3 and not DIV
0
From 17b)......week 1 away dogs that lost their last three away games from the previous season.....if that team won more than three games that previous season the results have been 55-27 ATS, 38-16-2 ATS if they are away non-divisional dogs.....ON Bucs
Those that won three or less games the previous season in this scenario have only been 15-17 ATS.....Cardinals, Jets
Query text.....week = 1 and tpS(W@A, N=3) = 0 and AD and tpS(W) > 3 and not DIV
Indigo, do you have any stats on NFL teams the game before opening up new stadiums. The Bills play at home week 2 & opening their new stadium on TNF.
No I don't have the wherewithal to test that.
Deleting the Cowboys win division play.
Futures plays....
1) Bills win division -147
2) Giants win division +550
3) Chargers win division +185
4) Saints win division +260
Cowboys win division DELETED
Looking to fade quarterbacks in their age 29 seasons, they often get hurt or underperform...............Joe Burrow, Daniel Jones, Sam Darnold, Kylar Murray, Lamar Jackson
1
Quote Originally Posted by SecretAgentMan1:
Indigo, do you have any stats on NFL teams the game before opening up new stadiums. The Bills play at home week 2 & opening their new stadium on TNF.
No I don't have the wherewithal to test that.
Deleting the Cowboys win division play.
Futures plays....
1) Bills win division -147
2) Giants win division +550
3) Chargers win division +185
4) Saints win division +260
Cowboys win division DELETED
Looking to fade quarterbacks in their age 29 seasons, they often get hurt or underperform...............Joe Burrow, Daniel Jones, Sam Darnold, Kylar Murray, Lamar Jackson
Here is an angle if you don't mind me adding Indigo
The super bowl loser is 4-10 ATS week 1 if they had a losing record of .500 or less the season before playing in the super bowl, & its since 1978 inception of the 16 game schedule. (Patriots were 4-13 in 2024)
1
Here is an angle if you don't mind me adding Indigo
The super bowl loser is 4-10 ATS week 1 if they had a losing record of .500 or less the season before playing in the super bowl, & its since 1978 inception of the 16 game schedule. (Patriots were 4-13 in 2024)
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.