All Forums | NFL Betting Forum

Saturday Divisional Playoffs

...

Participants:

Posts: 170

starwink

Banned

Joined: Apr, 2005

Posts: 24201

Posted: Jan. 10, 2008 - 6:21 PM ET #26

Opposite on both sides. New England hasn't been covering vs. good running teams. Jax eats up clock in their drives. GB is sort of one dimensional, also.

You've made me money. Much respect. I'll have to re-examine.

ChinCapper

Prospect

Joined: Dec, 2007

Posts: 16

Posted: Jan. 10, 2008 - 6:30 PM ET #27

Pack won't cover. They win by 6

brhuffma

Prospect

Joined: Oct, 2007

Posts: 192

Posted: Jan. 10, 2008 - 6:55 PM ET #28

Been watching you all year, have learn my lesson going against you! Good luck!

redskinsnut

Veteran

Joined: Oct, 2007

Posts: 1845

Posted: Jan. 10, 2008 - 8:42 PM ET #29

Quote Originally Posted by rush:

Seattle is one dimensional(no running game at all)...Green Bay's pash rush will eventually wear Seattle down in a big way....Seattle will turn the ball over at least twice.. Green Bay is very balanced w/ the imergence of Ryan Grant.....this will allow Favre plenty of time to throw to his weapons Driver, Jennings, Jones, and Martin...the Washington game was a tough one for Seattle now they have to travel to Green Bay and play a very good and rested Packer team in Lambeau...I see a pretty convincing win here for the Pack...gl

aplous

Rookie

Joined: Feb, 2003

Posts: 927

Posted: Jan. 10, 2008 - 9:49 PM ET #30

Love the Pack........seeing some 7.5's out there now....gonna hit -7.

GL!

aplous

Rookie

Joined: Feb, 2003

Posts: 927

Posted: Jan. 10, 2008 - 9:49 PM ET #31

Love the Pack........seeing some 7.5's out there now....gonna hit -7.

GL!

ezcomeezgo

Rookie

Joined: Jan, 2007

Posts: 517

Posted: Jan. 10, 2008 - 10:13 PM ET #32

with you on the GB side and total....both defenses in top 10 and I could see the Pack runny Grant 20-30 times considering Seattle's pass rush is their strength....could see this get as high as 45.....inflated # on that NE game, opened 11.5 and has shot up, NE gives up 4.4 per rush, that might keep Jax in the game longer then expected, im thinking over in that game however...jax has gone over 11 in a row dont see why this one isnt number 12 if there is no wind.....pitt threw all over the secondary of the jags last week, if the Pats do get up a couple of TD's early it could get ugly for them.....GL!

ANTE_CHICAGO

Veteran

Joined: Sep, 2007

Posts: 1457

Posted: Jan. 10, 2008 - 10:31 PM ET #33

spo8

Rookie

Joined: Oct, 2007

Posts: 624

Posted: Jan. 10, 2008 - 10:57 PM ET #34

yes very tough game, leaning GB also,,

just did a 4 team teaser

takin all the dogs plus 6 except indy , 2 to 1 odds.

handpicked

All-Star

Joined: Nov, 2001

Posts: 13368

Posted: Jan. 11, 2008 - 12:52 AM ET #35

Changed my over play for the g.bay-seattle from over to Your Under after reading your input on game.& added g.Bay ats also thx.I was born in milwaukee>so I'll be a cheese-head on sat.>hehe.& following you on that Pats train to

>hehe.thx & let's hit em ALL.

Skipster

Captain

Joined: Nov, 2007

Posts: 6422

Posted: Jan. 11, 2008 - 1:57 AM ET #36

Well, I'd rather lose with Favre and Brady on my side than let them smoke me once again. Not sure about the under, but what the hell, I bet it anyway. GL Rush. You're the king.

dynamite140

Banned

Joined: Dec, 2006

Posts: 2798

Posted: Jan. 11, 2008 - 2:05 AM ET #37

hey rush, i see GB -8 on matchbook for about +108. I know all your plays on -110. I see GB -7 with -115 on thegreek. Do you think that 1 point will make a big difference?