Posted:
#126
ROAD TO THE SB
Posted:
#128
Just put in this bet:
| ONLINE 01/24/2018 11:25 PM |
|
Just put in this bet:
| ONLINE 01/24/2018 11:25 PM |
|
Posted:
#130
Quote Originally Posted by pdouble:
Dude
incerdible run your on
congrats and keep up the excellent work
gl
PDUBS. thanks a lot for those kind words, buddy !!!
Always a real pleasure. All that's left of this NFL season is for us to get this Eagles money and truly make America great again !!!
Quote Originally Posted by pdouble:
Dude
incerdible run your on
congrats and keep up the excellent work
gl
PDUBS. thanks a lot for those kind words, buddy !!!
Always a real pleasure. All that's left of this NFL season is for us to get this Eagles money and truly make America great again !!!
Posted:
#131
FROM: COOLER
As far as my thoughts, this Philly D is the real deal. They can pressure the offense without having to blitz, and that's going to cause Tommy a lot of trouble. They have a better running attack than NE, and that will serve them well going into the 4th quarter.
My only caveat is Foles. Hope I'm getting the good one and not the up and down one. But hey, that's gambling.
MY REPLY:
Good point about the Eagles' defensive line. The only counter I can come up with is that JAX had the same advantage. And they're sittin' at home right now. That said, it IS a major plus for PHI.
Speaking of which, you may wanna look into the over on the sacks prop. The Pats alone, I think have about 8-9 sacks this postseason. I think this is one prop I will likely play. I will also post my prop plays--and will try to do so a few days before--this time around.
FROM: COOLER

As far as my thoughts, this Philly D is the real deal. They can pressure the offense without having to blitz, and that's going to cause Tommy a lot of trouble. They have a better running attack than NE, and that will serve them well going into the 4th quarter.
My only caveat is Foles. Hope I'm getting the good one and not the up and down one. But hey, that's gambling.
MY REPLY:
Good point about the Eagles' defensive line. The only counter I can come up with is that JAX had the same advantage. And they're sittin' at home right now. That said, it IS a major plus for PHI.
Speaking of which, you may wanna look into the over on the sacks prop. The Pats alone, I think have about 8-9 sacks this postseason. I think this is one prop I will likely play. I will also post my prop plays--and will try to do so a few days before--this time around.
Posted:
#132
Got a big bet riding right now on Simona Halep in the Aussie Open against Angelique Kerber.
F--n Kerber just won't go away. Halep had 2 match points and let Kerber back in the game.
I am really sweating this one out. So much so that I may hedge my bet just to "cancel" it.
Got a big bet riding right now on Simona Halep in the Aussie Open against Angelique Kerber.
F--n Kerber just won't go away. Halep had 2 match points and let Kerber back in the game.
I am really sweating this one out. So much so that I may hedge my bet just to "cancel" it.
Posted:
#133
Geez, I forgot the Aussie Open has different rules---and NO tie-breakers. They play full games until one player is 2 points apart...and wins. I can't take this....


I just missed +313 odds on Kerber just before this current game.
10,000 to win 33,130
Would've lost my 10K profit if Halep wins, but I could live with that....cuz if Kerber wins, I would get 30K.
Geez, I forgot the Aussie Open has different rules---and NO tie-breakers. They play full games until one player is 2 points apart...and wins. I can't take this....


I just missed +313 odds on Kerber just before this current game.
10,000 to win 33,130
Would've lost my 10K profit if Halep wins, but I could live with that....cuz if Kerber wins, I would get 30K.
Posted:
#136
DO NOT try this at home !!! I am a trained, degenerate, reckless gambler. These big money bets to win half back--or sometimes a fraction--are one of my weaknesses. They look like easy money--and usually are--but I HAVE been burned several times on heavy avorites.
A few that come to mind. Andy Murray was once a -2000 something favorite and I swear he laid down on purpose. I will never forgive him for that. I lost about 45K on that one.
Another was Golden State as a favorite of about -1300. I forget against whom. Of course, they lost against the pushover they should have beaten in their sleep. I lost about 23K on that bet.
Luckily, I got this one. Man, I was sweatin' .......
DO NOT try this at home !!! I am a trained, degenerate, reckless gambler. These big money bets to win half back--or sometimes a fraction--are one of my weaknesses. They look like easy money--and usually are--but I HAVE been burned several times on heavy avorites.
A few that come to mind. Andy Murray was once a -2000 something favorite and I swear he laid down on purpose. I will never forgive him for that. I lost about 45K on that one.
Another was Golden State as a favorite of about -1300. I forget against whom. Of course, they lost against the pushover they should have beaten in their sleep. I lost about 23K on that bet.
Luckily, I got this one. Man, I was sweatin' .......
Posted:
#148
For the ones who claim:
1) Sports aren't rigged
2) Neither teams, coaches nor players care about point spreads
Etc, etc, etc.
Observe the following ticket, which was a posted win from earlier tonight.
For the ones who claim:
1) Sports aren't rigged
2) Neither teams, coaches nor players care about point spreads
Etc, etc, etc.
Observe the following ticket, which was a posted win from earlier tonight.
Posted:
#150
I bet this twice. I often do that...for assorted reasons. Anyhow. lemme share the line movement for the 2H, as I remember it:
Opened at:
over 73.5 -111
under 73.5 -102
Then moved to:
over 74 -106
under 74 -106
Then moved to, and settled at:
over 74 -102
under 74 -111 (finally settled at -112 when I placed my second bet)
After initially leaning toward betting the OVER, I decided to wait out the line a few minutes. In the end, I opted to play the UNDER 74.
I did not watch the game cuz it wasn't broadcast online. Plus, I was placing other bets. Point is, I checked in sporadically on the score, and late in the game, I swore it was gonna go over. Cannot remember exactly, but they were about 5 points from the over, with 2 minutes to go. Do not quote me on that.
Next thing you know, I refresh the page, and the game is over. Guess how many points they scored in the 2H............
A GRAND TOTAL OF 73 POINTS......
A mere 1 point UNDER the 2H total.
This happens VERY frequently, where either 1H or 2H scores fall within 1/2 or 1 point over or under the total.
Are Vegas bookmakers THAT omnipotent and great at their craft ???? (INSERT SARCASM)
MORAL: Yes, line movement DOES have a level of importance in betting----of course. But many of you who state this fact, fail to either realize or admit that you are making a bona fide case for game-fixing.
OF COURSE coaches and players AND refs are aware of point spreads, and they act and adjust accordingly. Look at the Saints game where they did not kick the extra point.
Sure, sure. It isn't mandatory. Yet, it almost always affects bettors..........wake up, guys. Those of you who ask for proof, do not really want proof. You want a 60 minutes exposé or a "deep throat" type recorded conversation or video with Tom Brady, in a secldued Boston parking lot. How naive are you?
I bet this twice. I often do that...for assorted reasons. Anyhow. lemme share the line movement for the 2H, as I remember it:
Opened at:
over 73.5 -111
under 73.5 -102
Then moved to:
over 74 -106
under 74 -106
Then moved to, and settled at:
over 74 -102
under 74 -111 (finally settled at -112 when I placed my second bet)
After initially leaning toward betting the OVER, I decided to wait out the line a few minutes. In the end, I opted to play the UNDER 74.
I did not watch the game cuz it wasn't broadcast online. Plus, I was placing other bets. Point is, I checked in sporadically on the score, and late in the game, I swore it was gonna go over. Cannot remember exactly, but they were about 5 points from the over, with 2 minutes to go. Do not quote me on that.
Next thing you know, I refresh the page, and the game is over. Guess how many points they scored in the 2H............
A GRAND TOTAL OF 73 POINTS......
A mere 1 point UNDER the 2H total.
This happens VERY frequently, where either 1H or 2H scores fall within 1/2 or 1 point over or under the total.
Are Vegas bookmakers THAT omnipotent and great at their craft ???? (INSERT SARCASM)
MORAL: Yes, line movement DOES have a level of importance in betting----of course. But many of you who state this fact, fail to either realize or admit that you are making a bona fide case for game-fixing.
OF COURSE coaches and players AND refs are aware of point spreads, and they act and adjust accordingly. Look at the Saints game where they did not kick the extra point.
Sure, sure. It isn't mandatory. Yet, it almost always affects bettors..........wake up, guys. Those of you who ask for proof, do not really want proof. You want a 60 minutes exposé or a "deep throat" type recorded conversation or video with Tom Brady, in a secldued Boston parking lot. How naive are you?
Hot Forum Topics
- 🤢🥴💩_ Fubah's risky baseball bets _🥶😲🥵 450,181
- 🏈🏈🏈 Fubah2's risky CFB bets 260,590
- Friday 09/25/2026 657
- I'm embarrassed for Trump supporters 58,446
- NFL LOCKED IN! 100,363
- Falcons vs Packers TNF in-game live 2,168
- Happening just recently . . . 34,762
- NCAA FOOTBALL. 151 25,394
- Public Indicator Calculations 2026 14,794
- ***Macwesties * Thur. * Sun. Sept. 24, 27, 2026 * Week #3 * NFL Football Plays* 4,409
Warning - External Link
Report User
Thank you for reporting
This content is abusive or harmful
This post is spam
An error has occurred
This post is spam
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
Delete Post
Are you sure you would like to remove this post?
Remove Thread
Are you sure you would like to remove this thread?
Scan Results
Login/Register
Happy to have you join the conversation. To do so, please login or create an account.
Accounts are free and easy to create.
Accounts are free and easy to create.
Search
