excellent analysis PV! Especially under in car game I'm already on TB& see a tight game start to finish both teams being able to run coming up short on drives settling for fgs under makes complete sense. Interested in your Seattle lean would love to hear some breakdown on that one if you care to
0
excellent analysis PV! Especially under in car game I'm already on TB& see a tight game start to finish both teams being able to run coming up short on drives settling for fgs under makes complete sense. Interested in your Seattle lean would love to hear some breakdown on that one if you care to
Grins: I'm actually on NE -3 but I bought points before all the crazy line movement so I kinda got in a crappy spot against the book on that one, but whatever it aint over yet and as long as Brady is all good etc.. I like NE, mostly because I think the dolphins O is a lot more one dimensional than the Saints and that the Pat D will do a lot better job.
Haven 't played Minn game yet, don't know if I will they haven't been on the road since early November and its not like ARZ sucks, but if Warner doesn't play and you have Minn I feel like its almost a gimme, so not sure If I'll play that one but If I had to choose it would be Minn.
Hou/Jax is a total no-play for me I have no clue who takes this one whatsoever
0
Thanks for the kind words guys.
Grins: I'm actually on NE -3 but I bought points before all the crazy line movement so I kinda got in a crappy spot against the book on that one, but whatever it aint over yet and as long as Brady is all good etc.. I like NE, mostly because I think the dolphins O is a lot more one dimensional than the Saints and that the Pat D will do a lot better job.
Haven 't played Minn game yet, don't know if I will they haven't been on the road since early November and its not like ARZ sucks, but if Warner doesn't play and you have Minn I feel like its almost a gimme, so not sure If I'll play that one but If I had to choose it would be Minn.
Hou/Jax is a total no-play for me I have no clue who takes this one whatsoever
Yeah I was thinking about teasing TB & the under I think that's a good combination. I think I might go play that one right now especially cause I just heard Deangelo might not play which is good for Tampa and the under, even though Stewart and the other backs are good they aren't quite the home run threat Williams is.
I just took Seattle on a teaser this week, kinda like them for the same reasons they were my #1 pick last week @ STL, they have a bad record but are head and shoulders above other teams with equal records and if not for some bad breaks at some bad times could have had a winning record. They have started to improve in stopping the run and I think they will do a better job this time containing Gore, I think SF will be a little stubborn in sticking to the run waiting for the big one to strike, this may lead to SF being in a lot of 3rd and longs
If that is so I like Seattle at home against Alex Smith, its cold up here this weekend and he's been knocked before for having small hands etc... Lastly I think the Seattle offense will do enough at home to put up 20+ so while I'm not hammering them on the reg spread I think they are a good teaser choice at +13 at home in the cold.
0
Splooge,
Yeah I was thinking about teasing TB & the under I think that's a good combination. I think I might go play that one right now especially cause I just heard Deangelo might not play which is good for Tampa and the under, even though Stewart and the other backs are good they aren't quite the home run threat Williams is.
I just took Seattle on a teaser this week, kinda like them for the same reasons they were my #1 pick last week @ STL, they have a bad record but are head and shoulders above other teams with equal records and if not for some bad breaks at some bad times could have had a winning record. They have started to improve in stopping the run and I think they will do a better job this time containing Gore, I think SF will be a little stubborn in sticking to the run waiting for the big one to strike, this may lead to SF being in a lot of 3rd and longs
If that is so I like Seattle at home against Alex Smith, its cold up here this weekend and he's been knocked before for having small hands etc... Lastly I think the Seattle offense will do enough at home to put up 20+ so while I'm not hammering them on the reg spread I think they are a good teaser choice at +13 at home in the cold.
Ok Just locked in that teaser, but just for one unit. I said this in my other thread but I'm going to have a big play for MNF this week too. That's probably about it for the week
0
Ok Just locked in that teaser, but just for one unit. I said this in my other thread but I'm going to have a big play for MNF this week too. That's probably about it for the week
know what you r saying w/ hawks seems like they r a great play at times this year vs the right competition especially at home. I honestly backed them more than i should have this year especially in spot home vs ariz and road sf but see this as a spot they can win and backed them yet again. Hopefully run defense steps up and offensive line can do some things so they can get Carlson spread out doing what he does best and not in tight pinching. GL w/ your plays PV like your breakdowns a lot!
0
know what you r saying w/ hawks seems like they r a great play at times this year vs the right competition especially at home. I honestly backed them more than i should have this year especially in spot home vs ariz and road sf but see this as a spot they can win and backed them yet again. Hopefully run defense steps up and offensive line can do some things so they can get Carlson spread out doing what he does best and not in tight pinching. GL w/ your plays PV like your breakdowns a lot!
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.