A fact that can't be over looked in the S.F. game is the team that upsets the reining champ. are just 0-8 s.u. and 1-7 a.t.s. Also, teams upsetting the super bowl champ. are 1-22 s.u. and 3-20 a.t.s. in all road games since 1990. A team off a scoring burst ( 35+ pts. )and traveling in next game have stuggled in that next game also going 1-10 s.u. and a.t.s. Also, of all starting q.b. this season A. Smith has the fewest with 5.
0
A fact that can't be over looked in the S.F. game is the team that upsets the reining champ. are just 0-8 s.u. and 1-7 a.t.s. Also, teams upsetting the super bowl champ. are 1-22 s.u. and 3-20 a.t.s. in all road games since 1990. A team off a scoring burst ( 35+ pts. )and traveling in next game have stuggled in that next game also going 1-10 s.u. and a.t.s. Also, of all starting q.b. this season A. Smith has the fewest with 5.
A fact that can't be over looked in the S.F. game is the team that upsets the reining champ. are just 0-8 s.u. and 1-7 a.t.s. Also, teams upsetting the super bowl champ. are 1-22 s.u. and 3-20 a.t.s. in all road games since 1990. A team off a scoring burst ( 35+ pts. )and traveling in next game have stuggled in that next game also going 1-10 s.u. and a.t.s. Also, of all starting q.b. this season A. Smith has the fewest with picks with 5.
0
Quote Originally Posted by The.Ice.Man:
A fact that can't be over looked in the S.F. game is the team that upsets the reining champ. are just 0-8 s.u. and 1-7 a.t.s. Also, teams upsetting the super bowl champ. are 1-22 s.u. and 3-20 a.t.s. in all road games since 1990. A team off a scoring burst ( 35+ pts. )and traveling in next game have stuggled in that next game also going 1-10 s.u. and a.t.s. Also, of all starting q.b. this season A. Smith has the fewest with picks with 5.
Ravens@Patriots under 50 for 20 units... This number is only this high because of the public perception of the Patriots. The betting public will say the Patriots scored 49 & 45 the past 2 games and be inclined to wager on the over. Hence the reason we have yet the 4th playoff game set in the 50's. No way should this game be a 50 just like the Broncos@Patriots were last week. With all 3 of the other 50 pt playoff totals going over this one should have a great shot at staying under...POD#2
0
Adding:
Ravens@Patriots under 50 for 20 units... This number is only this high because of the public perception of the Patriots. The betting public will say the Patriots scored 49 & 45 the past 2 games and be inclined to wager on the over. Hence the reason we have yet the 4th playoff game set in the 50's. No way should this game be a 50 just like the Broncos@Patriots were last week. With all 3 of the other 50 pt playoff totals going over this one should have a great shot at staying under...POD#2
I also lean to Under in S.F. game. But that being said, liking the under in that one, this one trend has me really thinking Over in N.E. game. Not only because of the strong trend, but i really think they both get enough scoring opportunities to get it over the #.
Over has resulted in 24 of 28 Champ. Conf. games since 1993....and *only 2 times* in that period was the UNDER the result in both games in a single year.
So, if ya like the under in that game ????...G.L. to you and your plays.
The results from past years have no relevance to today's games about to be played. I would love to talk trend betting in the NBA but in football it's a game of injuries & match-ups. So what happened since 1993 does not have my interest at all for wagering on these games. Also I would like to see just for shits and giggles how many of those overs came in the cozy confines of a dome during the cold season...BOL
I also lean to Under in S.F. game. But that being said, liking the under in that one, this one trend has me really thinking Over in N.E. game. Not only because of the strong trend, but i really think they both get enough scoring opportunities to get it over the #.
Over has resulted in 24 of 28 Champ. Conf. games since 1993....and *only 2 times* in that period was the UNDER the result in both games in a single year.
So, if ya like the under in that game ????...G.L. to you and your plays.
The results from past years have no relevance to today's games about to be played. I would love to talk trend betting in the NBA but in football it's a game of injuries & match-ups. So what happened since 1993 does not have my interest at all for wagering on these games. Also I would like to see just for shits and giggles how many of those overs came in the cozy confines of a dome during the cold season...BOL
Wow only 2 times seems unreal has both went Under.
If you were gonna do something you could also wait for the result of the first game which is NE
This would limit your betting patterns and take away from making a wager that you may feel strong about. Not trying to be a dick but your statement sounds like you have been losing recently, I would think the same way sometimes during losing days or weeks. Don't let losses alter your strategies. Apply your past knowledge to the present and bet accordingly. Awaiting the result of the 1st game to bet on the 2nd game based on historic trend could be so very mentally draining. Especially if it doesn't hot because you will be saying things like "I should have went with my gut". Let me ask you this. Think of it like this: On any particular crazy Saturday full of lots of games how many CFB games can you find during them being played that you say to yourself (Damn I knew that game was a good one). My guess you can find a lot, it happens to all of us. So my point is if you bet the 2nd game according to what happens in the first game you have now put yourself in a position to be very mad and upset upon a possible result. This is exactly why i respond to people by saying go with your gut on games a lot...BOL
0
Quote Originally Posted by MJ2345:
Wow only 2 times seems unreal has both went Under.
If you were gonna do something you could also wait for the result of the first game which is NE
This would limit your betting patterns and take away from making a wager that you may feel strong about. Not trying to be a dick but your statement sounds like you have been losing recently, I would think the same way sometimes during losing days or weeks. Don't let losses alter your strategies. Apply your past knowledge to the present and bet accordingly. Awaiting the result of the 1st game to bet on the 2nd game based on historic trend could be so very mentally draining. Especially if it doesn't hot because you will be saying things like "I should have went with my gut". Let me ask you this. Think of it like this: On any particular crazy Saturday full of lots of games how many CFB games can you find during them being played that you say to yourself (Damn I knew that game was a good one). My guess you can find a lot, it happens to all of us. So my point is if you bet the 2nd game according to what happens in the first game you have now put yourself in a position to be very mad and upset upon a possible result. This is exactly why i respond to people by saying go with your gut on games a lot...BOL
That's a hell of a mistake. That's a difference of 22%. I haveno interest in this stat at all but BOL. If it hits it will not be because of the past history...
That's a hell of a mistake. That's a difference of 22%. I haveno interest in this stat at all but BOL. If it hits it will not be because of the past history...
Teams who score 28 or more points in conference title games are 32-5 SU and 31-6 ATS over the same span. Home teams that put up 28 or more points in this round are 23-0 SU and 21-2 ATS. Just my thoughts , still looking at them. G.L. in your plays.
Again unless you have a crystal ball and can tell me which teams will accomplish this task this means nothing to me at all. And the fact that a inexperienced bettor may be reading this could very well altar his/her betting patterns in a bad/good way. Be careful what you read...
0
Quote Originally Posted by The.Ice.Man:
Teams who score 28 or more points in conference title games are 32-5 SU and 31-6 ATS over the same span. Home teams that put up 28 or more points in this round are 23-0 SU and 21-2 ATS. Just my thoughts , still looking at them. G.L. in your plays.
Again unless you have a crystal ball and can tell me which teams will accomplish this task this means nothing to me at all. And the fact that a inexperienced bettor may be reading this could very well altar his/her betting patterns in a bad/good way. Be careful what you read...
Was just reading some more news letters, jotting a few things down and was thinking on them lines myself . Although teasers are not really recommended, I played them during c.f. bowl season and also in nfl playoffs with some success as lines seem to tighten up, less games so line makers have more time to look into games. 6 pt. Teaser with : N.E. over 44 and S.F. + 3.5. or S.F. under 48 ........maybe ?.
Now i can relate to your success with this as teasers in playoffs and bowl games can be profitable. The reason for this is after the books get a full season to analyze all the teams through play the lines towards the end of the season become much sharper...
BOL...
0
Quote Originally Posted by The.Ice.Man:
Was just reading some more news letters, jotting a few things down and was thinking on them lines myself . Although teasers are not really recommended, I played them during c.f. bowl season and also in nfl playoffs with some success as lines seem to tighten up, less games so line makers have more time to look into games. 6 pt. Teaser with : N.E. over 44 and S.F. + 3.5. or S.F. under 48 ........maybe ?.
Now i can relate to your success with this as teasers in playoffs and bowl games can be profitable. The reason for this is after the books get a full season to analyze all the teams through play the lines towards the end of the season become much sharper...
A fact that can't be over looked in the S.F. game is the team that upsets the reining champ. are just 0-8 s.u. and 1-7 a.t.s. Also, teams upsetting the super bowl champ. are 1-22 s.u. and 3-20 a.t.s. in all road games since 1990. A team off a scoring burst ( 35+ pts. )and traveling in next game have stuggled in that next game also going 1-10 s.u. and a.t.s. Also, of all starting q.b. this season A. Smith has the fewest with 5.
PTB seems to have a short lived passion and would love to lather himself up in the historical trends your posting here. Sorry i;m not on board with you...
0
Quote Originally Posted by The.Ice.Man:
A fact that can't be over looked in the S.F. game is the team that upsets the reining champ. are just 0-8 s.u. and 1-7 a.t.s. Also, teams upsetting the super bowl champ. are 1-22 s.u. and 3-20 a.t.s. in all road games since 1990. A team off a scoring burst ( 35+ pts. )and traveling in next game have stuggled in that next game also going 1-10 s.u. and a.t.s. Also, of all starting q.b. this season A. Smith has the fewest with 5.
PTB seems to have a short lived passion and would love to lather himself up in the historical trends your posting here. Sorry i;m not on board with you...
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.