yea dont piss off vanzack he pays covers money to get others sent to the box
Oddsmaster - you are a little behind on your "protection" payments - please make sure you get this squared up with my assistant as soon as possible.
Dude, did you read what I wrote in this thread? Are you paraphrasing what I wrote?
Look - let me put this as simple as possible. The best edge that I feel I get in an NFL game is 60%. That means that on my best game, I feel I have a 40% chance of losing. Im not picking the cowboys and risking my life.
I am saying that if this game were played 100 times I feel the cowboys would cover 57 of those. Can they lose tonight by 40? YES. But its about probability and expected value, something gamblers at covers are quick to lose sight of. You pick for long term results, not short term hits.
Dude, did you read what I wrote in this thread? Are you paraphrasing what I wrote?
Look - let me put this as simple as possible. The best edge that I feel I get in an NFL game is 60%. That means that on my best game, I feel I have a 40% chance of losing. Im not picking the cowboys and risking my life.
I am saying that if this game were played 100 times I feel the cowboys would cover 57 of those. Can they lose tonight by 40? YES. But its about probability and expected value, something gamblers at covers are quick to lose sight of. You pick for long term results, not short term hits.
Every damn post I read from vanzack about gambling in general is spot on. Some of you guys should read his post and take a few minutes to digest what he is saying.
Established in 1995,
Hot Forum Topics
