Thanks for posting...I like overs when played in rain and I don't expect as much from Calvin tonight because the Bears will defend him just like everyone else has done this season. But with Chicago's coverage, Detroit will have other receivers in man coverage that I think can exploit Chicago, namely, Petigrew. Cover 2 leaves the middle open and I don't think the Bears LB's can cover our TE's or crossing routes across the middle. I simply don't like Chicago's pass coverage. Any team, including the Colts, who have thrown, have had success moving the chains. Cutler, on the other hand, doesn't concern me and as much credit as Chicago receives against the run, Detroit is equal to the task, allowing less than 100 yds/gm, 3.5 yds/rush. I'm not looking to persuade anyone on tonight's game. Maybe Detroit loses by 30....I'm just making a few points as to why I'm on Detroit. Have a good one
Thanks for posting...I like overs when played in rain and I don't expect as much from Calvin tonight because the Bears will defend him just like everyone else has done this season. But with Chicago's coverage, Detroit will have other receivers in man coverage that I think can exploit Chicago, namely, Petigrew. Cover 2 leaves the middle open and I don't think the Bears LB's can cover our TE's or crossing routes across the middle. I simply don't like Chicago's pass coverage. Any team, including the Colts, who have thrown, have had success moving the chains. Cutler, on the other hand, doesn't concern me and as much credit as Chicago receives against the run, Detroit is equal to the task, allowing less than 100 yds/gm, 3.5 yds/rush. I'm not looking to persuade anyone on tonight's game. Maybe Detroit loses by 30....I'm just making a few points as to why I'm on Detroit. Have a good one
Thanks for posting...I like overs when played in rain and I don't expect as much from Calvin tonight because the Bears will defend him just like everyone else has done this season. But with Chicago's coverage, Detroit will have other receivers in man coverage that I think can exploit Chicago, namely, Petigrew. Cover 2 leaves the middle open and I don't think the Bears LB's can cover our TE's or crossing routes across the middle. I simply don't like Chicago's pass coverage. Any team, including the Colts, who have thrown, have had success moving the chains. Cutler, on the other hand, doesn't concern me and as much credit as Chicago receives against the run, Detroit is equal to the task, allowing less than 100 yds/gm, 3.5 yds/rush. I'm not looking to persuade anyone on tonight's game. Maybe Detroit loses by 30....I'm just making a few points as to why I'm on Detroit. Have a good one
Thanks for posting...I like overs when played in rain and I don't expect as much from Calvin tonight because the Bears will defend him just like everyone else has done this season. But with Chicago's coverage, Detroit will have other receivers in man coverage that I think can exploit Chicago, namely, Petigrew. Cover 2 leaves the middle open and I don't think the Bears LB's can cover our TE's or crossing routes across the middle. I simply don't like Chicago's pass coverage. Any team, including the Colts, who have thrown, have had success moving the chains. Cutler, on the other hand, doesn't concern me and as much credit as Chicago receives against the run, Detroit is equal to the task, allowing less than 100 yds/gm, 3.5 yds/rush. I'm not looking to persuade anyone on tonight's game. Maybe Detroit loses by 30....I'm just making a few points as to why I'm on Detroit. Have a good one
You're right...Being successful in rushing only four is a big key. The problem with that is that Stafford isn't a 7 step quarterback. He works out of the gun and he's had optimal time to deliver the ball this season. In fact, he's only been sacked 8 times this season. So, if the Bears have to blitz, there may be a consequence.
You're right...Being successful in rushing only four is a big key. The problem with that is that Stafford isn't a 7 step quarterback. He works out of the gun and he's had optimal time to deliver the ball this season. In fact, he's only been sacked 8 times this season. So, if the Bears have to blitz, there may be a consequence.
Thanks for posting...I like overs when played in rain and I don't expect as much from Calvin tonight because the Bears will defend him just like everyone else has done this season. But with Chicago's coverage, Detroit will have other receivers in man coverage that I think can exploit Chicago, namely, Petigrew. Cover 2 leaves the middle open and I don't think the Bears LB's can cover our TE's or crossing routes across the middle. I simply don't like Chicago's pass coverage. Any team, including the Colts, who have thrown, have had success moving the chains. Cutler, on the other hand, doesn't concern me and as much credit as Chicago receives against the run, Detroit is equal to the task, allowing less than 100 yds/gm, 3.5 yds/rush. I'm not looking to persuade anyone on tonight's game. Maybe Detroit loses by 30....I'm just making a few points as to why I'm on Detroit. Have a good one
Thanks for posting...I like overs when played in rain and I don't expect as much from Calvin tonight because the Bears will defend him just like everyone else has done this season. But with Chicago's coverage, Detroit will have other receivers in man coverage that I think can exploit Chicago, namely, Petigrew. Cover 2 leaves the middle open and I don't think the Bears LB's can cover our TE's or crossing routes across the middle. I simply don't like Chicago's pass coverage. Any team, including the Colts, who have thrown, have had success moving the chains. Cutler, on the other hand, doesn't concern me and as much credit as Chicago receives against the run, Detroit is equal to the task, allowing less than 100 yds/gm, 3.5 yds/rush. I'm not looking to persuade anyone on tonight's game. Maybe Detroit loses by 30....I'm just making a few points as to why I'm on Detroit. Have a good one
Couldn't be any further from the truth. I bet against Michigan teams 90% of the time. In any case, thanks for the post, gl
Couldn't be any further from the truth. I bet against Michigan teams 90% of the time. In any case, thanks for the post, gl
I like to see Michigan teams do well but I show no loyalty. I'm only a fan of whom I wagering on. Tonight, I'm a huge Lions and Giants fan
I like to see Michigan teams do well but I show no loyalty. I'm only a fan of whom I wagering on. Tonight, I'm a huge Lions and Giants fan
Totals are so hard for me to predict regarding Lions games because oddmakers adjust the totals based on several variables which include the Lions big play threats on offense as well as them giving up big plays, defensively. The oddsmakers tell you this by setting the total at 47. And yet, they're facing two stingy defenses against the run. I'm just not sure making a play on the total is a solid bet one way or the other. If anything, I like Detroit's tt over 20.
Totals are so hard for me to predict regarding Lions games because oddmakers adjust the totals based on several variables which include the Lions big play threats on offense as well as them giving up big plays, defensively. The oddsmakers tell you this by setting the total at 47. And yet, they're facing two stingy defenses against the run. I'm just not sure making a play on the total is a solid bet one way or the other. If anything, I like Detroit's tt over 20.
Appreciate the thoughts big fella...wish us the best tonight
Appreciate the thoughts big fella...wish us the best tonight
I like to see Michigan teams do well but I show no loyalty. I'm only a fan of whom I wagering on. Tonight, I'm a huge Lions and Giants fan
Exactly !! This is the only way to make money......there is no such thing as being a loyal fan in sports betting. If you think "YOUR" team is going to get crushed be against em,
I find it very funny,....people who just can't bet against their fave team.....OR convince themselves the right side is so because it's their favorite team.
That being said....my faveorite team is the one I'm laying my money on plain and simple.
Also, whatever team beats the Montreal Canadians(NHL) I really love too !!
I like to see Michigan teams do well but I show no loyalty. I'm only a fan of whom I wagering on. Tonight, I'm a huge Lions and Giants fan
Exactly !! This is the only way to make money......there is no such thing as being a loyal fan in sports betting. If you think "YOUR" team is going to get crushed be against em,
I find it very funny,....people who just can't bet against their fave team.....OR convince themselves the right side is so because it's their favorite team.
That being said....my faveorite team is the one I'm laying my money on plain and simple.
Also, whatever team beats the Montreal Canadians(NHL) I really love too !!
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.