there is another one ![]()
Jmb9, I'm sure you are one of many lemmings on here that follow others picks instead of doing research so you wouldnt understand things like takeaways and special teams play.![]()
there is another one ![]()
Jmb9, I'm sure you are one of many lemmings on here that follow others picks instead of doing research so you wouldnt understand things like takeaways and special teams play.![]()
there is another one ![]()
Jmb9, I'm sure you are one of many lemmings on here that follow others picks instead of doing research so you wouldnt understand things like takeaways and special teams play.![]()
wow! so smar!t u figured it out. i use this site to laugh at idiots like you that make statements that make no sense.
there is another one ![]()
Jmb9, I'm sure you are one of many lemmings on here that follow others picks instead of doing research so you wouldnt understand things like takeaways and special teams play.![]()
wow! so smar!t u figured it out. i use this site to laugh at idiots like you that make statements that make no sense.
does this mean u take the redskins every week because of turnovers? this is probablly the dumbest statement i have ever heard
Who said anything about taking the Redskins. The title of this thread was Indy giving the game away and I just stated a fact that people should not be surprised with the turnovers because that is one of the Redskins specialties.
couple cans short of a six pack are you.![]()
does this mean u take the redskins every week because of turnovers? this is probablly the dumbest statement i have ever heard
Who said anything about taking the Redskins. The title of this thread was Indy giving the game away and I just stated a fact that people should not be surprised with the turnovers because that is one of the Redskins specialties.
couple cans short of a six pack are you.![]()
wow! so smar!t u figured it out. i use this site to laugh at idiots like you that make statements that make no sense.
must be your time of the month huh mary.![]()
wow! so smar!t u figured it out. i use this site to laugh at idiots like you that make statements that make no sense.
must be your time of the month huh mary.![]()
Who said anything about taking the Redskins. The title of this thread was Indy giving the game away and I just stated a fact that people should not be surprised with the turnovers because that is one of the Redskins specialties.
couple cans short of a six pack are you.![]()
going into this game the colts have one less takeaway than the redskins. ![]()
Who said anything about taking the Redskins. The title of this thread was Indy giving the game away and I just stated a fact that people should not be surprised with the turnovers because that is one of the Redskins specialties.
couple cans short of a six pack are you.![]()
going into this game the colts have one less takeaway than the redskins. ![]()
there is another one ![]()
Jmb9, I'm sure you are one of many lemmings on here that follow others picks instead of doing research so you wouldnt understand things like takeaways and special teams play.![]()
I understand just fine. The Redskins entered this game 6th in the league in turnover margin (+0.8) The Colts were in a tie for 7th place at (+0.4)
The calculation says that the Redskins were unlikely to hold any edge in turnover margin whatsoever. The numbers called for a wash. It's pure coincidence that they are +3 in this game so far, not statistical probability.
there is another one ![]()
Jmb9, I'm sure you are one of many lemmings on here that follow others picks instead of doing research so you wouldnt understand things like takeaways and special teams play.![]()
I understand just fine. The Redskins entered this game 6th in the league in turnover margin (+0.8) The Colts were in a tie for 7th place at (+0.4)
The calculation says that the Redskins were unlikely to hold any edge in turnover margin whatsoever. The numbers called for a wash. It's pure coincidence that they are +3 in this game so far, not statistical probability.
I understand just fine. The Redskins entered this game 6th in the league in turnover margin (+0.8) The Colts were in a tie for 7th place at (+0.4)
The calculation says that the Redskins were unlikely to hold any edge in turnover margin whatsoever. The numbers called for a wash. It's pure coincidence that they are +3 in this game so far, not statistical probability.
![]()
I understand just fine. The Redskins entered this game 6th in the league in turnover margin (+0.8) The Colts were in a tie for 7th place at (+0.4)
The calculation says that the Redskins were unlikely to hold any edge in turnover margin whatsoever. The numbers called for a wash. It's pure coincidence that they are +3 in this game so far, not statistical probability.
![]()

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.