Well like i said i will take my medicine if i am wrong like i always do.We are just on opposite sides this time PTB
You really don't watch the Seahawks very much do you?
You really don't watch the Seahawks very much do you?
You really don't watch the Seahawks very much do you?
You really don't watch the Seahawks very much do you?
Let's look at the Seahawks wins this year.
Arizona. Stationary quarterback, not much of a run game, bad team in general.
@ NY Giants - Stationary quarterback, Ahmad Bradshaw was out, so was Tuck and half of the secondary.
Baltimore - Staionary quarterback, the team ignored Ray Rice in the 2nd half making them a non-running team.
@ St. Louis - Staionary quarterback, another plain bad team that punted something like 11 consecutive drives in that game.
If Lesean McCoy is out, I might be with you but the early indications are that he's going to play. The Seahawks have not seen close to as much speed as they're going to see this Thursday plus the weak special teams has to be a concern against a team that can burn you big on ST (then again, Jackson might not return many kicks on a short week.)
Sorry to question your knowledge, it's just my nature to question someone that opposes my view. BOL to you but I'm on the Eagles in this one.
Let's look at the Seahawks wins this year.
Arizona. Stationary quarterback, not much of a run game, bad team in general.
@ NY Giants - Stationary quarterback, Ahmad Bradshaw was out, so was Tuck and half of the secondary.
Baltimore - Staionary quarterback, the team ignored Ray Rice in the 2nd half making them a non-running team.
@ St. Louis - Staionary quarterback, another plain bad team that punted something like 11 consecutive drives in that game.
If Lesean McCoy is out, I might be with you but the early indications are that he's going to play. The Seahawks have not seen close to as much speed as they're going to see this Thursday plus the weak special teams has to be a concern against a team that can burn you big on ST (then again, Jackson might not return many kicks on a short week.)
Sorry to question your knowledge, it's just my nature to question someone that opposes my view. BOL to you but I'm on the Eagles in this one.
Carpenter and Moffit both went down with season ending injuries, which was unfortunate because Cable finally had the unit playing cohesively. As for the game, I really like the HAWKS in this spot for the following reasons:
PHILLY had high expectations coming into this season and the loss last week must have been demoralizing, so I give the HAWKS a slight advantage in the MOJO department.
PHILLY is on a short week and travelling from east to west as a road favorite.
SEAHAWKS lost the first game of this three game homestand and will be looking to get back into the 'W' column at home. I checked last years pointspread logs for a situtation where HAWKS lost the first game of a homestand and came up with the ATS stats below. Obviously, not much of a sample size, but look for a good HAWKS effort in prime time. I haven't gotten down on it as usual waiting for BODOG to hang a number.
I was thinking of teasing this with BEARS game, but I'm wondering if ORTON will effect the outcome of the game. ORTON was the BEAR's signal caller a way back and CHIEFS staff may tap into his skull for some dope on the BEARS defense, but really will the BEARS will the they let this one get away. I was a bit surprised that the line has dropped from 8 to 7.5 - I know Haney threw three pics on Sunday, but there's got to be a learning curve here and Bears staff will reign him in. As for that 3rd Haney pic that blew the cover, what were the BEARS doing throwing a screen from the seven yard line. It's hard to figure out why they made that call.
Any opinions on my logic is welcome? What kind of turnover ratio do the CHIEFS have, etc.
Good Luck
N.28 K. CITY L +1' 24-42 o45
D.05 CAR. W -5 31-14 o40
Carpenter and Moffit both went down with season ending injuries, which was unfortunate because Cable finally had the unit playing cohesively. As for the game, I really like the HAWKS in this spot for the following reasons:
PHILLY had high expectations coming into this season and the loss last week must have been demoralizing, so I give the HAWKS a slight advantage in the MOJO department.
PHILLY is on a short week and travelling from east to west as a road favorite.
SEAHAWKS lost the first game of this three game homestand and will be looking to get back into the 'W' column at home. I checked last years pointspread logs for a situtation where HAWKS lost the first game of a homestand and came up with the ATS stats below. Obviously, not much of a sample size, but look for a good HAWKS effort in prime time. I haven't gotten down on it as usual waiting for BODOG to hang a number.
I was thinking of teasing this with BEARS game, but I'm wondering if ORTON will effect the outcome of the game. ORTON was the BEAR's signal caller a way back and CHIEFS staff may tap into his skull for some dope on the BEARS defense, but really will the BEARS will the they let this one get away. I was a bit surprised that the line has dropped from 8 to 7.5 - I know Haney threw three pics on Sunday, but there's got to be a learning curve here and Bears staff will reign him in. As for that 3rd Haney pic that blew the cover, what were the BEARS doing throwing a screen from the seven yard line. It's hard to figure out why they made that call.
Any opinions on my logic is welcome? What kind of turnover ratio do the CHIEFS have, etc.
Good Luck
N.28 K. CITY L +1' 24-42 o45
D.05 CAR. W -5 31-14 o40
PTB, thanks for the stat
PTB, thanks for the stat
True but Iggles played at home, now they got to do it on the road. And this animal have no business chalking pts either.
I was also on Pats last week......![]()
True but Iggles played at home, now they got to do it on the road. And this animal have no business chalking pts either.
I was also on Pats last week......![]()
Man, if you were betting real money you would be doing pretty well. It must make you sick to type that you are +15k, knowing that you could have been if you had actually been betting that kind of $$.
Of course if you were winning that kind of jack, you would probably be satisfied with the warm feeling you get from all that cash instead of constantly seeking attention from a bunch of anonymous people on a message board, some of which seem to actually believe your wild tales.
Man, if you were betting real money you would be doing pretty well. It must make you sick to type that you are +15k, knowing that you could have been if you had actually been betting that kind of $$.
Of course if you were winning that kind of jack, you would probably be satisfied with the warm feeling you get from all that cash instead of constantly seeking attention from a bunch of anonymous people on a message board, some of which seem to actually believe your wild tales.
True but Iggles played at home, now they got to do it on the road. And this animal have no business chalking pts either.
I was also on Pats last week......![]()
True but Iggles played at home, now they got to do it on the road. And this animal have no business chalking pts either.
I was also on Pats last week......![]()

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.