We looked at the teams that averaged less than 1.0 turnovers/game and how they did the following season.
| Team | Year | Record | TOs | Year N+1 | Record | TOs | Diff. |
| NY Giants | 2008 | 12-4 | 13 | 2009 | 8-8 | 31 | 18 |
| NY Jets | 2004 | 10-6 | 16 | 2005 | 4-12 | 34 | 18 |
| Miami | 2008 | 11-5 | 13 | 2009 | 7-9 | 29 | 16 |
| Jacksonville | 2002 | 6-10 | 15 | 2003 | 5-11 | 31 | 16 |
| Kansas City | 2010 | 10-6 | 14 | 2011 | 7-9 | 28 | 14 |
| Denver | 2005 | 13-3 | 16 | 2006 | 9-7 | 30 | 14 |
| NY Giants | 1990 | 13-3 | 14 | 1991 | 8-8 | 23 | 9 |
| San Diego | 2006 | 14-2 | 15 | 2007 | 11-5 | 24 | 9 |
| Dallas | 1998 | 10-6 | 15 | 1999 | 8-8 | 23 | 8 |
| New England | 2010 | 14-2 | 10 | 2011 | 13-3 | 17 | 7 |
| New England | 2007 | 16-0 | 15 | 2008 | 11-5 | 21 | 6 |
| Green Bay | 2009 | 11-5 | 16 | 2010 | 10-6 | 22 | 6 |
| Kansas City | 2002 | 8-8 | 15 | 2003 | 13-3 | 18 | 3 |
| Team | Year | Record | TOs | Year N+1 | Record | TOs | Diff. |
| NY Giants | 2008 | 12-4 | 13 | 2009 | 8-8 | 31 | 18 |
| NY Jets | 2004 | 10-6 | 16 | 2005 | 4-12 | 34 | 18 |
| Miami | 2008 | 11-5 | 13 | 2009 | 7-9 | 29 | 16 |
| Jacksonville | 2002 | 6-10 | 15 | 2003 | 5-11 | 31 | 16 |
| Kansas City | 2010 | 10-6 | 14 | 2011 | 7-9 | 28 | 14 |
| Denver | 2005 | 13-3 | 16 | 2006 | 9-7 | 30 | 14 |
| NY Giants | 1990 | 13-3 | 14 | 1991 | 8-8 | 23 | 9 |
| San Diego | 2006 | 14-2 | 15 | 2007 | 11-5 | 24 | 9 |
| Dallas | 1998 | 10-6 | 15 | 1999 | 8-8 | 23 | 8 |
| New England | 2010 | 14-2 | 10 | 2011 | 13-3 | 17 | 7 |
| New England | 2007 | 16-0 | 15 | 2008 | 11-5 | 21 | 6 |
| Green Bay | 2009 | 11-5 | 16 | 2010 | 10-6 | 22 | 6 |
| Kansas City | 2002 | 8-8 | 15 | 2003 | 13-3 | 18 | 3 |
In the 2011-12 NFL playoffs, we see a lot of firsts that the team have already achieved or are looking to achieve:
In the 2011-12 NFL playoffs, we see a lot of firsts that the team have already achieved or are looking to achieve:
The top No. 3 seeds (post-merger)
The top No. 3 seeds (post-merger)
Wrong info Big Ben was not a rookie...good info.
Wrong info Big Ben was not a rookie...good info.
PRIME SAYS..... Umm...I had the Jets ML & spread in that playoff game & I posted it here on covers..............& dont try to tell me trends & stats mean nothing when I saw you over in Mack's thread saying the trends he posted were awesome & provided the reasons you were playing the games...........you're a hypocrite.............. first off it dont matter if u had jets or not,thats not the point...point was that the last meeting trends means shit!!....u understand that now.....as far as me following any i dont ...if u were paying attention u would see it clearly states in my posts that these are for people who follow stats/trends which i dont......unless the trend is perfect or has 1 loss than throw them in the garbage in my opinion...... HEYY PRIME LETS SEE HOW YOUR TRENDS/STATS STACK UP IN THE 4 GAMES THIS WEEK VS MY PLAYS.....WE ALREADY KNOW U GOT NINERS,AND I GOT SAINTS......LETS SEE HOW THE REST SHAPE OUT....GOOD LUCK PAL U ALREADY 0-1 WITH NINERS!! |
PRIME SAYS..... Umm...I had the Jets ML & spread in that playoff game & I posted it here on covers..............& dont try to tell me trends & stats mean nothing when I saw you over in Mack's thread saying the trends he posted were awesome & provided the reasons you were playing the games...........you're a hypocrite.............. first off it dont matter if u had jets or not,thats not the point...point was that the last meeting trends means shit!!....u understand that now.....as far as me following any i dont ...if u were paying attention u would see it clearly states in my posts that these are for people who follow stats/trends which i dont......unless the trend is perfect or has 1 loss than throw them in the garbage in my opinion...... HEYY PRIME LETS SEE HOW YOUR TRENDS/STATS STACK UP IN THE 4 GAMES THIS WEEK VS MY PLAYS.....WE ALREADY KNOW U GOT NINERS,AND I GOT SAINTS......LETS SEE HOW THE REST SHAPE OUT....GOOD LUCK PAL U ALREADY 0-1 WITH NINERS!! |
Some of the info here is wrong.
There have been a good number of teams win the SB with a toatl yards differential under +50, not just the 2 teams mentioned.
2001 Pats and 80 Raiders were the two worst in the stat.
2007 Gmen about +26
2003 Pats about +24
90 Gmen about +38
86 Gmen about +38
2004 Pats about +48
87 Redskins about +24 when not including scab players
82 Redskins I belive also under +50
It's possible 2 more teams could be under +50
Some of the info here is wrong.
There have been a good number of teams win the SB with a toatl yards differential under +50, not just the 2 teams mentioned.
2001 Pats and 80 Raiders were the two worst in the stat.
2007 Gmen about +26
2003 Pats about +24
90 Gmen about +38
86 Gmen about +38
2004 Pats about +48
87 Redskins about +24 when not including scab players
82 Redskins I belive also under +50
It's possible 2 more teams could be under +50

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.