The new poster boy of NFL and they said it is Roger Goddell's prophecy that he will save the Raiders franchise. Is he ready to put the big boy pants on? I think Seahawks defense will chew him up and spit him out like a hooker being thrown back to the streets in a night club.
No. 1 picks are 4-18 SU and 6-16 ATS in their first start, and 1-10 SU and 3-8 ATS on the road.
Initial lean Seahawks -6.5 and under.
Fernando Mendoza
The new poster boy of NFL and they said it is Roger Goddell's prophecy that he will save the Raiders franchise. Is he ready to put the big boy pants on? I think Seahawks defense will chew him up and spit him out like a hooker being thrown back to the streets in a night club.
No. 1 picks are 4-18 SU and 6-16 ATS in their first start, and 1-10 SU and 3-8 ATS on the road.
Initial lean Seahawks -6.5 and under.
Underdog QBs of 6.5 or more points since 2015: 26-136 SU, 66-92-4 ATS (41.8%). Both Mendoza (LV, +6.5 vs SEA) and Beck (ARI, +9.5 vs LAR) are home underdogs of 6.5 or more.
Rams will be without Puka Nacua but I can see they are getting their rhythm back. Is this a revenge game for them against the Cardinals after choking so hard on Jacoby Brisset's balls earlier this season?
Carson Beck will be facing Myles Garrett and Aaron Donald. good luck to this kid this Sunday.
Underdog QBs of 6.5 or more points since 2015: 26-136 SU, 66-92-4 ATS (41.8%). Both Mendoza (LV, +6.5 vs SEA) and Beck (ARI, +9.5 vs LAR) are home underdogs of 6.5 or more.
Rams will be without Puka Nacua but I can see they are getting their rhythm back. Is this a revenge game for them against the Cardinals after choking so hard on Jacoby Brisset's balls earlier this season?
Carson Beck will be facing Myles Garrett and Aaron Donald. good luck to this kid this Sunday.
@Way2Good
I’ve already taken both favorites in these games. Starting to second guess Seattle, something is fishy there. How does this line stay below 7? Would any other rookie getting their first start without the name Mendoza be getting less than 7? I don’t think so.
I hate betting the Rams. I really do. But this is just a no handicap for me. I didn’t like Beck in college and I sure as hell don’t like him facing the Rams defense. At less than 10 this could be free money and I don’t care who’s on the field for LA. I’ll take my chances in this one. ![]()
@Way2Good
I’ve already taken both favorites in these games. Starting to second guess Seattle, something is fishy there. How does this line stay below 7? Would any other rookie getting their first start without the name Mendoza be getting less than 7? I don’t think so.
I hate betting the Rams. I really do. But this is just a no handicap for me. I didn’t like Beck in college and I sure as hell don’t like him facing the Rams defense. At less than 10 this could be free money and I don’t care who’s on the field for LA. I’ll take my chances in this one. ![]()
@brn2loslive2win
Drew Lock is the answer you are looking for with the question why the spread is so low. But this opened at -3.5 and with Cousin’s departure it went up to 6.5
@brn2loslive2win
Drew Lock is the answer you are looking for with the question why the spread is so low. But this opened at -3.5 and with Cousin’s departure it went up to 6.5
@brn2loslive2win
Quote Originally Posted by Raiders22: @Way2Good How much difference would you put Drew Lock to the spread? 0.2 points from Darnold to lock
I think at most 1 point. Cousins maybe 3 over Mendoza
![]()
@brn2loslive2win
Quote Originally Posted by Raiders22: @Way2Good How much difference would you put Drew Lock to the spread? 0.2 points from Darnold to lock
I think at most 1 point. Cousins maybe 3 over Mendoza
![]()
@brn2loslive2win
@Raiders22 Do you have any read on this game yet?
I do not. It seems SEA may have more injuries that matter. But I cannot see anything except maybe an UNDER. But a bad INT-6 or INT for short fields could mess that up.
I think I skip it. ![]()
But be hard not to lean SEA. ![]()
@brn2loslive2win
@Raiders22 Do you have any read on this game yet?
I do not. It seems SEA may have more injuries that matter. But I cannot see anything except maybe an UNDER. But a bad INT-6 or INT for short fields could mess that up.
I think I skip it. ![]()
But be hard not to lean SEA. ![]()
@Raiders22
I’m not much of a totals player but I may play both Seattle and under. If Seattle’s o line is what keeps them from covering I think it will set up nicely for a low scoring dog fight. ![]()
@Raiders22
I’m not much of a totals player but I may play both Seattle and under. If Seattle’s o line is what keeps them from covering I think it will set up nicely for a low scoring dog fight. ![]()
Hot Forum Topics
- Friday 11/13/2026 639
- Serious Streak Survivor Strategies 1,918,796
- PART DEUX 177
- 🏈🏈🏈 Fubah2's risky CFB bets 303,662
- Week 11 Money 8,160
- Happening just recently . . . 40,144
- Dallas Mavericks +6 3,029
- Bags Friday LARGE **Arizona vs Auburn** 2,452
- Streak Survivor with 15 straight picks going with FSU tonight 1,066
- ::Friday:: 11/13 (50-21-0) +26.9 units 4,911
Warning - External Link
Report User
This post is spam
Delete Post
Remove Thread
Scan Results
Login/Register
Accounts are free and easy to create.
Search
